| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Medicine (G.J.M., K.D.N., M.W.S.), Harborview Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104; Pacific Northwest Research Institute and Department of Pharmacology (C.J.R.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98112; Research Division (M.G.M.), Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215; Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System (J.E.B., D.G.B.), Seattle, Washington 98108; and Departments of Medicine and Biological Structure (D.G.B.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Professor Michael Schwartz, Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359757, Seattle, Washington 98104. E-mail: mschwart{at}u.washington.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several observations support the hypothesis that the adipocyte hormone, leptin, is an adiposity-negative feedback signal. Leptin circulates at levels proportionate to body fat content (4) and enters the CNS in proportion to its plasma level (5). Leptin also potently reduces food intake and body weight (6, 7, 8, 9) by activating leptin receptors expressed in brain areas known to be involved in food intake control, such as the arcuate nucleus (ARC; Ref. 10). Evidence that leptin signaling is essential for normal energy homeostasis stems from observations that genetic deficiency of either leptin (in ob/ob mice; Ref. 11) or Lepr (in db/db mice; Ref. 12, 13, 14) causes severe obesity and leptin administration reverses obesity in ob/ob, but not db/db, mice (9). Similarly, Lepr mutation causes a severe obesity phenotype in both the Zucker (fa/fa; Ref. 15) and Koletsky (fak/fak) rat models. The latter animals have a nonsense mutation (T2289A
Tyr763Stop) in the extracellular domain of Lepr, resulting in absence of all forms of Lepr protein and reduced leprb mRNA stability (16, 17). The clinical importance of intact leptin signaling is highlighted by the severe obesity that occurs in humans with homozygous mutation of either leptin (18) or Lepr (19).
The Lepr contains a single transmembrane domain and is a member of the class I cytokine receptor family (14). Of five known Lepr splice variants, only the long or signaling form of the leptin receptor, Leprb, has been shown to be essential for normal energy homeostasis. Unlike the other leptin receptor isoforms, Leprb contains a 302-amino acid cytoplasmic domain that includes motifs for binding of intracellular signaling molecules such as Janus kinase (20, 21, 22). After binding to the activated leptin receptor, Janus kinase 2 phosphorylates signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins (23) that then dimerize and translocate to the nucleus, in which they activate a specific program of gene transcription. Lepr signaling is also coupled to the intracellular insulin receptor substrate-phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase pathway (24, 25).
Among the various brain areas that express leprb, the ARC is implicated as playing an especially important role. Contained within the ARC are two subsets of neurons that are regulated by leptin and exert potent, opposing effects on food intake and body weight. These include neurons containing proopiomelanocortin (POMC), which inhibit food intake (26, 27) and are stimulated by leptin (28, 29) and those containing both neuropeptide Y (NPY) and agouti-related peptide neurons, which stimulate food intake (30, 31, 32) and are inhibited by leptin (33, 34). Both neuronal subsets express leprb (10, 35, 36), and leptin microinjection into the vicinity of the ARC reduces food intake and body weight in rats (37). Although these observations suggest a key role for ARC neurons as mediators of leptin action in vivo, whether leptin signaling in the ARC alone is sufficient to mediate biological responses to leptin is unknown.
To critically test this hypothesis, we developed an adenoviral gene therapy approach with which to express leptin receptors in discrete brain areas. Specifically, we employed a stereotaxic microinjection technique to deliver adenovirus expressing either leprb (Ad-leprb) or a control reporter gene (Ad-lacZ) into the ARC of Lepr-deficient fak/fak rats and thereby determine the effects on food intake and body weight of leptin signaling limited to this brain area. Results from this experiment were compared with those obtained when Ad-leprb was microinjected into the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA), a brain area implicated in energy homeostasis that does not express high levels of Leprb (10, 35). Our findings suggest that leptin signaling limited to the ARC, but not the LHA, is sufficient to mediate leptin effects on energy homeostasis and adenoviral gene therapy is a useful approach with which to restore expression of CNS proteins missing because of genetic mutation in a brain region-specific manner.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Generation of recombinant adenovirus
The Ad-lacZ adenovirus was generated and purified as previously described (38). The human leprb (hleprb) cDNA in pcDNA3 was subcloned into the adenoviral transfer vector pACCMV using HindIII and XbaI. The recombined hleprb adenovirus was generated by cotransfection of pACCMV hleprb with the adenoviral backbone vector pBHG11 in 293 cells; the resulting recombinant virus was purified as described (Ref. 39 and Fig. 1
).
