Endocrinology Vol. 144, No. 6 2242-2252
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society
Cardiac Function in Mice Lacking the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor
Robert Gros,
Xiaomang You,
Laurie L. Baggio,
M. Golam Kabir,
Al Muktafi Sadi,
Imran N. Mungrue,
Thomas G. Parker,
Qingling Huang,
Daniel J. Drucker and
Mansoor Husain
Heart and Stroke Richard Lewar Center of Excellence (R.G., X.Y., M.G.K., A.M.S., I.N.M., T.G.P., M.H.), University of Toronto; Division of Cellular and Molecular Biology (R.G., X.Y., M.G.K., A.M.S., I.N.M., T.G.P., M.H.), Toronto General Hospital Research Institute; and Department of Medicine, Banting and Best Diabetes Centre (L.L.B., Q.H., D.J.D.), Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5G 2C4
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Mansoor Husain, M.D., Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, EN12-221, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4. E-mail: mansoor.husain{at}utoronto.ca.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) acts via its G protein-coupled receptor (GLP-1R) to regulate blood glucose. Although the GLP-1R is widely expressed in peripheral tissues, including the heart, and exogenous GLP-1 administration increases heart rate and blood pressure in rodents, the physiological importance of GLP-1R action in the cardiovascular system remains unclear. We now show that 2-month-old mice with genetic deletion of the GLP-1R (GLP-1R-/-) exhibit reduced resting heart rate and elevated left ventricular (LV) end diastolic pressure compared with CD-1 wild-type controls. At the age of 5 months, echocardiography and histology demonstrate increased LV thickness in GLP-1R-/- mice. Although baseline hemodynamic parameters of GLP-1R-/- did not differ significantly from those of wild type, GLP-1R-/- mice displayed impaired LV contractility and diastolic function after insulin administration. The defective cardiovascular response to insulin was not attributable to a generalized defect in the stress response, because GLP-1R-/- mice responded appropriately to insulin with increased c-fos expression in the hypothalamus and increased circulating levels of glucagon and epinephrine. Furthermore, LV contractility after exogenous epinephrine infusion was also reduced in GLP-1R-/- mice. These findings provide new evidence implicating an essential role for GLP-1R in the control of murine cardiac structure and function in vivo.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
THE PROGLUCAGON GENE is expressed in the pancreatic islets, gut endocrine cells, and brain, and gives rise to structurally related peptide hormones, the proglucagon-derived peptides, that exert a wide range of actions converging on regulation of energy homeostasis (1). Pancreatic glucagon, liberated from islet A cells by the action of prohormone convertase-2, regulates plasma glucose via effects on hepatic glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis. In the gut, prohormone convertase-1 mediates the liberation of glicentin, oxyntomodulin, intervening peptides, and two glucagon-like peptides, GLP-1 and GLP-2. Although the biological importance of glicentin and oxyntomodulin remains uncertain, GLP-2 acts in the gut to maintain the integrity and function of the mucosal epithelium (2, 3), and GLP-1 regulates nutrient flux via effects on gastrointestinal motility, glucagon and insulin secretion, and the control of appetite and body weight (BW; Refs.4 and 5).
The actions of the proglucagon-derived peptides are mediated by distinct members of the glucagon-secretin receptor superfamily that transduce their effects via dual signaling pathways, including activation of adenylate cyclase and intracellular calcium flux (6, 7). The GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is widely expressed in islet cells, kidney, lung, brain, heart, and the gastrointestinal tract (8, 9, 10). In contrast, the GLP-2 receptor is more restricted in its tissue distribution (11), because GLP-2R mRNA transcripts are predominantly localized to the brain and gastrointestinal tract (12, 13).
The observations that GLP-1 exerts multiple complementary actions that lower blood glucose in subjects with type 2 diabetes has engendered considerable interest in the possibility that long-acting GLP-1 analogs may be useful for the treatment of diabetes mellitus (1, 14, 15). However, GLP-1 also exerts actions distinct from those focused on glucoregulation, including regulation of hypothalamic and pituitary neuroendocrine function (16), reduction of pulmonary vascular tone (17), and stimulation of tracheal mucous secretion (18). Indeed, peripheral or central GLP-1 agonist administration is associated with a rapid increase in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in rodents and calves (19, 20, 21).
GLP-1 has been shown to activate cAMP in isolated rat cardiac myocytes (22), but it also activates central and peripheral autonomic responses (21). Because GLP-1 receptor RNA transcripts are detected in the rodent and human heart (10, 23) and in regions of the brain involved in autonomic function (21, 24, 25), central or peripheral GLP-1R signaling systems may transduce direct and indirect cardiovascular effects of circulating GLP-1. However, despite evidence implicating exogenous GLP-1 administration in the regulation of cardiac contractile and chronotropic activity (20, 21, 26, 27), whether central or peripheral GLP-1R systems are essential for cardiovascular function has not been established. To assess the importance of endogenous cardiac GLP-1R activity for baseline cardiovascular function in vivo, we first conducted invasive hemodynamic monitoring in male 2-month-old mice with genetic disruption of GLP-1R (GLP-1R-/-; Ref. 28) and age- and gender-matched CD-1 wild-type (WT) controls. We next used echocardiography, cardiac histology, and invasive hemodynamic monitoring to assess cardiac structure and function in GLP-1R-/- and WT animals at 5 months of age. Finally, cardiac hemodynamic responses to external stress hormones were compared in older GLP-1R-/- mice and age-matched WT controls. Our data suggest a heretofore-unrecognized role for GLP-1R signaling in cardiac function, which is most evident in the cardiovascular response to stress.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Animals
All animal experimentation was carried out in accordance with protocols and guidelines approved by the Animal Care Committee at the Toronto General Hospital. Two- and 5-month old male GLP-1R-/- mice in the CD-1 genetic background and age- and sex-matched control CD-1 WT mice were maintained in the Toronto General Hospital Animal Facility on normal rodent chow and genotyped by Southern blot analysis as previously described (28). Animals younger than 2 months of age, particularly those lacking the GLP-1R, were found to be too small for safe and reproducible carotid artery cannulation. Moreover, they demonstrate less stable thermoregulation and hemodynamic values after anesthesia. Hence, invasive hemodynamic studies were carried out in older mice.
