help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2002-0168
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haisenleder, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haisenleder, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. C.
Endocrinology Vol. 144, No. 7 2768-2774
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Stimulation of Gonadotropin Subunit Transcription: Evidence for the Involvement of Calcium/Calmodulin-Dependent Kinase II (Ca/CAMK II) Activation in Rat Pituitaries

D. J. Haisenleder, L. L. Burger, K. W. Aylor, A. C. Dalkin and J. C. Marshall

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, and the Center for Research in Reproduction, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Daniel J. Haisenleder, Aurbach Medical Research Building, P.O. Box 801412, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. E-mail: djh2q{at}virginia.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The intracellular pathways mediating GnRH regulation of gonadotropin subunit transcription remain to be fully characterized, and the present study examined whether calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (Ca/CAMK II) plays a role in the rat pituitary. Preliminary studies demonstrated that a single pulse of GnRH given to adult rats stimulated a transient 2.5-fold rise in Ca/CAMK II activity (as determined by an increase in Ca/CAMK II phosphorylation), with peak values at 5 min, returning to basal 45 min after the pulse. Further studies examined the {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß transcriptional responses to GnRH or Bay K 8644+KCl (BK+KCl) pulses in vitro in the absence or presence of the Ca/CAMK II-specific inhibitor, KN-93. Gonadotropin subunit transcription was assessed by measuring primary transcripts (PTs) by quantitative RT-PCR. In time-course studies, both GnRH and BK+KCl pulses given alone increased all three subunit PTs after 6 h (2- to 4-fold). PT responses to GnRH increased over time (3- to 8-fold over basal at 24 h), although BK+KCl was ineffective after 24 h. KN-93 reduced the LHß and FSHß transcriptional responses to GnRH by 50–60% and completely suppressed the {alpha}PT response. In contrast, KN-93 showed no inhibitory effects on basal transcriptional activity or LH or FSH secretion. In fact, KN-93 tended to increase basal {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß PT levels and enhance LH secretory responses to GnRH. These results reveal that Ca/CAMK II plays a central role in the transmission of pulsatile GnRH signals from the plasma membrane to the rat {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß subunit genes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
LH AND FSH subunit gene expression and secretion are regulated by GnRH, which is released into the hypophyseal portal circulation in a pulsatile manner (1, 2, 3). Studies in various species have shown that the pattern of GnRH pulse signals differentially regulates {alpha}, LHß and FSHß gene expression at both transcriptional and the steady-state mRNA levels (4, 5, 6). More specifically, rapid- or intermediate-pulse frequencies maximally stimulate expression of the {alpha}- and LHß genes, and slower-frequency pulses selectively stimulate FSHß. Alterations in GnRH pulse amplitude and frequency can also differentially regulate other gonadotrope genes including the GnRH receptor (GnRHR), follistatin, and inhibin subunits (7, 8, 9).

The GnRHR is a member of the seven-transmembrane receptor family, with receptor-binding activating various GTP-binding proteins, including Gq and G11, stimulating increased phosphoinositide turnover within the plasma membrane, cytoplasmic diacylglycerol levels, and the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) (10, 11). GnRHR binding increases intracellular calcium through activation of L-type voltage-sensitive calcium channels and inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate-induced release from intracellular calcium storage pools (12, 13). GnRH has also been shown to activate other intracellular pathways, including cAMP/protein kinase A, ERK, p38, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19).

Although the intracellular messenger pathways that mediate GnRH pulsatile actions on gonadotropin subunit genes remain to be fully characterized, calcium has been shown to be a major component in the transduction of GnRH signals (10, 12). GnRH-induced increases in intracellular calcium stimulate a rise in gonadotropin subunit transcription or promoter activity, subunit mRNAs, and LH and FSH secretion (13, 20, 21, 22). Calcium plays an essential role in gonadotropin subunit responses to pulsatile GnRH (23), and pulsatile calcium signals (via pulses of the L-type channel activator Bay K 8644) are more effective in stimulating {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß mRNAs than continuous calcium influx (23). Recently we demonstrated that the frequency of the calcium pulse signal can differentially regulate {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß transcriptional activity and mRNA expression (22, 24), similar to results seen for pulsatile GnRH (6).

Although data suggest that alterations in intracellular calcium plays a role in the transmission of GnRH pulsatile signals, the downstream third-messenger pathway(s) that mediate GnRH actions on the gonadotrope remain to be fully delineated. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (Ca/CAMK II) is an important mediator of calcium signaling in various cell types, including the pituitary (25, 26). Ca/CAMK II plays a role in cross-talk between intracellular messengers by activating adenylate cyclase, calcium ATPase, nitric oxide synthetase, calcineurin, and other enzyme systems (27). Ca/CAMK II has been shown to regulate gene expression and secretion in various tissues (25, 28). In the brain, Ca/CAMK II stimulates c-fos expression and norepinephrine and glutamate secretion (29). In the pituitary, the enzyme stimulates prolactin secretion and promoter activity (26, 30, 31).