|
Blood and tissue collection and processing
On d 16 after adenoviral injection, Koletsky animals were placed under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia and perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS. Perfused brains were removed, postfixed in the same solution overnight at 4 C, embedded in 25% sucrose solution for 48 h at 4 C, snap-frozen in isopentane cooled with liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 C for subsequent histochemical analysis. In a separate group of Koletsky rats and for studies using Wistar rats, a wedge of mediobasal hypothalamus (defined caudally by the mamillary bodies; rostrally by the optic chiasm; laterally by the optic tract; and superiorly by the apex of the hypothalamic third ventricle) was rapidly dissected following euthanasia and frozen for subsequent analysis by RT-PCR. Blood was obtained by cardiac puncture and collected into chilled heparin-containing tubes, separated into plasma, and stored at -20 C. Plasma glucose was measured using the glucose oxidase method (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA), and plasma insulin concentrations were determined by RIA (Linco, St. Louis, MO).
Histochemical analyses
ß-Galactosidase (ß-gal) staining.
Coronal cryostat sections (14 µm) of rat brains were thaw mounted on slides, washed for 2 min in ice-cold PBS, fixed for 5 min in ice-cold 0.02% glutaraldehyde and 3.8% formaldehyde, and incubated in substrate according to standard methods (40). Cells expressing ß-gal (+) were identified by their blue-staining cell bodies.
In situ hybridization (ISH).
Brains were sectioned in a coronal plane at 14 µm on a cryostat; thaw mounted on ribonuclease-free slides; and treated with 4% paraformaldehyde, acetic anhydride, ethanol, and chloroform as described (28). For each animal, five slides (10 brain sections) were selected for hybridization with each riboprobe, and care was taken to ensure that slides for each assay were taken from comparable brain areas of each animal. Sections for Pomc mRNA quantitation were selected from an area of the ARC rostral to the ventromedial nucleus but caudal to the optic chiasm. Sections for Npy hybridization contained the ventromedial nucleus and corresponded to the midregion of the ARC. For hybridization to leprb mRNA, sections were sampled at regular intervals from areas extending from the midregion to the rostral portion of the ARC. All brain slices for within-group comparisons were prepared for hybridization concurrently and used in the same assay. Riboprobes from a cDNA template for NPY, POMC, or leprb (based on nucleotides 28993251) were transcribed in the presence of 33P-UTP (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). Unincorporated label was separated using a QIAquick nucleotide removal kit (QIAGEN, Santa Clarita, CA). The hybridization signal was detected and quantitated using the Cyclone phosphor imager system (Packard Instrument Company, Meriden, CT). For each section, the background hybridization signal was subtracted from the selected target. The mean value for each animal was determined from 810 anatomically matched sections per animal, per riboprobe, to produce an index of mRNA levels.
RT-PCR.
Total RNA was extracted from tissue using RNAzol B according to manufacturers instructions (Tel-Test, Inc., Friendswood, TX). RNA was quantitated by spectrophotometry at 260 nm, and 1 µg RNA was reverse transcribed with 10 U avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). PCR was performed on a LightCycler (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) using a 50-ng sample of cDNA template added to the commercially available LightCycler PCR master mix (FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I, Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Primers that were designed to span an exon/intron boundary were optimized for mRNA encoding leprb, Npy, Pomc, melanin-concentrating hormone (Mch), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh). The primer sequences are listed: Leprb forward, 5'-tgttttgggacgatgttcca-3'; Leprb reverse, 5'-aaagatgctcaaatgtttcaggc-3'; Npy forward, 5'-accaggcagagatatggcaaga-3'; Npy reverse, 5'-ggacattttctgtgctttctctcatta-3'; Pomc forward, 5'-cgctcctactctatggagcactt-3'; Pomc reverse, 5'-tcacctaccagctccctcttg-3'; Mch forward, 5'-ccagctgagaatggagttcaga-3'; Mch reverse, 5'-gtcggtagactcttcccagcat-3'; Gapdh forward, 5'-aacgaccccttcattgac-3'; Gapdh reverse, 5'-tccacgacatactcagcac-3'. Expression levels of each hypothalamic neuropeptide mRNA were normalized to Gapdh mRNA content and expressed as a percent of Ad-lacZ-treated animals. Nontemplate controls were incorporated into each PCR run.
Statistical analysis
All results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 10.1, SPSS, Inc., Fullerton, CA). A one-way ANOVA with a least significant differences post hoc test was used to compare means between multiple groups, and a two-sample unpaired t test was used for two-group comparisons. In all instances, probability values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
To evaluate the time course of Ad-leprb mRNA expression following ARC microinjection, leprb mRNA levels were determined by RT-PCR in extracts of mediobasal hypothalamus obtained from wild-type Wistar rats either 1 or 2 wk after adenovirus microinjection into the ARC (n = 56 per group). One week after injection, mediobasal hypothalamic leprb mRNA content was increased more than 3-fold in Ad-leprb-treated, compared with Ad-lacZ-treated rats, and remained elevated by 2.4-fold at 2 wk (P < 0.05 for each comparison). Thus, adenovirus-mediated delivery of the gene encoding leprb to the ARC increased mediobasal hypothalamic leprb mRNA content for at least 2 wk.
Response to ARC delivery of Ad-leprb in obese and lean Koletsky rats
To test the hypothesis that leptin receptor signaling in the ARC alone is sufficient to attenuate the severe obesity phenotype of rats with global leptin receptor deficiency, fak/fak rats were microinjected directly into the ARC with either Ad-leprb (n = 6) or Ad-lacZ (n = 5). Relative to animals receiving Ad-lacZ microinjections, daily food intake was significantly reduced in Ad-leprb-treated animals on d 8, 9, 11, 15, and 16 following adenovirus injection (Fig. 4B
). Mean daily food intake for the entire study period (d 316) was also significantly reduced (by 13%; 29.4 ± 1.5 vs. 33.6 ± 1.1 g/d; P < 0.05), as was cumulative food intake (382 ± 19 vs. 438 ± 14 g; P < 0.05) in Ad-leprb-treated, compared with Ad-lacZ-treated, rats. This reduction of food intake was accompanied by a 33% reduction of body weight gain in Ad-leprb-treated, compared with Ad-lacZ-treated, fak/fak rats (40.6 ± 5.3 vs. 60.2 ± 4.2 g; P < 0.05; weight at baseline: 517 ± 14 g for Ad-leprb vs. 510 ± 2 g for Ad-lacZ; Fig. 4A
).
|
Based on differences in food intake and rate of body weight gain between lean Fak/Fak and obese fak/fak rats treated with control virus (Ad-lacZ), we calculated the extent to which Ad-leprb gene therapy directed to the ARC reversed the phenotype of hyperphagia and excessive weight gain that results from global leprb deficiency. This analysis revealed that the effects of the fak/fak genotype to increase food intake and body weight gain were attenuated by 35% and 42%, respectively, following Ad-leprb microinjection into the ARC. Despite these beneficial effects, fak/fak rats receiving Ad-leprb microinjection into the ARC had plasma glucose (220 ± 2 vs. 210 ± 7 mg/dl; P = NS) and insulin levels (1166 ± 330 vs. 1422 ± 36 pmol; P = NS) that were comparable to Ad-lacZ-treated controls.
Response to LHA delivery of Ad-leprb in obese Koletsky rats
To investigate whether the weight-reducing effects of Ad-leprb microinjection are specific to the ARC, we microinjected either Ad-leprb or Ad-lacZ into the LHA of a separate group of fak/fak rats. Unlike leptin receptor gene therapy directed to the ARC, this intervention did not significantly reduce mean daily food intake (32.4 ± 1.3 vs. 34.5 ± 0.9 g/d; P = NS) or body weight gain, compared with treatment with Ad-lacZ (59.9 ± 1.3 vs. 70.1 ± 5.8 g; P = NS; weight at baseline: 490 ± 13 g for Ad-leprb vs. 491 ± 12 g for Ad-lacZ; Fig. 4
, E and F).
Hypothalamic neuropeptide and leprb mRNA levels in Ad-leprb-treated obese Koletsky rats
As a first step to investigate mechanisms mediating the reduction of food intake and attenuation of body weight gain following Ad-leprb microinjection into the ARC, but not the LHA, of fak/fak rats, we used ISH to measure hypothalamic expression of Npy and Pomc mRNA levels. As predicted, levels of Pomc mRNA in the ARC were significantly increased in fak/fak rats receiving Ad-leprb into this brain area, compared with those receiving Ad-lacZ microinjection (165% ± 5% vs. 100% ± 17%; P < 0.05, n = 56 group). As expected, Npy mRNA levels measured by ISH were lower in Ad-leprb- than Ad-lacZ-treated fak/fak rats (53% ± 8% vs. 100% ± 33%), although this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.08; Fig. 5
, A and C). In contrast, neither Pomc mRNA levels (68% ± 5% for Ad-leprb vs. 100% ± 22% for Ad-lacZ; P = NS) nor Npy mRNA levels (118% ± 18% for Ad-leprb vs. 100% ± 17% for Ad-lacZ; P = NS) were significantly affected in fak/fak rats following Ad-leprb delivery to the LHA (Fig. 5
, B and D).
|
|
Nonspecific effects of intrahypothalamic adenovirus microinjection
To determine whether intrahypothalamic adenovirus microinjection can, in and of itself, reduce food intake or body weight, we compared the effects of ARC microinjection of Ad-lacZ with that of vehicle alone (without adenovirus particles) in wild-type Fak/Fak rats. Relative to injection of vehicle, Ad-lacZ administration failed to induce significant changes of mean daily food intake (21.5 ± 0.4 g/d for vehicle vs. 22.0 ± 1.3 g/d for Ad-lacZ; P = NS), cumulative food intake (279 ± 6 g for vehicle vs. 286 ± 17 g for Ad-lacZ; P = NS) or body weight gain (17.7 ± 1.7 g for vehicle vs. 22.1 ± 4.3 g for Ad-lacZ; P = NS) over a 16-d period. Adenovirus injection into the ARC, therefore, does not, in and of itself, appear to affect food intake or body weight in normal animals.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A practical advantage conferred by the leptin receptor mutation in fak/fak rats is that it reduces leprb mRNA stability and consequently lowers its content to levels that are undetectable under standard ISH conditions. Consequently, the hypothalamic distribution of leprb mRNA derived from Ad-leprb could readily be evaluated in these animals. Using ISH, we found this leprb mRNA to be concentrated in, and largely limited to, the ARC of fak/fak rats that received Ad-leprb microinjection into this area. In some animals, leprb mRNA was additionally detected along the cannula tract, just dorsal to the ARC, but this pattern of expression did not alter any outcome measure. Because adenoviral gene products were not detected in other brain areas following microinjection into the ARC, we concluded that leprb expression in the ARC accounts for the observed effects of Ad-leprb microinjection on food intake and body weight of fak/fak rats.
To determine the extent to which adenoviral gene therapy corrected leptin receptor deficiency in the ARC of Koletsky rats, we used real-time PCR to compare hypothalamic leprb mRNA content of fak/fak animals treated with either Ad-leprb or Ad-lacZ to wild-type control values. Our finding that Ad-leprb treatment restored leprb mRNA content to values comparable with normal animals suggests that the effects on energy homeostasis of this intervention were due to a reconstitution of intact leptin signaling in this brain area. Because obesity was only partially reversed by leptin receptor gene therapy directed to the ARC, an important role for leptin action in other brain areas in the control of energy homeostasis can be inferred (41, 42). The contribution of the ARC to leptin action in vivo is likely to have been underestimated by our data, however, because adenoviral gene delivery is unlikely to have targeted all of the ARC neurons that normally express leprb.
The magnitude of food intake suppression (
15% reduction of mean daily intake) conferred by ARC-directed leptin receptor gene therapy was less than is often observed following pharmacological leptin administration to rodents (6, 7, 8, 9) and is likely insufficient to fully explain the loss of weight in our studies. These observations raise several important issues. First, restored leptin signaling to the ARC of fak/fak rats may have increased energy expenditure, in addition to its effects on food intake, and studies to investigate this hypothesis are warranted. Second, our findings suggest that unlike leptin administration, it may not be possible to achieve a pharmacological increase of leptin signaling solely by increasing leptin receptor content. This conclusion stems in part from our finding that injection of Ad-leprb into the ARC of normal rats does not reduce food intake or body weight, despite increases in hypothalamic leptin receptor content of 2- to 3-fold. As with many hormone systems, therefore, cellular leptin signal transduction may depend more on the concentration of ligand than on that of the receptor, so long as normal levels of receptor expression are present. Based on these considerations, it is perhaps not surprising that the food intake response to leptin receptor gene therapy is less than that reported following pharmacological administration of leptin. Despite these considerations, however, the effect of ARC-directed leptin receptor gene therapy is substantial when evaluated according to the extent to which hyperphagia of fak/fak rats was reversed. In our first study, we found that this intervention reversed the effect of the fak mutation on food intake by 35%; in the second study, the effect was even greater, reflecting a reversal of more than 70% of the hyperphagic phenotype of fak/fak rats.
As a first step to evaluate the relative importance of the ARC in comparison with other hypothalamic subnuclei in mediating leptin signaling, we introduced leptin receptors into the LHA in a separate group of fak/fak rats. Although neurons critical to stimulation of feeding behavior (e.g. MCH and orexin-producing neurons) (43, 44) are concentrated in this brain area, leptin receptors are not (10, 35). Because LHA neurons can stimulate food intake and are regulated by changes in nutritional state, introduction of leptin receptors in this brain area might be expected to affect energy homeostasis. Unlike the response to Ad-leprb microinjection into the ARC, however, expression of leptin receptor in the LHA of obese Koletsky rats did not significantly alter food intake or body weight gain. This finding suggests that in leptin receptor-deficient animals, neuronal leptin signaling is effective only when receptor expression is directed to brain areas that normally mediate leptin effects, such as the ARC.
To investigate the mechanisms responsible for reduced food intake and body weight gain following delivery of Ad-leprb into the ARC of fak/fak rats, we measured hypothalamic expression of neuropeptides produced by ARC neurons that, in normal animals, are implicated in leptin action. Both NPY- and POMC-expressing neurons in the ARC coexpress leptin receptor mRNA, are regulated by leptin, and participate in energy homeostasis (10, 28, 34, 36, 45). Moreover, mutations affecting either leptin or its receptor result in the combination of reduced hypothalamic expression of POMC and increased expression of NPY, responses that promote excessive food intake and weight gain (28, 29, 33, 34). Our finding that leptin receptor gene therapy directed to the ARC of fak/fak rats increased local concentrations of Pomc mRNA suggests that increased melanocortin signaling in the hypothalamus may have contributed to its weight-reducing effects. Similarly, hypothalamic Npy mRNA levels in the ARC were lower following Ad-leprb delivery to this brain area, suggesting that leptin signaling had been restored to both NPY and POMC neurons by this intervention. By comparison, there was no effect on Mch gene expression of Ad-leprb gene therapy directed to the ARC; conversely, leptin receptor gene therapy directed to the LHA had no detectable effect on Npy or Pomc mRNA levels.
Several key questions about the role played by specific brain areas in the response to leptin await further study. Leptin exerts diverse CNS effects that influence autonomic function, the reproductive axis and glucose homeostasis, and the role played by the ARC, relative to that of other brain areas, was not addressed in our studies. Our findings suggest that adenoviral gene therapy will be a useful tool with which to further dissect the contributions made by discrete brain areas to leptins many central effects.
In conclusion, we report that adenovirally mediated expression of the signaling isoform of the leptin receptor is sufficient to reduce food intake and body weight gain when directed to the ARC, but not the LHA, of leptin receptor-deficient Koletsky (fak/fak) rats. These findings constitute direct evidence that leprb signaling in the ARC is required for normal energy homeostasis and provide proof-of-principal endorsing viral gene therapy as a useful approach with which to study the contribution of discrete brain areas to the physiologic actions of specific molecules.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: ARC, Arcuate nucleus; ß-gal, ß-galactosidase; CNS, central nervous system; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; hleprb, human leprb; ISH, in situ hybridization; LHA, lateral hypothalamic area; Lepr, leptin receptor; MCH, melanin-concentrating hormone; NPY, neuropeptide Y; POMC, proopiomelanocortin.
Received December 9, 2002.
Accepted for publication January 21, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-melanocyte stimulating hormone in vivo. Endocrinology 139:44284431This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. W. Gelling, W. Yan, S. Al-Noori, A. Pardini, G. J. Morton, K. Ogimoto, M. W. Schwartz, and P. J. Dempsey Deficiency of TNF{alpha} Converting Enzyme (TACE/ADAM17) Causes a Lean, Hypermetabolic Phenotype in Mice Endocrinology, December 1, 2008; 149(12): 6053 - 6064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Hill, J. K. Elmquist, and C. F. Elias Hypothalamic pathways linking energy balance and reproduction Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2008; 294(5): E827 - E832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Merino, V. Cano, R. Guzman, B. Somoza, and M. Ruiz-Gayo Leptin-Mediated Hypothalamic Pathway of Cholecystokinin (CCK-8) to Regulate Body Weight in Free-Feeding Rats Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1994 - 2000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. van de Wall, R. Leshan, A. W. Xu, N. Balthasar, R. Coppari, S. M. Liu, Y. H. Jo, R. G. MacKenzie, D. B. Allison, N. J. Dun, et al. Collective and Individual Functions of Leptin Receptor Modulated Neurons Controlling Metabolism and Ingestion Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1773 - 1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Jackman, A. Steig, J. A. Higgins, G. C. Johnson, B. K. Fleming-Elder, D. H. Bessesen, and P. S. MacLean Weight regain after sustained weight reduction is accompanied by suppressed oxidation of dietary fat and adipocyte hyperplasia Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): R1117 - R1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Morton Hypothalamic leptin regulation of energy homeostasis and glucose metabolism J. Physiol., September 1, 2007; 583(2): 437 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Huo, L. Maeng, C. Bjorbaek, and H. J. Grill Leptin and the Control of Food Intake: Neurons in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Are Activated by Both Gastric Distension and Leptin Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2189 - 2197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Gorski, A. A. Dunn-Meynell, and B. E. Levin Maternal obesity increases hypothalamic leptin receptor expression and sensitivity in juvenile obesity-prone rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): R1782 - R1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Rahmouni and D. A. Morgan Hypothalamic Arcuate Nucleus Mediates the Sympathetic and Arterial Pressure Responses to Leptin Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 647 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Prodi and S. Obici Minireview: The Brain as a Molecular Target for Diabetic Therapy Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): 2664 - 2669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Clegg, L. M. Brown, S. C. Woods, and S. C. Benoit Gonadal hormones deter |