Cardiac hemodynamic measurements and drug administration
Mice were anesthetized using ketamine-HCl (100 mg/kg ip) and xylazine-HCl (10 mg/kg ip) and placed on a warming pad. A mild cardiodepressant effect of this anesthesia has been described (29). The right common carotid artery and/or jugular vein was isolated after midline neck incision and cannulated using a Millar Mikro-tip pressure transducer (1.4F sensor, 2F catheter; Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) as previously described (30). From jugular vein cannulations, the catheter was advanced to the right atrium, passed through the tricuspid valve, and stabilized in the right ventricular cavity. From carotid artery cannulations, stable arterial pressure tracings were recorded, from which systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were later measured. The catheter was advanced to the aorta, passed through the aortic valve, and stabilized in the left ventricular (LV) cavity. HR (beats per minute), systolic and diastolic LV pressures (mm Hg) were recorded at baseline and specific time intervals up to 10 min after the administration of drugs (see Results). Peak positive and negative first derivatives (maximum ± dP/dT; mm Hg/second) were obtained from LV pressure curves using Origin 6.0 (Microcal Software, Inc., Northampton, MA). Once a stable baseline for cardiovascular parameters was observed, administration of drugs was initiated. Weight-adjusted doses of insulin (3 U/kg, ip; Humulin R, Eli-Lilly Canada, Toronto, Canada) and adrenaline (1 µg/kg iv, Warner-Lambert, Toronto, Canada) were administered. Blood glucose levels were assessed in whole blood samples obtained via a tail nick using a hand-held glucometer and One-Touch glucometer strips (LifeScan Canada, Ltd., Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada). Tail blood samples were taken at baseline and at specific time intervals after drug administration (see Results).
Echocardiography
Nonfasted mice were more lightly anesthetized with ketamine-HCl (70 mg/kg ip) and xylazine-HCl (7 mg/kg ip) and placed on a warming pad. Two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography as well as pulsed Doppler analyses were performed by a blinded observer using a Hewlett-Packard 5500 ultrasound device (Hewlett-Packard Co., Palo Alto, CA) and a 12-MHz phased array and 15 MHz Doppler probes as previously described (30). Three to five M-mode recordings of end-systolic and end-diastolic LV internal diameters, and end-diastolic septal and LV posterolateral wall thickness measurements were made at the level of the papillary muscle. Two observers (blinded to genotype) interpreted each mouse study and agreed on a set of three values for each measurement. A single mean was then calculated for each mouse. For each animal, a LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) was estimated from the modified single plane area formula {LVEDV = 0.85 (A2/L); ml} (Ref. 31) and fractional shortening (%FS; Ref. 32) stroke volume (SV; Ref. 29), cardiac output (CO; Refs.33 and 34), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR; Ref. 35) were derived from established formulae: %FS = 100 (LVIDd - LVIDs)/LVIDd); SV = %FS x LVEDV; CO = SV x HR; SVR = 80 (MAP - LVEDP)/CO).
Cardiac morphology
Animals were anesthetized as described above, perfused via the left ventricle with 2 M KCl to arrest the heart in diastole, and fixed with 4% buffered formalin at physiological pressure. Hearts were post-fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 6 µm, and stained with H&E (hematoxylin and eosin). Cardiac morphometry was performed with Scion Image software (Scion Co., Frederick, MD) using digital planimetry of images obtained from midventricular cross sections.
Assessment of c-fos activation in the murine central nervous system (CNS)
The number of c-fos-immunoreactive neurons in specific brain regions was quantitatively assessed in both WT and GLP-1R-/- mice as described (21, 36). Briefly, animals were treated with ip insulin or saline and anesthetized as described above, brains were removed immediately and kept in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 4 d, then transferred to a solution containing paraformaldehyde and 10% sucrose before being cut 12 h later using a sliding microtome Leica SM2000R (Leica Microsystems, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada). Sections (25-µm-thick) were collected and stored at -30 C in a cold cryoprotecting solution. Brain sections were processed for immunocytochemical detection of Fos using a conventional avidin-biotin-immuno peroxidase method (Vectastain ABC Elite Kit, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) as described (21, 36). The Fos antibody (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., Oakville, Ontario, Canada) was used at a 1:50,000 dilution. Brain sections corresponding to the level of the arcuate nucleus and medial parvocellular portion of the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus were selected for analyses. For the latter, sections matching the levels from the bregma -0.70 mm to bregma -0.94 mm were picked according to the Mouse Brain Atlas of Franklin and Paxinos (37).
Neurohumoral responses to stress
For assessment of the hormonal counterregulatory response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia, mice were given ip injections of either 2 U/kg human insulin (Novolinge Toronto; Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) or saline. Blood was drawn from a tail vein at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 75 min after insulin or saline administration, and blood glucose levels were measured using a blood glucose meter (Glucometer Elite, Bayer Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada). Blood glucose levels (millimoles per liter) fell from an average value of 7.3 at time 0 to 2.1 at 75 min after ip insulin for both WT CD-1 and GLP-1R-/- mice (data not shown). After the last blood glucose measurement at 75 min, mice were anesthetized with Somnotol (sodium pentobarbital solution, MTC Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada) and exsanguinated via cardiac puncture. Blood samples were immediately mixed with a 10% volume of a chilled solution containing 5000 KIU/ml Trasylol (Miles Pharmaceuticals, Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada), 32 mM EDTA, and 0.1 nM diprotin A (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 4 C and stored at -80 C until assayed. Plasma glucagon concentrations were measured by RIA (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO), and plasma (adrenaline) epinephrine levels were assayed by ELISA (IBL Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany).
Data analysis
Unless otherwise noted, all data are expressed as mean ± SE. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA or Students t test where appropriate. Significance was considered when P value was less than 0.05.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Baseline cardiac function
Two-month-old male GLP-1R-/- mice had significantly lower BW compared with age-matched male CD-1 WT controls [29.0 ± 1.1 g (n = 14) vs. 33.0 ± 0.5 g (n = 12); P < 0.003], consistent with previous observations (38). Although 2-month-old GLP-1R-/- mice displayed a reduced resting HR [223 ± 20 min-1 (n = 6) vs. 315 ± 33 min-1 (n = 6); P < 0.05] and elevated LV end-diastolic pressure [LVEDP; 14.5 ± 1.3 mm Hg (n = 6) vs. 6.8 ± 1.4 mm Hg (n = 5); P < 0.01], no significant differences were observed in aortic SBP and DBP, peak right ventricular systolic pressure, right ventricular end-diastolic pressure, or the maximum rates of LV pressure rise and fall (peak +dP/dT and -dP/dT; Fig. 1
).