Ca/CAMK II is a complex of subunits derived from four genes ({alpha}, ß, {gamma}, and {delta}), with {alpha}- and ß-subunits prominent in the brain and {gamma}- and {delta}-isoforms in other tissues, with each Ca/CAMK II subunit having catalytic activity (25, 28). Ca/calmodulin binding to the regulatory domain of the subunit stimulates activation of Ca/CAMK II by disinhibiting the enzyme and promoting binding of ATP and appropriate peptide substrate (28, 29). Following activation the subunit is autophosphorylated, increasing the affinity for Ca/calmodulin-CAMK II binding and extending the duration of enzyme activation state (29). Studies have shown that Ca/CAMK II autophosphorylation plays an important role in Ca/CAMK II activity (25), including recent findings that reveal that Ca/CAMK II autophosphorylation is required for hippocampal long-term potentiation and spatial learning in the mouse (32). Ca/CAMK II is transported to the nucleus, allowing the enzyme to influence the expression of specific genes by directly activating various transcription factors (28).

The aim of the present studies was to determine whether GnRH stimulates Ca/CAMK II activity in the rat pituitary and whether the enzyme system mediates {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß transcriptional responses to pulsatile GnRH.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In vivo studies
All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the University of Virginia Animal Care and Use Committee. In a preliminary study, we used a GnRH-deficient model (33) (castrate, testosterone-replaced, adult male rats) and gave a single iv injection of GnRH (300 ng) via a jugular cannula and euthanized 2, 5, 15, or 45 min later (controls received a BSA-saline injection; n = 5–6 animals per group). Pituitaries were collected, homogenized in tissue lysis buffer (50 µM HEPES; 100 mM NaCl; 2 mM EDTA; 0.1% Nonidet P-40; 1 µM aprotinin; 1 mM Na orthovanadate, pH 7.5), protein content measured, and Ca/CAMK II activity determined by immunoblot.

In vitro perifusion studies
For each experiment, pituitaries from 36 adult female rats were pooled and dissociated in medium containing 0.35% collagenase, 0.1% hyaluronidase, and 0.01% Dnase. Following dissociation, the cell suspension was aliquoted into 12 culture wells (5–6 x 106 cells per well) containing 22-mm plastic coverslips coated with Matrigel (Becton Dickinson and Co., Bedford, MA). The cells were cultured for 48 h before beginning each experiment. The in vitro procedure and culture medium constituents have previously been described (16, 23). To allow LHß mRNA expression in response to pulsatile GnRH, testosterone [at a concentration present on proestrus, 500 pg/ml (34)] was added during the last 24 h of plating and during perifusion. After plating, the coverslips were inserted into custom-made chambers and allowed to equilibrate for 1 h before initiating treatment. The perifusion flow rate was 200 µl/min, and 100-µl pulses were administered over a 10-sec duration via Autosyringe pumps. Studies were conducted as three to four separate experiments (12 chambers per experiment), with all treatment groups represented in each experiment (three chambers/treatment per experiment). Data from each experiment were expressed as percent change vs. vehicle-pulsed controls.

GnRH pulse studies.
Chambers were given pulses of GnRH (peak chamber concentration = 200 pM, medium pulses to controls) every 60 min for 6–24 h. For some experiments, chambers were perifused with medium containing the water-soluble Ca/CAMK II-specific inhibitor KN-93 (10 µM), the inactive isoform KN-92 (10 µM), or vehicle. LH and FSH secretory responses were determined by collecting 10-min perifusate fractions over 60 min after 2 h and 22 h (for 24-h studies) of treatment. Cells were recovered 5 min after the last pulse; total RNA extracted with guanidinium thiocyanate; and {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß primary transcripts (PTs) determined by quantitative RT-PCR.

Bay K 8644+KCl pulse studies.
Perifusion chambers received pulses of Bay K 8644 (BK) plus potassium chloride (BK+KCl) [peak chamber concentration = 3 µM (BK) plus 10 mM (KCl)], every 60 min for 6 or 24 h. This treatment paradigm is based on previous data showing that BK is more effective in stimulating pituitary secretion or mRNA responses in the presence of a threshold depolarization concentration of K+ in the medium (23). Control groups received vehicle pulses (0.2% ethanol/medium). Then 10 µM KN-93 (or vehicle) were added to the perifusion medium for some studies. LH and FSH secretory responses to pulse treatments were determined by collecting 10-min perifusate fractions over 60 min between 2 and 3 h of treatment. Five minutes after the final pulse, the cells were recovered; total RNA extracted; and {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß PTs measured.

Ca/CAMK II immunoblot assay
Cell lysate protein (120 µg) was resolved by electrophoresis (4–20% SDS-PAGE). Protein bands were transferred to nitrocellulose filters and immunoblotted using antibodies specific to phosphorylated {alpha}- and ß-Ca/CAMK II subunits (P-CAMK II, Promega Corp., Madison, WI), and phosphorylated and unphosphorylated {alpha}-, ß-, {gamma}-, and {delta}-subunits [total Ca/CAMK II (T-CAMK II), Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA]. The secondary antibody was horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY). Bands were detected using the Super Signal Pico West chemiluminescent system (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL), followed by autoradiography. P-CAMK II bands was quantitated by densitometry and corrected to the amount of T-CAMK II per sample. Treatment-induced responses were similar for both {alpha}- and ß-Ca/CAMK II subunits. However, because the intensity of the signal for the ß-subunit was greater than that seen for {alpha}-Ca/CAMK II subunit, results were quantitated using ß-Ca/CAMK II.

Quantitative RT-PCR
The {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß PT concentrations were determined by quantitative RT-PCR assay, as previously described (35). The method is based on adding known amounts of a size-altered competitor RNA to a constant amount of pituitary RNA. Briefly, for each subunit, regions of intron/exon were amplified using specific oligonucleotide primers and a size-altered competitive template (CT) RNA for each gene. A four-point standard curve was generated by adding a fixed amount of pituitary RNA (100–400 ng/PCR) to an increasing amount of CT (2, 10, 50, 250 fg). The pituitary and CT RNAs were reverse transcribed, followed by 35 cycles of PCR in the presence of 32P-dCTP. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 3% agarose, DNA bands were excised, and 32P-dCTP incorporation determined by scintillation counting. PT concentrations were expressed as femtomoles/100 µg pituitary RNA. Intraassay coefficients of variation are 8.9% ({alpha}), 6.7% (LHß), and 5.0% (FSHß); interassay coefficients of variation are 22.2% ({alpha}), 19.2% (LHß), and 14.1% (FSHß). To reduce the effect of interassay variation, all samples from each experiment were run within a single PCR assay.

RIA
LH and FSH secretory responses were measured in perifusate fractions by RIA, using reagents provided by the National Hormone and Pituitary Program. The assays were performed by the University of Virginia Center for Research in Reproduction, Ligand Assay and Analysis Core Facility. The RIA standards were NIDDK RP-3 (for LH) and RP-2 (for FSH). The assay sensitivities were 0.09 ng/tube for LH and 0.8 ng/tube for FSH. The coefficients of variation were 8.3% and 10.8% for the LH assay and 6.3% and 9.6% for FSH (intraassay and interassay, respectively). All samples from each experiment were assayed in a single RIA.

Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, with differences between treatment groups determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Figure 1Go shows the Ca/CAMK II activational response to a single pulse of GnRH in GnRH-deficient rats in vivo, as determined by Ca/CAMK II autophosphorylation. The upper panel presents a representative autoradiograph of the Ca/CAMK II phosphorylation response (P-CAMK II) 2, 5, 15, and 45 min after the GnRH stimulus. As shown in the lower panel, GnRH stimulated a rapid rise in Ca/CAMK II phosphorylation, with a significant increase (84%) seen 2 min after the pulse [P < 0.05 vs. control (Con)]. Peak values were observed 5 min after the GnRH pulse (245% increase vs. Con; P < 0.05), maintained through 15 min and then declined to control levels 45 min after GnRH administration.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Time course of responses of GnRH-induced Ca/CAMK II phosphorylation in rat pituitary cells in vivo. Rats received a single pulse of GnRH (300 ng; BSA-saline pulse to Con) and pituitaries collected 2–45 min later. Ca/CAMK II phosphorylation was determined by immunoblot (see Materials and Methods for details). P-CAMK II results for each sample were corrected to T-CAMK II for the same sample. The data are presented as percent change vs. Con; mean ± SEM are shown; *, P < 0.05 vs. Con. A representative immunoblot is presented in the upper panel.

 
Before examining the role played by Ca/CAMK II in regulating gonadotropin subunit gene expression, in vitro time-course studies were conducted to optimize treatment duration for GnRH and BK+KCl pulses. We have previously noted that GnRH or BK+KCl treatment durations of less than 6 h in vitro do not stimulate significant increases in gonadotropin subunit PTs (our unpublished observation). For this reason, 6 h was the earliest treatment duration examined. As shown in Fig. 2Go, pulsatile GnRH for 6 h stimulated a 2- to 4-fold increase in {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß PTs (P < 0.05 vs. Con). However, maximal increases occurred after longer treatment durations, 14 h for {alpha} (7-fold increase), and 24 h for LHß (5-fold), and FSHß (8-fold). BK+KCl pulses also stimulated subunit PTs, but in contrast to GnRH, significant increases (P < 0.05 vs. Con) were only seen after 6 h of treatment. Also of note, maximal responses for each subunit PT to GnRH were greater than that seen for BK+KCl (P < 0.05).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Gonadotropin subunit PT responses to pulses of 200 pM GnRH or 3 µM Bay K 8644 + 10 mM KCl (BK) given every 60 min for durations of 6–24 h. Results are presented as percent change vs. vehicle-pulsed Con. Mean ± SEM are shown; *, P < 0.05 vs. Con. Note the different scale for each panel.

