help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2004-0059
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verty, A. N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mallet, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verty, A. N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mallet, P. E.
Endocrinology Vol. 145, No. 7 3224-3231
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Evidence for an Interaction between CB1 Cannabinoid and Melanocortin MCR-4 Receptors in Regulating Food Intake

A. N. A. Verty, J. R. McFarlane, I. S. McGregor and P. E. Mallet

Schools of Psychology (A.N.A.V., P.E.M.) and Biological, Biomedical and Molecular Science (J.R.M.), University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351; and School of Psychology (I.S.M.), University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Paul Mallet, School of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia. E-mail: paul.mallet{at}une.edu.au.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Melanocortin receptor 4 (MCR4) and CB1 cannabinoid receptors independently modulate food intake. Although an interaction between the cannabinoid and melanocortin systems has been found in recovery from hemorrhagic shock, the interaction between these systems in modulating food intake has not yet been examined. The present study had two primary purposes: 1) to examine whether the cannabinoid and melanocortin systems act independently or synergistically in suppressing food intake; and 2) to determine the relative position of the CB1 receptors in the chain of control of food intake in relation to the melanocortin system. Rats were habituated to the test environment and injection procedure and then received intracerebroventicular injections of various combinations of the MCR4 receptor antagonist JKC-363, the CB1 receptor agonist {Delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the MCR4 receptor agonist {alpha}-MSH, or the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716. Food intake and locomotor activity were then recorded for 120 min. When administrated alone, SR 141716 and {alpha}-MSH dose-dependently attenuated baseline feeding, whereas sub-anorectic doses of SR 141716 and {alpha}-MSH synergistically attenuated baseline feeding when combined. {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-induced feeding was not blocked by {alpha}-MSH, whereas SR 141716 dose-dependently attenuated JKC-363-induced feeding. Locomotor activity was not significantly affected by any drug treatment, suggesting that the observed effects on feeding were not due to a nonspecific reduction in motivated behavior. These findings revealed a synergistic interaction between the cannabinoid and melanocortin systems in feeding behavior. These results further suggested that CB1 receptors are located downstream from melanocortin receptors and CB1 receptor signaling is necessary to prevent the melanocortin system from altering food intake.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN THE PAST FEW decades, a tremendous increase in our understanding of ingestive behavior has occurred. Animal studies have shown that the hypothalamic neurotransmitter and neuropeptide systems play a key role in maintaining food intake and energy balance. Among these, the melanocortin (MC) and cannabinoid systems are considered to be important mediators of feeding behavior (for review, see Refs. 1 and 2).

MCs, such as {alpha}-MSH, a 13-amino acid peptide derived from the larger proopiomelanocortin (POMC) polypeptide precursor molecule, are potent catabolic agents (3, 4). In the brain, POMC mRNA is localized in neurons within the arcuate nucleus (5). These neurons project to hypothalamic nuclei such as the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and dorsomedial and ventromedial nuclei (6), which are involved in mediating energy homeostasis. MC receptor-4 (MCR4) receptors are located in these regions and act as an important mediator of feeding behavior (for review, see Ref. 2). Indeed, the deletion of the MCR4 gene in mice leads to hyperphagia and profound obesity (7). In addition, hypothalamic MCR4 receptors are selectively down-regulated in diet-induced obese rats and up-regulated in food-restricted rats (8). Furthermore, intracerebroventicular (ICV) administration of {alpha}-MSH or its synthetic homolog MT-II suppresses food intake in rats (9, 10) via MCR4 receptor activation (10). Administration of HS014 or JKC-363, both pharmacological antagonists at MCR4 receptors, dose-dependently stimulates food intake (3, 11, 12). Taken together, these studies suggest an important role for the MCR4 receptors in mediating feeding behavior.

A growing body of evidence has also established that appetite is modulated by the cannabinoid system of the brain. The administration of the cannabis constituent {Delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) stimulates appetite (13, 14, 15), whereas the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 reduces food intake (16, 17, 18, 19). Furthermore, recent studies have indicated that appetite is increased by the endogenous cannabinoid ligands 2-arachidonoylglycerol and anandamide (for review, see Refs. 1 and 20). SR 141716 fails to reduce food intake in transgenic mice lacking CB1 cannabinoid receptors, and these mice eat 50% less than their wild-type littermates (21). This provides additional evidence that the cannabinoid system is a positive modulator of food intake.

Indirect evidence suggests a possible interaction between the cannabinoid and MC systems in feeding behavior. Both cannabinoid and MC receptors are localized within the hypothalamus (22, 23), and administration of THC, SR 141716, and MT-II leads to c-fos expression, a marker of neural activation, in similar regions of the hypothalamus (24, 25, 26). Furthermore, high concentrations of {alpha}-MSH are found in the PVN and dorsomedial and ventromedial nuclei (6). Perhaps the strongest support for an interaction between the cannabinoid and MC systems comes from the observation that THC regulates ß-endorphin, a POMC-related peptide, levels in the hypothalamus (27, 28) and that a subactive dose of SR 141716 enhances the hemorrhagic shock-reversing effects of MC (29).

To further investigate the interaction between the cannabinoid and MC systems in feeding behavior, a series of experiments were conducted with two primary purposes: 1) to determine whether a MC agonist and a CB1 receptor antagonist synergistically block food intake; and 2) to determine the relative position of the CB1 receptors in the chain of control of food intake in relation to the MC system.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Drugs
SR 141716 [N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methylpyrazole-3-carboxamide; Sanofi-Synthelabo (Montpellier, France)] was first mixed with a few drops of Tween 80 (polyoxtethylene sorbitan monooleate; ICN Biomedicals, Seven Hills, New South Wales, Australia). Physiological saline was then added, and the solution was stirred and then sonicated. The final vehicle solution contained 15 µl Tween 80/2 ml saline. SR 141716 was administered ICV unilaterally into the lateral ventricle (LV) at doses of 0.03, 0.3, or 3.0 µg in a volume of 1 µl.