Five-month-old male GLP-1R-/- mice remained significantly lower in BW than age-matched male CD-1 controls [32.8 ± 0.6 g (n = 22) vs. 37.9 ± 0.8 g (n = 22); P < 0.001]; however, baseline HR, SBP, DBP, peak LV systolic pressure (LVSP), LVEDP, and peak +dP/dT and -dP/dT were not significantly different (Table 1
). Furthermore, echocardiography and Doppler-defined (noninvasive) measures of cardiac performance such as fractional shortening, peak aortic flow velocity, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance were not significantly different between lightly anesthetized male 5-month-old GLP-1R-/- and CD-1 WT controls (Table 1
and data not shown). Taken together, these data suggest either an age-dependent compensation for the specific baseline cardiac functional abnormalities (resting HR and LVEDP) noted in 2-month-old GLP-1R-/- mice, or differences in the rate of normal cardiovascular development between GLP-1R-/- mice and controls.
Cardiac structure
To ascertain whether GLP-1R-/- mice exhibited changes in cardiac structure, we performed two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography in 5-month-old lightly anesthetized male GLP-1R-/- mice and WT CD-1 controls. Although absolute septal thickness (ST) and posterolateral myocardial wall thickness (PLT) of GLP-1R-/- and WT mice did not differ [ST: GLP-1R-/-, 0.769 ± 0.028 mm (n = 11) vs. WT, 0.728 ± 0.038 mm (n = 10); P = 0.39; PLT: GLP-1R-/-, 0.662 ± 0.016 mm (n = 11) vs. WT, 0.658 ± 0.031 mm (n = 10); P = 0.89], BW-adjusted values were significantly increased in GLP-1R-/- compared with age-matched control mice (Fig. 2A
).

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Cardiac morphometry and histology. Data shown in Panels A-B were obtained from male 5 month-old GLP-1R-/- and CD-1 WT mice. A, Weight-adjusted baseline M-mode echocardiography-derived ST and PLT wall thickness in lightly anesthetized animals. B, The wet HW/BW ratio. Data shown are the mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 via unpaired Students t test. C, Representative midventricular cardiac sections of 2- and 5-month old GLP-1R-/- and CD-1 WT mice. Scale bar, 5 mm. D, Representative photomicrographs of H&E-stained histological sections. Magnification, Top, x40; bottom, x100 oil immersion.
|
|
Morphometry of perfusion-fixed hearts from 2- and 5-month-old GLP-1R-/- and WT mice demonstrated significant differences in cardiac dimension. Although the wet heart weight (HW) of 2-month-old GLP-1R-/- mice appeared lower than that of age-matched WT controls [150 ± 11 mg (n = 8) vs. 178 ± 10 mg (n = 6); P = 0.06], HW/BW ratios were nearly identical [5.26 ± 0.35 mg/g (n = 8) vs. 5.28 ± 0.33 mg/g (n = 6); P = not significant). By contrast, wet HW was significantly reduced in GLP-1R-/- vs. WT controls at 5 months of age [207.3 ± 21.5 mg (n = 6) vs. 353.3 ± 26.8 mg (n = 7); P < 0.002], and this difference remained significant after correction for BW (Fig. 2B
).
Although morphometry of perfusion-fixed cardiac sections also suggested that GLP-1R-/- hearts are smaller than WT hearts at 2 months of age [0.110 ± 0.008 cm2 (n = 9) vs. 0.140 ± 0.012 cm2 (n = 6); P = 0.05], this difference was again far more significant at 5 months of age [0.148 ± 0.025 cm2 (n = 6) vs. 0.240 ± 0.015 cm2 (n = 7); P < 0.01; Fig. 2C
].
Quantitative morphometry of histological sections revealed that BW-adjusted ST and PLT wall thickness was significantly increased in older GLP-1R-/- mice [ST/BW, 0.030 ± 0.005 mm/g (n = 5) vs. 0.019 ± 0.002 mm/g (n = 7); P < 0.05; PLT/BW, 0.032 ± 0.004 mm/g (n = 5) vs. 0.021 ± 0.002 mm/g (n = 7); P < 0.02], consistent with the results of in vivo echocardiography. These data suggest that although baseline cardiac functional abnormalities are no longer detectable in 5-month-old GLP-1R-/- mice, significant differences in cardiac dimension remain detectable in GLP-1R-/- vs. WT mice.
Light microscopy did not reveal overt histological differences between H&E-stained cardiac sections of GLP-1R-/- and WT mice at 2 or 5 months of age (Fig. 2
, C and D). Specifically, no valvular abnormalities, myofibrillar disarray, necrosis, myocyte loss, inflammatory infiltration, or increased matrix deposition could be identified as possible explanations for either the decreased heart size or increased wall thickness of GLP-1R-/- mice (Fig. 2
, C and D).
Cardiac responses to stress hormones
To assess whether the cardiovascular consequences of GLP-1R gene disruption might be unmasked by stress hormone-mediated activation of cardiac function, we examined the impact of 1) insulin and 2) adrenaline on cardiovascular parameters in both CD-1 WT and GLP-1R-/- mice at 5 months of age. Insulin administration (at time 0) produced a nonsignificant reduction in blood glucose (millimoles per liter) in anesthetized mice over the duration of the experiment (10 min; WT, 8.38 ± 0.30 vs. 7.34 ± 0.37, P = 0.061; GLP-1R-/-, 8.98 ± 0.34 vs. 8.06 ± 0.39, P = 0.113; initial vs. final blood glucose level, Fig. 3A
). Both WT and GLP-1R-/- mice exhibited significant increases in HR in response to insulin that did not differ significantly between WT and GLP-1R-/- mice (Fig. 3B
). By contrast, significant differences in LVSP, LVEDP, and contractility (peak +dP/dT) were noted in WT vs. GLP-1R-/- mice after insulin administration (Fig. 3
, CE). Insulin administration was associated with a transient increase in both LV contractility (Fig. 3E
) and lusitropy (Fig. 3F
) in WT but not GLP-1R-/- mice. In contrast, the significant elevations of LVEDP noted in insulin-treated GLP-1R-/- but not WT mice were sustained for the entire duration of monitoring (Fig. 3D
) and did not correct even after other hemodynamic parameters appeared to have normalized.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Cardiac hemodynamic responses to insulin in 5-month-old mice. Effect of insulin (3 U/kg, ip, administered at arrow) on blood glucose (A), HR (B), LVSP (C), LVEDP (D), +dP/dT (E), and -dP/dT (F) in 5-month-old WT (closed symbols) and GLP-1R-/- (open symbols) mice. Data for B, C, D, E, and F are expressed as percentage of baseline (time = 0) parameters. Statistical analyses between WT and GLP-1R-/- curves were by two-way ANOVA, with n = 5 for each group.