 
To investigate whether the observed rise in Ca/CAMK II phosphorylation in response to GnRH plays a role in gonadotropin transcriptional regulation, GnRH pulses were give for 24 h in the absence or presence of the Ca/CAMK II-specific inhibitor, KN-93. As shown in Fig. 3Go, GnRH stimulated increases in {alpha} (3-fold), LHß, (6-fold) and FSHß (9-fold) PT (P < 0.05 vs. Con). KN-93 suppressed LHß and FSHß PT responses to GnRH by 50–60% and completely blocked the GnRH-induced increase in {alpha}-PT. Of interest, gonadotropin subunit PTs in pituitary cells treated with KN-93 alone were not suppressed vs. vehicle controls and tended to be elevated, although this did not achieve significance.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. {alpha}, LHß and FSHß PT responses to pulsatile GnRH ± the Ca/CAMK II-specific inhibitor, KN-93 (10 µM). Rat pituitary cells received pulses of GnRH (200 pM, 60-min intervals) for 24 h. Results are expressed as the percent change vs. medium-pulsed Con. Note the different scale for each panel. Groups marked with different letters (a, b, or c) are statistically different (P < 0.05).

 
To confirm the specificity of the inhibitory effect of KN-93 on gonadotropin subunit PTs, we conducted a separate study in which GnRH pulses were given for 24 h in the presence of the inactive isoform, KN-92 [or vehicle (Veh); n = 4 per group; results expressed as percent increase vs. vehicle controls]. KN-92 had no effect on gonadotropin subunit PTs in medium-pulsed control groups [Veh: {alpha} (mean ± SEM = 100 ± 6), LHß (100 ± 18), FSHß (100 ± 17); KN-92: {alpha} (99 ± 3), LHß (108 ± 16), FSHß (94 ± 12)]. Pulsatile GnRH stimulated a significant increase in LHß and FSHß PTs (P < 0.05 vs. Veh controls) in both Veh-treated and KN-92-treated groups (LHß: Veh+GnRH = 451 ± 88, KN-92+GnRH = 322 ± 67; FSHß: Veh+GnRH = 343 ± 74, KN-92+GnRH = 365 ± 53). LHß and FSHß PT responses to GnRH in Veh and KN-92 treated groups were not significantly different. Of note, in this particular study a GnRH-induced increase in {alpha}-PT was not seen in either Veh or KN-92 treated groups. This likely is due to the experimental duration used (24 h), which is not optimal for {alpha} (as shown in Fig. 2Go).

The effect of KN-93 on gonadotropin secretory responses to pulsatile GnRH after 2 h and 22 h of treatment in vitro is shown in Fig. 4Go. LH and FSH in KN-93 controls were not different from Veh controls and are not shown. GnRH stimulated a pulsatile LH and FSH release pattern that continued over 22 h. Although LH and FSH secretory responses to GnRH alone or in combination with KN-93 were similar, LH release to GnRH tended to be greater during the initial phase of the study (2-h time point) in chambers given KN-93. Over the course of the study, LH release remained stable in control chambers. Peak LH levels were 7- to 8-fold above pre-GnRH concentrations. The magnitude of FSH secretory responses to GnRH was lower than that seen for LH (3.5-fold vs. 8-fold), and KN-93 had no effect on FSH release. Similar to responses seen for gonadotropin subunit PT, KN-92 had no effect on basal or GnRH-stimulated LH or FSH release (data not shown).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. LH and FSH release to pulsatile GnRH ± KN-93. Controls (Con) received medium pulses. LH and FSH in KN-93-treated controls were similar to vehicle-treated controls and are not presented. Ten-minute fractions were collected after 2 and 22 h of treatment (note different scales for each panel). Arrows indicate the timing of the pulse.

 
To investigate whether Ca/CAMK II mediates subunit transcriptional responses to pulsatile increases in intracellular calcium, 60-min pulses of BK+KCl were given for 6 h in the presence or absence of KN-93 (Fig. 5Go). Pulses of BK+KCl stimulated PT concentrations of {alpha} (50%), LHß (80%), and FSHß (115%) vs. vehicle-pulsed controls (P < 0.05). However, because KN-93 alone tended to increase {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß PTs vs. controls and the magnitude of responses to pulsatile BK+KCl were reduced, compared with GnRH, the effect of KN-93 on responses to BK+KCl pulses were inconclusive. Similar to results for GnRH on LH secretion, KN-93 tended to enhance the effectiveness BK+KCl on LH release but not to a significant degree (data not shown).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. The effect of 60-min pulses of Bay K 8644 + KCl (BK) on gonadotropin subunit PTs ± KN-93. Pulse treatments were given for 6 h. Results are expressed as percent change vs. vehicle-pulsed controls (Con). Mean ± SEM are shown. Groups marked with different letters (a or b) are statistically different (P < 0.05).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of the present study are the first to show that GnRH rapidly (within 2 min) stimulates Ca/CAMK II activity, as indicated by an increase in Ca/CAMK II autophosphorylation, in normal rat pituitary cells. Also of note, the data reveal that Ca/CAMK II plays a role in GnRH stimulation of {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß transcription. These findings are physiologically relevant because the studies used differentiated pituitary cells, a physiological treatment paradigm (i.e. pulsatile GnRH), and measured endogenous gene products. In primary pituitary cells, the Ca/CAMK II-specific inhibitor, KN-93, either completely ({alpha}) or partially (LHß and FSHß) suppressed gonadotropin subunit PT responses to pulsatile GnRH. This action was specific because the inactive isoform, KN-92, had no effect on GnRH-induced increases in gonadotropin subunit PTs or secretion. Of note, we recently showed that KN-93, but not KN-92, completely blocked GnRH-induced Ca/CAMK II phosphorylation in gonadotrope-derived LßT2 cells (36).

Previous studies revealed that Ca/CAMK II regulates the expression of several genes in various cell types, including the pituitary (25, 28, 31). Nowakowski et al. (31) showed that Ca/CAMK II stimulates prolactin promoter activity via actions on the pituitary-specific transcription factor, Pit 1. In rat lactotrope cells or lactotrope-derived GH3 cells, Ca/CAMK II mediates TRH or potassium depolarization-induced prolactin release, through actions on L-type voltage sensitive calcium channels (26, 30). In contrast, our results suggest that Ca/CAMK II has little or no effect on gonadotropin secretion. Indeed, LH secretory responses to pulsatile GnRH or BK+KCl in the presence of KN-93 tended to be increased vs. GnRH or BK+KCl alone.

A rise in intracellular calcium is essential in the activation of Ca/CAMK II (25, 28), and recent results reveal that Ca/CAMK II is regulated by alterations in the amplitude and duration of intracellular calcium spikes (37). Based on these observations and our previous data showing that pulsatile BK+KCl stimulates {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß transcription (24), we examined whether Ca/CAMK II plays a role in calcium-induced gonadotropin subunit PT responses. Unfortunately, we were not able to answer the question using the current experimental paradigm. This was due to the consistent observation that KN-93 tended to increase {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß PTs, which did not allow for statistically significant changes to be seen following pulsatile BK+KCl.

Although we have previously demonstrated that BK+KCl pulses replicate most effects of pulsatile GnRH (22, 24), including the differential {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß transcriptional responses to pulse frequency, some differences have been noted. As seen in the present study, the optimal treatment duration for BK+KCl and GnRH differs (6 h vs. 24 h, Fig. 2Go), which may reflect differences in site of action for both compounds (GnRHR vs. L-type calcium channels). One possibility is that L-type channels within the pituitary become desensitized to BK+KCl pulses over longer durations. In support, we have previously noted that LH secretory responses to BK+KCl pulses in perifused rat pituitary cells decline between 3 and 21 h of treatment to a greater extent than that seen for pulsatile GnRH (22). Also of note, the magnitude of transcriptional responses to GnRH was greater than that for BK+KCl (as shown in Fig. 2Go). GnRHR binding stimulates the activation of various second-messenger pathways that play a role in gonadotropin subunit gene expression, including PKC, protein kinase A, ERK, JNK, and p38 (10, 15, 16, 17, 18). Although calcium may mediate the activation of Ca/CAMK II and other third-messenger pathways, its role in activating various second-messenger systems associated with GnRHR binding is either permissive or less important than G protein-initiated activational responses (10, 12, 17, 38). Thus, although alterations in intracellular calcium may be critical to the transmission of pulse frequency signals within the gonadotrope, it is likely that maximal responses to pulsatile GnRH require cross-talk among calcium, Ca/CAMK II, and other intracellular pathways.

We and others have shown that calcium plays an important role in GnRH-induced stimulation of {alpha}, LHß, and FSHß subunit gene expression, both at the steady-state mRNA and transcriptional levels in various cell models, including primary rat and mouse pituitary cells, as well as gonadotrope-derived {alpha}T3 and LßT2 cells (20, 22, 24, 39). However, some results have differed, showing either no effect or selective stimulation of one but not other subunit genes (21). Recent findings in LßT4 cells reveal that calcium may play a role in the inhibitory effect of long-term continuous GnRH desensitization on rat LHß promoter activity (40). The reason(s) for divergent results remain unclear, but differences in cell model, experimental paradigms using pulsatile or continuous stimulation, and end products measured are likely contributory factors. Also, because cross-talk among intracellular messenger systems play an important role in the transduction of GnRH signals (10, 15, 38, 41), differences in interactions among messenger systems within primary cells vs. cell line models may be a factor in the differing results.

Our results showed that {alpha}-PT responses to pulsatile GnRH were completely suppressed by Ca/CAMK II inactivation, suggesting that Ca/CAMK II plays an essential role in rat {alpha}-transcription. These findings differ from that seen for the murine {alpha}-subunit gene because one report showed that transfecting {alpha}T3 cells with a Ca/CAMK II expression vector did not stimulate mouse {alpha}-subunit promoter activity (42). We and others have shown that ERK also plays an important role in GnRH stimulation of the {alpha}-subunit gene (16, 42, 43). Recent finding suggest that ERK stimulates {alpha}-transcription by activating a member of the Ets family of transcription factors, which binds to the GnRH-responsive element of both the mouse and rat {alpha}-subunit promoters (44, 45). Thus, the present results suggest that cross-talk between the Ca/CAMK II and ERK pathways may be critical to transmitting GnRH signals to the rat, but not the mouse, {alpha}-subunit gene.

Both LHß and FSHß PT responses to GnRH were partially suppressed by blocking Ca/CAMK II autophosphorylation, suggesting that this intracellular pathway is only partially responsible for transmitting GnRH signals to these two gonadotropin subunit genes. Similar to {alpha}, we and others have shown that ERK plays a role in GnRH actions on FSHß mRNA expression (16, 46). Results from other investigations reveal that PKC also stimulates FSHß gene expression in both the rat and sheep (39, 46). In contrast to {alpha} and FSHß, evidence does not support a role for ERK in the regulation of LHß (16, 20). However, recent findings reveal that PKC and JNK may mediate GnRH action on the rat LHß promoter via effects on one or both GnRH-responsive elements (19, 47).

In summary, our findings reveal that Ca/CAMK II plays an important role in the GnRH signal transduction pathway within the rat gonadotrope. Although Ca/CAMK II mediates transcriptional responses to GnRH for all three gonadotropin subunits to some extent, the magnitude of responses differ among subunits, with Ca/CAMK II playing a greater role for {alpha} than for FSH ß or LH ß. Whether Ca/CAMK II plays a critical role in modulating gonadotropin subunit responses to transient increases in intracellular calcium will require further investigation. However, these findings suggest that cross-talk between Ca/CAMK II and other intracellular messenger pathways are essential in the transmission of GnRH signals from the plasma membrane to the gonadotropin subunit genes.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by United States Public Health Service Grant HD-33039 and HD-11489 (to J.C.M.) and NICHD/NIH through a cooperative agreement (U54-HD-28934, Ligand Assay and Analysis Core) as part of the Specialized Cooperative Centers Program in Reproductive Research (to J.C.M. and D.J.H.).

Abbreviations: BK, Bay K 8644; Ca/CAMK II, calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II; Con, control; CT, competitive template; GnRHR, GnRH receptor; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; P-CAMK II, phosphorylated {alpha}- and ß-Ca/CAMK II subunit; PKC, protein kinase C; PT, primary transcript; T-CAMK II, total Ca/CAMK II; Veh, vehicle.

Received December 19, 2002.