THC (AGAL, Pymble, Australia), available as a 2.0-mg THC/ml ethanol solution, was first mixed with a few drops of Tween 80 (ICN Biomedicals). The suspension was stirred continuously under a steady stream of nitrogen gas until all ethanol was evaporated. Physiological saline was then added, and the solution was stirred until the Tween 80/THC suspension was well dispersed. The final vehicle solution contained 15 µl Tween 80/2 ml saline. THC was administered ICV unilaterally into the LV at a dose of 5 µg in a volume of 1 µl.

{alpha}-MSH and JKC-363 (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) were dissolved in physiological saline and administered ICV unilaterally into the LV at doses of 0.1, 1.0, and 10 µg ({alpha}-MSH) and 1 nmol (1.5068 µg; JKC-363).

For intracranial administration, the injection cannula consisted of a length of 30-gauge stainless steel tubing (O-HTX-30; Small Parts Inc., Miami Lakes, FL), which was 1.0 mm longer than the implanted guide cannulae. Tygon micro-bore tubing (O-TGY-010; Small Parts Inc.) was used to attach the injection cannula to a 10 µl Hamilton microsyringe (Hamilton Bonoduz AG, Bonaduz, Switzerland), which was connected to an infusion pump (model 53200V; Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL). Drug infusions occurred over a period of 30 sec. The injection cannula was left in place for an additional 30 sec to promote diffusion of the drug. Rats were held gently for the entire injection procedure.

Experimental animals
Male Wistar rats (n = 28), approximately 8–10 wk of age at the beginning of the experiment, were used. Ten experimentally naïve rats were used in each of the first two experiments. These rats were combined and used again in experiment 3. An additional eight experimentally naïve rats were used in experiment 4 and subsequently reused in experiment 5; however, one rat lost its cannula mount, leaving seven rats for this experiment.

Rats were housed four to six per group in opaque polypropylene cages (640 x 410 x 250 mm high) with stainless steel wire lids. Cages were lined with dust-free wood chips, and rats were housed in a climate-controlled room maintained on a 12-h reverse light/dark cycle (lights off at 0800 h). Experimental testing commenced at 0830 h (i.e. 30 min after the onset of the dark cycle). Rats had ad libitum access to standard laboratory chow (rat and mouse chow; Ridley AgriProducts, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) and tap water while in their home cages.

Animals were treated in accordance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (National Institutes of Health publication no. 85-23, revised 1985) and the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. This study was reviewed and approved by the University of New England Animal Ethics Committee.

Surgery
Rats had permanent custom-made stainless steel guide cannulae (0.64 mm in diameter) implanted stereotaxically above the LV and secured to the skull with stainless steel screws and dental acrylic (30). Unilateral stereotaxic coordinates for the LV were 1.0 mm posterior to bregma, 1.0 mm lateral to the midline, and 3.0 mm ventral to the surface of the skull according to the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (31).

Verification of cannula placements was done before the start of experimental testing by the administration of angiotensin II (100 ng/rat; Sigma-Aldrich). Angiotensin II reliably induces water drinking in nondeprived rats when administered into the ventricles (32). Only data from rats drinking more than 10 ml in a 30-min period were included in the analysis. Sixteen rats were implanted with guide cannulae for each of the first two experiments. Cannula placements were deemed acceptable for 10 rats from each of these experiments. In experiment 4, cannula placements in eight of 11 implanted rats were deemed acceptable.

Apparatus
The experiment was conducted in eight identical chambers located within sound-attenuating chambers fitted with a fan, which provided ventilation and noise masking (30). The test food (rat and mouse chow; Ridley AgriProducts) (analysis: acid detergent fiber, 10.2%; neutral detergent fiber, 29.4%; crude protein, 22.4%; crude fat, 3.8%; crude fiber, 6.7%; digestible energy, 16.6 MJ/kg dry matter; average carbohydrate, 27.9%) was presented in cylindrical glass dishes (105 mm diameter x 35 mm high) placed in one corner of the test chambers. Dishes were washed daily at the end of testing with a detergent solution (Pyroneg; DiverseyLever Australia Pty. Ltd., Sydney, New South Wales, Australia). Each rat received the same dish for the entire duration of the experiment. Plastic drinking bottles containing tap water were always available in the test chambers. A computer-controlled passive infrared detector mounted on the ceiling of each box was used to quantify locomotor activity using custom designed software (30). Locomotor activity was defined as time spent in motion in seconds and recorded in 1-min bins.

Experiment 1: effects of SR 141716
Rats received one session every 24 h at approximately the same time each day. On the first day, all animals received a single habituation session. During this session, rats were given injections of the vehicle for SR 141716 (1 µl) and placed in the apparatus for 120 min with 100 g of laboratory chow, and food intake was measured by weight every hour. Spilled food was recovered before weighing. During the next session, all rats received additional sessions in which they were given injections of vehicle or SR 141716 (0.03, 0.3, or 3.0 µg) and immediately placed in the test chamber for 2 h. The amount of food consumed was determined by weight every hour. Locomotor activity (time in motion) was recorded and grouped into two 60-min bins for statistical analysis.

In this and all subsequent experiments, drug treatments were tested using a repeated measures design whereby each rat in a given experiment received each drug treatment. Drug tests were conducted every 48 h, and all rats received all treatments in a counterbalanced order. On the day between drug sessions, animals were placed in the apparatus and the session was conducted as usual, except that the rats received sham injections. No data were collected during this time.

Experiment 2: effects of {alpha}-MSH
The procedure was similar to experiment 1, except that rats received injections of saline or {alpha}-MSH (0.1, 1.0, and 10 µg). The order of drug treatments was counterbalanced across animals.

Experiment 3: effects of combined administration of SR 141716 and {alpha}-MSH
The procedure was similar to experiment 1, except that rats received SR 141716 or its vehicle, followed 5 min later by {alpha}-MSH or its vehicle at doses that, on their own, did not affect food intake in experiments 1 and 2. The amount of food consumed was determined by weight every hour. The order of drug treatments was counterbalanced across animals.

Experiment 4: effects of {alpha}-MSH on feeding induced by THC
The procedure was similar to experiment 1, except that rats were first given 30 min of drug-free access to the test food (this portion of each session is hereafter called the "prefeed phase"). A prefeed phase was used to facilitate the observation of drug-induced food intake by ensuring low baseline food intake during the testing period. The remaining food was weighed, and in the habituation session, animals were given injections of saline, followed 25 min later by vehicle for THC. Rats were then immediately returned to the testing chamber for an additional 120 min. Next, all rats received additional sessions similar to the habituation session, except that after the prefeed phase, rats were given injections of saline or {alpha}-MSH (0.1, 1.0, or 10.0 µg), followed 25 min later by vehicle or THC (5 µg).

Experiment 5: effects of SR 141716 on feeding induced by JKC-363
The procedure was identical to experiment 4, with the exception that in the habituation session, the vehicle for SR 141716 was administered, followed 25 min later by saline. During the additional sessions, rats received vehicle or SR 141716 (0.03, 0.3, or 3.0 µg), followed by JKC-363 (1 nmol). The dose of JKC-363 was chosen based on a previous study demonstrating the hyperphagic effect of this compound (12). All animals received all treatments in a counterbalanced order.

Statistical analysis
The amount of food consumed (grams) and time spent in motion (seconds) were used as dependent variables and analyzed separately. Data for the prefeed phases in experiments 4 and 5 were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVAs. For the drug phase data in experiments 1–5, food intake and locomotor activity data were collapsed into two 60-min bins, and bin was treated as a factor. Separate two-factor repeated measures (dose by bin) ANOVAs were conducted on each dependent variable. Where significant main effects were found, pairwise comparisons were conducted using Bonferroni tests. Mauchly’s W test was computed to check for violations of the sphericity assumption. When Mauchly’s W test was significant, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction was applied.

All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 11.0 for Macintosh (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) using a probability level of 0.05.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Experiment 1: effects of SR 141716
Pretreatment with SR 141716 attenuated food intake relative to vehicle in a dose-dependent manner, as shown by a significant main effect of dose (Fig. 1Go, top) (F(3,27) = 22.07; P < 0.001). Pairwise comparison revealed that the 0.3- and 3.0-µg doses were significantly different from vehicle. The 0.3-µg dose was significantly different from the 0.03-µg dose. Furthermore, the 3.0-µg dose was significantly different from the 0.03- and 0.3-µg doses. A significant main effect of bin was observed, indicating that more food was consumed in the first hour relative to the second hour of testing (F(1,9) = 158.65; P < 0.001). The dose by bin interaction was not significant. Analysis of the locomotor activity results for the drug test revealed that SR 141716 did not affect locomotor activity (Fig. 1Go, bottom). The dose by bin interaction was not significant, but the main effect of bin was (F(1,9) = 6.41; P < 0.05), showing that locomotor activity was generally higher in the first hour relative to the second hour (Fig. 1Go, bottom).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Laboratory chow consumed (top) and locomotor activity (bottom) in nondeprived rats after ICV administration of vehicle or 0.03, 0.3, or 3.0 µg SR 141716. Data represent means (+SEM) at two consecutive 60-min measurement intervals. V, Vehicle; SR, dose of SR 141716 in micrograms; *, P < 0.05, significantly different from V; #, P < 0.05, significantly different from 0.03 SR; %, P < 0.05, significantly different from 0.3 SR.

 
Experiment 2: effects of {alpha}-MSH
Pretreatment with {alpha}-MSH attenuated food intake relative to vehicle in a dose-dependent manner, as shown by a significant main effect of dose (Fig. 2Go, top) (F(3,27) = 71.02; P < 0.001). Pairwise comparison revealed that the 1.0- and 10.0-µg doses were significantly different from saline and the 0.1-µg dose. Furthermore, the 10.0-µg dose was significantly different from the 1.0-µg dose. A significant main effect of bin was observed, indicating that more food was consumed in the first hour relative to the second hour of testing (F(1,9) = 138.41; P < 0.001). The dose by bin interaction was also significant (F(3,27) = 14.15; P < 0.001). The main effects of dose and bin and the dose by bin interactions were not significant for locomotor activity (Fig. 2Go, bottom).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Laboratory chow consumed (top) and locomotor activity (bottom) in nondeprived rats after ICV administration of saline or 0.1, 1.0, or 10.0 µg {alpha}-MSH. Data represent means (+SEM) at two consecutive 60-min measurement intervals. V, Vehicle; MSH, dose of {alpha}-MSH in micrograms; *, P < 0.05, significantly different from saline; #, P < 0.05, significantly different from 0.1 MSH; %, P < 0.05, significantly different from 1.0 MSH.

 
Experiment 3: effects of combined administration of SR 141716 and {alpha}-MSH
Combined administration of sub-anorectic doses of SR 141716 (0.03 µg) and {alpha}-MSH (0.1 µg) significantly attenuated food intake relative to vehicle, as shown by a significant main effect of dose (Fig. 3Go, top) (F(3,57) = 79.01; P < 0.001). Pairwise comparison revealed that 0.03 µg SR 141716 and 0.1 µg {alpha}-MSH alone did not significantly affect food consumption compared with vehicle. Furthermore, combined administration 0.03 µg SR 141716 and 0.1 µg {alpha}-MSH was significantly different from vehicle, 0.03 µg SR 141716, and 0.1 µg {alpha}-MSH. A significant main effect of bin was observed, indicating that more food was consumed in the first hour relative to the second hour of testing (F(1,19) = 50.47; P < 0.001). The dose by bin interaction was also significant (F(3,27) = 5.58; P < 0.01). Analysis of the locomotor activity results for the drug test revealed that SR 141716 and {alpha}-MSH alone or in combination did not affect locomotor activity compared with vehicle (Fig. 3Go, bottom). The dose by bin interaction was not significant, but the main effect of bin was (F(3,57) = 5.58; P < 0.001), showing that locomotor activity was generally higher in the first hour relative to the second hour (Fig. 3Go, bottom).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Laboratory chow consumed (top) and locomotor activity (bottom) in nondeprived rats after ICV administration of vehicle+saline, 0.03 SR+Sal, vehicle+0.1 MSH, or 0.03 SR+0.1 MSH. Data represent means (+SEM) at two consecutive 60-min measurement intervals. V, Vehicle; Sal, saline; SR, dose of SR 141716 in micrograms; MSH, dose of {alpha}-MSH in micrograms; *, P < 0.05, significantly different from V+Sal; #, P < 0.05, significantly different from 0.03 SR+Sal; %, P < 0.05, significantly different from V+0.1 MSH.

 
Experiment 4: effects of {alpha}-MSH on feeding induced by THC
The mean quantity of food consumed (mean, 2.49 g; range, 2.39–2.58 g) and locomotor activity (mean, 480.90 sec; range, 468.41–496.45 sec) before drug administration during the 30-min prefeed phase in experiment 4 was relatively low and did not differ significantly between treatments. A repeated measures ANOVA comparing all treatments revealed a significant main effect of dose (F(4,28) = 16.09; P < 0.001) and a significant main effect of bin (F(1, 7) = 46.08; P < 0.001) for food consumption (Fig 4Go, top). Pairwise comparison revealed that food intake with saline+THC, 0.1 M {alpha}-MSH+THC, 1.0 M SH+THC, and 10.0 M SH+THC was significantly higher than with saline+vehicle treatment, suggesting that THC-induced feeding was not blocked by the administration of {alpha}-MSH. A significant main effect of bin was observed for locomotor activity (F(1,7) = 316.85; P < 0.001), again reflecting higher locomotor activity in the first hour relative to the second hour of testing. The dose by bin interaction was not significant for either of the dependent variables (Fig 4Go).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. Laboratory chow consumed (top) and locomotor activity (bottom) in nondeprived rats after ICV administration of vehicle or THC (5 µg) alone or in combination with saline or 0.1, 1.0, or 10.0 µg {alpha}-MSH. Data represent means (+SEM) at two consecutive 60-min measurement intervals. Sal, Saline; V, vehicle; THC, dose of THC in micrograms; MSH, dose of {alpha}-MSH in micrograms; *, P < 0.05, significantly different from Sal+V.

 
Experiment 5: effects of SR 141716 on feeding induced by JKC-363
The mean quantity of food consumed (mean, 2.34 g; range, 2.08–2.44 g) and locomotor activity (mean, 462.996 sec; range, 453.01–476.19 sec) before drug administration during the 30-min prefeed phase in experiment 5 was relatively low and did not differ significantly between treatments. A repeated measures ANOVA comparing all treatments was conducted for the food consumption and locomotor activity results. SR 141716 produced a significant dose-dependent reduction of JKC-363-stimulated food consumption (Fig. 5Go, top) (F(4,24) = 36.96; P < 0.001) but had no effect on locomotor activity (Fig. 5Go, bottom). Pairwise comparison of the effects of different doses of SR 141716 on JKC-363-induced food consumption revealed that the 0.3 µg SR+JKC-363 and 3.0 µg SR+JKC-363 doses differed significantly from the vehicle+JKC-363 treatment. Furthermore, the 0.03 µg SR+JKC-363 treatment differed significantly from the 3.0 µg SR+JKC-363 treatment. There was a significant main effect of bin (F(1,6) = 37.35; P < 0.001) showing that less food was consumed during the second hour compared with the first hour. There was also a significant main effect of bin for locomotor activity (F(1,6) = 37.35; P < 0.001), suggesting that locomotion was greater during the first hour relative to the second hour of testing. The dose by bin interaction was not significant for food consumption or locomotor activity.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5. Laboratory chow consumed (top) and locomotor activity (bottom) in nondeprived rats after ICV administration of saline or JKC-363 (1 nmol) alone or in combination with vehicle or 0.03, 0.3, or 3.0 µg SR 141716. Data represent means (+SEM) at two consecutive 60-min measurement intervals. V, Vehicle; SR, dose of SR 141716 in micrograms; Sal, saline; JKC, dose of JKC-363 in micrograms; *, P < 0.05, significantly different from Sal+V; #, P < 0.05, significantly different from JKC+V; %, P < 0.05, significantly different from 0.03 SR+JKC.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The major findings of the present study can be summarized as: 1) when administered alone, SR 141716 and {alpha}-MSH dose-dependently attenuated baseline feeding; 2) administration of sub-anorectic doses of SR 141716 and {alpha}-MSH synergistically attenuated baseline food intake; 3) THC-induced feeding was not blocked by {alpha}-MSH; 4) SR 141716 dose-dependently attenuated JKC-363-induced feeding behavior; and 5) locomotor activity was not significantly affected by any drug treatments, suggesting that effects on feeding were not due to a nonspecific reduction in motivated behavior.

The results from experiment 1 demonstrate that SR 141716 attenuates feeding, complementing previous findings with this drug (17, 18, 19, 33, 34) and offering additional support for the role of the endogenous cannabinoid system in the control of feeding (for review, see Ref. 1). The finding that {alpha}-MSH suppresses food intake (experiment 2) is also in good agreement with previous reports (3, 4) and further supports the notion that MC receptors play an important role in the regulation of feeding.

Experiment 3 examined whether {alpha}-MSH and SR 141716 act independently or synergistically to block food intake. Results revealed that the combined administration of doses of SR 141716 and {alpha}-MSH that did not alter food intake on their own produced a synergistic reduction of food intake. This finding complements a previous study demonstrating that CB1 receptor blockade by SR 141716 enhances the ability of MCs to promote recovery from hemorrhagic shock (29). It is notable that only a single dose of {alpha}-MSH and SR 141716 were combined in experiment 3; additional doses should be studied to fully characterize the interactive effects of these drugs. Although the specific mechanisms underlying the synergistic action of {alpha}-MSH and SR 141716 are poorly understood, it is possible that SR 141716 and MCs may interact at the signal transduction mechanism level by increasing cAMP synthesis via an effect on Gi proteins. Both cannabinoids and MCs belong to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily (for review, see Refs. 35 and 36), and blockade of CB1 receptors with SR 141716 and stimulation of MC receptors increases cAMP production (37, 38). It is worth noting that the effect of SR 141716 on cAMP may be due to the inverse agonist action of SR 141716 combined with a reduction of the endogenous cannabinoid tone. cAMP has been proposed to be a biochemical signal mediating satiety (39). Thus, when given alone, sub-anorectic doses of SR 141716 or {alpha}-MSH may not be sufficient to stimulate cAMP production. However, when given together, they may stimulate the production of sufficient cAMP to reduce feeding, although the effects of combined administration of sub-anorectic doses of SR 141716 and {alpha}-MSH on cAMP production needs to be elucidated. The proposed mechanism underlying the synergistic effect of SR 141716 and {alpha}-MSH may, therefore, represent a biochemical, rather than a physiological, correlate.

The synergistic interaction between the cannabinoid and MC systems observed in this study may involve the opioid system. Thus, MCs are considered to be endogenous antagonists for the opioid system (40), morphine-induced depression of evoked potentials (41) and the addictive properties of opiates (42) are blocked by MCs, and MC effects on experimental hemorrhagic shock can be reversed by morphine treatment (43). Furthermore, opioids stimulate endogenous cannabinoid release (44), and SR 141716 reduces morphine-induced feeding behavior (30). It is, therefore, possible that the synergistic effect between the cannabinoid and MC systems may be modulated by opioid signaling.

Experiments 4 and 5 were designed to determine the relative position of CB1 receptors in the chain of control of food intake in relation to the MC system. Results revealed that THC and JKC-363 significantly increased food intake, consistent with previous studies (12, 45). Interestingly, in experiment 4, {alpha}-MSH failed to block THC-induced feeding at doses that significantly reduced feeding on their own (experiment 2), whereas in experiment 5, SR 141716 reduced feeding induced by JKC-363. The results of experiments 4 and 5 suggest that CB1 receptors may be located downstream from MCR4 receptors and that THC-induced feeding is not critically dependent on the MC system.

Although the results of the present study do not elucidate the specific brain regions and mechanisms involved, other studies serve to suggest several possibilities. One such hypothesis is that the cannabinoid and MC interaction observed in the present study may be mediated via the PVN (9, 10). The PVN regulates food intake by influencing the metabolic, hormonal, and endocrine responses relating to the nutritional state of the organism (2). This structure is the target of converging orexigenic and anorexigenic pathways originating from various hypothalamic sites (46) and is, therefore, considered to be the chief site mediating hypothalamic regulation of energy homeostasis. The PVN is richly innervated by, and is particularly sensitive to, neurons that release neurochemicals known to alter food intake, such as neuropeptide Y (NPY), galanine, serotonin, cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript, as well as MC peptides and cannabinoids (2).

MC and cannabinoid receptors are densely located within the PVN (23, 47). Maximal suppression of food intake by {alpha}-MSH was observed with intra-PVN injections (48), and the synthetic MCR4 ligand MT-II produces widespread Fos expression in the PVN. In addition, we have shown that systemic administration of THC and SR 141716 produces Fos expression in many regions of the hypothalamus, with the PVN showing the highest levels (24, 25). We have recently demonstrated that administration of THC into the PVN produces a profound stimulation of feeding (our unpublished data). It is, therefore, possible that the MC and cannabinoid systems may interact within the PVN to regulate food intake. It should be noted that most synaptic transmission and intracellular signaling within the hypothalamus is mediated via axonal release of the neurotransmitter glutamate (for review, see Ref. 49). Evidence suggests that cannabinoid (50) and POMC (51) neurons use glutamate, suggesting that the interaction observed in the present study could be due to the activation or suppression of the excitatory synaptic drive to PVN anorexigenic signals. Indeed, a recent study has demonstrated cannabinoid-induced suppression of excitatory glutamatergic inputs to PVN neurons (52).

The results of the present study and other published reports provide evidence that CB1 receptor activation is necessary to prevent MC-induced inhibition of feeding and CB1 receptors are located downstream from MC receptors. For example, the NPY-Y1 receptor antagonist 1229U91 significantly reduces food intake stimulated by the MR4R receptor antagonist HS014 (53). MC4R receptor knockout mice still respond to the orexegenic effects of NPY (54), whereas NPY fails to stimulate feeding in CB1 receptor-deleted mice (55). Fos expression induced by leptin, an adipocyte-derived hormone, is blocked by the MC3R/MC4R receptor antagonist SHU9119 (56). HS014 reduces feeding inhibition and body weight loss induced by leptin in rats (57), and leptin-deficient C57BL/6JLepob mice respond to the anorectic effect of the MC agonist melanotan-II (3). These data clearly suggest that leptin exerts control over the melanocortinergic neurons, whereas the cannabinoid and NPY systems are modulated by the MC system. Thus, MC receptor signaling seems to be located downstream from leptin receptors and upstream from endogenous cannabinoid-, NPY-, and opioid-producing neurons. Taken together, it is hypothesized that melanocortinergic neurons would control endogenous cannabinoid activity. This conclusion is supported by the results of experiments 4 and 5, in which it was demonstrated that THC-induced feeding was not reduced by {alpha}-MSH, whereas SR 141716 reduced JKC-363-induced feeding. These results suggest a signaling cascade involving leptin->{alpha}-MSH-> NPY->CB1.

The present study also found a synergistic interaction between the cannabinoid and MC systems, suggesting that MCs may directly modulate endogenous cannabinoid activity bypassing NPY. It would be interesting to determine whether MCs affect food intake in CB1 receptor-deleted mice. Based on the results of the present study and previous published reports, we hypothesize that CB1 receptor-deleted mice should not respond to the anorexigenic effect of {alpha}-MSH or the orexigenic effect of JKC-363. Such a study is eagerly awaited.

The finding that the doses of SR 141716 used in the present study are effective in decreasing food intake when administered alone (16) admittedly complicated the interpretation of an interaction between the cannabinoid and MC systems. That is, attenuation of JKC-363-induced feeding by SR 141716 may be unrelated to an interaction with the MC system but may, in fact, result from suppression of all feeding by a downstream mechanism. It is, therefore, important to note the results of a previous study from our group (30). In this study, SR 141716 attenuated feeding produced by intra-PVN but not intra-accumbens application of morphine. These results clearly show that the anorectic effects of a systemically administered high dose of SR 141716 (i.e. 3.0 mg/kg) can be completely overridden by pharmacological treatment.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates for the first time a synergistic interaction between the MC and cannabinoid systems in regulating food intake. Results further suggest that the cannabinoid receptors are located downstream from the MC system and that CB1 receptor activation may be necessary for MC antagonist-induced stimulation of food intake.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Sanofi-Synthelabo for its generous supply of SR 141716 and Dr. Edward Clayton for analysis of the test food.


   Footnotes
 
This work was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council to I.S.M. and P.E.M.

Abbreviations: ICV, Intracerebroventicular; LV, lateral ventricle; MC, melanocortin; MCR4, MC receptor-4; NPY, neuropeptide Y; POMC, proopiomelanocortin; PVN, paraventricular nucleus.

Received January 19, 2004.

Accepted for publication March 9, 2004.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Berry E, Mechoulam R 2002 Tetrahydrocannabinol and endocannabinoids in feeding and appetite. Pharmacol Ther 95:185–190[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Williams G, Bing C, Cai XJ, Harrold JA, King PJ, Liu XH 2001 The hypothalamus and the control of energy homeostasis: different circuits and different purposes. Physiol Behav 74:683–701[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Fan W, Boston BA, Kesterson RA, Hruby VJ, Cone RD 1997 Role of melanocortinergic neurons in feeding and the agouti obesity syndrome. Science 385:165–168[CrossRef]
  4. Grill HJ, Ginsberg AB, Seeley RJ, Kaplan JM 1998 Brainstem application of melanocortin receptor ligands produces long-lasting effects of feeding and body weight. J Neurosci 18:10128–10135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Watson SJ, Akil H 1979 The presence of two {alpha}-MSH positive cell groups in rat hypothalamus. Eur J Pharmacol 58:101–103[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Mountjoy KG, Wong J 1997 Obesity, diabetes and functions for proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides. Mol Cell Endocrinol 128:171–177[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Huszar D, Lych CA, Fairchild-Huntress V, Dunmore JH, Fang Q, Berkemeier LR, Gu W, Kesterson RA, Boston BA, Cone RD, Smith FJ, Campfield LA, Burn P, Lee F 1997 Targeted disruption of the melanocortin-4 receptor results in obesity in mice. Cell 88:131–141[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Harrold JA, Widdowson PS, Williams G 1999 Altered energy balance causes selective changes in melanocortin-4(MC4-R), but not melanocortin-3 (MC3-R), receptors in specific hypothalamic regions: further evidence that activation of MC4-R is a physiological inhibitor of feeding. Diabetes 48:267–271[Abstract]
  9. Poggioli R, Vergoni AV, Bertolini A 1986 ACTH-(1–24) and {alpha}-MSH antagonize feeding behavior stimulated by kappa opiate agonists. Peptides 7:843–848[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Thiele TE, van Dijk G, Yagaloff KA, Fisher SL, Schwartz M, Burn P, Seeley RJ 1998 Central infusion of melanocortin agonist MTII in rats: assessment of c-Fos expression and taste aversion. Am J Physiol 274:R248–R254
  11. Hansen MJ, Morris MJ 2002 Evidence for an interaction between neuropeptide Y and the melanocortin-4 receptor on feeding in the rat. Neuropharmacology 42:792–797[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Kim M-S, Rossi M, Abbott CR, AlAhmed SH, Smith DM, Bloom SR 2002 Sustained orexigenic effect of Agouti related protein may be not mediated by the melanocortin 4 receptor. Peptides 23:1069–1076[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Koch JE 2001 Delta 9-THC stimulates food intake in Lewis rats: effects on chow, high-fat, and sweet high-fat diets. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 68:539–543[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Williams CM, Rogers PJ, Kirkham TC 1998 Hyperphagia in pre-fed rats following oral D9-THC. Physiol Behav 65:343–346[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Williams CM, Kirkham TC 2002 Reversal of {Delta}9-THC hyperphagia by SR141716 and naloxone but not dexfenfluramine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 71:341–348[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Verty ANA, McGregor IS, Mallet PE 2004 Consumption of high carbohydrate, high fat, and normal chow is equally suppressed by a cannabinoid receptor antagonist in non-deprived rats. Neurosci Lett 354:217–220[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Arnone M, Maruani J, Chaperon F, Thiebot MH, Poncelet M, Soubrie P, Le Fur G 1997 Selective inhibition of sucrose and ethanol intake by SR 141716, an antagonist of central cannabinoid (CB1) receptors. Psychopharmacology 132:104–106[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Colombo G, Agabio R, Diaz G, Lobina C, Reali R, Gessa GL 1998 Appetite suppression and weight loss after the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716. Life Sci 63:PL113–PL117.
  19. Simiand J, Keane M, Keane PE, Soubrié P 1998 SR 141716, a CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, selectively reduces sweet food intake in marmoset. Behav Pharmacol 9:179–181[Medline]
  20. Kirkham TC, Williams CM 2001 Endogenous cannabinoids and appetite. Nutr Res Rev 14:65–86
  21. Di Marzo V, Goparaju SK, Wang L, Liu J, Batkai S, Jarai Z, Fezza F, Miura GI, Palmiter RD, Sugiura T, Kunos G 2001 Leptin-regulated endocannabinoids are involved in maintaining food intake. Nature 410:822–825[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Adan RAH, Gispen WH 2000 Melanocortins and the brain: from effects via receptors to drug targets. Eur J Pharmacol 405:13–24[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Herkenham M, Lynn AB, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, de Costa BR, Rice KC 1991 Characterization and localization of cannabiniod receptors in rat brain: A quantitative in vitro autoradiographic study. J Neurosci 11:563–583[Abstract]
  24. Allen KV, McGregor IS, Hunt GE, Singh ME, Mallet PE 2003 Regional differences in naloxone modulation of {Delta}9-THC induced Fos expression in rat brain. Neuropharmacology 44:264–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Verty ANA, Singh ME, McGregor IS, Mallet PE Interactive effects on food intake by cannabinoid and opioid receptors in the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus. Proc 20th International Australasian Winter Conference on Brain Research, Queenstown, New Zealand, 2002, p 41
  26. Trivedi P, Jiang M, Tamvakopoulos CC, Shen X, Yu H, Mock S, Fenyk-Melody J, Van der Ploeg LH, Guan XM 2003 Exploring the site of anorectic action of peripherally administered synthetic melanocortin peptide MT-II in rats. Brain Res 977:221–230[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Corchero J, Fuentes JA, Manzanares J 1997 {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol increases proopiomelanocortin gene expression in the arcuate nucleus of the rat hypothalamus. Eur J Pharmacol 323:193–195[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Corchero J, Fuentes JA, Manzanares J 1999 Chronic treatment with CP 55, 940 regulates corticotropin releasing factor and proopiomelanocortin gene expression in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland of the rat. Life Sci 64:905–911[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Cainazzo MM, Ferrazza G, Mioni C, Bazzani C, Bertolini A, Guarini S 2002 Cannabinoid CB1 receptor blockade enhances the protective effect of melanocortins in hemorrhagic shock in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 441:91–97[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Verty ANA, Singh ME, McGregor IS, Mallet PE 2003 The cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 attenuates overfeeding induced by systemic or intracranial morphine. Psychopharmacology 168:314–323[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Paxinos G, Watson C 1998 The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. New York: Academic Press
  32. Ritter RC, Slusser PG, Stone S 1981 Glucoreceptors controlling feeding and blood glucose: location in the hindbrain. Science 213:451–452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Freedland CS, Poston JS, Porrino LJ 2000 Effects of SR141716A, a central cannabinoid receptor antagonist on food-maintained responding. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 67:265–270[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Rowland NE, Mukherjee M, Robertson K 2001 Effects of cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716, alone and in combination with dexfenfluramine or naloxone, on food intake in rats. Psychopharmacology 159:111–116[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Abdel-Malek ZA 2001 Melanocortin receptors: their functions and regulation by physiological agonists and antagonists. Cell Mol Life Sci 58:434–441[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Ameri A 1999 The effects of cannabinoids on the brain. Prog Neurobiol 58:315–348[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Daniels D, Patten CS, Roth JD, Yee DK, Fluharty SJ 2003 Melanocortin receptor signaling through mitogen-activated protein kinase in vitro and in rat hypothalamus. Brain Res 986:1–11[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Mato S, Pazos A, Valdizan EM 2002 Cannabinoid receptor antagonism and inverse agonism in response to SR141716A on cAMP production in human and rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol 443:43–46[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Sheriff S, Chance WT, Iqbal S, Rizvi TA, Xiao C, Kasckow JW, Balasubramaniam A 2003 Hypothalamic administration of cAMP agonist/PKA activator inhibits both schedule feeding and NPY-induced feeding in rats. Peptides 24:245–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. de Wied D, Jolles J 1982 Neuropeptides derived from pro-opiocortin: behavioral, physiological, and neurochemical effects. Physiol Behav 62:976–1059
  41. Zimmermann E, Krivoy W 1973 Antagonism between morphine and the polypeptides ACTH, ACTH1–24 and ß-MSH in the nervous system. Prog Brain Res 39:383–394[Medline]
  42. van Ree JM, Bohus B, Csontos KM, Gispen WH, Greven HM, Nijkamp FP, Opmeer FA, de Rotte GA, van Wimersma Greidanus TB, Witter A, de Wied D 1981 Behavioral profile of {gamma}-MSH: relationship with ACTH and beta-endorphin action. Life Sci 28:2875–2878.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Bertolini A, Guarini S, Ferrari W, Rompianesi E 1986 Adrenocorticotropin reversal of experimental hemorrhagic shock is antagonized by morphine. Life Sci 39:1271–1280[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Manzanares J, Corchero J, Romero J, Fernández-Ruiz JJ, Ramos JA, Fuentes JA 1999 Pharmacological and biochemical interactions between opioids and cannabinoids. Trends Pharmacol Sci 20:287–294[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Koch JE, Matthews SM 2001 {Delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol stimulates palatable food intake in Lewis rats: effects of peripheral and central administration. Nutr Neurosci 4:179–187[Medline]
  46. Elmquist JK, Elias C, Saper C 1998 From lesions to leptin: hypothalamic control of food intake and body weight. Neuron 22:221–232
  47. Broberger C, Johansen J, Johansson C, Schalling M, Hokfelt T 1998 The neuropeptide Y/agouti gene-related protein (AGRP) brain circuitry in normal, anorectic, and monosodium glutamate-treated mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15043–15048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Kim MS, Rossi M, Abusnana S, Sunter D, Morgan DG, Small CJ, Edwards CM, Heath MM, Stanley SA, Seal LJ, Bhatti JR, Smith DM, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR 2000 Hypothalamic localization of the feeding effect of agouti-related peptide and {alpha}-melanocyte-stimulating hormone. Diabetes 49:177–182[Abstract]
  49. van den Pol AN 2003 Weighing the role of hypothalamic feeding neurotransmitters. Neuron 40:1059–1061[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Kiss J, Csaki A, Bokor H, Shanabrough M, Leranth C 2000 The supramammillo-hippocampal and supramammillo-septal glutamatergic/aspartatergic projections in the rat: a combined [3H]D-aspartate autoradiographic and immunohistochemical study. Neuroscience 97:657–669[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Collin M, Backberg M, Ovesjo ML, Fisone G, Edwards RH, Fujiyama F, Meister B 2003 Plasma membrane and vesicular glutamate transporter mRNAs/proteins in hypothalamic neurons that regulate body weight. Eur J Neurosci 18:1265–1278[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Di S, Malcher-Lopes R, Halmos KC, Tasker JG 2003 Nongenomic glucocorticoid inhibition via endocannabinoid release in the hypothalamus: a fast feedback mechanism. J Neurosci 23:4850–4857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Kask A, Rago L, Korrovits P, Wikberg JE, Schioth HB 1998 Evidence that orexigenic effects of melanocortin 4 receptor antagonist HS014 are mediated by neuropeptide Y. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 248:245–249[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Marsh DJ, Hollopeter G, Huszar D, Laufer R, Yagaloff KA, Fisher SL, Burn P, Palmiter RD 1999 Response of melanocortin-4 receptor-deficient mice to anorectic and orexigenic peptides. Nat Genet 21:119–122[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Poncelet M, Maruani J, Calassi R, Soubrie P 2003 Overeating, alcohol and sucrose consumption decrease in CB1 receptor deleted mice. Neurosci Lett 343:216–218[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Seeley RJ, Yagaloff KA, Fisher SL, Burn P, Thiele TE, van Dijk G, Baskin DG, Schwartz MW 1997 Melanocortin receptors in leptin effects. Nature 390:349[Medline]
  57. Kask A, Rago L, Wikberg JE, Schioth HB 1998 Evidence for involvement of the melanocortin MC4 receptor in the effects of leptin on food intake and body weight. Eur J Pharmacol 360:15–19[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 DiabetesHome page
C. Doyon, R. G. Denis, E.-D. Baraboi, P. Samson, J. Lalonde, Y. Deshaies, and D. Richard
Effects of Rimonabant (SR141716) on Fasting-Induced Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis and Neuronal Activation in Lean and Obese Zucker Rats
Diabetes, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 3403 - 3410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
P. Pacher, S. Batkai, and G. Kunos
The Endocannabinoid System as an Emerging Target of Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 389 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
K. M. Gadde and D. B. Allison
Cannabinoid-1 Receptor Antagonist, Rimonabant, for Management of Obesity and Related Risks
Circulation, August 29, 2006; 114(9): 974 - 984.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
U. Pagotto, G. Marsicano, D. Cota, B. Lutz, and R. Pasquali
The Emerging Role of the Endocannabinoid System in Endocrine Regulation and Energy Balance
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2006; 27(1): 73 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Physiol. Rev.Home page
S. Stanley, K. Wynne, B. McGowan, and S. Bloom
Hormonal Regulation of Food Intake
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2005; 85(4): 1131 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Alcohol AlcoholHome page
I. S. McGREGOR, K. D. B. DAM, P. E. MALLET, and J. E. GALLATE
{Delta}9-THC REINSTATES BEER- AND SUCROSE-SEEKING BEHAVIOUR IN ABSTINENT RATS: COMPARISON WITH MIDAZOLAM, FOOD DEPRIVATION AND PREDATOR ODOUR
Alcohol Alcohol., January 1, 2005; 40(1): 35 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verty, A. N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mallet, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verty, A. N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mallet, P. E.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals