help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2003-1762
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mineo, R.
Right arrow Articles by Belfiore, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mineo, R.
Right arrow Articles by Belfiore, A.
Endocrinology Vol. 145, No. 9 4355-4365
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Activation of the Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)-Met System in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: Biological Effects of HGF in Thyroid Cancer Cells Depend on Met Expression Levels

Rossana Mineo, Angela Costantino, Franco Frasca, Laura Sciacca, Simona Russo, Riccardo Vigneri and Antonino Belfiore

Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e di Medicina Specialistica (R.M., A.C., F.F., L.S., S.R., R.V.), Cattedra di Endocrinologia, University of Catania, Ospedale Garibaldi, 95123 Catania, Italy; and Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica (A.B.), Cattedra di Endocrinologia, Policlinico Mater Domini, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia," 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Antonino Belfiore, M.D., Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Policlinico Mater Domini, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia," via Tommaso Campanella 115, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy. E-mail: belfiore{at}unicz.it.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Met, the receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), is overexpressed in approximately 90% papillary thyroid carcinomas. To investigate the role of the HGF-Met system in these tumors, we examined HGF and Met expression in a variety of primary cultures, normal or malignant thyroid cells, and tissue specimens and analyzed the different HGF effects (promotion of mitogenesis, branching morphogenesis, and cell motility and invasion). In cancer specimens, HGF was produced at high levels by tumor stromal cells, and Met was constitutively phosphorylated in malignant cells. No HGF production was found in a panel of malignant thyroid cancer cells. Biological effects of HGF were examined in papillary cancer cell cultures with either high or low Met expression. High-Met cells were more sensitive to the growth effect of HGF (ED50 = 3–5 ng/ml and 10–15 ng/ml in high- or low-Met cells, respectively). Moreover, only high-Met cells underwent branching morphogenesis in response to HGF. In contrast, high-Met cells showed a reduced migration. Met down-regulation by small interfering RNAs resulted in enhanced cell migration and abrogation of branching morphogenesis in response to HGF. Conversely, Met overexpression impaired cell migration while favoring branching morphogenesis and cell adherence to substrate. These data suggest that both Met and HGF are overexpressed in papillary thyroid carcinomas, that Met is frequently activated in these carcinomas and may favor tumor growth, and that the abundance of Met expression may differently regulate cell growth, morphogenesis, and migration in response to HGF.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PAPILLARY CANCER OF the thyroid represents the most common malignancy of the thyroid gland. In most cases, this differentiated thyroid cancer has a relatively indolent evolution, and it remains localized to the thyroid gland or spreads only to the locoregional lymph nodes. However, hematogenous metastases develop in 10–15% of cases and may cause tumor-related death (1). The factors and the mechanisms determining the aggressive behavior of some papillary carcinomas are not completely understood. Papillary thyroid cancers maintain some peculiar features of the normal thyroid tissue, including TSH receptor expression and the ability to produce thyroglobulin. Therefore, pituitary TSH is a major growth factor for this tumor, as it is for the normal thyroid. L-thyroxine administration at a TSHsuppressive dose is a mainstay in the management of papillary cancer. TSH suppression, however, is not always sufficient to prevent or block metastatic spread, indicating that other factors may play an important role in the metastatic process (2).

We recently observed that approximately 70% of papillary thyroid cancers overexpress Met (3), the tyrosine kinase receptor for the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/scatter factor. HGF is a cytokine with several biological activities, including stimulation of cell proliferation, motility, and morphogenesis. HGF is secreted as an inactive precursor that is converted to the active heterodimeric form by secreted proteases, including plasminogen activators (4, 5, 6, 7). Because Met is not expressed or only focally expressed at low level in the normal thyroid, its aberrant expression in papillary cancer suggests a role for the HGF-Met system in the development or the progression of these tumors. When we investigated the possible prognostic significance of Met immunostaining in a large series of thyroid carcinomas, we found that Met overexpression was a specific and early event in papillary cancer development (8). Surprisingly, Met overexpression was inversely correlated with the occurrence of distant metastases. In fact, negative or low Met expression was the most effective predictive factor for the occurrence of distant metastases and patient survival (8).

To better understand the biological role of the Met overexpression in papillary thyroid carcinomas, we investigated whether Met tyrosine kinase is activated by locally produced HGF in these tumors. We also examined the biological effects of HGF in primary cultures of papillary cancer cells expressing Met at different levels.

In papillary thyroid cancer specimens, we found that Met is activated, and HGF is locally produced by the tumor stromal fibroblasts. In cultured thyroid cancer cells, HGF was a potent mitogenic and survival factor. HGF, however, elicited different biological effects, depending on the Met expression level. In cells with high Met expression (high-Met cells), the major effect of HGF was branching morphogenesis, with no appreciable stimulation of cell migration or invasion of reconstituted basal membranes. In contrast, in cells with low Met expression (low-Met cells), HGF caused little branching morphogenesis but effectively stimulated cell migration and invasion of reconstituted basal membranes.

Therefore, these data suggest that, in papillary thyroid cancer cells, a high Met expression favors growth and morphogenetic epithelial-mesenchymal interactions but not cell migration and invasiveness. These findings may help explain why a high Met expression is associated with a low occurrence of distant metastases in papillary thyroid cancer.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Primary human thyroid cell cultures and human tissue specimens
Thyroid primary cultures were prepared from both neoplastic and normal thyroid tissue obtained at surgery from the same subjects. Briefly, the tissue was fragmented with a scalpel, suspended in PBS without Ca2+ and Mg2+, and digested with a solution of type IV collagenase (1 mg/ml) in a 37 C shaking bath for 90 min. The cell suspension, containing intact and fragmented thyroid follicles, was centrifuged (400 x g for 10 min), and the pellet was resuspended in culture medium consisting of MEM supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 0.1 mU/ml TSH, 5 µg/ml insulin, 5 µg/ml transferrin, 50 µg/ml gentamicin, and 3% fetal calf serum (FCS). Under these conditions, follicles formed a monolayer after 1–2 d. The medium was routinely changed every 2 d. To score the degree of nonepithelial cells present in the cultures, epithelial thyroid cells were identified by indirect immunofluorescence staining with antithyroglobulin and anticytokeratin antibodies, as previously described (9). Less than 5% cells were cytokeratin negative, indicating that contamination with nonepithelial cells was low.

Cell cultures obtained from six different papillary carcinomas were used to carry out functional studies. Two cultures had low Met levels, and four cultures had high Met levels (see Results). All cultures were obtained from well-differentiated cancers. Extrathyroid invasion and locoregional lymph node metastases were present in two of two low-Met tumors and in one of four high-Met tumors at diagnosis. Patient follow-up was available for both low-Met patients but only two of four high-Met patients (33 ± 4 months, mean ± SD). No patient developed distant metastases. To exclude the presence of met mutations in the papillary cell culture studied, sequences corresponding to exons 16–19 were amplified and screened for possible mutations by automatic sequencing (10). None of these tumors had met mutations.

Fresh tissue specimens (used for Western blot studies) were collected at surgery, immediately frozen, and stored in liquid nitrogen until processing.

Established cell lines
Established thyroid cell lines from papillary (TPC-1, BC-PAP, and NPA), follicular (WRO), or anaplastic thyroid cancer (ARO and FF-1) were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 10% FCS, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin. Simian virus 40-transformed human thyrocytes (4A1), which were obtained as previously described (11), were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 2 mM glutamine and 5% FCS.

Met and HGF mRNA evaluation
Both Met and HGF mRNAs were evaluated in thyroid cells and tissue specimens by RT-PCR. Total RNA was prepared using a commercial kit (Ultraspec II RNA; Biotecx Laboratories, Inc, Houston, TX). cDNA was synthesized by adding 0.3 µg of total RNA to 15 U/ml murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, UK), 2.5 mM random hexamers, 0.5 mM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 3 mM MgCl2, 75 mM KCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol, and 50 mM Tris-HCl in a total volume of 20 µl and incubated at 37 C for 70 min. PCR amplification was performed with 5 µl cDNA, adding 1.25 U Taq polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), 2.5 mM specific primers, 2.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 mM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate. The following primer sequences were used: met, sense primer, nucleotides 3936–3960, 5'-TACTTGTTGCAAGGGAGAAGACTCCTA-3'; met, antisense primer, nucleotides 4391–4416, 5'-GGGACCAAGCCTCTGGTTCTGATGC-3'; HGF, sense primer, nucleotides 945–970, 5'-GGAATGGAATTCCATGTCAGCGTT-3'; and HGF, antisense primer, nucleotides 1587–1609, 5'-TCAAGTCTCGAGAAGGGAAACA-3'. Conditions for met PCR were as follows: 94 C x 60 sec, 77 C x 60 sec, and 72 C x 60 sec for 30 cycles. Conditions for HGF PCR were as follows: 94 C x 60 sec, 64 C x 45 sec, and 72 C x 90 sec for 35 cycles. PCR products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by ethidium bromide staining (12).

Met and HGF protein measurement by Western blot
Frozen tissues were pulverized in the presence of liquid nitrogen (Mikro-Dismembrator; B. Braun Biotech International, Melsungen, Germany). Powdered tissues or subconfluent cell monolayers were solubilized with 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride. For Met protein measurement, solubilized extracts were first immunoprecipitated with anti-Met antibody sc161 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) raised against the carboxy terminal of human Met (13).

After centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 5 min, the pellets were washed three times at high stringency (0.5 M NaCl; 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4; 0.5% Nonidet P-40; 2 mM EDTA; and 0.04% BSA), boiled in Laemmli buffer, and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 5 min at 4 C. The supernatants were then subjected to 7.5% PAGE under reducing conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Filters were then incubated with either 0.5 µg/ml anti-Met DQ-13 monoclonal antibody (14) (an antibody directed against a peptide corresponding to the last 19 amino acids of human Met carboxy terminal; UBI, Lake Placid, NY) or 1 µg/ml {alpha}PY antibody (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY).

To measure HGF protein content, tissue extracts (100 µg/lane) were subjected to PAGE under nonreducing conditions, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with an anti-HGF antibody (R&D Systems Ltd., Abingdon, UK). Filters were then incubated with a second antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase, and the reaction was developed by an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham International, Amersham, UK). The signal was subjected to densitometric analysis.

Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) Met knock-down
TPC-1 cells (2 x 105/well) were plated in 60-mm tissue culture plates and grown in regular medium without antibiotics for 24 h. Cells, at 90–95% confluency, were then transfected with Met-specific siRNA oligonucleotides (Met siRNA smart pool, catalog no. M-003156-01-05; Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO) and with scramble RNA oligonucleotides as control (nonspecific control duplex-XIII, catalog no. D-001206-13-05; Dharmacon) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Laboratories, Paisley, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The final concentration of siRNA was 100 nM. The lipid/siRNA complex was added drop-wise to the cultures and was replaced with fresh medium after 6 h. Experiments to evaluate the biological effects of HGF were then carried out 24 h after siRNA transfection. Met down-regulation in transfected cells was confirmed by Western blot analysis, as described earlier.

ERK1/2, Akt, and Stat-3 phosphorylation in response to HGF
TPC-1 cells, which were transfected with Met siRNAs or with scramble RNA oligonucleotides, were washed twice with PBS (pH 7.4) and serum starved for 48 h. The cells were then treated with HGF (20 ng/ml) for 10 min. Ligand stimulation was terminated by two washes with ice-cold PBS (pH 7.4), buffer removal by aspiration, and addition of ice-cold sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris, pH 6.8; 10% glycerol; 2% SDS; 50 mM dithiothreitol; and 0.1% bromophenol blue). After scraping, samples were sonicated for 10 sec and heated to 95–100 C for 5 min. Whole-cell lysates were then subjected to reducing SDS-PAGE on 10% polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, the resolved proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and subjected to immunoblot analysis.

To study the principal Met signaling pathways, the blots were probed with polyclonal antibodies against the phosphorylated form of either ERK1/2 or Akt. Both phosphospecific antibodies were from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA).

To control for protein content, the membranes were stripped with stripping buffer Restore (Pierce, Rockford, IL) for 15 min at room temperature and subsequently reprobed with specific polyclonal antibodies, either anti-ERK or anti-Akt polyclonal antibody (all from New England Biolabs). All immunoblots were revealed by enhanced chemiluminescence method, autoradiographed, and subjected to densitometric analysis.

Immunofluorescence studies
TPC-1 cells treated with siRNA or with scramble RNA oligonucleotides were cultured onto coverslips and either exposed or not to HGF (20 ng/ml) for 10 min. Cells were then fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde, permeabilized with PBS/0.3% Triton X-100, blocked with PBS/10% normal goat serum, and incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with Alexa-conjugated (Alexa Fluor 594 or 488) secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands) for 1 h. To visualize the cytoplasm, the cells were also incubated with Alexa-conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Probes) for an additional 30 min. The cells were finally counterstained with Hoechst 33258 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) to color the nuclei. Epifluorescence microscopy was performed with an Olympus microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The images were digitally acquired with an Orca CCD Camera (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan) and processed with the Image-Pro Plus 4.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).

Cell growth studies
The growth response of thyroid cells to the mitogenic effect of HGF was evaluated both by measuring [3H]thymidine incorporation and cellular DNA.

For [3H]thymidine incorporation experiments, cells (3 x 104/well) were plated in 24-well tissue culture plates and grown in their regular medium for 24 h. The medium was then replaced with fresh medium containing 0.3% charcoal-stripped FCS. Twenty-four hours later, HGF was added to each well at the indicated concentrations. After 24 h, 18.5 kBq/well of [3H]thymidine was added for 4 h. At the end of the incubation, cell monolayers were washed twice with cold buffer, incubated with cold 10% trichloroacetic acid solution for 30 min, solubilized with 0.1 N NaOH, and counted by liquid scintillation.

In parallel experiments, cells were seeded in 24-well tissue culture plates at a density of 3 x 104 cells/well and incubated with HGF for 4 d with a medium change on the d 3. Cells were detached with a 0.2% EDTA solution and counted in a hemochromocytometer. The cellular suspension was then centrifuged, the pellet was solubilized with 0.03% SDS, and the cellular DNA content was determined by the fluorometric method of Labarca and Paigen (15).

Cell cycle analysis
TPC-1 cells treated with siRNA or with scramble RNA oligonucleotides were synchronized for 24 h in serum-free medium and then incubated in the presence or the absence of HGF (20 ng/ml) for another 24 h. Bromodeoxyuridine was added directly to the culture medium to the final concentration of 10 µM for 30 min. Cells were harvested and resuspended in 70% ethanol and stored at –20 C. Staining with antibromodeoxyuridine antibody was performed as suggested by the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were resuspended in PBS containing 20 mg/ml propidium iodide plus 40 mg/ml RNase (Sigma) for 30 min in the dark. Cells were then subjected to FACS analysis (FACScalibur; BD Bioscience, Bedford, MA).

Invasion, migration, and adhesion assays
Invasion assays were performed with the Boyden’s chamber technique. Approximately 105 cells, resuspended in 200 µl of media, were placed on 6.5-mm diameter polycarbonate filters (8-µm pore size; Corning Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA) coated at the lower and the upper side (chemotaxis assay) with 1.2 mg/ml of Matrigel (BD Biosciences Labware, Bedford, MA). Various doses of HGF (0–50 ng/ml) in 1 ml of medium were added to the lower compartment. The plates were incubated at 37 C with 5% CO2 for 6 h (chemotaxis assay) or 48 h (invasion assay). At the end of incubation, the cells or the Matrigel at the upper side of the filter were removed with a cotton swab. Cells that had migrated to the lower side of the filter were fixed with 11% glutaraldehyde for 15 min at room temperature and stained with 0.1% crystal violet in 20% methanol for 20 min. After three washes with water and complete drying, the crystal violet was solubilized by immersion of the filters in 10% acetic acid. The concentration of the solubilized crystal violet was evaluated as absorbance at 590 nm.

Migration assay in TPC-1-transfected cells was performed in Boyden chambers with modifications. Briefly, cells were seeded onto six-well plates (5 x 104 cells/well) and maintained in complete medium for 24 h. Cells were then transfected by FuGene6 method (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) with either an empty vector (2 µg/well) or Met (0.5, 2, or 4 µg/well) along with histone 2B (H2B)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) (0.4 µg/well) to mark transfected cells (DNA to Fugene6 ratio, 1:3). Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were harvested by trypsinization and allowed to migrate for 6 h in 250 µg/ml collagen IV-coated translucent transwells (1 x 105 cells/transwell; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). To measure haptotaxis (migration toward the matrix: basal and HGF stimulated), transwells were coated with collagen IV on the lower side. To measure HGF-induced chemotaxis, transwells were coated with collagen IV on both sides (lower and upper), and HGF was added in the lower chamber. To evaluate HGF-induced random migration, HGF was added in both chambers (lower and upper). Chambers were then put in 3.7% formaldehyde, washed with PBS, and incubated for 10 min with PBS plus 5 µg/ml Hoechst to stain cell nuclei. Chambers were then examined under a fluorescence invertoscope (Olympus) at x20 magnification. Hoechst-stained cells represented the total migrated population, whereas GFP-positive cells represented the transfected migrated population. This procedure was allowed by the characteristics of transwells, which are translucent to the florescent light and allow the visualization of cells present on the lower side only. In parallel experiments, migrated cells were stained with crystal violet. Numbers obtained with migrated GFP-positive cells were normalized for numbers obtained with Hoechst- and crystal violet-stained cells and expressed as a percentage of basal. Results are mean of three separate experiments performed in triplicates.

Adhesion assay was performed with TPC-1 thyroid cancer cells transfected as reported earlier. Cells were plated onto collagen-coated six-well plates (2 x 105 cells/plate) and allowed to adhere in complete medium for 10, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min at 37 C with 5% CO2. At each time point, cells were rinsed three times with PBS and fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde, washed with PBS, and incubated for 10 min with PBS plus 5 µg/ml Hoechst to stain cell nuclei. Plates were then examined under a fluorescence invertoscope (Olympus) at x20 magnification. Hoechst-stained cells represented the total adherent population, whereas GFP-positive cells represented the transfected adherent population. In parallel experiments, adherent cells were stained with crystal violet. Numbers obtained with adherent GFP-positive cells were normalized for numbers obtained with Hoechst- and crystal violet-stained cells and expressed as a percentage of adherent cells at time 10 min. Results are the mean of three separate experiments performed in triplicates.

Chemoinvasiveness in response to HGF was also evaluated in TPC-1 cells treated with siRNA or with scramble RNA oligonucleotides.

Morphogenic effect
Approximately 5 x 103 cells were seeded into 48-well plastic plates, which had been previously coated with 150 µl of Matrigel (10 mg/ml) and allowed to set for 30 min at 37 C. The following day, various concentrations of HGF (0–50 ng/ml) were added in fresh medium. The cells were incubated with daily feeding of HGF and then photographed after 7 d (16). To evaluate cell growth, Matrigel was dissolved with dispase. The cellular suspension was then centrifuged, the pellet was solubilized with 0.03% SDS, and the cellular DNA content was determined by the fluorometric method of Labarca and Paigen (15).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Met tyrosine kinase activation and HGF production in papillary thyroid cancer specimens
Five papillary cancer tissue specimens were solubilized, immunoprecipitated with an anti-Met antibody, and immunoblotted with an anti-Py antibody. Filters were then stripped and subsequently reblotted with an anti-Met antibody. All papillary cancer specimens, except one, expressed the Met protein with a variable degree of tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1AGo). We then evaluated HGF expression by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. RT-PCR analysis demonstrated the presence of the HGF transcript in all cancer specimens (data not shown), and Western blot analysis revealed the presence of HGF protein in all specimens (Fig. 1BGo). HGF concentration ranged between 15 and 110 ng/100 µg protein, as evaluated by Western blot using recombinant HGF as a standard (data not shown).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Western blot analysis of Met (phosphorylation status and protein content) and HGF content in papillary cancer specimens and normal specimens. A, For Met analysis, five different tissue specimens (lanes 1–5) were solubilized and immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Met antibody sc161 followed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (IB) with an aPy (antiphosphotyrosine) antibody (upper panel). The filters were then stripped and reprobed with anti-Met antibody DQ-13 (lower panel). Lysates from either unstimulated or HGF-treated thyroid cancer cells (ARO) were used as controls (lanes C1 and C2). B, For HGF analysis, tissue lysates (80 µg) were subjected to PAGE under nonreducing conditions and blotted with an anti-HGF antibody (lanes 1–5). Recombinant HGF was used as positive control (lane C). A representative of three experiments is shown. C, Western blot analysis of Met and HGF content in three papillary cancer specimens and three normal thyroid tissue specimens from the same subjects. A representative of three experiments is shown.

 
In three papillary cancer patients, tissue was available from both the tumor and the contralateral normal lobe. These specimens were used to compare Met and HGF protein expression in cancer vs. normal tissue from the same glands. Both Met and HGF were expressed in cancer tissues. In contrast, in normal thyroid tissues, Met expression was absent or barely present, and HGF was present at a level 3- to 16-fold lower than in the corresponding cancer tissue specimen (Fig. 1C).

To identify the source of HGF production, separate cultures of either thyrocytes or fibroblasts were obtained from both neoplastic and normal thyroid tissue specimens (n = 3 for each condition). Western blot analysis revealed that fibroblasts, but not thyrocytes, express the HGF protein (Fig. 2AGo). The same results were obtained by RT-PCR (Fig. 2BGo).



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. HGF expression in fibroblasts (F) and thyrocytes (T) isolated and separately cultured from a papillary cancer specimen and the contralateral normal thyroid tissue. Thyrocytes were isolated after digestion with collagenase and cultured in low FCS (2%) medium. Cells at the second passage were lysed and analyzed. In these conditions, fibroblast contamination was less than 1%. Thyroid fibroblast-enriched cultures were fed with high FCS (15%) medium to allow fibroblast overgrowth. After approximately 10–15 passages, fibroblast cultures were negative for cytokeratin. A, Cells were lysed, subjected to PAGE under nonreducing conditions, and blotted with an anti-HGF antibody (upper panel). Filters were then stripped and reblotted with an antiactin antibody to control for protein loading (lower panel). B, RNA was extracted from both fibroblasts and thyroid cells, and RT-PCR for HGF was carried out as described in Materials and Methods (upper panel). RT-PCR for Ele-1 was used as control (lower panel).

 
We then investigated whether a variety of transformed thyrocytes expressed HGF in an autocrine manner. Long-term cultures of neoplastic thyrocytes (>20 in vitro passages and, therefore, fibroblast free) were established from six different papillary carcinomas. We then measured HGF expression and protein content in these long-term cultures, in six permanent thyroid cancer cell lines with a various degree of differentiation, and in simian virus 40-transformed thyrocytes. All these cultured thyroid cells expressed Met, but none expressed HGF (Table 1Go). Taken together, these data indicate that Met is activated in papillary thyroid carcinomas and that HGF is produced by stromal fibroblasts.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. HGF and Met expression in cultured malignant thyrocytes

 
Biological effects of HGF in thyroid cancer cells
We evaluated the biological effects elicited by HGF in malignant thyrocytes expressing different levels of Met. For these studies, we used primary thyrocyte cultures obtained from papillary carcinomas with either high (n = 4) or relatively low (n = 2) Met expression. In these cultures, the level of Met expression was repeatedly assessed during the study period and found to be fairly stable, being approximately 2- to 3-fold higher in high-Met compared with low-Met thyrocyte cultures (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Western blot analysis of Met expression in long-term thyrocyte cultures obtained from six different papillary carcinomas. Cells were solubilized, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with anti-Met antibody DQ-13 (upper panel). Cultures 1 and 2 had relatively low Met expression and cultures 3–6 had consistently higher Met expression. Filters were stripped and reprobed with an antiactin antibody (middle panel). The experiment is a representative of six experiments carried out at various times of cell cultures. Densitometric evaluation of Met expression by Western blot analysis is shown in the lower panel. Bars indicate mean ± SE of arbitrary densitometric units obtained in six separate experiments.

 
Mitogenic effect.
Papillary thyroid cancer cell growth was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation after exposure to HGF in serum-starved cells. In high-Met papillary thyroid cancer cell cultures (n = 4), the maximal effect (196 ± 28% over basal) was observed at 10–20 ng/ml HGF. In low-Met papillary cancer cell cultures (n = 2), the maximal growth response (175 ± 15% over basal) was observed at 20–50 ng/ml HGF. A growth response was already observed at a HGF concentration of 5 ng/ml (119 ± 6% vs. 149.5 ± 9% in low- and high-Met cells, respectively). These differences between cells with low or high Met did not reach statistical significance (Table 2Go). Very similar results were obtained with DNA measurements, as described in Materials and Methods (results not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. [3H]Thymidine incorporation in low- or high-Met thyroid cancer cell cultures

 
Morphogenic effect.
A rather unique property of HGF is to induce cell aggregation in tubule-like structures (branching morphogenesis) when cells are cultured onto a reconstituted basal membrane (Matrigel) (4, 5, 6). We evaluated the ability of HGF to induce morphogenesis in either low- (n = 2) or high-Met cell cultures (n = 4). Cells were seeded in Matrigel and incubated in the presence or absence of 5–50 ng/ml HGF. After 4–7 d, cells were inspected under an inverted microscope to evaluate the formation of tubule-like structures. In the absence of HGF, both low-Met cells and high-Met cells remained isolated or formed small aggregates (Fig. 4Go, A and B). In the presence of HGF, low-Met cells formed only rare tubule-like structures, and cells predominantly aggregated in spheroids (Fig. 4CGo), whereas high-Met cells developed an extensive tubule network in a dose-dependent manner starting at a HGF concentration of 5–10 ng/ml (Fig. 4DGo).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Morphogenic effect of HGF in thyroid papillary cancer cells. Thyrocytes with either low or high Met expression were seeded in Matrigel and incubated either in the absence or presence of 20 ng/ml HGF. Cells from both cultures remained as single cells or small aggregates in the absence of HGF (A and B). In the presence of HGF low-Met cells aggregated in spheroids (C), whereas high-Met cells formed tubule-like structures (D). The experiment shown is a representative of six experiments.

 
To assess cell growth, cells exposed to HGF for 7 d were recovered by Matrigel digestion with dispase, and cellular DNA was measured. In all cases, HGF stimulated growth in a dose-dependent manner (maximal effect = 200–300% over basal, with no significant difference between low- and high-Met cultures; data not shown). HGF was also an effective survival factor. In the absence of HGF, cells died after 10–12 d, whereas they were still viable up to 15–20 d when cultured in the presence of HGF. Insulin (10 nM), with or without TSH (0.1–1.0 mU/ml), was much less effective than HGF alone in promoting survival and never induced branching morphogenesis (data not shown).

Motogenic effect.
HGF typically stimulates chemotaxis and chemoinvasion in a variety of epithelial cells. To evaluate the ability of papillary cancer thyrocytes to respond to HGF-induced chemotaxis, we measured HGF-stimulated migration through filters in a Boyden chamber. Furthermore, we evaluated HGF-stimulated chemoinvasion in terms of the cancer thyrocyte ability to cross a Matrigel barrier obtained by coating filters of the Boyden chamber with a thin layer of Matrigel. This property is considered a measure of the cell invasive potential.

In low-Met cells, both chemotaxis and chemoinvasion were actively stimulated by HGF, with the maximal effect reached at 20 ng/ml HGF (Fig. 5Go, A and B). In high-Met cells, chemotaxis was only modestly stimulated by HGF, and chemoinvasion was only marginally responsive to HGF (Fig. 5Go, A and B).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. HGF-stimulated chemotaxis and chemoinvasion in papillary thyroid cancer cells. Chemotaxis (A) and chemoinvasion (B) assays were carried out after exposure to increasing HGF concentrations in cell lines with either low (n = 2) or high (n = 4) Met expression. After exposure to HGF, both chemotaxis and chemoinvasion were higher in low-Met cells compared with high-Met cells. Each curve represents pooled data from papillary cancer thyrocytes with either low or high Met expression. Values represent means ± SE of three separate experiments carried out in each cell line.

 
Biological effects of HGF in TPC-1 papillary cancer cell line
Biological effects of HGF in TPC-1 papillary cancer cell clones with high- or low-Met level expression.
To confirm that the different level of Met expression can differentially modulate the biological effects of HGF, we established cell clones from the TPC-1 papillary cancer cell line. Two clones with low Met expression and two clones with high Met expression were identified (Fig. 6AGo). The difference in Met expression between low- or high-Met cell clones was similar to that observed when using different cell lines. Also, in this model, only high-Met thyroid cancer cells underwent branching morphogenesis when cultured in Matrigel in the presence of 20 ng/ml HGF (Fig. 6BGo). In contrast, HGF-stimulated invasiveness in Boyden chambers was higher in low-Met cell clones than in high-Met cell clones (+150–188% vs. +102–130%, respectively; P < 0.002; range of values obtained in four different experiments). The maximal growth response to HGF was similar in both groups (165 ± 19% and 161 ± 6% in high- or low-Met clones, respectively).



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. HGF effect on branching morphogenesis in cell clones with different Met expression. A, Cell clones were derived from TPC-1 cells having either low (L1 and L2) or high (H1 and H2) Met expression (upper panel). Filters were stripped and reprobed with an antiactin antibody (lower panel). B, Micrographs showing the morphogenic effect of 20 ng/ml HGF in cell clones with either low (upper panel) or high Met expression (lower panel). HGF induced tubule-like structures only in clones with high Met expression.

 
Studies in transfected cells: effects of Met down-regulation or overexpression.
To further explore the role of Met abundance in modulating HGF effects, we selectively down-regulated Met in TPC-1 cells by siRNAs (Fig. 7AGo). In Met siRNA-treated cells, HGF-stimulated chemoinvasion was increased compared with cells transfected with scramble RNA oligonucleotides (Fig. 7BGo). Moreover, cells with silenced Met were unable to form tubule-like structures in Matrigel in contrast with cells transfected with scramble-siRNA (Fig. 7CGo). We then evaluated whether siRNA treatment affected cell cycle progression in response to HGF. TPC-1 cells that were treated with either Met siRNAs or with scramble RNA oligonucleotides were exposed to 20 ng/ml of HGF for 24 h, and the cell cycle was, thereafter, analyzed by FACS analysis. In control cells, HGF induced an increase in cell progression to S phase (from 40–51%), with a reduction of cells in the G1 and G2 phases. Met siRNA-treated cells showed a smaller progression to S phase and no reduction of G2 phase after exposure to HGF (Fig. 7DGo).



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Effect of Met down-regulation by specific siRNAs. A, TPC-1 cells were treated with Met siRNA or with control RNA oligonucleotides. Cell were lysed and evaluated for Met expression by Western blot using DQ-13 anti-Met antibody (upper panel). Filters were then stripped and reprobed with an antiactin antibody to control for protein loading (lower panel). B, Chemotaxis in response to 20 ng/ml HGF in TPC-1 with silenced Met was enhanced compared with control cells. C, Branching morphogenesis in response to HGF was observed only in control cells (left) but not in siRNA-treated cells (right). D, Cell cycle analysis in cells incubated in the presence or the absence of 20 ng/ml HGF for 24 h. siRNA-treated cells showed a reduced cell cycle progression.

 
To evaluate the effects of forced Met expression, we transfected TPC-1 cells with increasing amounts of Prk5-met expression vector or with the corresponding empty vector. Met expression levels achieved with transfection are shown in Fig. 8AGo. Cells were cotransfected with H2B-GFP to mark the transfected population. Chemotaxis in response to HGF was then evaluated in transwells coated with collagen IV on both sides and HGF added to the lower chamber. Met transfection caused a dose-dependent reduced chemotaxis both in basal conditions and, more evidently, in response to HGF (Fig. 8BGo). We also evaluated random motility (HGF in both chambers), which resulted to be even more impaired than HGF-induced chemotaxis (data not shown). Very similar results were obtained when haptotaxis (migration through transwells coated with collagen IV only on the lower side) was evaluated. Similarly to what was observed with chemotaxis, random haptotaxis (HGF in both chambers) was more impaired than HGF-driven haptotaxis (HGF in the lower chamber; data not shown).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Effect of Met overexpression on thyroid cancer cell migration and adhesion. Thyroid cancer cells were transiently transfected with either an empty vector or with 0.5, 2, or 4 µg/well Prk5-met expression vector along with H2B-GFP to mark transfected cells. Met expression was evaluated with Western blot (A). B, Effect of Met on chemotaxis. Cells were seeded in Boyden chambers coated with matrix on both sides, and HGF (20 ng/ml) was added to the lower chamber. Migrated GFP-positive cells were scored as described in Materials and Methods, and numbers are expressed as percentage of basal (mean ± SD of three separate experiments performed in triplicates). C, Adhesion assay. Cells were transfected and allowed to adhere for the indicated times as described in Materials and Methods. Numbers obtained are expressed as percentage of the numbers obtained at 10 min (basal) and are the means ± SD of three separate experiments performed in triplicates. {blacksquare}, Empty-transfected cells; {blacktriangleup}, Met-transfected cells.

 
These findings suggest that Met overexpression may alter the adhesive properties of thyroid cancer cells. To study the effect of overexpressed Met on thyroid cancer cell adhesion, we performed adhesion assays using Met-transfected TPC-1 cells. We allowed cells to adhere onto collagen IV-coated plates for different times (10–120 min) and scored the proportion of adherent GFP-positive cells, as described in Materials and Methods. Adhesion curves obtained with this assay (Fig. 8CGo) showed that Met overexpression significantly reduced thyroid cancer cell adhesion. These data may help explain the restraining effect of Met on thyroid cancer cell migration.

Met down-regulation leads to a relocalization of phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in response to HGF stimulation but not to a preferential Akt or ERK pathway activation
To explore the mechanisms underlying the enhanced cell migration in cells with low Met, we used TPC-1 papillary thyroid cancer cells treated with Met siRNA. TPC-1 cells were treated with either siRNA Met or scramble oligonucleotides, as described in Materials and Methods, and stimulated with 20 ng/ml HGF for 10 min. Cells were then solubilized and subjected to Western blot analysis with phosphospecific antibodies to Akt and ERK1/2, two major signaling pathways stimulated by HGF. In parallel experiments, siRNA Met-treated TPC-1 were seeded onto coverslips, stimulated with 20 ng/ml HGF for 10 min, and then processed for immunofluorescence studies. Western blot analysis showed that siRNA-induced Met down-regulation completely blocked both Akt and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in response to HGF stimulation (Fig. 9Go).



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. Western blot analysis of Akt and ERK1/2 activation after Met down-regulation. TPC-1 cells treated either with scramble RNA oligonucleotides or with Met siRNA were stimulated with 20 ng/ml HGF for 10 min and then lysed. Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and blotted with phosphospecific antibodies to either Akt or ERK1/2. Filters were then stripped and reprobed with an anti-Akt or an anti-ERK antibody to control protein loading. A representative experiment out of three experiments is shown.

 
Immunostaining with antiphosphotyrosine antibody revealed that HGF effectively stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation in thyroid cancer cells treated with either scramble or Met siRNA. In untreated cells, tyrosine phosphorylation staining was weak and diffuse, with a predominant perinuclear localization. By contrast, in HGF-treated cells, tyrosine phosphorylation staining was stronger and displayed a characteristic dotted pattern (data not shown). Because FAK has been implicated in signaling pathways responsible for cell adhesion and migration in response to extracellular matrix and growth factors, we performed parallel immunofluorescence experiments with anti-pFAK antibody. Interestingly, high Met-expressing cells showed a perinuclear localization of phosphorylated FAK (pFAK) under basal conditions, which became diffuse in HGF-treated cells (Fig. 10Go). By contrast, HGF stimulation in cells treated with siRNA led to a pFAK relocalization at the cell edge (Fig. 10Go). Experiments performed with anti-FAK antibody were unable to show any significant difference in FAK localization between high and low Met-expressing cells (data not shown). These data indicate that, despite the attenuation in Met signaling observed under Met protein down-regulation, HGF stimulation in low-Met cells results in a different pFAK localization, suggesting that FAK may be responsible for the enhanced HGF-induced migration.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10. pFAK relocalization after HGF stimulation in Met siRNA-treated TCP-1 cells. TPC-1 cells were seeded onto glass coverslips and treated either with scramble RNA oligonucleotides or with Met siRNA. Cells were then stimulated with 20 ng/ml HGF for 10 min, fixed, and treated for immunofluorescence with an anti-pFAK antibody. To visualize the cytoplasm, the cells were incubated with Alexa-conjugated phalloidin. Cell nuclei were evidenced by Hoechst 33258 staining. Epifluorescence microscopy was performed with an Olympus microscope. Original magnification, x40.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In normal thyrocytes, Met is not expressed or is expressed at a very low level. In contrast, high Met expression is a frequent molecular abnormality in papillary thyroid cancer, including microcarcinomas, indicating that Met overexpression is a frequent and early event in thyroid papillary tumor carcinogenesis (3, 8). In a previous study carried out in a series of 120 archival cases of papillary thyroid cancers, a high Met-expression immunostaining was inversely related to the risk of developing hematogenous metastases (8).

The present study, undertaken to clarify the biological role of the aberrant Met expression in papillary thyroid cancer, has yielded two major findings.

First, we observed that HGF, the Met ligand, is locally produced at a relatively high level in papillary thyroid cancer tissue and may cause ligand-induced activation of its receptor that is overexpressed by the malignant thyrocytes. We found that HGF is produced by stromal fibroblasts, whereas no HGF production could be detected in primary cultures from either normal thyroid or papillary thyroid cancers. Moreover, no autocrine HGF production was observed in a panel of established thyroid cancer cell lines. Cultured fibroblasts from either normal or neoplastic thyroid tissue expressed similar amounts of HGF. It is possible, therefore, that the increased tumor HGF production originates from fibroblasts stimulated by unidentified mediators produced by the malignant cells. The possibility also exists that stromal cells, other than fibroblasts, substantially contribute to the increased HGF content in thyroid cancer specimens. Macrophages may be such cells because they produce HGF and are a major component of the lymphoreticular infiltrate commonly present in papillary thyroid cancer (17). Therefore, we can conclude that Met overexpression in epithelial thyroid cancer cells and increased paracrine HGF production by tumor stromal cells result in abnormal Met activation in papillary thyroid cancer. Paracrine HGF secretion by stromal cells has been previously described in nonneoplastic tissues as well as in a variety of malignancies (18, 19). Trovato et al. (20) reported both paracrine and autocrine HGF production in papillary thyroid carcinomas. However, the use of immunohistochemistry as the sole method to detect HGF is a limitation of that study. Further studies are required to assess whether a subset of thyroid carcinomas indeed produces HGF.

A second novel observation in the present study is that HGF induces different biological effects in papillary cancer malignant thyrocytes depending on Met expression levels. High-Met cells were highly sensitive to HGF-induced growth and branching morphogenesis. In contrast, low-Met cells were less sensitive to HGF-induced growth and hardly underwent branching morphogenesis in response to HGF. Interestingly, both basal and HGF-stimulated cell migration was reduced in high-Met cells compared with low-Met cells. These results were confirmed in cell clones with a high or low Met expression derived from TPC-1 papillary thyroid cancer cell line.

Met down-regulation obtained by specific siRNAs confirmed that Met reduction inhibits branching morphogenesis but not cell migration in response to HGF. Conversely, Met-transfected cells allowed us to further confirm that Met overexpression causes an overall reduced migration in thyroid cancer cells. This model also allowed us to find that Met overexpression affects not only HGF-driven migration (chemotaxis) but also matrix-driven migration (haptotaxis). These data may suggest that the effect of Met overexpression on thyroid cancer cell invasiveness may depend on HGF concentrations and the extracellular matrix surrounding thyroid cancer cells.

These results are in agreement with previous studies demonstrating that the different biological responses elicited by the HGF-Met interaction (mitogenesis, branching morphogenesis, and cell motility) have different molecular bases. Mitogenesis appears to be mediated by the recruitment of the Grb2-SoS complex that, in turn, stimulates Ras, whereas cell motility is mediated by the phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase pathway. Branching morphogenesis requires a sustained recruitment of phospholipase C-{gamma} to Gab-1 (21). Interestingly, the expression of a Gab-1 mutant unable to bind phospholipase C-{gamma} does not affect cell motility; it only partially reduces cell growth stimulation but completely inhibits branching morphogenesis (21). Activation of the Stat-3 pathway is also required for morphogenesis (22); this pathway is associated with cell differentiation but not with cell motility and growth. Recently, we observed that c-abl may be a negative regulator of HGF-induced thyroid cancer cell motility (23), a mechanism that may be linked to a high Met expression because it is not present in normal thyroid cells.

Our present finding of a different localization of pFAK in low Met-expressing cells in response to HGF may suggest different hypotheses. First, Met down-regulation in thyroid cancer cells may cause a reduction in the focal contacts formation in response to HGF and, as a consequence, a reduced cell adhesion. These observations may explain the higher responsiveness of low Met-expressing cells to HGF in terms of migration and are consistent with the results obtained with adhesion curves (Fig. 8Go). Second, because pFAK is able to recruit several docking proteins (including paxillin and p130Cas) involved in multiple signal transduction pathways (24), it is reasonable to suppose that pFAK relocalization in low Met-expressing cells may be responsible for a signaling partitioning at cell migrating edge, with a consequent enhancement in cell migration mechanisms.

Our data in differentiated thyroid cancer cells are in concert with the recent observations that Met activation confers an invasive phenotype only in undifferentiated breast cancer cells, whereas it has a predominant morphogenetic effect in the same cells transfected with and expressing E-cadherins (21).

The present findings may also help explain our previous clinical data indicating that papillary thyroid cancers with Met overexpression have a reduced risk of developing hematogenous metastases (8) and underline the complexity of the effect of Met overexpression and the interplay between Met and the extracellular matrix.

Other different mechanisms may also play a role in determining a good prognosis in papillary tumors that overexpress Met. Recently, it has been shown that HGF stimulation of Met-positive thyroid cancer cells is one of the mechanisms involved in the recruitment of dendritic cells (25). We and others have found that dendritic cell infiltration is strongly associated with a low risk of developing distant metastases and with a more favorable prognosis in papillary cancer patients (16, 26).

Interestingly, a high Met expression may be also associated with a more favorable outcome in patients with either pancreatic (27) or breast cancer (28).

Taken together, these data indicate that abnormal Met activation in papillary thyroid cancer may play an important role in promoting growth and survival of neoplastic cells from the initial stages of thyroid tumorigenesis. At the same time the relative expression of Met and its ligand HGF may affect papillary thyroid cancer characteristics such as growth, structure, invasiveness, and distant metastases, which are all factors that will determine the tumor progression rate, its ability to spread to adjacent and distant sites, and eventually, the patient outcome.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported in part by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (to A.B. and R.V.) and from Ministero Italiano Università e Ricerca Scientifica (Cofin2003 to A.B.).

A.B. and R.V. contributed equally to this work.

Abbreviations: FAK, Focal adhesion kinases; FCS, fetal calf serum; GFP, green fluorescent protein; H2B, histone 2B; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; pFAK, phosphorylated FAK; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; siRNA, small interfering RNA.

Received December 31, 2003.

Accepted for publication June 2, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Mazzaferri EL 1993 Thyroid carcinoma: papillary and follicular. In: Mazzaferri L, Samaan NA, eds. Endocrine tumors. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 278–333
  2. Farid NR, Shi Y, Zou M 1994 Molecular basis of thyroid cancer. Endocr Rev 15:202–232[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Di Renzo MF, Olivero M, Ferro S, Prat M, Bongarzone I, Pilotti S, Belfiore A, Costantino A, Vigneri R, Pierotti MA, Comoglio PM 1992 Overexpression of the c-MET/HGF receptor gene in human thyroid carcinomas. Oncogene 7:2549–2553[Medline]
  4. Stoker M, Gherardi E, Perryman M, Gray J 1987 Scatter factor is a fibroblast derived modulator of epithelial cell motility. Nature 327:239–242[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Gherardi E, Gray J, Stoker M, Perryman M, Furlong R 1989 Purification of scatter factor, a fibroblast-derived basic protein that modulates epithelial interactions and movement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:5844–5848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Brinkmann V, Foroutan H, Sachs M, Weidner KM, Birchmeier W 1995 Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor induces a variety of tissue-specific morphogenetic programs in epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 131:1573–1586[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Grant DS, Kleinman HK, Goldberg ID, Bhargawa MM, Nickoloff BJ, Kinsella JL, Polverini P, Rosen EM 1993 Scatter factor induces blood vessel formation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1937–1941[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Belfiore A, Gangemi P, Costantino A, Russo G, Santonocito GM, Ippolito O, Di Renzo MF, Comoglio P, Fiumara A, Vigneri R 1997 Low/absent expression of Met/HGF receptor identifies papillary thyroid carcinomas with high risk of distant metastases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:2322–2328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Milazzo G, La Rosa GL, Catalfamo R, Vigneri R, Belfiore A 1992 Effect of TSH in human thyroid cells. Evidence for both mitogenic and antimitogenic effects. J Cell Biochem 49:231–238[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Di Renzo MF, Olivero M, Martone T, Maffe A, Maggiora P, De Stefani A, Valente G, Giordano S, Cortesina G, Comoglio PM 2000 Somatic mutations of the MET oncogene are selected during metastatic spread of human HNSC carcinomas. Oncogene 19:1547–1555[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Belfiore A, Mauerhoff T, Pujol-Borrell R, Badenhoop K, Buscema M, Mirakian R, Bottazzo GF 1991 De novo HLA class II and enhanced HLA class I molecule expression in SV40 transfected human thyroid epithelial cells. J Autoimmun 4:397–414[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Di Renzo MF, Poulsom R, Comoglio PM, Lemoine NR 1995 Expression of the Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor in human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 55:1129–1138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ferracini R, Longati P, Naldini L, Vigna E, Comoglio PM 1991 Identification of the major autophosphorylation site of Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem 266:19558–19564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Prat M, Crepaldi T, Gaudino L, Giordano S, Longati P, Comoglio PM 1991 C-terminal truncated forms of Met, the hepatocyte growth factor receptor. Mol Cell Biol 11:5954–5960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Labarca C, Paigen K 1980 A simple, rapid and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal Biochem 72:248–254[CrossRef]
  16. Montesano R, Schaller G, Orci L 1991 Induction of epithelial tubular morphogenesis in vitro by fibroblast-derived soluble factors. Cell 66:697–711[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Fiumara A, Belfiore A, Russo G, Salomone E, Santonocito GM, Ippolito O, Vigneri R, Gangemi P 1997 In situ evidence of neoplastic cell phagocytosis by macrophages in papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1615–1620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Montesano R, Matsumoto K, Nakamura T, Orci L 1991 Identification of a fibroblast-derived morphogen as hepatocyte growth factor. Cell 67:901–908[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Nakamura T, Matsumoto K, Kiritoshi A, Tano Y, Nakamura T 1997 Induction of hepatocyte growth factor in fibroblasts by tumor-derived factors affects invasive growth of tumor cells: in vitro analysis of tumor-stromal interactions. Cancer Res 57:3305–3313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Trovato M, Villari D, Bartolone L, Spinella S, Simone A, Violi MA, Trimarchi F, Batolo D, Benvenga S 1998 Expression of the hepatocyte growth factor and c-met in normal thyroid, non-neoplastic, and neoplastic nodules. Thyroid 8:125–131[Medline]
  21. Meiners S, Brinkmann V, Naundorf H, Birchmeier W 1998 Role of morphogenetic factors in metastasis of mammary carcinoma cells. Oncogene 16:9–20[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Boccaccio C, Andò M, Tamagnone L, Bardelli A, Michieli P, Battistini C, Comoglio PM 1998 Induction of epithelial tubules by growth factor HGF depends on the STAT pathway. Nature 391:285–288[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Frasca F, Vigneri P, Vella V, Vigneri R, Wang JY 2001 Tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 enhances thyroid cancer cell motile response to hepatocyte growth factor. Oncogene 20:3845–3856[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Schaller MD 2001 Biochemical signals and biological responses elicited by the focal adhesion kinase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1540:1–21[Medline]
  25. Scarpino S, Stoppacciaro A, Ballerini F, Marchesi M, Prat M, Stella MC, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Mantovani A, Ruco LP 2000 Papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) stimulates tumor cells to release chemokines active in recruiting dendritic cells. Am J Pathol 156:831–837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Schroeder S, Schwarz W, Rehpenning W, Loning T, Bocker W 1988 Dendritic/Langerhans cells and prognosis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinomas. Immunocytochemical study of 106 thyroid neoplasms correlated to follow-up data. Am J Clin Pathol 89:295–300[Medline]
  27. Furukawa T, Duguid WP, Kobari M, Matsuno S, Tsao MS 1995 Hepatocyte growth factor and Met receptor expression in human pancreatic carcinogenesis. Am J Pathol 147:889–895[Abstract]
  28. Nakopoulou L, Gakiopolou H, Keramopoulos A, Giannopoulou I, Athanassiadou P, Mavrommatis J, Davaris PS 2000 c-met Tyrosine kinase receptor expression is associated with abnormal ß-catenin expression and favourable prognostic factors in invasive breast carcinoma. Histopathology 36:313–325[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
O. L. Griffith, A. Melck, S. J.M. Jones, and S. M. Wiseman
Meta-Analysis and Meta-Review of Thyroid Cancer Gene Expression Profiling Studies Identifies Important Diagnostic Biomarkers
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 24(31): 5043 - 5051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mineo, R.
Right arrow Articles by Belfiore, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mineo, R.
Right arrow Articles by Belfiore, A.


HOME HELP