Accepted for publication March 20, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Urbanski HF, Pickle RL, Ramirez VD 1988 Simultaneous measurement of GnRH, LH and FSH in the ovariectomized rat. Endocrinology 123:413–419[Abstract]
  2. Gharib SD, Wierman ME, Shupnik MA, Chin WW 1990 Molecular biology of the pituitary gonadotropins. Endocr Rev 11:177–199[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Haisenleder DJ, Dalkin AC, Marshall JC 1993 Regulation of gonadotropin gene expression. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, eds. The physiology of reproduction. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press, Ltd.; 1793–1813
  4. Kaiser UB, Conn PM, Chin WW 1997 Studies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) action using GnRH receptor-expressing pituitary cell lines. Endocr Rev 18:46–70[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Leung K, Kaynard AH, Negrini BP, Kim KE, Mauer RA, Landefeld TD 1987 Regulation of gonadotropin subunit gene expression by GnRH pulse frequency in ewes. Mol Endocrinol 1:724–728[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Haisenleder DJ, Dalkin AC, Ortolano GA, Marshall JC, Shupnik MA 1991 A pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulus is required to increase transcription of the gonadotropin subunit genes: evidence for differential regulation of transcription by pulse frequency in vivo. Endocrinology 128:509–517[Abstract]
  7. Kirk SE, Dalkin AC, Yasin M, Haisenleder DJ, Marshall JC 1994 GnRH pulse frequency regulates expression of pituitary follistatin mRNA: a mechanism for differential gonadotrope function. Endocrinology 135:876–880[Abstract]
  8. Yasin M, Dalkin AC, Haisenleder DJ, Kerrigan JR, Marshall JC 1995 GnRH pulse pattern regulates GnRH receptor gene expression: augmentation by estradiol. Endocrinology 136:1559–1564[Abstract]
  9. Dalkin AC, Haisenleder DJ, Gilrain JT, Aylor K, Yasin M, Marshall JC 1999 GnRH regulation of gonadotropin subunit gene expression in female rats: actions on FSH ß mRNA involve differential expression of pituitary activin (ß-B) and follistatin mRNAs. Endocrinology 140:903–908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Stojilkovic SS, Catt KJ 1995 Novel aspects of GnRH-induced intracellular signaling and secretion in pituitary gonadotrophs. J Neuroendocrinol 7:739–757[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Hsieh KP, Martin TF 1992 Thyrotropin-releasing hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors activate phospholipase C by coupling to the guanosine triphosphate-binding proteins Gq and G11. Mol Endocrinol 6:1673–1681[Abstract]
  12. Naor Z 1990 Signal transduction mechanisms of Ca2+ mobilizing hormones: the case of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Endocr Rev 11:326–353[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Tse A, Hille B 1992 GnRH-induced calcium oscillations and rhythmic hyperpolarizations of pituitary gonadotropes. Science 255:462–464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Liu F, Usui I, Evans LG, Austin DA, Mellon PL, Olefsky JM, Webster NJ 2002 Involvement of both Gq/11 and Gs proteins in gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor-mediated signaling in Lß T2 cells. J Biol Chem 277:32099–32108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Garrel G, McArdle CA, Hemmings BA, Counis R 1997 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide affect levels of cyclic adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) subunits in the clonal gonadotrope {alpha}T3-1 cells: evidence for cross-talk between PKA and protein kinase C pathways. Endocrinology 138:2259–2266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Haisenleder DJ, Cox ME, Parsons SJ, Marshall JC 1998 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulses are required to maintain activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase: role in stimulation of gonadotrope gene expression. Endocrinology 139:3104–3111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Levi NL, Hanoch T, Benard O, Rozenblat M, Harris D, Reiss N, Naor Z, Seger R 1998 Stimulation of Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) by gonadotropin-releasing hormone in pituitary {alpha}T3-1 cell line is mediated by protein kinase C, c-Src, and CDC42. Mol Endocrinol 12:815–824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Roberson MS, Zhang T, Li HL, Mulvaney JM 1999 Activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Endocrinology 140:1310–1318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Yokoi T, Ohmichi M, Tasaka K, Kimura A, Kanda Y, Hayakawa J, Tahara M, Hisamoto K, Kurachi H, Murata Y 2000 Activation of the luteinizing hormone beta promoter by gonadotropin-releasing hormone requires c-Jun NH2-terminal protein kinase. J Biol Chem 275:21639–21647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Weck J, Fallest PC, Pitt LK, Shupnik MA 1998 Differential gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulation of rat luteinizing hormone subunit gene transcription by calcium influx and mitogen-activated protein kinase-signaling pathways. Mol Endocrinol 12:451–457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Saunders BD, Sabbagh E, Chin WW, Kaiser UB 1998 Differential use of signal transduction pathways in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone-mediated regulation of gonadotropin subunit gene expression. Endocrinology 139:1835–1843[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Haisenleder DJ, Yasin M, Marshall JC 1997 Gonadotropin subunit and gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene expression are regulated by alterations in the frequency of calcium pulsatile signals. Endocrinology 138:5227–5230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Haisenleder DJ, Yasin M, Yasin A, Marshall JC 1993 Regulation of prolactin, thyrotropin subunit, and gonadotropin subunit gene expression by pulsatile or continuous calcium signals. Endocrinology 133:2055–2061[Abstract]
  24. Haisenleder DJ, Workman LJ, Burger LL, Aylor KW, Dalkin AC, Marshall JC 2001 Gonadotropin subunit transcriptional responses to calcium signals in the rat: evidence for regulation by pulse frequency. Biol Reprod 65:1789–1793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hanson PI, Schulman H 1992 Neuronal Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases. Annu Rev Biochem 61:559–601[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Cui ZJ, Gorelick FS, Dannies PS 1994 Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-II activation in rat pituitary cells in the presence of thyrotropin-releasing hormone and dopamine. Endocrinology 134:2245–2250[Abstract]
  27. Lu KP, Means AR 1993 Regulation of the cell cycle by calcium and calmodulin. Endocr Rev 14:40–58[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Schulman H, Heist K, Srinivasan M 1995 Decoding Ca2+ signals to the nucleus by multifunctional CaM kinase. Prog Brain Res 105:95–104[Medline]
  29. Miller SG, Kennedy MB 1986 Regulation of brain type II Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase by autophosphorylation: a Ca2+-triggered molecular switch. Cell 44:861–870[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Cui ZJ, Hidaka H, Dannies PS 1996 KN-62, a calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibitor, inhibits high potassium-stimulated prolactin secretion and intracellular calcium increases in anterior pituitary cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1310:343–347[Medline]
  31. Nowakowski BE, Okimura Y, Maurer RA 1997 Characterization of DNA regions mediating the ability of Ca2+/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II to stimulate prolactin promoter activity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 132:109–116[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Giese KP, Fedorov NB, Flipkowski RK, Silva AJ 1998 Autophosphorylation at the Thr286 of the alpha Ca/CAMK II in LPT and learning. Science 279:870–873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Steiner RA, Bremner WJ, Clifton DK 1982 Regulation of LH frequency and amplitude by testosterone in the adult male rat. Endocrinology 111:2055–2061[Abstract]
  34. Rush ME, Blake CA 1982 Serum testosterone concentrations during the 4-day estrous cycle in normal and adrenalectomized rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 169:216–221[Medline]
  35. Dalkin AC, Burger LL, Aylor KW, Haisenleder DJ, Workman LJ, Cho S, Marshall JC 2001 Regulation of gonadotropin subunit gene transcription by GnRH: measurement of primary transcript RNAs by quantitative rtPCR assays. Endocrinology 142:139–146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Haisenleder DJ, Ferris HA, Shupnik MA, The calcium component of GnRH-stimulated LH subunit gene transcription is mediated by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II. Endocrinology, in press
  37. De Koninck P, Schulman H 1998 Sensitivity of CaM kinase II to the frequency of calcium oscillations. Science 279:227–230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Ando H, Hew CL, Urano A 2001 Signal transduction pathways and transcription factors involved in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated gonadotropin subunit gene expression. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 129:525–532[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Ben Menahem D, Naor Z 1994 Regulation of gonadotropin mRNA levels in cultured rat pituitary cells by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH): role for Ca2+ and protein kinase C. Biochemistry 33:3698–3704[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Vasilyev VV, Lawson MA, Dipaolo D, Webster NJ, Mellon PL 2002 Different signaling pathways control acute induction versus long-term repression of LHbeta transcription by GnRH. Endocrinology 143:3414–3426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Reiss N, Llevi LN, Shacham S, Harris D, Seger R, Naor Z 1997 Mechanism of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the pituitary of {alpha}T3–1 cell line: differential roles of calcium and protein kinase C. Endocrinology 138:1673–1682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Roberson MS, Misra-Press A, Laurance ME, Stork PJ, Maurer RA 1995 A role for mitogen-activated protein kinase in mediating activation of the glycoprotein hormone {alpha}-subunit promoter by gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Mol Cell Biol 15:3531–3539[Abstract]
  43. Sundaresan S, Colin IM, Pestell RG, Jameson JL 1996 Stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by gonadotropin-releasing hormone: evidence for the involvement of protein kinase C. Endocrinology 137:304–311[Abstract]
  44. Maurer RA, Kim KE, Schoderbek WE, Roberson MS, Glenn DJ 1999 Regulation of glycoprotein hormone {alpha}-subunit gene expression. Recent Prog Horm Res 54:455–484
  45. Weck J, Anderson AC, Jenkins S, Fallest PC, Shupnik MA 2000 Divergent and composite gonadotropin-releasing hormone-responsive elements in the rat luteinizing hormone subunit genes. Mol Endocrinol 14:472–485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Vasilyev VV, Pernasetti F, Rosenberg SB, Barsoum MJ, Austin DA, Webster NJG, Mellon PL 2002 Transcriptional activation of the ovine FSH ß gene by GnRH involves multiple signal transduction pathways. Endocrinology 143:1651–1659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Halvorson LM, Kaiser UB, Chin WW 1999 The protein kinase C system acts through the early growth response protein 1 to increase LH ß gene expression in synergy with steroidogenic factor-1. Mol Endocrinol 13:106–116[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. J. Haisenleder, L. L. Burger, H. E. Walsh, J. Stevens, K. W. Aylor, M. A. Shupnik, and J. C. Marshall
Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Stimulation of Gonadotropin Subunit Transcription in Rat Pituitaries: Evidence for the Involvement of Jun N-Terminal Kinase But Not p38
Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 139 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Harada, H. Kanasaki, S. Mutiara, A. Oride, and K. Miyazaki
Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'Monophosphate/Protein Kinase A and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3/1 Pathways Are Involved in Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide 1-Induced Common Alpha-Glycoprotein Subunit Gene (Cga) Expression in Mouse Pituitary Gonadotroph LbetaT2 Cells
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2007; 77(4): 707 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. A. Ferris and M. A. Shupnik
Mechanisms for Pulsatile Regulation of the Gonadotropin Subunit Genes by GNRH1
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2006; 74(6): 993 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Kanasaki, G. Y. Bedecarrats, K.-Y. Kam, S. Xu, and U. B. Kaiser
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Frequency-Dependent Activation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathways in Perifused L{beta}T2 Cells
Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5503 - 5513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. S. Roberson, S. P. Bliss, J. Xie, A. M. Navratil, T. A. Farmerie, M. W. Wolfe, and C. M. Clay
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Induction of Extracellular-Signal Regulated Kinase Is Blocked by Inhibition of Calmodulin
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 19(9): 2412 - 2423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
F. Liu, M. S. Ruiz, D. A. Austin, and N. J. G. Webster
Constitutively Active Gq Impairs Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Induced Intracellular Signaling and Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in L{beta}T2 Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 19(8): 2074 - 2085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D.J. Haisenleder, L.L. Burger, K.W. Aylor, A.C. Dalkin, H.E. Walsh, M.A. Shupnik, and J.C. Marshall
Testosterone Stimulates Follicle-Stimulating Hormone {beta} Transcription via Activation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase: Evidence in Rat Pituitary Cells
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 523 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
L L Burger, D J Haisenleder, A C Dalkin, and J C Marshall
Regulation of gonadotropin subunit gene transcription
J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 33(3): 559 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Xu, X.-Z. Xu, C. S. Nunemaker, and S. M. Moenter
Dose-Dependent Switch in Response of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Neurons to GnRH Mediated through the Type I GnRH Receptor
Endocrinology, February 1, 2004; 145(2): 728 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haisenleder, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haisenleder, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals