| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Graduate Center for Nutritional Sciences (L.Q., J.Sh.), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536; and Departments of Microbiology (J.Sc.), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Jianhua Shao, M.D., Ph.D., Graduate Center for Nutritional Sciences, University of Kentucky, 900 South Limestone, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0200. E-mail: JianhuaShao{at}uky.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(C/EBP
) levels and binding of C/EBP
to the adiponectin promoter without altering the levels of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
and steroid regulatory element binding protein-1. Furthermore, VPA did not suppress adiponectin gene expression in C/EBP
gene-deficient adipocytes that stably expressed exogenous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
2. Together, these results demonstrate that histone deacetylase inhibitor VPA suppresses adiponectin gene expression in mature adipocytes. The study also provides evidence that diminished C/EBP
protein level and decreased binding at the adiponectin promoter mediate the inhibitory effects of VPA on adiponectin gene transcription. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adiponectin is a recently identified adipose-derived hormone (6, 7, 8, 9). Adiponectin has diverse roles that include regulation of insulin sensitivity and energy homeostasis, immunological responses, and the development of vascular disease (10, 11, 12, 13). Administration of adiponectin improves fatty acid oxidation in the liver and skeletal muscle in vivo and reduces hepatic glucose production in vitro (14, 15, 16). These metabolic effects appear to be mediated through the adiponectin receptor and AMP kinase signaling pathway (16, 17, 18). Expression and serum levels of adiponectin are significantly reduced in humans and animals with obesity and type 2 diabetes (19, 20, 21, 22). VPA-induced obesity is associated with elevated serum insulin and leptin (5, 23). There are no available data regarding whether VPA treatment changes serum adiponectin levels. Because VPA treatment can induce significant weight gain and obesity that inversely correlate with adiponectin expression, it is reasonable to speculate that VPA treatment might alter adiponectin expression and contribute to obesity-associated insulin resistance.
Transcription in mammalian cells does not occur on naked DNA and is critically influenced by the manner in which DNA is packaged. DNA is packaged into chromatin, a highly organized and dynamic protein-DNA complex. The fundamental unit of chromatin is the nucleosome, which is composed of an octamer of four core histones, i.e. an H3/H4 tetramer and two H2A/H2B dimmers, wrapping 146 bp of DNA. Histone modifications, include site-specific acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination, affect chromatin structure and gene expression through nucleosomal core structure remodeling. Acetylation of histones, particularly H3 and H4, near the N terminus, is a critical regulatory mechanism by which gene expression is regulated. In general, increased levels of histone acetylation loosens chromatin packaging and have been correlated with transcriptional activation, whereas decreased levels of histone acetylation are associated with transcriptional repression (25). Steady-state levels of acetylation of the core histones result from the balance between the opposing activities of histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Recently, VPA has been shown to inhibit HDACs (26, 27). Thus, inhibition of HDAC activity provides a new avenue for studying how VPA affects genes expression.
In this study, we show that 1 wk of VPA treatment significantly suppresses adiponectin gene expression in the epididymal adipose tissues from C57BL/6J mice. Our in vitro studies reveal that VPA at therapeutic concentrations inhibits adiponectin gene expression in mature 3T3-L1 adipocytes. The inhibitory effects were dose and time dependent and occurred through the inhibition of HDACs. Furthermore, our study provides evidence that VPA treatment reduces CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP
) protein level and binding at the adiponectin promoter, the likely mechanism by which VPA suppresses adiponectin gene expression in differentiated adipocytes.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aesar (Ward Hill, MA). Penicillin-streptomycin and DMEM were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Anti-PPAR (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor)
, C/EBP
, and steroid regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP1) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antiadiponectin and anti-aP2 (adipocyte-specific fatty acid-binding protein) monoclonal antibodies were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Anti-ß-actin antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Anti-acetyl-histone H3 and -acetyl-histone H4 were purchased from Upstate Biotechnologies (Lake Placid, NY).
Experimental animals
Male C57B/6J mice (10 wk old) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were maintained under standardized conditions with 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle. The mice were randomly divided into three groups (n = 5). VPA was dissolved in saline. VPA (200 mg/kg) or saline were injected ip in a volume of 4 ml/kg three times daily. At this dosage and administration, serum VPA can reach therapeutic concentrations in humans (28, 29). For the pair-feeding mice, food supply was calculated based on the intake of VPA-treated mice and provided daily.
