| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLE |
The Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California 92037
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Wylie W. Vale, Ph.D., The Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, The Salk Institute, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. We also demonstrated that the expression of CRF R2 in the pituitary is sensitive to alterations to the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis as CRF R2 mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary of male rats were significantly decreased 6 h after bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection or restraint stress. Subcutaneous corticosterone injections also resulted in significant suppression of CRF R2 mRNA levels in the pituitary, suggesting that glucocorticoids are involved in modulating CRF R2 mRNA levels in the pituitary under stress. LPS administration still caused a significant suppression of CRF R2 mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary of adrenalectomized rats. This suggests that one or more additional factors is involved in the regulation of CRF R2 expression in the anterior pituitary. Taken together, these data suggest that CRF R2
in the anterior pituitary might be involved in the regulation of gonadal functions under stress. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CRF R2 shares 69% homology with CRF R1 on amino acid level, and yet it has different pharmacological properties from CRF R1 regarding ligand binding (6, 11). Whereas CRF has approximately 20-fold lower affinity for CRF R2 than for CRF R1, Ucn has a 40-fold higher affinity for CRF R2 than does CRF (12). In addition to Ucn, two additional Ucn-related peptides, Ucn II (also known as stresscopin-related peptide; Refs. 13 and 14) and Ucn III (as known as stresscopin; Refs. 14 and 15), have been found recently in mammals. Both Ucn II and Ucn III have very high affinity for CRF R2 with little or no binding affinity for CRF R1. Thus, the three Ucns may serve as natural ligands for CRF R2 in mammals. For example, it has been shown that both Ucn and CRF R2ß are expressed in the rat heart. Ucn is more potent in regulation of CRF R2 mRNA levels in aortic smooth muscles than CRF (16). Furthermore, Ucn is a more powerful inotrope and is also more potent to increase coronary blood flow and to reduce overall blood pressure than is CRF (17, 18). Thus, the natural ligand for CRF R2ß, at least in the cardiovascular system, is likely to be Ucn rather than CRF.
Several splice variants of CRF R2 have been reported. Two variants, CRF R2
and CRF R2ß, have been found in rat. CRF R2
and CRF R2ß differ in their N-terminal domain (5). CRF R2
is expressed primarily in several discrete brain regions including the hypothalamus, lateral septum, and raphe nuclei (19), whereas CRF R2ß is found predominately in peripheral tissues such as heart, gastrointestinal treat, the arterioles, and muscles (16, 19). CRF R2 mRNA has also been reported to be present in the rat pituitary (20), but neither the splice variant involved nor the function of the receptor has been defined in the rat pituitary.
In the pituitary, the changes in CRF R1 have been suggested to play a major role in modulating adaptive responses to stressors. It has been shown that CRF, vasopression, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), cytokines, and glucocorticoids can negatively modulate pituitary CRF R1 mRNA levels (21, 22, 23). The decrease in CRF receptor would contribute to a sustained reduction in the number of CRF binding sites and restricting subsequent effect of CRF to restore homeostasis. The existence of CRF R2 in the pituitary raised an important question as what function of pituitary CRF R2 may serve regarding the regulation of HPA axis activity. Our previous studies have demonstrated that both immune challenge and restraint stress can modulate CRF R2ß expression in the heart (16). It is conceivable that the expression of pituitary CRF R2 may be also sensitive to various stressors, which may suggest that CRF R2 in the pituitary is also involved in modulation of pituitary response to stressors.
To further understand the possible function and regulation of CRF R2 in the pituitary, we first examined the dominant receptor type and the localization of CRF R2 mRNA in the pituitary. We next determined whether the levels of CRF R2 mRNA in the anterior pituitary are modulated by HPA stimulation following immune or restraint stress.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgery
Jugular vein cannulation.
A jugular vein catheter (PE 50, Becton Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD) was inserted into the right atrium of the rats under light halothane anesthesia 2 d before experiments. The catheter was filled with sterile heparinized saline, passed through an sc tunnel, and exteriorized at the back of the neck. After the cannulation, rats were housed in individual cages.
Subcutaneous cannulation.
In animals in which ACTH gel or corticosterone was injected, an sc catheter (PE 20, Becton Dickinson and Co.) was inserted into the back at the same time as jugular vein cannulation. The catheter was filled with saline, passed through an sc tunnel, and exteriorized at the back of the neck.
Adrenalectomy (Adx).
Halothane-anesthetized rats were bilaterally adrenalectomized via a dorsal approach, and sc implanted with a slow-release corticosterone pellet (35 mg, 21-d release; Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, FL; Adx + corticosterone). This regimen was chosen for its ability to retain basal CRF and vasopressin mRNA levels in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus and proopiomelanocortin mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary after Adx (24). A control group of rats (sham) was anesthetized, received the same dorsal incision, and was implanted with a placebo pellet. After surgery, all rats were provided with water containing 0.9% NaCl. Five days later, sham and Adx + corticosterone rats participated in LPS experiments. In LPS-injected Adx + corticosterone rats, Adx was verified by the lack of change in plasma corticosterone. In saline-injected Adx + corticosterone rats, Adx was verified by the lack of circadian elevation in plasma corticosterone 8 h after lights-on.
Reagents
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Escherichia coli serotype O26: B6; code 3755, lot 37H4095) and corticosterone were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
In vivo experimental procedure
On the day of the experiment, the rats were housed in opaque sampling cages, and the jugular vein catheter was connected to a sampling tube to allow for remote sequential blood sampling. After a period of 23 h, experiments were started at 08000900 h. The rats were killed by decapitation after final blood sampling. The anterior pituitaries were separated and frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Experiment 1: effects of iv injection of LPS [50 µg/kg body weight (BW)] on CRF R2 mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary
After blood sampling for measurement of basal plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels, vehicle (saline, 100 µl) or LPS at a dose of 50 µg/kg BW was injected iv at 0 min. Blood was drawn 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min later and stored for future measurements of plasma ACTH and corticosterone. After sampling blood at 6 h, some rats were decapitated, and organs were harvested. To examine time-dependent changes in CRF R2 mRNA levels, other rats were decapitated 2, 9, and 24 h after vehicle or LPS injection.
Experiment 2: effects of restraint or sc injection of corticosterone on CRF R2 mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary
After blood sampling for measurement of the basal plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels, vehicle (100 µl of saline for iv injection, and 200 µl of 11% ethanol-containing saline for sc injection), LPS (50 µg/kg BW, iv), a low dose of corticosterone (37.5 µg/rat, sc), or a high dose of corticosterone (125 µg/rat, sc) was injected. Both low and high doses of corticosterone were also administered at 30, 60, 120, and 180 min. Some rats that received both vehicle injections were wrapped in cloth towels and restrained by rubber bands and labeling tape for 1 h. Blood was drawn 30, 60, 180, and 360 min after injection or onset of restraint for plasma ACTH and corticosterone measurements. After sampling at 6 h, the rats were decapitated for tissue collection.
Experiment 3: effects of Adx with corticosterone replacement and LPS injection (50 µg/kg BW) on CRF R2 mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary
After blood sampling for measurement of the basal plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels, vehicle (saline, 100 µl) or LPS (50 µg/kg BW, iv) was injected at 0 min in sham or Adx + corticosterone rats. Blood was drawn at 60 and 240 min for ACTH and corticosterone measurements. After the final blood sampling, the rats were decapitated for tissue collection.
Corticosterone and ACTH measurement
Plasma corticosterone and ACTH were measured in duplicate from unextracted samples as described previously (25). Plasma corticosterone levels were measured with a commercial immunoradiometric assay kit produced by ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Costa Mesa, CA). Plasma ACTH levels were measured with a commercial immunoradiometric assay kit produced by Nichols Institute Diagnostics (San Juan Capistrano, CA). Samples repeated from individual rats were analyzed within the same assay.
Ribonuclease (RNase) protection
Total RNA was extracted using TRI Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH). Rat CRF R2 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA levels were measured simultaneously by RNase protection assay, using rat GAPDH as an internal loading control. CRF R2 and R2
antisense riboprobes specific to the rat CRF R2 and CRF R2
mRNA were synthesized using T3 RNA polymerase, respectively (Fig. 1A
). A 165-nucleotide (nt) GAPDH antisense riboprobe specific to the rat GAPDH mRNA was synthesized using T3 RNA polymerase. All riboprobes were synthesized in the presence of [
-32P] uridine triphosphate (UTP; 3000 Ci/mmol) and 20 µM UTP, as described (26). The fragments protected by the CRF R2 probe 1 and the GAPDH riboprobe are 463 nt and 135 nt, respectively (Fig. 1B
). The CRF R2
and CRF R2ß fragments protected by CRF R2 probe 2 are 154 nt and 113 nt, respectively (Fig. 1C
).
|
-transfected cells) were hybridized in 24 µl deionized formamide plus 6 µl hybridization buffer containing 5 x 105 cpm of CRF R2 and 2 x 104 cpm GAPDH antisense riboprobes. After heating at 85 C for 5 min, the samples were hybridized at 42 C for 15 h and subsequently digested by RNase (200 µg/ml RNase A and 350 U/ml RNase T1) at 24 C for 60 min. The samples were resolved on 6% polyacrylamide urea gels. Quantitative analysis was performed using the PhosphorImager system (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) and the ImageQuant 4.0 software package. The intensity of each of the protected fragments was corrected for differences in loaded RNA according to the intensity of the protected GAPDH fragment of the same sample, and results are expressed as corrected arbitrary units. The intensity of CRF R2 mRNA was in proportion to the intensity of GAPDH mRNA in the same sample when added in a range from 515 µg (not shown).
Perfusion and tissue sectioning
Animals were anesthetized with an overdose of choral hydrate (1 g/kg BW, ip) and perfused transcardially with 150 ml of saline followed by 350 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde in borate buffer (pH 9.5). The pituitary was postfixed in 25% sucrose at 4 C for 6 h. Coronal sections (20 µm) were cut on a cyrostat, thaw-mounted onto glass slides and collected in one-in-three series. The sections were stored at -80 C until use.
Immunohistochemistry procedures
Tissue sections from all animals were processed in one assay to ensure uniformity of immunostaining. All solutions were treated with diethylpyrocarbonate to prevent RNase contamination. Tissue sections were rinsed in 0.05 M potassium PBS (KPBS) followed by treatment with 1% NaBH4-KPBS solution (Sigma). Sections were incubated in following primary antibodies raised in rabbit: anti-GH, prolactin, TSH, LH, ACTH (1:5000, NIH, Bethesda, MD) or S-100 (1:5000; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) in KPBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 1 h, followed by 4 C for 48 h. After the incubation, the tissues were rinsed in KPBS and incubated in biotinylated donkey antirabbit IgG (1:600, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) in KPBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature. This was followed by another 1 h incubation at room temperature in avidin-biotin complex solution (Vectastain ABC Elite Kit, Vector Laboratories). The antibody-peroxidase complex was visualized with a mixture of 3',3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB, 0.2 mg/ml) and 3% H2O2 (0.83 µl/ml) in 0.05 M Tris buffer-saline solution. Following the staining, tissue sections were processed for in situ hybridization.
In situ hybridization
CRF R2 cRNA probe was transcribed from the CRF R2 probe 1 in the presence of the 33P-labeled UTP (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA). The specific activity of the probe ranged from 15 x 105 cpm/µl of hybridization buffer. The pituitary sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, digested with proteinase K (5 µg/ml, Sigma), treated with a fresh solution containing 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine (pH 8.0), followed by a rinse in 2x saline-sodium citrate buffer (SSC), dehydrated through a graded series of alcohol, delipidated in chloroform, dehydrated through a second series of alcohol, and then air dried. The slides were exposed to the CRF R2 cRNA probe overnight in moist chambers at 55 C. After the incubation, the slides were washed in SSC that increased in stringency, in RNase, in 0.1x SSC at 65 C, and dehydrated through graded series of alcohol and dried. Slides were dipped in NTB-2 emulsion (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY), exposed for 15 d at 4 C and developed.
Statistical analysis
All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses of these data were performed using one-way ANOVA, or two-way ANOVA on repeated measures with time and treatment as the factors, followed by Scheffés F post hoc test. P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and CRF R2ß (Fig. 1A
was used in the RNase protection assays to distinguish between CRF R2
and CRF R2ß because the first exon of CRF R2ß is different from that of CRF R2
due to an alternative splicing that led to an exon substitution (Fig. 1A
was found in the RNA samples from the anterior pituitary, the lateral septum, the ventromedial hypothalamus and CRF R2
transfected cells. This result suggests that CRF R2
is the dominant receptor type in the anterior pituitary.
Localization of CRF R2 mRNA in the rat pituitary
By using in situ hybridization, CRF R2 mRNA was visualized in the anterior pituitary. CRF R2 mRNA positive signals were only found in the tissues probed with antisense probes (Fig. 2A
). No signals were found in the sense control. Immunohistochemistry on various pituitary-produced hormones and S-100 protein combined with in situ hybridization for CRF R2 mRNA showed that the majority of CRF R2 positive signals colocalized with gonadotropes as identified by LH-positive staining (Fig. 2B
). Only a few ACTH-positive cells expressed CRF R2 mRNA (Fig. 2C
). Table 1A
summarizes the percentage of each cell type identified in CRF R2 positive cells. The data demonstrate that roughly 84% of CRF R2 positive cells are LH-immunopositive, whereas 3%, 11%, 15%, 7%, and 4% of CRF R2 mRNA positive cells are ACTH, TSH, prolactin, GH, and S-100 immunopositive cells, respectively. Table 1B
summarizes the percentage of CRF R2 positive cells identified in each cell type. These data demonstrated that 52% of gonadotropes are CRF R2 positive, whereas approximately 2%, 6%, 3%, 1%, and 2% of corticotropes, thyrotropes, lactotropes, somatotropes, and S-100 positive cells, respectively, are CRF R2 positive.
|
|
Iv injection of LPS caused a time-dependent reduction of CRF R2 mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary (ANOVA; P < 0.005; Fig. 3
). CRF R2 mRNA levels decreased to less than half those of the control values by 6 h after LPS injection (P < 0.05). CRF R2 mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary remained reduced 9 h and 24 h after the injection but tended to return toward control levels at 24 h.
|
There was a significant interaction among treatments on CRF R2 mRNA levels (ANOVA; P < 0.001; Fig. 4
). Restraint stress and both high and low doses of corticosterone significantly decreased CRF R2 mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary compared with that of the control groups (ANOVA; P < 0.01), indicating that corticosterone can modulate the expression of CRF R2 in the pituitary.
|
There was a significant interaction between adrenal surgery and treatment on CRF R2 mRNA levels (ANOVA; P < 0.05; Fig. 5
). Adx with corticosterone replacement tended to attenuate the effects of LPS injection on CRF R2 mRNA levels, but not significantly (P = 0.06), compared with that of LPS-injected sham rats.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
instead of CRF R2ß, the major CRF R2 subtype found in rat peripheral tissues (16, 19). Furthermore, combined immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization demonstrated that CRF R2 mRNA colocalizes mainly with gonadotropes but not corticotropes. These data suggest that CRF R2
in the anterior pituitary might be involved in modulation of gonadotropin secretions and/or gonadal function. Activation of stress systems could potentially influence reproduction at any level of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis (27). The decreases in the LH/FSH secretions by stress would influence the gonadal functions such as sex steroidogenesis and sperm production (27, 28). It has been shown that central CRF injections can inhibit LH/FSH secretion (29). However, this effect of CRF probably reflects a central mechanism involving modulation of the activity of GnRH neurons in the hypothalamus (30). In addition, peripheral administration of CRF did not affect LH secretion (31, 32). Taken together, it is likely that CRF, a low affinity ligand for CRF R2, does not have a direct effect on gonadotropes and stimulation of CRF R1 in the pituitary by CRF is not involved in LH secretion. We are currently investigating whether CRF R2 selective ligands including Ucn II and Ucn III can modulate LH/FSH secretions from pituitary. Further, studies in progress in several groups with CRF R2-specific antagonists and CRF R2-deficient mice should provide more definitive insight into the physiological roles of CRF R2 in the pituitary (33).
In the present studies, we observed a significant decrease in anterior pituitary CRF R2 mRNA levels 6 h after the rats treated with LPS, which has been shown to also suppress LH and FSH release in rats (34). Restraint stress also caused a decrease in CRF R2 mRNA levels. Furthermore, direct injection of either ACTH (unpublished observation) or corticosterone also down-regulated CRF R2 mRNA levels. These results suggest that glucocorticoids could play a role in mitigating CRF R2 mRNA levels in the pituitary during immune challenge or restraint stress. A direct effect of corticosterone on the expression of CRF R2 mRNA in the anterior pituitary is consistent with our previous report of CRF R2ß in the cardiovascular system (16). CRF R2ß mRNA levels in the rat heart or aorta were decreased after sc injections of corticosterone in vivo (16). CRF R2ß mRNA expression in the A7r5 aortic smooth muscle cells were also inhibited by dexamethasone (16). Thus, both CRF R2
and CRF R2ß expression in the periphery can be modulated by glucocorticoids (35, 36).
Interestingly, we found that LPS treatment can still suppress CRF R2 mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary of Adx rats with basal corticosterone supplement, suggesting that additional factors such as CRF-related ligands and cytokines might be involved in the regulation of CRF R2 mRNA. In fact, we and other investigators (16, 37) have observed that proinflammatory cytokines, IL-1ß, TNF-
, or IL-6, each decreased CRF R2ß messenger levels in A7r5 cells or heart. Therefore, following immune challenges, increased circulating concentrations of some cytokines or endotoxin itself might regulate CRF R2
mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary. Furthermore, glucocorticoids have been shown to negatively modulate proinflammatory cytokine levels (38, 39). Thus, it is possible that immune stress induced elevation of proinflammatory factors would be exaggerated and might have a more pronounced effect on CRF R2 expression in the pituitary in Adx rats in the absence of glucocorticoids.
Our previous in vitro study showed that treatment of A7r5 cells with Ucn or CRF decreased CRF R2ß mRNA levels, consistent with the possibility that ligands for CRF R2ß may be involved in the regulation of the receptor expression (16). The lack of glucocorticoids elevation in Adx rats after stress results in a large increase in CRF and AVP levels in the portal circulation followed by an elevation in plasma ACTH (40, 41). It has been suggested that the elevated portal levels of CRF or AVP might contribute to the decrease in CRF R1 mRNA levels in the pituitary (21, 22). Thus, it is conceivable that the endogenous ligands for CRF R2 might be involved in the modulation of CRF R2 mRNA levels in the pituitary under these conditions, although the endogenous ligand(s) for CRF R2
in the anterior pituitary is still unclear.
Ucn mRNA is expressed in discrete regions of the brain including the supraoptic nucleus of hypothalamus (42, 43) and a number of peripheral tissues such as the thymus, spleen, heart, stomach, intestine, testis, liver (25), lymphocytes (44), and placental and fetal membranes (45). Thus, both supraoptic nucleus and peripheral tissues could potentially provide the source of Ucn for pituitary CRF R2. Several studies even showed that Ucn is expressed in the rat and human pituitary (42, 46). Limited studies have shown that in the brain Ucn II is expressed in the PVN (13), suggesting that Ucn II may reach the pituitary through the portal circulation to interact with pituitary CRF R2. Ucn III is expressed in discrete areas in the hypothalamus and amygdala (15). In addition, Ucn III immunoreactivity has been found in the internal zone of the median eminence (47). It hasnt been excluded that one of the Ucns could reach the pituitary from the general circulation under some circumstances. Clearly, more studies are needed to further determine the endogenous ligand responsible for interacting with CRF R2 in the pituitary.
Similar to CRF R1 in the pituitary (21, 22, 23), CRF R2 mRNA levels in the pituitary are suppressed by LPS, restraint stress, and glucocorticoids. By contrast, in the PVN of the hypothalamus, the regulation of CRF R2
mRNA levels seems to be different from those of CRF R1 mRNA levels (48). CRF R2 mRNA levels in the PVN are not modulated by LPS or corticosterone injection, or Adx, whereas CRH R1 mRNA levels in the PVN are altered by these treatments (48). This differences between the regulation of receptors in the pituitary and the PVN might result from the altered susceptibility of these tissues to these factors.
The reduction in CRF-binding sites or number of CRF receptors is achieved through internalization of receptors induced by CRF in the pituitary (49, 50). In addition, the decrease in mRNA levels of the receptors might reflect the suppression of the receptor synthesis, consequently diminishing number of the receptors (21, 51, 52, 53). It is therefore possible that the decrease in CRF R2
mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary contributes to a sustained reduction in the number of CRF family peptide-binding sites, restricting subsequent ligand actions to restore homeostasis. Additional studies are needed to determine the biological role that occurs after down-regulation of CRF R2
in the pituitary.
In summary, the present study identified that CRF R2 mRNA is expressed in gonadotropes in the anterior pituitary. RNase protection assays of anterior pituitary mRNA show that the dominant receptor type is CRF R2
. The CRF R2 mRNA levels in the anterior pituitary are regulated, in part, by glucocorticoids, in response to an immune challenge or restraint stress. Other factors such as CRF-related ligands and cytokines might also be involved in the regulation of CRF R2 mRNA. Further studies on the role of the CRF family of ligands and their receptors would elucidate the novel regulation of gonadotropins under stress.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Present address: The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8562, Japan. ![]()
Abbreviations: Adx, Adrenalectomized; BW, body weight; CRF R1, CRF receptor type 1; CRF R2, CRF receptor type 2; DAB, 3',3'-diaminobenzidine; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HPA, hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal; KPBS, potassium PBS; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; nt, nucleotide; PVN, paraventricular nucleus; RNase, ribonuclease; Ucn, urocortin; UTP, uridine triphosphate.
Received October 9, 2002.
Accepted for publication December 17, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and CRF2 ß receptor mRNAs are differentially distributed between the rat central nervous system and peripheral tissues. Endocrinology 136:41394142[Abstract]
and TNF
down-regulate CRH receptor-2 mRNA expression in the mouse heart. Endocrinology 142:35373545
corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor mRNA in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus of the rat. Mol Brain Res 47:170176[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Legendre, E. Papakonstantinou, M.-C. Roy, D. Richard, and R. B. S. Harris Differences in response to corticotropin-releasing factor after short- and long-term consumption of a high-fat diet Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1076 - R1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Wu, P.-q. Yuan, L. Wang, Y. L. Peng, C.-Y. Chen, and Y. Tache Identification and Characterization of Multiple Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Type 2 Receptor Isoforms in the Rat Esophagus Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1675 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Smith, J. M. Vaughan, C. J. Donaldson, R. E. Fernandez, C. Li, A. Chen, and W. W. Vale Cocaine- and Amphetamine-Regulated Transcript Is Localized in Pituitary Lactotropes and Is Regulated during Lactation Endocrinology, March 1, 2006; 147(3): 1213 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kageyama, K. Hanada, T. Moriyama, T. Nigawara, S. Sakihara, and T. Suda G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Involvement in Desensitization of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF) Receptor Type 1 by CRF in Murine Corticotrophs Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 441 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Westphal and A. F. Seasholtz Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Positively Regulates Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone-Binding Protein Expression via Multiple Intracellular Signaling Pathways and a Multipartite GnRH Response Element in {alpha}T3-1 Cells Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2005; 19(11): 2780 - 2797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sirianni, B. A. Mayhew, B. R. Carr, C. R. Parker Jr., and W. E. Rainey Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone (CRH) and Urocortin Act through Type 1 CRH Receptors to Stimulate Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate Production in Human Fetal Adrenal Cells J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5393 - 5400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. De Groef, N. Goris, L. Arckens, E. R. Kuhn, and V. M. Darras Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone (CRH)-Induced Thyrotropin Release Is Directly Mediated through CRH Receptor Type 2 on Thyrotropes Endocrinology, December 1, 2003; 144(12): 5537 - 5544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology |