| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLE |
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cell Biology and Physiology (H.L.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110; and Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology (S.K.D), Ralph L. Smith Research Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: H. Lim, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. E-mail: limj{at}msnotes.wustl.edu; or S. K. Dey, Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Ralph L. Smith Research Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160. E-mail: sdey{at}kumc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, PPAR
, and PPAR
, though initially cloned as a family of orphan receptors, are now known for their ligand promiscuity. The ligands range from free fatty acids and their derivatives produced by the cyclooxygenase or lipoxygenase pathway to certain hypolipidemic drugs. The predisposition of PPARs to use a wide spectrum of ligands is well explained by their unusually large ligand-binding pocket. The promiscuous ligand usage by PPARs is also reflected by their involvement in various pathophysiological events. Several recent independent reports show that endogenously produced PGI2 indeed activates PPAR
in vivo, indicating that a novel signaling mechanism for this abundant eicosanoid is operative in certain systems. This review attempts to cover recent developments in nuclear actions of PGI2 in diverse biological functions. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
within minutes in vivo (9). Because of its valuable clinical implications in vascular physiology, several synthetic analogs, such as iloprost, cicaprost, and carbarprostacyclin (cPGI) with more stable chemical structures have been developed (10, 11, 12). | Signaling Mechanisms of PGI2: Prostacyclin Receptor (IP) and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Differential subcellular localization of PG synthesizing machinery began to make more sense when a class of nuclear receptors known as PPARs was shown to use a broad spectrum of lipid mediators and synthetic drugs as ligands for transcriptional activation (22, 23, 24, 25). PPARs belong to a family of ligand-activated transcription factors and heterodimerization with a retinoid X receptor is a prerequisite for their DNA binding activity (26) and recruitment of transcriptional cofactors is required to activate target genes (27). Along with several synthetic ligands including specific hypolipidemic drugs, certain eicosanoids and fatty acids were identified as PPAR ligands. For example, PGI2 agonists such as cPGI and iloprost can effectively induce DNA binding and transcriptional activation by PPAR
and PPAR
. Interestingly, unlike other PGI2 agonists, cicaprost is incapable of inducing dimerization between PPAR
or PPAR
and retinoid X receptor (24). PGI2 itself also failed to induce dimerization under these experimental conditions, possibly because the chemical instability of this PG precluded it to reach the nuclear target. Alternatively, whereas cell-permeable cPGI makes its way into the nucleus more efficiently, a specific PG transporter may be required for intracellular delivery of PGI2. Leukotriene B4, a product of arachidonic acid generated by the lipoxygenase pathway, was reported as a PPAR
ligand as well (28). As for PPAR
, 15-deoxy-
12,14-PGJ2, a PGD2 metabolite, was first proposed as a ligand in an adipocyte differentiation model (29, 30). Because of the important role of PPAR
and PPAR
in metabolic diseases (reviewed in Ref. 31), many synthetic ligands of PPARs are being continuously developed. However, the question of endogenous ligand utilization by these receptors remains mostly unanswered. Nevertheless, recent work using diverse systems show that PPAR
in fact uses PGI2 as an endogenous ligand to modulate specific cellular functions.
PGI2 as a Ligand for PPAR
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and PPAR
, was examined. Among these, PPAR
was shown highly colocalized at similar regions of the implantation sites with COX-2 and PGIS; the expression of IP and PPAR
was very low to undetectable. The functionality of PPAR
as a PGI2 receptor was further validated in vivo, using COX-2-deficient mice as a model. Administration of cPGI or L-165041 (a selective PPAR
agonist) improved implantation and decidualization defects in COX-2(-/-) mice (33). Along with other in vitro evidence, this work demonstrated that maternal PPAR
expressed in the uterine stroma actively responds to a PGI2 agonist to mediate embryo implantation. However, cicaprost, an IP agonist but with no PPAR
agonism, had no effect.
Colorectal cancer
COX-2 is overexpressed in colorectal cancers in humans and animals, and COX-2-derived PGs modulate angiogenesis and cell adhesion during tumorigenesis (35, 36). Recent evidence shows that PPAR
is also overexpressed in colorectal cancers and its expression is colocalized with COX-2 within the tumor (37, 38). Furthermore, a recent in vitro study demonstrated that endogenous production of PGI2 by coexpression of COX-2 and PGIS indeed leads to transcriptional activation of PPAR
, whereas coexpression of COX-1 and PGIS failed to generate any significant level of PGI2 and transcriptional activation of PPAR
(38). These results clearly indicate that coupling of COX-2 and PGIS leads to impressive production of PGI2 within a cell and that endogenously produced PGI2 in fact uses PPAR
as its receptor. It is interesting to note that co-overexpression of COX-2 and PPAR
has also been reported in endometrial adenocarcinoma (39). Although the mechanism by which COX-2-PPAR
pathway promotes neoplastic transformations in certain tissues warrants further investigation, there is evidence that PPAR
is involved in vascular functions (see below).
Vascular functions
PGI2 is unequivocally one of the most abundant PGs in vasculature (1). Classic experiments using isolated platelets and blood vessels in vitro demonstrated that different PGI2 agonists exhibit anticoagulation and vasodilating activities (10, 19, 20). Although the anticoagulating activity of PGI2 seems to be mediated primarily by IP (21), its effects on vasculature may be shared between IP and PPAR
. Accumulating evidence supports this assumption. Increased endometrial vascular permeability and angiogenesis at the site of embryo are hallmarks of implantation and decidualization. Using a variety of proangiogenic markers, we have recently observed that cPGI or PPAR
agonists can improve implantation defects in COX-2-deficient mice with improved angiogenesis at the implantation site (unpublished observation). Furthermore, PPAR
is expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells and promotes their proliferation (40). These results suggest a role for PPAR
in vascular biology and also propose an interesting paradigm that a single ligand provokes two distinct signaling pathways, i.e. via a cell surface receptor and a nuclear receptor. However, the time course of these two signaling mechanisms could be different, further elucidation of which may establish a correlation between these two different pathways.
Apoptosis
Endogenously produced PGI2 apparently uses PPAR
to modulate apoptotic process as well (41). In this report, the authors show that endogenous production of PGI2 activates endogenously expressed PPAR
in a kidney cell line, leading to an apoptotic response. It is interesting to note that addition of exogenous PGI2 or cAMP-elevating agents showed opposing effects. These results are suggestive of possible cross-talk between PPAR and certain cytoplasmic signaling pathways. On a similar note, PPAR
is associated with keratinocyte differentiation in response to inflammatory stimuli and activated PPAR
in the skin seems to regulate genes associated with apoptosis (42). Although this work suggested that an endogenously produced PPAR
ligand is required for PPAR
activation following inflammatory stimuli, the identity of this putative ligand remains unknown.
Studies on PPAR -Deficient Mice: Tales of Diversity
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
-deficient mice show multiple functions of this previously neglected member of the PPAR family, although the variable phenotypes observed could be due to different genetic backgrounds of mice used in these studies. Peters and collaborators reported that PPAR
(-/-) mice were born below the expected Mendelian ratio and were smaller than their littermates (43). Although certain developmental defects were implicated in this finding, the cause of embryonic lethality in a subset of PPAR
null fetuses was not delineated. These mutant mice had smaller gonadal fat stores contributing to smaller body weights, and they also exhibited altered myelination in the central nervous system, suggesting an alteration in fatty acid metabolism. Whether the surviving PPAR
(-/-) mice were fertile was not reported. In another study, more than 90% of PPAR
(-/-) embryos showed severe developmental defects primarily due to placental malformation (44). Therefore, only a handful of PPAR
(-/-) mice on a specific genetic background escaped from the placental defects and survived to adulthood. The very few surviving PPAR
(-/-) mice showed reduced adiposity and were stated to have no apparent fertility defects. In contrast, another group has reported that the majority of the PPAR
(-/-) embryos die in utero or failed to survive to adulthood due to yet to be identified developmental defects, and a surviving line has variable and often reduced fertility (Ref. 45 ; and Desvergne, B., and W. Wahli, personal communication). Therefore, the characterization of reproductive phenotypes in the absence of PPAR
will require in-depth study using mice on different genetic backgrounds. The skin of PPAR
(-/-) mice also displays an increased hyperplasic response to an inflammatory response (43, 45), possibly by regulating apoptotic signaling (45). Although these reports show broad action of PPAR
in developmental and metabolic processes, specific ligand usage by PPAR
, whether it is PGI2 or other endogenous ligands, in different tissues requires further investigation. | Sophisticated Signaling Network of PGI2To Be Untangled |
|---|
|
|
|---|
as a PGI2 receptor is a good starting point to gain deeper insights into the mechanism of nuclear PGs. Although PPAR
is also known to interact with PGI2 agonists (24), no further studies are yet reported. Because of the promiscuity of ligand recognition by PPAR
, its activation in vivo or in vitro does not always involve PGI2. As mentioned, due to a large cavity in the ligand binding domain (25), PPARs can also be activated by polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic acid and arachidonic acid, and by certain classes of synthetic drugs. Studies on the interaction of PPAR
and these ligands are more focused on lipid biology. For example, several reports illustrate that fatty acids modulate proliferation and differentiation of adipocyte via PPAR
in vitro (46, 47, 48). Moreover, studies using PPAR
-selective synthetic agonists suggest a role for this receptor in lipid metabolism (49, 50), although which natural ligands of PPAR
would serve as an endogenous counterpart for this action is still unknown. It is therefore possible that differential ligand usage by one receptor may lead to completely different physiological outcomes depending on the cellular context.
Although this scheme of differential ligand usage adopted by PPARs may explain wide range of their functions, dissection of PPAR signaling pathway may shed light on understanding the convergence of intracellular signaling pathways activated by a single ligand. IP, the classical cell-surface receptor for PGI2, is known to mediate increases in intracellular cAMP production. Interestingly, there is evidence that cAMP signaling pathway modulates PPAR function, possibly by transactivation (51, 52). Especially in the model of adipocyte differentiation, both IP and PPAR
are expressed and responsive to cPGI (52, 53). This appears to be an excellent system to untangle a possible mechanism of signal integration and diversification of PGI2 in and out of the nucleus. Further investigation on the endogenous ligand usage by PPAR
in different cellular systems will also help elucidate the physiological importance of the ligand promiscuity displayed by the receptor.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: cPGI, Carbarprostacyclin; COX, cyclooxygenase; IP, prostacyclin receptor; PG, prostaglandin; PGI2, prostacylin; PGIS, PGI2 synthase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.
Received February 8, 2002.
Accepted for publication March 22, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-leukotriene B4 pathway to inflammation control. Nature 384:3943[CrossRef][Medline]
12, 14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR
. Cell 83:803812[CrossRef][Medline]
and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell 83:813819[CrossRef][Medline]
. Genes Dev 13:15611574
is an APC-regulated target of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cell 99:335345[CrossRef][Medline]
in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1327513280
in human endometrial adenocarcinoma. Neoplasia 2:483490[CrossRef][Medline]
is upregulated during vascular lesion formation and promotes post-confluent cell proliferation in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 277:1150511512
. J Biol Chem 276:4626046267
in keratinocyte response to inflammation. Genes Dev 15:32633277
). Mol Cell Biol 20:51195128
on placentation, adiposity, and colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:303308
and PPARß mutant mice. J Cell Biol 154:799814
activity affect fatty acid- controlled adipose differentiation. J Biol Chem 275:3876838773
mediates the effects of long-chain fatty acids on post-confluent cell proliferation. Biochem J 350(Pt 1):9398
promotes induction of PPAR
and adipocyte differentiation in 3T3C2 fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 274:2192021925
promotes lipid accumulation in human macrophages. J Biol Chem 276:4425844265
agonist promotes reverse cholesterol transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:53065311
(PPAR
)-mediated regulation of preadipocyte proliferation and gene expression is dependent on cAMP signaling. J Biol Chem 276:31753182
in preadipose cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 160:149156[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. Skill, N. G. Theodorakis, Y. N. Wang, J. M. Wu, E. M. Redmond, and J. V. Sitzmann Role of cyclooxygenase isoforms in prostacyclin biosynthesis and murine prehepatic portal hypertension Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): G953 - G964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nemenoff, A. M. Meyer, T. M. Hudish, A. B. Mozer, A. Snee, S. Narumiya, R. S. Stearman, R. A. Winn, M. Weiser-Evans, M. W. Geraci, et al. Prostacyclin Prevents Murine Lung Cancer Independent of the Membrane Receptor by Activation of Peroxisomal Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Cancer Prevention Research, October 1, 2008; 1(5): 349 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. He, T. Lu, L. V. d'Uscio, C.-F. Lam, H.-C. Lee, and Z. S. Katusic Angiogenic Function of Prostacyclin Biosynthesis in Human Endothelial Progenitor Cells Circ. Res., July 3, 2008; 103(1): 80 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. C. Kengni, I. St-Louis, S. Parent, V. Leblanc, C. Shooner, and E. Asselin Regulation of prostaglandin D synthase and prostacyclin synthase in the endometrium of cyclic, pregnant, and pseudopregnant rats and their regulation by sex steroids J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 195(2): 301 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Jaffar, M. E. Ferrini, M. C. Buford, G. A. FitzGerald, and K. Roberts Prostaglandin I2-IP Signaling Blocks Allergic Pulmonary Inflammation by Preventing Recruitment of CD4+ Th2 Cells into the Airways in a Mouse Model of Asthma J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 6193 - 6203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lin, C.-C. Hou, C.-F. Cheng, T.-H. Chiu, Y.-H. Hsu, Y.-M. Sue, T.-H. Chen, H.-H. Hou, Y.-C. Chao, T.-H. Cheng, et al. Peroxisomal Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha} Protects Renal Tubular Cells from Doxorubicin-Induced Apoptosis Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2007; 72(5): 1238 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Freedman, E. Wang, S. Voiculescu, R. Patenia, R. L. Bassett Jr., M. Deavers, F. M. Marincola, P. Yang, and R. A. Newman Comparative Analysis of Peritoneum and Tumor Eicosanoids and Pathways in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5736 - 5744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Eyster The membrane and lipids as integral participants in signal transduction: lipid signal transduction for the non-lipid biochemist Advan Physiol Educ, March 1, 2007; 31(1): 5 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Froment, F Gizard, D Defever, B Staels, J Dupont, and P Monget Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in reproductive tissues: from gametogenesis to parturition. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 189(2): 199 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Poole, J. Bigler, J. Whitton, J. G. Sibert, J. D. Potter, and C. M. Ulrich Prostacyclin synthase and arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase polymorphisms and risk of colorectal polyps. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 502 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Y. Ali, K. Egan, G. A. FitzGerald, B. Desvergne, W. Wahli, D. Bishop-Bailey, T. D. Warner, and J. A. Mitchell Role of Prostacyclin versus Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor beta Receptors in Prostacyclin Sensing by Lung Fibroblasts Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 242 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nasrallah and R. L. Hebert Prostacyclin signaling in the kidney: implications for health and disease Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): F235 - F246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Di-Poi, C. Y. Ng, N. S. Tan, Z. Yang, B. A. Hemmings, B. Desvergne, L. Michalik, and W. Wahli Epithelium-Mesenchyme Interactions Control the Activity of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {beta}/{delta} during Hair Follicle Development Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2005; 25(5): 1696 - 1712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Korita, H. Itoh, N. Sagawa, S. Yura, M. Yoshida, K. Kakui, M. Takemura, and S. Fujii 17{beta}-Estradiol Up-Regulates Prostacyclin Production in Cultured Human Uterine Myometrial Cells Via Augmentation of Both Cyclooxygenase-1 and Prostacyclin Synthase Expression Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 2004; 11(7): 457 - 464. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nasrallah and R. L. Hebert Reduced IP receptors in STZ-induced diabetic rat kidneys and high-glucose-treated mesangial cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): F673 - F681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sirois, K. Sayasith, K. A. Brown, A. E. Stock, N. Bouchard, and M. Dore Cyclooxygenase-2 and its role in ovulation: a 2004 account Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2004; 10(5): 373 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Dey, H. Lim, S. K. Das, J. Reese, B. C. Paria, T. Daikoku, and H. Wang Molecular Cues to Implantation Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 341 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Lim, I. Moon, and K. Han Transcriptional Cofactors Exhibit Differential Preference toward Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors {alpha} and {delta} in Uterine Cells Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2886 - 2895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.D. Norata, E. Callegari, H. Inoue, and A.L. Catapano HDL3 Induces Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression and Prostacyclin Release in Human Endothelial Cells Via a p38 MAPK/CRE-Dependent Pathway: Effects on COX-2/PGI-Synthase Coupling Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(5): 871 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S Battersby, H O D Critchley, A J de Brum-Fernandes, and H N Jabbour Temporal expression and signalling of prostacyclin receptor in the human endometrium across the menstrual cycle Reproduction, January 1, 2004; 127(1): 79 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. E. Berry, R. Eykholt, R. J. A. Helliwell, R. S. Gilmour, M. D. Mitchell, and K. W. Marvin Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Isoform Expression Changes in Human Gestational Tissues with Labor at Term Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2003; 64(6): 1586 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||