Cell culture
3T3-L1 fibroblasts were purchased from ATCC. 3T3-L1CAR
1 cells stably express the coxsackie-adenovirus receptor, which improves the efficiency of adenoviral transduction for gain or loss of function studies (30, 31). Mouse C/EBP
gene-deficient (C/EBP
/) fibroblasts were a gift from Dr. Gretchen J. Darlington (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). Stable cell lines were created by transfection with pcDNA-PPAR
2 plasmid or retroviral transduction of the human C/EBP
cDNA. The retroviral vector was packaged in GP2293 cells (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). The cells were maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS (Gemini Bio-Products, Woodland, CA). Adipocyte conversion was induced by treating 2-d postconfluent cultures with DMEM containing 0.25 µM dexamethasone, 0.5 mM isobutylmethylxanthine, and 107 M insulin for 48 h, then with DMEM containing 107 M insulin for 2 d, then insulin was withdrawn from medium for the next 4 d (30, 32). For the induction of adipocyte differentiation of C/EBP
- or/and PPAR
2-expressing C/EBP
/ fibroblasts, 1 µM TZD was added with the above cocktail. For adenovirus transduction studies, purified adenoviruses were used at 100 pfu/cell. Twenty-four hours after transduction, protein was isolated as described below.
Oil Red O staining
After VPA treatment, cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 10% formalin in PBS for 1 h. Cells were stained with Oil Red O. Excess stain was washed out with water. The stained cells were dried in air. Stained oil droplets were dissolved and extracted in isopropanol containing 4% vol/vol Nonidet P-40. The samples were quantified by measuring the absorbance at 520 nM.
Apoptosis assay
Cysteine aspartic acid-specific protease (caspase) family members play key effector roles in apoptosis in mammalian cells. Caspase-3/7 activity was measured as an indicator of apoptosis using Apo-One homogenous caspase-3/7 assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Eight days after the initiation of adipocyte differentiation, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with or without 1 mM VPA or 30 ng/ml TNF
for 24 h. Cells were lysed, and caspase-3/7 activity was measured by cleavage of the caspase-3/7 substrate provided by the manufacturer using a Gemini XPS spectrofluorometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) with 485 nm excitation and 530 nm emission.
Plasmid constructs and generation of recombinant adenovirus
A 1.3-kb fragment of the 5'-flanking region of the mouse adiponectin gene, extending from 1300 bp to + 18 bp relative to the cap site, was generated by PCR using mouse genomic DNA as template. The sequences of the primers are the following: forward primer, 5'-TGCTCCCGAGAATCAGCTCT-3'; reverse primer, 5'-GACAATCGTACAGACAGAAA-3'. The PCR product was ligated into pGl3-basic (mPro-Luc). The full-length human PPAR
2 cDNA was inserted into pcDNA3.1 to generate pcDNA-hPPAR
2, as described previously (32). To create a retrovirus vector encoding C/EBP
, human C/EBP
cDNA was inserted into pBabe-puro (gift from Dr. Sheila Stewart, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO). The inserted DNA fragments for these constructs were verified by restriction analysis and sequencing. An adenovirus vector encoding small interfering RNA (siRNA) directed against C/EBP
was described previously (32). Transduction efficiency was monitored by fluorescence microscopy for green fluorescent protein (GFP) that is coexpressed in the AdTrack-AdEasy recombinants.
Immunoblotting
Eight days after the induction of adipocyte differentiation, 3T3-L1 or adenovirus transduced 3T3-L1CAR
1 adipocytes were treated with VPA or analogs for the times indicated in the figure legends. Nuclear or total protein were extracted and analyzed as described previously (32), using antibodies raised against mouse adiponectin, C/EBP
, PPAR
, SREBP1, aP2, or ß-actin. The bands from Western blots were quantified using Kodak Image Station 2000R and 1D software (Kodak, New Haven, CT).
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was prepared from 3T3-L1 adipocytes with Trizol following the manufacturers protocol (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase and oligo(deoxythymidine)1218 primer (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR was performed using the Mx3000P Real-Time PCR system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using SYBR Green dye (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The sequences for the primers are: adiponectin 5'AAAGGAGAGCCTGGAGAAGC-3' and 5'-AAAGGAGAGCCTGGAGAAGC-3'; C/EBP
5'-TGGACAAGAACAGCAACGAG-3' and 5'-TCACTGGTCAACTCCAGCAC-3'; and ß-actin 5'-TACAGCTTCACCACCACAGC-3' and 5'-TACAGCTTCACCACCACAGC-3'. The levels of PCR product were calculated from standard curves established from each primer pair. Expression data were normalized to the amount of ß-actin PCR product.
Quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays
ChIP was described in detail previously (32, 33). Briefly, adipocytes were fixed and chromatin was sheared by sonication. Chromatin complexes were immunoprecipitated for 1218 h at 4 C while rotating with 5 µg of anti-C/EBP
, Ac-H3, or Ac-H4 antibody or with normal rabbit serum to provide controls. Immune complexes were collected with 40 µl of protein A-agarose. Coimmunoprecipitated promoter fragments were quantitated by real-time PCR using continuous SYBR Green I monitoring as detailed previously (34). The primer sequences are: forward 5'-GTATGGGATCCGGTCTAGCA; reverse, 5'-ATTCCCAGCACCCACAGTAA. Data were expressed as fold-differences relative to control conditions, in which normal rabbit serum was used instead of specific antibody in the ChIP. The formula and calculation were described in detail previously (34). ChIP assays were independently performed at least four times. Each ChIP sample was quantitated in triplicate on at least two separate occasions. A melting curve analysis was performed for each sample after PCR amplification to ensure that a single product of expected melting curve characteristics was obtained.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using the Students t test (group comparison) or ANOVA analyses (dosage and time course), followed by contrast test with Tukey or Dunnett error protection. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
mRNA levels of in epididymal fat were significantly lower in VPA-treated mice than that in control or pair-feeding mice (P < 0.01, Fig. 1B
|
VPA inhibits adiponectin gene expression in mature adipocytes
To study whether VPA directly affects adiponectin expression, fully differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes (8 d after the initiation of differentiation) were used in this study. Intracellular adiponectin protein levels were measured by Western blot. As shown in Fig. 2A
, adiponectin protein level was significantly reduced in adipocytes treated for 8 h with VPA (P < 0.05). Intracellular adiponectin protein levels were suppressed by 7074% after 16 or 24 h treatment and reached their lowest levels (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2A
). Interestingly, acute VPA treatment (14 h) tended to slightly increase adiponectin protein levels (P > 0.05). Adiponectin mRNA levels exhibited changes that paralleled changes in protein levels after treatment with 1 mM VPA for 8 h (Fig. 2B
). Similar results were obtained using Chub-S7 human adipocytes (data not shown).
|
To determine whether VPA treatment alters adiponectin secretion, adiponectin levels in the medium were measured. There were significant reductions of adiponectin in the medium after 8 h VPA treatment. Adiponectin protein levels in the medium correlated well with intracellular levels during treatment with VPA (data not shown). Thus, VPA treatment does not appear to affect adiponectin secretion.
VPA inhibits adiponectin gene expression without inducing adipocyte dedifferentiation or apoptosis
The presence of VPA during adipocyte differentiation blocks adipogensis (36), raising the possibility that the VPA-reduced adiponectin expression is caused by adipocyte dedifferentiation or change of cellular phenotype. To address this possibility, triacylglycerol droplets were stained with Oil Red O and quantitatively analyzed in differentiated mature 3T3-L1 adipocytes that were treated with or without VPA (1 mM) for 12 or 24 h. TZD (1 µM) was used as positive control. As shown in Fig. 3A
, there was no difference in the triacylglycerol droplet amounts between control and 12-h VPA-treated cells (P > 0.05). There was a small but statistically insignificant decrease after 24 h of VPA treatment. The study also showed that VPA treatment (1 mM, 24 h) slightly reduced the mRNA levels of perilipin in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, but without statistical difference (data not shown).
|
treatment increased caspase-3/7 activity markedly. Taken together, these data suggest that VPA-inhibited adiponectin expression is not caused by dedifferentiation or induction of apoptosis.
Inhibition of HDACs by VPA appears to be required for suppressing adiponectin gene expression
VPA has recently been shown to inhibit a subset of HDACs (26, 27). To determine whether VPA-suppressed adiponectin expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes was mediated by HDAC inhibition, a series of VPA analogs was used. Similar to VPA, treatment of 3T3-L1 adipocytes for 16 h with 3 nM TSA or 1 mM sodium butyrate decreased the intracellular levels of adiponectin protein (Fig. 4
) and mRNA (data not shown). The concentrations of VPA, TSA, and sodium butyrate used in this study are within the HDAC IC50 ranges (39). Two VPA analogs, VPM and 2M2P, with minimal HDAC inhibitory effect (HDAC IC50 > 20 mM for VPM and HDAC IC50 = 15 mM for 2M2P) (39), were used to control for effects other than inhibition of HDACs. The concentrations of VPM (1 mM) and 2M2P (1 mM) used in this study have almost no HDAC inhibitory effect (39). As shown in Fig. 4
, 16-h exposure to VPM or 2M2P did not reduce intracellular adiponectin protein levels in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Total acetylated histone H4 was also measured. As expected, H4 acetylation was significantly increased in VPA, TSA, and sodium butyrate-treated cells but was not changed in VPM- or 2M2P-treated cells. Thus, these results suggest that inhibition of HDACs activity is correlated in VPA-induced down-regulation of adiponectin expression in mature adipocytes.
|
|

, PPAR
, and SREBP1 were measured by Western blot. The results showed that, after 8 h of treatment with 1 mM VPA, both the 42- and 30-kDa C/EBP
isoforms were reduced (Fig. 6A
protein was reduced greater than 78% after 16 h treatment (Fig. 6A
and SREBP1 protein levels were detected using the same membranes. Interestingly, VPA treatment did not significantly change the protein levels of PPAR
2, PPAR
1, or cleaved SREBP1 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (Fig. 6A
|
on VPA concentration was then examined. Exposure of 3T3-L1 adipocytes to 0.5 mM VPA for 16 h markedly reduced the levels of both the 42- and 30-kDa forms of C/EBP
(Fig. 6B
isoforms were apparent with increasing VPA concentrations through 4 mM, the highest dose tested. PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 protein levels did not exhibit statistically significant change with VPA treatment at any tested concentration (Fig. 6B
protein levels in 3T3-L1 adipocytes in a dose- and time-dependent manner.
Our previous study demonstrated that adiponectin gene transcription is well correlated with C/EBP
protein levels in mature adipocytes (32). To determine whether the VPA-induced reduction in adiponectin expression is dependent on reductions in C/EBP
, three experiments were conducted. In the first study, C/EBP
protein was knocked down approximately 80% in 3T3-L1CAR
1 adipocytes transduced with an adenovirus vector encoding an siRNA specific for C/EBP
(32). The reduction in C/EBP
protein was accompanied by a significant reduction in adiponectin protein that was similar to the reduction induced by VPA treatment (Fig. 7A
).
|
gene-deficient (C/EBP
/) mouse fibroblasts were stably transfected with C/EBP
and/or PPAR
2. Differentiation was induced following the protocol published previously (41). Consistent with our previous study, low levels of adiponectin protein were observed in cells expressing exogenous PPAR
2 in the absence of C/EBP
compared with adipocytes expressing both C/EBP
and PPAR
2 (Fig. 7B
2 alone (Fig. 7B
and PPAR
2 (Fig. 7B
protein in adipocytes that stably express C/EBP
and PPAR
2 (data not shown), which may due to the use of the exogenous retroviral long terminal repeat promoter to direct C/EBP
expression. This result suggests that VPA treatment has no impact on exogenous promoter-driven C/EBP
gene expression. The study also revealed that, consistent with the results from 3T3-L1 adipocytes, adiponectin protein levels correlated with C/EBP
level in the adipocytes differentiated from mouse embryo fibroblasts.
A C/EBP
binding site in the mouse promoter has recently been reported (42). Our group has recently identified a new C/EBP
responding region in the mouse adiponectin promoter through which C/EBP
acts as a coactivator to up-regulate adiponectin transcription (Qiao, L., and J. Shao, unpublished data). We next examined effects of VPA treatment on C/EBP
binding to the adiponectin promoter region. Quantitative ChIP assay revealed that the binding of C/EBP
at the proximal adiponectin promoter was significantly reduced by VPA treatment (P < 0.05), but bound acetyl-histone H3 and H4 were significantly increased (Fig. 8
). Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that VPA-suppressed adiponectin expression is mediated by the reduction of C/EBP
protein and impaired C/EBP
binding to the adiponectin promoter in mature adipocytes.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using an in vitro cell culture system, we show here that VPA directly inhibits adiponectin gene expression in differentiated adipocytes. Because the current study does not rule out the possibility of obesity-driven low adiponectin expression, we postulate that VPA-suppressed adiponectin gene expression is one of the mechanisms that contribute to VPA-induced insulin resistance. Unfortunately, there are no clinical data regarding whether VPA alters adiponectin expression in human subjects.
Adiponectin is exclusively expressed in adipocytes (6, 7). Adiponectin gene expression is turned on 2 d after the initiation of adipocyte differentiation and maintained at a relatively high level in mature adipocytes. Blockage of adipocyte differentiation reduces adiponectin expression. To avoid effects of VPA on differentiation (36), all of the cells used in this study were fully differentiated mature adipocytes and were treated beginning 8 d after initiation of adipocyte differentiation. The fact that treatment with VPA for 24 h did not alter triacylglycerol droplet content indicates that VPA treatment did not induce dedifferentiation of the adipocytes. Therefore, we conclude that VPA-suppressed adiponectin gene expression in mature adipocytes occurs through a mechanism distinct from that of the antiadipocyte differentiation effects of VPA.
VPA and certain of its analogs arrest growth and apoptosis in several types of cancer cells (1). Our study showed that the presence of 1 mM VPA in the cell culture medium, a level reached in patient serum during therapy of epilepsy with a daily dose of 2030 mg/kg, did not induce significant loss of cell viability. In addition, Western blot studies showed that ß-actin levels were fairly stable and were not altered by VPA treatment of adipocytes. The mechanisms involved in VPA- or VPA analog-induced apoptosis are intricate and differ among cell types. Therapeutic concentrations of VPA do not induce apoptosis in most cell types (37, 38). Therefore, these results demonstrate that the inhibition of adiponectin gene expression by VPA in mature adipocytes is gene specific and not due to cellular toxicity or apoptosis.
Histone acetylation plays an important role in regulating transcription (25). Histone acetylation is dynamic and the level of acetylation is determined by the balance of the activities of acetyltransferases and HDACs. Recently, HDACs have been identified as direct targets of VPA (26, 27). VPA inhibits both class I and II HDACs, with a high potency for class I (26, 27, 39). Our study showed that VPA and its analogs with HDAC inhibitory effects suppress adiponectin expression. In contrast, the VPA analogs VPM and 2M2P, which do not inhibit HDAC activity, did not affect adiponectin protein levels in adipocytes (Fig. 4
). Therefore, the inhibition of adiponectin gene expression by VPA is most likely mediated through HDAC inhibition. However, further studies are required to determine whether HDAC inhibition directly suppresses adiponectin gene expression.
In general, increased levels of histone acetylation by histone acetyltransferases loosens chromatin packaging and are correlated with transcriptional activation, whereas histone deacetylation by HDACs is associated with transcriptional repression (25). However, recent studies have demonstrated that histone deacetylation also associate with transcription activation of certain genes (47). VPA and other HDAC inhibitors increase histone acetylation universally by suppressing HDAC activity. VPA or TSA treatment increase transcription of genes including those encoding gelsolin, cytokeratin A, and c-fos (1). However, inhibition of HDAC activities also suppresses expression of certain genes including those encoding c-myc, IL-2, IL-8, and LC-pTP (1, 48, 49, 50). Inhibition of HDACs by TSA or trapoxin alters transcription, either up or down, of approximately 2% of genes (48). Therefore, HDAC inhibitors regulate gene expression either positively or negatively in a gene-specific manner. Our study showed that VPA treatment represses adiponectin gene transcription in mature adipocytes. Interestingly, our study also revealed that VPA increased mouse adiponectin promoter-driven luciferase expression in 3T3-L1 fibroblasts but decreased it in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes. This finding suggests that, similar to most promoters tested, hyperacetylation of histones up-regulates adiponectin promoter activity. However, the adipocyte-specific inhibition of adiponectin promoter activity by VPA suggests that VPA treatment inhibits adiponectin gene expression through an indirect mechanism. Therefore, we hypothesized that VPA treatment might alter signal pathway(s) or transcription factor(s) and thereby inhibit adiponectin gene transcription in mature adipocytes.
C/EBP
and PPAR
are major adipogenic transcription factors that transactivate many adipocyte-specific genes. Our previous study and other studies have demonstrated that C/EBP
is required to fully activate adiponectin gene expression (32, 41, 51). SREBP1c also plays a role in regulating adiponectin gene transcription. Our current study showed that VPA treatment significantly decreased C/EBP
protein levels in differentiated adipocytes. However, VPA treatment did not alter protein levels of PPAR
1, PPAR
2, or SREBP1. Furthermore, VPA treatment did not alter adiponectin expression in C/EBP
-deficient adipocytes that ectopicly express PPAR
2 (Fig. 7B
). These studies strongly support our hypothesis that by reducing the level of the adipogenic transcription factor C/EBP
, VPA inhibits adiponectin gene transcription in adipocytes.
C/EBP-responsive elements that are associated with C/EBP
and C/EBPß have been identified in the mouse adiponectin promoter (42) (our unpublished data). While we were preparing this manuscript, a new study demonstrated that inhibition of HDACs increases C/EBP
acetylation as well as histone acetylation (37). The study demonstrated that elevated acetylation of C/EBP
inhibits its binding to target DNA sequences (37). Although we did not test the acetylation levels of C/EBP
, our quantitative ChIP assay showed the binding of C/EBP
to the adiponectin promoter region is significantly reduced in VPA-treated adipocytes. Therefore, we conclude that VPA inhibits adiponectin gene transcription in adipocytes by reducing the amount of C/EBP
protein and its binding to the adiponectin promoter. In contrast to our study, Lagace et al. (24) reported that 3 h of VPA treatment transiently reduced PPAR
and SREBP1a mRNA in adipocytes, but prolonged exposure (6 or 12 h) had no significant effect on protein or mRNA levels of C/EBP
, PPAR
, and SREBP1a. We do not have any evidence to explain the discrepancy but speculate that differences in the adipocyte differentiation procedure and differentiation stages of the adipocytes might contribute. The protein samples used in our study were nuclear extract while total cell lysis was used in the study by Lagace et al. Thus, differences in sample preparation may also contribute to the discrepant results. Strikingly, VPA treatment (1 mM, 12 h) significantly increases C/EBP
protein levels in FAO hepatoma cells (Qiao, L., and J. Shao, unpublished data). These data indicate that VPA regulates C/EBP
gene expression in a tissue-specific manner. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted to investigate the mechanism(s) whereby VPA represses C/EBP
expression in mature adipocytes.
In summary, our results demonstrate that VPA suppresses adiponectin gene expression in mice and differentiated adipocytes, and that the suppression is correlated with the inhibition of HDAC activity of VPA. VPA-suppressed adiponectin gene expression occurs at the transcriptional level. We provide evidence that VPA suppresses adiponectin gene expression via down-regulation of C/EBP
and its binding at the adiponectin promoter.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online November 10, 2005
Abbreviations: aP2, Adipocyte-specific fatty acid-binding protein; C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; GFP, green fluorescent protein; HDAC, histone deacetylase; 2M2P, 2-methyl-2-pentenoic acid; PPAR
, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
; siRNA, small interfering RNA; SREBP1, steroid regulatory element binding protein-1; TSA, trichostatin A; TZD, thiazolidinedione; VPA, valproic acid; VPM, valpromide.
Received August 12, 2005.
Accepted for publication October 31, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
regulates human adiponectin gene transcription through an intronic enhancer. Diabetes 54:17441754
2, but not C/EBP
-evidence for differential regulation of the aP2 and adiponectin genes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 308:933939[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. C. Cha, N. R. Oak, S. Kang, T.-A. Tran, S. Kobayashi, S.-H. Chiang, D. G. Tenen, and O. A. MacDougald Phosphorylation of CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein {alpha} Regulates GLUT4 Expression and Glucose Transport in Adipocytes J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2008; 283(26): 18002 - 18011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Qiao, C. Zou, P. Shao, J. Schaack, P. F. Johnson, and J. Shao Transcriptional Regulation of Fatty Acid Translocase/CD36 Expression by CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein {alpha} J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2008; 283(14): 8788 - 8795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. V. Lin, J.-Y. Kim, A. Pocai, L. Rossetti, L. Shapiro, P. E. Scherer, and D. Accili Adiponectin Resistance Exacerbates Insulin Resistance in Insulin Receptor Transgenic/Knockout Mice Diabetes, August 1, 2007; 56(8): 1969 - 1976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||