|
|
To determine whether the defective cardiovascular responses observed in stressed GLP-1R-/- mice were attributable to primary cardiac abnormalities or to potential defects in central GLP-1R-mediated activation of the neurohormonal stress response, we examined both central and peripheral responses to a metabolic stress in WT and GLP-1R-/- mice. Activation of c-fos expression in the glucose-sensitive PVN was significantly increased after insulin administration in both WT and GLP-1R-/- mice (Fig. 4
, A and B). Insulin-induced hypoglycemia was also associated with significant induction of c-fos expression in the arcuate nucleus of both WT and GLP-1R-/- mice (data not shown). To determine whether insulin-induced hypoglycemia was associated with appropriately increased levels of counterregulatory hormones, plasma glucagon and adrenaline were measured after insulin administration. Baseline levels of adrenaline and glucagon were comparable and increased significantly in response to hypoglycemia in both WT and GLP-1R-/- mice (Fig. 4
, C and D). These data indicate that GLP-1R-/- mice are capable of sensing and responding appropriately to metabolic stress, suggesting that the abnormal cardiac responses to insulin observed in GLP-1R-/- mice were not likely attributable to defects in the central or peripheral arms of the neurohormonal stress response.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Central and peripheral neurohumoral responses to insulin. Assessment of central hypothalamic c-fos expression and counterregulatory hormonal responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia were performed as described in Materials and Methods. A, Representative photomicrographs of Fos-stained coronal brain sections of the PVN of the hypothalamus illustrate the effects of insulin-induced hypoglycemia on the number of Fos-immunopositive cells in CD-1 WT and GLP-1R-/- mice. Magnification, x100. B, The mean (±SE) numbers of Fos-immunoreactive cells counted in the PVN. Five brain sections were analyzed per mouse, with n = 710 mice in each group. *, P < 0.05 for saline- vs. insulin-injected mice. C and D, Mean (±SE) plasma adrenaline (C) and glucagon (D) levels in mice after the administration of saline or insulin are shown, with n = 48 mice/group. *, P < 0.05; #, P < 0.02; ##, P < 0.01 for saline- vs. insulin-injected mice by ANOVA.
|
|
To ascertain further whether the defective cardiovascular responses were secondary to primary defects in cardiac function, we examined the cardiac responses to adrenergic stimulation in both WT and GLP-1R-/- mice at 5 months of age. Adrenaline (epinephrine) administration (at time 0) produced a nonsignificant increase in blood glucose levels (millimoles per liter) in anesthetized mice over the duration of the 10-min experiment (WT, 10.60 ± 0.81 vs. 12.63 ± 0.89, P = 0.143; GLP-1R-/-, 9.82 ± 0.68 vs. 11.10 ± 0.99, P = 0.318; for initial vs. final glucose level, Fig. 5A
). Adrenaline administration was associated with a rapid (1 min) but transient increase in HR in both WT and GLP-1R-/- mice, with no significant difference between the HR responses of WT vs. GLP-1R-/- mice (Fig. 5B
). Adrenaline rapidly but transiently increased peak LVSP (Fig. 5C
) and decreased LVEDP (Fig. 5D
) in both WT and GLP-1R-/- mice. However, the LVSP response of GLP-1R-/- mice was significantly less than that of WT mice (Fig. 5C
). Similarly, adrenaline-induced increases in LV contractility (peak +dP/dT) were significantly more transient in GLP-1R-/- compared with WT mice (Fig. 5E
). Although the lusitropic response to adrenaline appeared to be blunted in GLP-1R-/- mice compared with WT controls (peak -dP/dT; Fig. 5F
), the difference between the GLP-1R-/- and WT responses was not statistically significant. Of note, a similar result was observed in the lusitropic response to insulin (Fig. 3F
).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Cardiac hemodynamic responses to adrenaline in 5-month-old mice. Effect of adrenaline (1 µg/kg, iv, administered at arrow) on blood glucose (A), HR (B), LVSP (C), LVEDP (D), +dP/dT (E), and -dP/dT (F) in 5-month-old WT (closed symbols) and GLP-1R-/- (open symbols) mice. Data in B, C, D, E, and F are expressed as percentage of the baseline (time = 0) parameter. Statistical analyses between WT and GLP-1R-/- curves were by two-way ANOVA, with n = 6 for each group.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Although cardiac expression of the GLP-1R has been identified in humans (23) and rodents (10), a direct role for cardiac GLP-1R signaling in vivo had not been demonstrated previously. Using isolated rat cardiac myocytes in vitro, Vila Petroff et al. (22) showed that GLP-1R signaling results in an increase in levels of intracellular Ca2+ and cytosolic cAMP, which did not induce any appreciable effects on contractile responses. Several studies have demonstrated that GLP-1 or exendin-4 infusions resulted in significant increases in both HR and BP in rats (20, 26). However, these effects appeared dependent in part on the CNS and vagal innervation (27), and exogenous administration of GLP-1R agonists also activated CNS regions involved in cardiac autonomic regulation (21). Accordingly, the relative contributions to cardiovascular physiology of the responses of the CNS and peripheral nervous system to GLP-1, vs. more direct effects on cardiac GLP-1 receptors in vivo, remained uncertain.
The new data presented here demonstrate that GLP-1R-/- mice exhibit significant differences in cardiac function compared with WT CD-1 controls, strongly suggesting that their distinctly blunted cardiac responses are at least partly due to cardiac defects and not strictly attributable to indirect central or peripheral neurohumoral mechanisms.
Hemodynamic abnormalities in GLP-1R-/- mice
The reduced HR of 2-month-old GLP-1R-/- mice is consistent with the known positive chronotropic effect of GLP-1 in rodents (Refs.20, 21, 26 and 27 ; see below). Given that the baseline SBP and DBP and peak LVSP of 2-month-old GLP-1R-/- mice were no different from those of WT animals (Fig. 1
), it is unlikely that the observed difference in HR can be attributed to an increased sensitivity to the weight-adjusted anesthetic. Rather, it suggests that an intact GLP-1R in young mice may have a more important role in cardiac pacemaker function than on ventricular contractility.
Importantly, the reduced HR of 2-month-old GLP-1R-/- mice cannot explain the significant elevation in their LVEDP. Indeed, prolongation of diastole is expected to improve and not exacerbate measures of diastolic performance. In the absence of significant defects in active lusitropy (peak -dP/dT), elevations in LVEDP may still be explained by abnormalities in the active and/or passive phases of diastole, or an increase in the effective circulating blood volume. Given their reduced BW and the absence of any signs of pulmonary congestion, edema, or an increase in right ventricular pressures or systemic blood pressure, the latter possibility is unlikely. Rather, a direct defect in diastolic function would be consistent with the small, thickened, LV cavity documented in older GLP-1R-/- animals (Fig. 2
) and the significant abnormalities in LVEDP and dP/dT noted after stress hormone administration (Figs. 3
and 5
). Although, not statistically significant (P = 0.16), a small but potentially functionally significant increase in LVEDP remained evident in 5-month-old GLP-1R-/- mice (Table 1
). Future studies exploring in vivo and/or ex vivo pressure-volume relationships will be required to dissect further the mechanisms underlying this abnormality.
Structural abnormalities in GLP-1R-/- mice
Notwithstanding their significantly reduced BW, the lower HW/BW ratio and smaller planimetry-defined cross-sectional area of perfusion-fixed GLP-1R-/- hearts suggest a potential role for GLP-1R in cardiac growth. Consistent with these findings, GLP-1R agonists exert proliferative and cytoprotective effects in the endocrine pancreas (39), and GLP-1R-/- mice exhibit modest but significant perturbations in the number and size of pancreatic islets (40). Interestingly, after correcting for BW, GLP-1R-/- mice appear to have thicker ventricular walls than expected. Given the absence of an increased BP (afterload) or larger cardiac diameter, the increase in LV wall thickness noted in GLP-1R-/- mice may represent an adaptive response to an isolated elevation in diastolic wall tension (see above). If so, this would represent a rather unique model of compensatory mural hypertrophy, deserving of further investigation.
Cardiac effects of glucagon and GLP-1
Several lines of evidence support a role for glucagon-like peptides in cardiac physiology. Both glucagon and GLP-1 exert overlapping physiological actions in different organs, including regulation of appetite (41, 42, 43), control of renal function (44, 45), and modulation of gastrointestinal motility (46, 47, 48, 49). The glucagon receptor is expressed in the heart (50, 51), and exogenous glucagon administration produces positive chronotropic and inotropic responses in rodents and human subjects (52, 53). These actions have led to the occasional use of glucagon as an agent for the treatment of refractory bradycardia or hypotension (54, 55). Glucagon exerts direct effects in the heart by modulation of cardiac Ca2+ current, activation of adenylyl cyclase, and inhibition of phosphodiesterase (56). Intriguingly, a smaller peptide derived from glucagon via proteolytic cleavage, glucagon (19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29), also regulates myocardial Ca2+ flux and amplifies the inotropic effects of glucagon on the heart via effects on cardiac phosphodiesterase activity (57). Whether glucagon receptor signaling is essential for cardiovascular function remains unclear, because parameters of cardiac physiology have not been reported in mice with genetic inactivation of the glucagon receptor (58).
Although less extensively studied, GLP-1 administration also produces dose-dependent increases in HR and BP in anesthetized rats after administration of the native peptide GLP-1(736)amide (20). Similar but less robust findings were observed after infusion of glucagon, whereas no changes in HR or BP were detected after administration of GLP-2 (20), consistent with the absence of detectable GLP-2R mRNA transcripts in the heart (12). The cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 were not abolished by pretreatment of rats with reserpine, propranolol, or phentolamine, suggesting that GLP-1 actions on the heart are not strictly dependent on catecholaminergic pathways (20). The cardiac actions of GLP-1 in anesthetized rats were mimicked but more prolonged after administration of the lizard GLP-1 agonist exendin-4, and they were blocked by the GLP-1R antagonist exendin(939) (Ref. 26). Taken together, these data are consistent with a role for the known GLP-1R in the transduction of GLP-1-mediated cardiovascular effects.
Evidence implicating both direct and indirect cardiac effects of GLP-1
The importance of both central and peripheral inputs for GLP-1 action on the cardiovascular system is exemplified by several studies. Intracerebroventricular (icv) or iv administration of GLP-1R agonists produced increases in HR and BP in rats that were blocked by icv administration of the GLP-1R antagonist exendin(939) (Ref. 27). The importance of neural innervation for cardiovascular GLP-1 actions is further illustrated by the demonstration that bilateral vagotomy blocked the increase in HR and BP induced by central GLP-1 and abolished the cardiovascular effects of central exendin(939) on icv, but not peripheral, GLP-1 (27). These findings suggest that the cardiovascular actions of GLP-1 reflect integration of both indirect neural and direct cardiac actions of GLP-1R signaling.
Additional evidence for the importance of central GLP-1 effects on cardiovascular function derives from experiments with nonanesthetized rats administered native GLP-1 or exendin-4 at low doses so as to avoid confounding hypoglycemia or hyperinsulinemia (21). Administration of GLP-1R agonists to normoglycemic rats dose-dependently increased BP and HR and induced c-fos expression in the adrenal medulla and neurons in the hypothalamus and brain stem (21). These neurons included medullary catecholamine neurons that provide input to sympathetic preganglionic neurons. Furthermore, GLP-1R agonists rapidly activated tyrosine hydroxylase gene transcription in brain stem catecholamine neurons, providing a link between GLP-1R signaling and activation of the sympathetic nervous system in the nonanesthetized rodent in vivo (21).
Importance of GLP-1R in cardiac physiology
Acute iv or icv administration of the GLP-1R antagonist exendin(939) had no effect on basal HR or BP in anesthetized rats (26, 27). Similarly, we did not observe significant changes in these parameters at baseline in 5-month-old GLP-1R-/- mice. In contrast, the cardiac responses to insulin administration were significantly blunted in GLP-1R-/- mice. Furthermore, the defective cardiovascular responses were not attributable to differences in blood glucose. Moreover, despite evidence implicating the GLP-1R in the CNS response to aversive stress (59, 60), the cardiovascular defect was not secondary to problems with sensing or responding to metabolic stress, because activation of counterregulatory stress-responsive pathways, as assessed by central c-fos expression and peripheral plasma glucagon and epinephrine levels, were comparable in WT and GLP-1R-/- mice.
Instead, data demonstrating abnormalities in cardiac contractility, HW, wall thickness, and area strongly implicate a direct role for GLP-1R signaling in formation of normal cardiac structure in the developing and/or adult heart (Fig. 6
). Activation of GLP-1R signaling in rat cardiomyocytes produced increases in cAMP formation that were blocked by exendin(939) (Ref. 22). Although both GLP-1 and isoproterenol produced an intracellular acidosis, GLP-1, but not isoproterenol, induced a decrease in contraction amplitude with no effect on intracellular Ca2+ transit (22). Taken together, the previous data and our present studies demonstrating structural and functional cardiac abnormalities in the GLP-1R-/- mouse suggest that the role of GLP-1 in cardiovascular physiology is complex, involves both direct and indirect effects on the nervous system and heart (Fig. 6
), and merits further investigation.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Schematic depiction of GLP-1-dependent regulation of cardiac function. The proposed model involves GLP-1, secreted from gut endocrine cells, acting either directly on heart GLP-1Rs, or indirectly via the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and/or CNS to regulate cardiovascular function. Top, Representative hearts from +/+ WT and GLP-1R-/- mice; bottom, fos-positive neurons in the PVN.
|
|
Implications for the clinical use of GLP-1R agonists
The implications of our findings in mice for the use of agents activating GLP-1R signaling for the treatment of human diabetes remain uncertain. Continuous infusion of GLP-1 for 48 h produced no major effect on HR, but SBP and DBP tended to be lower in GLP-1-treated patients (61). Subcutaneous administration of native GLP-1 for 6 wk in 20 human subjects with type 2 diabetes was not associated with abnormalities in HR or BP regulation (62). Hence, the role of GLP-1R signaling in the developing or adult rodent cardiovascular system may differ from the role(s) played by the GLP-1R in the human heart. Nevertheless, the GLP-1R is expressed at high levels in the human heart (23), and the long-term cardiovascular effects of more potent degradation-resistant GLP-1 agonists (currently in clinical trials for the treatment of type 2 diabetes) are not yet known. The findings that GLP-1R activation produces increases in HR, BP, and sympathetic nervous system activation in rodents (20, 26, 27), taken together with our data demonstrating structural and functional abnormalities in GLP-1R-/- mice, suggest that ongoing scrutiny of the cardiovascular effects of GLP-1R agonists appears prudent.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank Dr. L. Scrocchi for technical assistance with preliminary experiments.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
R.G. was supported by a Fellowship from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (HSFO) and the Edward Christie Stevens and the Evelyn McGloin Awards. X.Y. was supported by a Fellowship from the Canadian Hypertension Society/Medical Research Council of Canada. I.N.M. was supported by a Studentship from the HSFO/Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Q.H. is supported by a Research Fellowship from the Canadian Diabetes Association. D.J.D. is a Senior Scientist of the CIHR and was supported in part by operating grant support from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund, the National Institutes of Health, and the Canadian Diabetes Association. M.H. is a Clinician-Scientist of the CIHR and recipient of infrastructure awards from the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund. This work was supported in part by HSFO operating grants NA3636 and NA4389 and CIHR operating grants CL42617 and MT14648 (to M.H.).
R.G. and X.Y. contributed equally to this work.
Abbreviations: BP, Blood pressure; BW, body weight; DBP, diastolic BP; dP/dT, first derivative of left ventricle pressure; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; GLP-1R, GLP-1 receptor; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; HR, heart rate; HW, heart weight; icv, intracerebroventricular; LV, left ventricular; LVEDP, LV end diastolic pressure; LVEDV, LV end-diastolic volume; LVSP, LV systolic pressure; PLT, posterolateral thickness; PVN, paraventricular nucleus; SBP, systolic BP; ST, septal thickness; WT, wild-type.
Received January 3, 2003.
Accepted for publication March 10, 2003.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Drucker DJ 2001 Minireview: the glucagon-like peptides. Endocrinology 142:521527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Drucker DJ, Ehrlich P, Asa SL, Brubaker PL 1996 Induction of intestinal epithelial proliferation by glucagon-like peptide 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:79117916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Drucker DJ 2001 Glucagon-like peptide 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:17591764[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kieffer TJ, Habener JF 1999 The glucagon-like peptides. Endocr Rev 20:876913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Drucker DJ 2002 Biological actions and therapeutic potential of the glucagon-like peptides. Gastroenterology 122:531544[CrossRef][Medline]
- MacNeil DJ, Occi JL, Hey PJ, Strader CD, Graziano MP 1994 Cloning and expression of a human glucagon receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 198:328334[CrossRef][Medline]
- Mayo KE, Miller LJ, Bataille D, Dalle S, Goke B, Thorens B, Drucker DJ 2003 International Union of Pharmacology. XXXV. The glucagon receptor family. Pharmacol Rev 55:167194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Thorens B 1992 Expression cloning of the pancreatic ß cell receptor for the gluco-incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:86418645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Campos RV, Lee YC, Drucker DJ 1994 Divergent tissue-specific and developmental expression of receptors for glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 in the mouse. Endocrinology 134:21562164[Abstract]
- Bullock BP, Heller RS, Habener JF 1996 Tissue distribution of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding the rat glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor. Endocrinology 137:29682978[Abstract]
- Munroe DG, Gupta AK, Kooshesh F, Vyas TB, Rizkalla G, Wang H, Demchyshyn L, Yang ZJ, Kamboj RK, Chen H, McCallum K, Sumner-Smith M, Drucker DJ, Crivici A 1999 Prototypic G protein-coupled receptor for the intestinotrophic factor glucagon-like peptide 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:15691573[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yusta B, Huang L, Munroe D, Wolff G, Fantaske R, Sharma S, Demchyshyn L, Asa SL, Drucker DJ 2000 Enteroendocrine localization of GLP-2 receptor expression. Gastroenterology 119:744755[CrossRef][Medline]
- Bjerknes M, Cheng H 2001 Modulation of specific intestinal epithelial progenitors by enteric neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1249712502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Drucker DJ 2001 Development of glucagon-like peptide-1-based pharmaceuticals as therapeutic agents for the treatment of diabetes. Curr Pharm Des 7:13991412[CrossRef][Medline]
- Holst JJ 1999 An intestinal hormone, signaling nutritional abundance, with an unusual therapeutic potential. Trends Endocrinol Metab 10:229235[CrossRef][Medline]
- Seeley RJ, Blake K, Rushing PA, Benoit S, Eng J, Woods SC, DAlessio D 2000 The role of CNS glucagon-like peptide-1 (736) amide receptors in mediating the visceral illness effects of lithium chloride. J Neurosci 20:16161621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Golpon HA, Puechner A, Welte T, Wichert PV, Feddersen CO 2001 Vasorelaxant effect of glucagon-like peptide-(736)amide and amylin on the pulmonary circulation of the rat. Regul Pept 102:8186[CrossRef][Medline]
- Richter G, Feddersen O, Wagner U, Barth P, Goke R, Goke B 1993 GLP-1 stimulates secretion of macromolecules from airways and relaxes pulmonary artery. Am J Physiol 265:L374L381
- Edwards CM, Edwards AV, Bloom SR 1997 Cardiovascular and pancreatic endocrine responses to glucagon-like peptide-1(736) amide in the conscious calf. Exp Physiol 82:709716[Abstract]
- Barragan JM, Rodriguez RE, Blazquez E 1994 Changes in arterial blood pressure and heart rate induced by glucagon-like peptide-1-(736 amide) in rats. Am J Physiol 266:E459E466
- Yamamoto H, Lee CE, Marcus JN, Williams TD, Overton JM, Lopez ME, Hollenberg AN, Baggio L, Saper CB, Drucker DJ, Elmquist JK 2002 Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor stimulation increases blood pressure and heart rate and activates autonomic regulatory neurons. J Clin Invest 110:4352[CrossRef][Medline]
- Vila Petroff MG, Egan JM, Wang X, Sollott SJ 2001 Glucagon-like peptide-1 increases cAMP but fails to augment contraction in adult rat cardiac myocytes. Circ Res 89:445452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wei Y, Mojsov S 1995 Tissue-specific expression of the human receptor for glucagon-like peptide 1: brain, heart and pancreatic forms have the same deduced amino acid sequences. FEBS Lett 358:219224[CrossRef][Medline]
- Alvarez E, Roncero I, Chowen JA, Thorens B, Blazquez E 1996 Expression of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor gene in rat brain. J Neurochem 66:920927[Medline]
- Merchenthaler I, Lane M, Shughrue P 1999 Distribution of pre-pro-glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor messenger RNAs in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 403:261280[CrossRef][Medline]
- Barragan JM, Rodriguez RE, Eng J, Blazquez E 1996 Interactions of exendin-(939) with the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1-(736) amide and of exendin-4 on arterial blood pressure and heart rate in rats. Regul Pept 67:6368[CrossRef][Medline]
- Barragan JM, Eng J, Rodriguez R, Blazquez E 1999 Neural contribution to the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1-(736) amide on arterial blood pressure in rats. Am J Physiol 277:E784E791
- Scrocchi LA, Brown TJ, MacLusky N, Brubaker PL, Auerbach AB, Joyner AL, Drucker DJ 1996 Glucose intolerance but normal satiety in mice with a null mutation in the glucagon-like peptide receptor gene. Nat Med 2:12541258[CrossRef][Medline]
- Feldman MD, Erikson JM, Mao Y, Korcarz CE, Lang RM, Freeman GL 2000 Validation of a mouse conductance system to determine LV volume: comparison to echocardiography and crystals. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279:H1698H1707
- Mungrue IN, Gros R, You X, Pirani A, Azad A, Csont T, Schulz R, Butany J, Stewart DJ, Husain M 2002 Cardiomyocyte overexpression of iNOS in mice results in peroxynitrite generation, heart block, and sudden death. J Clin Invest 109:735743[CrossRef][Medline]
- Schiller N, Shah P, Crawford M, De Maria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reicheck N, Sahn D, Schnittger I, Silverman N, Tajik A 1989 American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms: recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2:358367[Medline]
- Fortuin NJ, Hood Jr WP, Craige E 1972 Evaluation of left ventricular function by echocardiography. Circulation 46:2635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Janssen BJ, Smits JF 2002 Autonomic control of blood pressure in mice: basic physiology and effects of genetic modification. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282:R1545R1564
- Janssen B, Debets J, Leenders P, Smits J 2002 Chronic measurement of cardiac output in conscious mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282:R928R935
- Drexler H, Hirth C, Stasch HP, Lu W, Neuser D, Just H 1990 Vasodilatory action of endogenous atrial natriuretic factor in a rat model of chronic heart failure as determined by monoclonal ANF antibody. Circ Res 66:13711380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Elias CF, Kelly JF, Lee CE, Ahima RS, Drucker DJ, Saper CB, Elmquist JK 2000 Chemical characterization of leptin-activated neurons in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol 423:261281[CrossRef][Medline]
- Franklin K, Paxinos G 1997 The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego: Academic Press
- Scrocchi LA, Drucker DJ 1998 Effects of aging and a high fat diet on body weight and glucose control in GLP-1R-/- mice. Endocrinology 139:31273132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Drucker DJ 2003 Glucagon-like peptides: regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Mol Endocrinol 17:161171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ling Z, Wu D, Zambre Y, Flamez D, Drucker DJ, Pipeleers DG, Schuit FC 2001 Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor signaling influences topography of islet cells in mice. Virchows Arch 438:382387[CrossRef][Medline]
- Inokuchi A, Oomura Y, Nishimura H 1984 Effect of intracerebroventricularly infused glucagon on feeding behavior. Physiol Behav 33:397400[CrossRef][Medline]
- Turton MD, OShea D, Gunn I, Beak SA, Edwards CMB, Meeran K, Choi SJ, Taylor GM, Heath MM, Lambert PD, Wilding JPH, Smith DM, Ghatei MA, Herbert J, Bloom SR 1996 A role for glucagon-like peptide-1 in the central regulation of feeding. Nature 379:6972[CrossRef][Medline]
- Verdich C, Flint A, Gutzwiller JP, Naslund E, Beglinger C, Hellstrom PM, Long SJ, Morgan LM, Holst JJ, Astrup A 2001 A meta-analysis of the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 (736) amide on ad libitum energy intake in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:43824389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schwartz Sorensen S, Eiskjaer H, Orskov H, Bjerregaard Pedersen E 1993 Effect of intravenous glucagon infusion on renal haemodynamics and renal tubular handling of sodium in healthy humans. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 53:2534[Medline]
- Ahloulay M, Bouby N, Machet F, Kubrusly M, Coutaud C, Bankir L 1992 Effects of glucagon on glomerular filtration rate and urea and water excretion. Am J Physiol 263:F24F36
- Necheles H, Sporn J, Walker L 1966 Effect of glucagon on gastrointestinal motility. Am J Gastroenterol 45:3439[Medline]
- Patel GK, Whalen GE, Soergel KH, Wu WC, Meade RC 1979 Glucagon effects on the human small intestine. Dig Dis Sci 24:501508[CrossRef][Medline]
- Schirra J, Kuwert P, Wank U, Leicht P, Arnold R, Goke B, Katschinski M 1997 Differential effects of subcutaneous GLP-1 on gastric emptying, antroduodenal motility, and pancreatic function in men. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 109:8497[Medline]
- Tolessa T, Gutniak M, Holst JJ, Efendic S, Hellstrom PM 1998 Inhibitory effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 on small bowel motility. J Clin Invest 102:764774[Medline]
- Svoboda M, Tastenoy M, Vertongen P, Robberecht P 1994 Relative quantitative analysis of glucagon receptor mRNA in rat tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol 105:131137[CrossRef][Medline]
- Dunphy JL, Taylor RG, Fuller PJ 1998 Tissue distribution of rat glucagon receptor and GLP-1 receptor gene expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol 141:179186[CrossRef][Medline]
- Parmley WW, Glick G, Sonnenblick EH 1968 Cardiovascular effects of glucagon in man. N Engl J Med 279:1217
- Farah AE 1983 Glucagon and the circulation. Pharmacol Rev 35:181217[Abstract]
- Love JN, Sachdeva DK, Bessman ES, Curtis LA, Howell JM 1998 A potential role for glucagon in the treatment of drug-induced symptomatic bradycardia. Chest 114:323326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- White CM 1999 A review of potential cardiovascular uses of intravenous glucagon administration. J Clin Pharmacol 39:442447[Abstract]
- Mery PF, Brechler V, Pavoine C, Pecker F, Fischmeister R 1990 Glucagon stimulates the cardiac Ca2+ current by activation of adenylyl cyclase and inhibition of phosphodiesterase. Nature 345:158161[CrossRef][Medline]
- Sauvadet A, Rohn T, Pecker F, Pavoine C 1996 Synergistic actions of glucagon and miniglucagon on Ca2+ mobilization in cardiac cells. Circ Res 78:102109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Parker JC, Andrews KM, Allen MR, Stock JL, McNeish JD 2002 Glycemic control in mice with targeted disruption of the glucagon receptor gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 290:839843[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rinaman L 1999 Interoceptive stress activates glucagon-like peptide-1 neurons that project to the hypothalamus. Am J Physiol 277:R582R590
- van Dijk G, Thiele TE 1999 Glucagon-like peptide-1 (736) amide: a central regulator of satiety and interoceptive stress. Neuropeptides 33:406414[CrossRef][Medline]
- Toft-Nielsen MB, Madsbad S, Holst JJ 1999 Continuous subcutaneous infusion of glucagon-like peptide 1 lowers plasma glucose and reduces appetite in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 22:11371143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Zander M, Madsbad S, Madsen JL, Holst JJ 2002 Effect of 6-week course of glucagon-like peptide 1 on glycaemic control, insulin sensitivity, and ß-cell function in type 2 diabetes: a parallel-group study. Lancet 359:824830[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Kim and J. M. Egan
The Role of Incretins in Glucose Homeostasis and Diabetes Treatment
Pharmacol. Rev.,
December 1, 2008;
60(4):
470 - 512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Maida, J. A. Lovshin, L. L. Baggio, and D. J. Drucker
The Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Oxyntomodulin Enhances {beta}-Cell Function but Does Not Inhibit Gastric Emptying in Mice
Endocrinology,
November 1, 2008;
149(11):
5670 - 5678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Hausenloy and D. M. Yellon
GLP-1 Therapy: Beyond Glucose Control
Circ Heart Fail,
September 1, 2008;
1(3):
147 - 149.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Poornima, S. B. Brown, S. Bhashyam, P. Parikh, H. Bolukoglu, and R. P. Shannon
Chronic Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Infusion Sustains Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Prolongs Survival in the Spontaneously Hypertensive, Heart Failure-Prone Rat
Circ Heart Fail,
September 1, 2008;
1(3):
153 - 160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ban, M. H. Noyan-Ashraf, J. Hoefer, S.-S. Bolz, D. J. Drucker, and M. Husain
Cardioprotective and Vasodilatory Actions of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Are Mediated Through Both Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor-Dependent and -Independent Pathways
Circulation,
May 6, 2008;
117(18):
2340 - 2350.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Basu, N. Charkoudian, W. Schrage, R. A. Rizza, R. Basu, and M. J. Joyner
Beneficial effects of GLP-1 on endothelial function in humans: dampening by glyburide but not by glimepiride
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
November 1, 2007;
293(5):
E1289 - E1295.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Holst
The Physiology of Glucagon-like Peptide 1
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2007;
87(4):
1409 - 1439.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Knudsen, D. Kiel, M. Teng, C. Behrens, D. Bhumralkar, J. T. Kodra, J. J. Holst, C. B. Jeppesen, M. D. Johnson, J. C. de Jong, et al.
From the Cover: Small-molecule agonists for the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor
PNAS,
January 16, 2007;
104(3):
937 - 942.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Riddle and D. J. Drucker
Emerging Therapies Mimicking the Effects of Amylin and Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2006;
29(2):
435 - 449.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|