| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLE |
Department of Physiology (A.P.A., T.S.P.-S., L.A.E., M.M.M.), University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201; Psychology Department (C.J.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218; and Department of Biology (M.J.T.), Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York 12866
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Anthony P. Auger, Department of Physiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. E-mail: . aauge001{at}umaryland.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nuclear receptor coactivators increase steroid receptor transcription via their intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity. Acetylation of histones by coactivators removes a positive charge, leading to a reduction in higher-order chromatin structures, and makes DNA more accessible to transcription factors (11, 12, 13). Nuclear receptor coactivators also increase transcriptional activity of steroid receptors by interacting with other histone acetyltransferase factors, such as p300/CBP-associated factor, and general transcription factors, such as TBP and TIFIIB (5). Because the actions of steroid receptors are important for normal reproductive physiology and behavior of both males and females and the actions of steroid receptors at the genome are governed by nuclear receptor coactivators, it is important to determine the expression and function of these nuclear receptor coactivators (i.e. CBP) during brain development.
Although much is known about CBP in vitro, little is known about the functional role of CBP in developing brain. Homozygous mice containing a targeted disruption of the CBP gene die during midgestation (14). Although heterozygous mice survive, they show postnatal disruptions in neurotube development as well as deficits in learning and memory, indicating that CBP is required for normal central nervous system development and function (15). In adult rat brain, CBP is found in many areas that also contain steroid receptors, such as the amygdala, hypothalamus, and hippocampus (16). In addition, CBP appears to be regulated by estradiol because treatment of cultured hippocampal neurons with estradiol increases the level of CBP within 24 h (17). The time course for estradiol-induced CBP correlates with estradiol-induced increases in neuronal dendritic spines, the sites of excitatory synapses, and one of the more pronounced sex differences in the brain is the density of dendritic spines (18, 19). Therefore, we hypothesized that CBP is involved in processes related to sexual differentiation of the brain.
Sexual differentiation of the brain is determined by steroid hormone exposure during a discrete developmental period, between embryonic d 18 and postnatal d 10 (20, 21, 22). At birth, male rats are exposed to high levels of testosterone released from the testis, resulting in behavioral masculinization, defined as increased male-typical behaviors, and behavioral defeminization, defined as decreased female-typical behaviors. The absence of a testosterone surge in females results in feminization of the brain. Neonatally castrated male rats grown to adulthood exhibit decreased male and increased female sexual behavior under the appropriate hormonal conditions (23). Likewise, females administered testosterone neonatally do not display female sexual behavior as adults (24, 25) but will display male-typical behaviors if treated with exogenous testosterone. We have recently reported that SRC-1 is critical for steroid-mediated differentiation of sexual behavior. Reducing SRC-1 expression during the first few days of life nearly abolished testosterones effect on suppressing female sexual behavior in males and androgenized females (26). Interestingly, reducing SRC-1 expression did not interfere with the development of male sexual behavior in males and androgenized females, suggesting the effects were specific to defeminization. Because CBP interacts with SRC-1 in vitro, we have now investigated the expression of CBP and its function in sexual differentiation of neonatal male and female rat brain.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiment 1: quantification of CBP using immunocytochemistry
On PN0, brains were collected from newborn male (n = 5) and female (n = 6) pups and immediately immersed in 5% acrolein for 24 h and then placed into 0.1 M PBS containing 20% sucrose overnight. Brains were sectioned at 50 µm using a cryostat at -20 C and stored in cryoprotectant until processed for CBP immunocytochemistry.
CBP immunocytochemistry
Sections were rinsed three times for 5 min each in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.6) and placed into 1% H2O2, 20% normal goat serum, and 1% BSA for 30 min to reduce nonspecific staining and endogenous peroxidase activity. Sections were then incubated with an antibody that recognizes the carboxy terminus of CBP (rabbit polyclonal, SC-20; 1:2000 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) overnight at room temperature in PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100. After primary incubation, sections were rinsed three times in PBS for 5 min each and then incubated with biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG (7.5 g/ml) diluted in PBS for 90 min at room temperature. Following three additional rinses in PBS, sections were incubated with the DH:biotinylated horseradish peroxidase H complex (1:200 in PBS) for 90 min. Sections were rinsed three more times in PBS for 5 min each and treated with 0.05% diaminobenzidine and 0.05% H2O2 in PBS for 5 min. Developed sections were mounted onto gelatin-coated slides and coverslipped with Permount mounting medium. Omission of CBP antibody and preadsorption with CBP control peptide blocked all immunoreactivity.
Computer-aided image analysis
Brain areas examined are illustrated in Fig. 1
and include areas that express high levels of gonadal steroid receptors, such as the medial preoptic area (MPOA), arcuate nucleus (Arc), ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH), and the CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus, and areas that contain little or no gonadal steroid receptor expression, such as the paraventricular thalamic nucleus, posterior part (PVP), and the frontal cortex. One section per area was matched according to the rat brain atlas of Paxinos and Watson (27).
|
Experiment 2: quantification of CBP by Western immunoblotting
Neonatal male and female rat brains (five to six rats per group) were collected on PN0, postnatal d 1, postnatal d 5, and postnatal d 11. The basomedial hypothalamus was dissected out on a chilled surface, snap frozen in isopentane on dry ice, and stored frozen until homogenization with ice-cold lysis buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, 1% Na-deoxycholate, 0.25% Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors (1 µg/ml aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin; 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Following tissue homogenization, samples were centrifuged at 2000 x g for 30 min at 4 C to sediment cellular debris and nuclei. The supernatant fraction was collected and protein concentration determined by a Bradford assay. Twenty micrograms total protein from each rat were gel electrophoresed using a precast SDS-PAGE (816% Tris Glycine) and transferred to a polyvinyl difluoride membrane. Membranes were washed briefly in 0.1M Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and blocked for 1 h in 0.1 M TBS containing 5% nonfat dry milk with constant agitation at room temperature. Membranes were then incubated with CBP antibody (SC-20; 1:3000) in TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TTBS) for 3 h at room temperature with agitation and washed three times for 5 min each in TTBS. Following washes, membranes were incubated in a goat antirabbit horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature with agitation and then washed three times for 5 min each in TTBS. Immunoreactive bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, MA) and membrane exposed to film (Hyperfilm-ECL, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Membranes were then reblotted with a mouse monoclonal antibody against the housekeeping gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; 1:100,000, Chemicon International, Inc., Temecula, CA). Films were placed on a light box and analyzed using a gel-plotting macro in the public domain NIH image program. Densitometric areas were then were analyzed with a two-tailed t test.
Experiment 3: functional consequence of reducing CBP protein using antisense oligodeoxynucleotides
Oligodeoxynucleotide infusions.
CBP antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) (n = 4) or scrambled control ODNs (n = 6) were infused into the hypothalamus of female rats on PN02, using a modified stereotaxic apparatus and a 1-µl Hamilton syringe. Rats were cryoanesthetized before each infusion. Bregma is visible through the skin under bright light and was used as a landmark for the hypothalamus. Bilateral injections (1 µg ODNs dissolved in 1 µl 0.9% saline) were aimed at the mediobasal hypothalamus (1.0 mm anterior and 0.8 mm lateral to Bregma; 5.0 mm below the skull). The sequence for the 21-mer antisense oligonucleotide spanning the putative start codon of CBP is 5'-CAG-CAA-GTT-CTC-GGC-CAT-CTT-3' and the 21-mer scrambled control oligonucleotide is 5'-CCC-TAG-CAG-CTA-CAG-CTT-CGC-3'. Chimeric ODNs were obtained from Oligos etc. (Wilforshire, OR). These second-generation chimeric ODNs contain limited phosphorothioate linkages allowing for greater resistance to nuclease cleavage and increased activation of Rnase H, an enzyme that cleaves the RNA strand of DNA/RNA hybrids. On postnatal d 1, all females were injected with 100 µg testosterone propionate, a dose known to both masculinize and defeminize sexual behavior.
Female sexual behavior.
Neonatally treated rats were grown to adulthood and ovariectomized on postnatal d 45 using ketamine/acepromazine anesthesia. Two weeks following surgery, rats were steroid primed with 10 µg estradiol benzoate followed 48 h later by 500 µg progesterone, a paradigm that reliably induces female sexual behavior. Fours hours after progesterone treatment, rats were placed in a testing chamber and allowed to acclimate. Behavioral testing occurred during the dark phase of the light cycle under dim red light. The flanks and perineum were manually stimulated by the experimenter and lordosis quotients and ratings scored. Lordosis quotients indicate number of responses per number of attempts multiplied by 100. Lordosis rating indicates a lordosis intensity range on a scale from 0 to 3, reflecting increasing dorsoflexion of the back. The experimenter scoring the lordosis response was blind to the treatment group.
Male sexual behavior.
Following testing for female sexual behavior, rats were implanted with testosterone-filled capsules and 3 wk later tested for male sexual behavior. Rats were then placed in a testing chamber and allowed to acclimate. A sexually receptive female was placed into the testing chamber, and the total number of mounts and latency to first mount were recorded over a 15-min test period. Behavioral testing occurred during the dark phase of the light cycle under dim red light. Behavioral data were analyzed with a two-tailed t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The sex difference in the levels of CBP within particular brain regions is likely to impact the activity of multiple steroid receptors. In vitro studies (4, 30) indicate that CBP interacts with receptors for glucocorticoids, estrogens, progestins, thyroid hormone, retinoic acid, and retinoid X as well as for androgens (31). An important outcome of ligand-activated steroid receptors is the ability to squelch the activity of other steroid receptors. One possible mechanism for this cross-talk between steroid receptors is by receptors binding to and limiting the availability of coactivators (4, 6). For example, ligand-induced transactivation of progestin receptors in HeLa cells can be squelched by estradiol activation of estrogen receptors, and this phenomenon can be overcome by increasing the levels of SRC-1 (6). Therefore, it appears that a limited amount of coactivators is available to bind to ligand-activated steroid receptors. Our present finding that CBP is regulated in a sex-specific manner during development suggests that the regulation of CBP provides a means by which one steroid receptor can alter the activity of other steroid receptors in developing brain. For example, testosterone, or its metabolites, may increase the response to other steroid hormones by increasing the levels of CBP within particular brain regions.
The immunocytochemical distribution of CBP in neonatal rat brain closely resembles that observed in adults (16). Although CBP immunoreactivity is widely expressed throughout the neonatal rat brain, there appears to be some heterogeneity in the levels of CBP as well as sex differences in these levels. The present immunocytochemical results suggest the sex differences in CBP expression occur only within sexually dimorphic brain regions that contain steroid receptors, such as the MPOA, VMH, and Arc. It is not known whether CBP immunoreactivity is found exclusively within neurons or can be found within glia. The presence of high levels of CBP may be important to promote cellular responses to steroids within cell populations that have low levels of steroid receptors. The distribution of CBP correlates well with the distribution of the coactivator, SRC-1, in rat brain (32). Because SRC-1 interacts with CBP at the genome to enhance steroid receptor-induced transcription, it is not surprising to find a similar distribution of these coactivators within the brain. Another parallel between CBP and SRC-1 is the functional role of these coactivators in modulating steroid-mediated differentiation of sexual behavior.
It is well documented that neonatal testosterone treatment of females leads to the suppression of adult female sexual behavior via its aromatization to estradiol (20, 21, 33). Because CBP is critical for estrogen receptor action in vitro, we examined whether CBP is required for estrogen receptor action in developing brain. If CBP is important for estrogen receptor action, then reducing CBP levels should interfere with the ability of estradiol to suppress female sexual behavior. Therefore, we hypothesized that reducing postnatal CBP levels in testosterone-treated female rats with antisense ODNs would block the suppressive actions of estradiol and lead to increased female sexual behavior. As predicted, testosterone-treated female rats infused with CBP antisense ODNs neonatally exhibited higher levels of lordosis as adults, contrasted with scrambled ODN controls. This indicates that reducing CBP expression interfered with estradiols ability to defeminize or reduce female sexual behavior. Interestingly, reducing CBP expression with antisense ODN did not interfere with male sexual behavior. There were no differences between rats treated with CBP antisense ODNs or control ODN in the number of mounts directed toward an estrous female, and there were no differences in the latency to mount an estrous female. Taken together, these data suggest that postnatal expression of CBP may be more important for processes leading to defeminization than those associated with masculinization of sexual behavior.
The postnatal disruption of defeminization, but not masculinization, of sexual behavior by reducing CBP expression is consistent with the effects of reducing SRC-1 expression neonatally (26). We previously reported that postnatal reduction of SRC-1 protein interfered with the defeminizing, but not the masculinizing, actions of testosterone. These data are consistent with others (23, 34, 35, 36, 37) that report changes in defeminization, but not masculinization, of sexual behavior. As stated above, it is well documented that behavioral defeminization results from estrogen action (23, 38, 39). However, behavioral masculinization by testosterone is more complex, at least in Sprague-Dawley rats (40). Neonatal treatment with an antiandrogen, cyproterone acetate or flutamide, interferes with behavioral masculinization but has little impact on behavioral defeminization (40, 41). Furthermore, blocking the aromatization of testosterone to estradiol neonatally with 1,4,6-androstatriene-3,17-dione disrupts behavioral defeminization, but not behavioral masculinization, of sexual behavior. That is, neonatally 1,4,6-androstatriene-3,17-dione-treated males exhibit high levels of both male and female sexual behavior (34). Thus, blocking the conversion of testosterone into estradiol produces bisexual males that resemble those treated neonatally with either SRC-1 or CBP antisense ODNs. Although our data do not rule out a possible role for CBP in modulating the development of some components of male sexual behavior, they do suggest that coactivators, such as CBP and SRC-1, may be more important in processes mediating defeminization than those mediating masculinization of sexual behavior.
The lack of an effect on masculinization in androgenized females does not rule out an involvement of CBP in masculinization in males. During development, masculinization of sexual behavior in males appears to be influenced by two surges in the synthesis and release of testosterone, one occurring on embryonic d 18 and the other on the day of birth. Treatment of pregnant rats with an androgen antagonist, cyproterone acetate, to block androgen action on embryonic d 18 interferes with masculinization (42). Furthermore, female rats located near a male within the uterus display increased male sexual behavior in adulthood, and this increase can be blocked by prenatal treatment with an antiandrogen, flutamide (43). These studies suggest that a portion of masculinization is due to prenatal testosterone. Therefore, it is possible that CBP may be involved in mediating some effects of prenatal testosterone on masculinization.
Another point to consider is that the CBP antisense ODN reduced protein expression by 30%, as determined by Western immunoblot. This percent reduction is consistent with what we observed using SRC-1 antisense ODN, which completely blocked the defeminizing, but not the masculinizing, actions of testosterone (26). Typically antisense ODN treatments reduces protein levels by 1040%, and the behavioral or physiological effects are more profound (44). It has been suggested that newly synthesized proteins may be functionally preferred over older proteins (44). The Western blot technique would detect both old and newly synthesized proteins. Because antisense ODNs interfere preferentially with the synthesis of new protein, it is possible for antisense to have a greater impact on physiology than on protein levels. Although a 30% reduction in CBP attenuated the defeminizing actions of testosterone, a greater reduction of coactivators may be needed to interfere with the masculinization of sexual behavior. Another possibility is that both CBP and SRC-1 may need to be reduced to influence masculinization. Indeed, simultaneous reduction of both CBP and SRC-1 was required to interfere with adult female sexual behavior and estradiol induction of progestin receptors (9).
It is important to note that CBP is not only a coactivator for steroid receptors but is also critically involved in mediating the actions of CREB (7, 8). When CREB is phosphorylated, it binds to a cAMP response element located on DNA and then recruits CBP to the transcriptional complex. Phosphorylation of CREB occurs following estradiol treatment in both adult (45, 46, 47) and immature neurons (17). Because neonatal males have higher levels of estradiol, which is aromatized from testosterone within the brain, it was predicted that males would have higher levels of CREB phosphorylation. Indeed, we have recently reported that CREB phosphorylation is higher in males on the day of birth, contrasted with females in steroid receptor-containing areas that are sexually dimorphic, such as the MPOA, VMH, and the Arc (48). Our present data indicate that males also express higher levels of CBP within these same regions. The increased expression of CBP may act to enhance downstream transcriptional events mediated by estradiol-induced phosphorylated CREB. Taken together, these data suggest that CBP is an important modulator of estradiol action in developing brain.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: Arc, Arcuate nucleus; CBP, CREB-binding protein; CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HRE, hormone response element; MPOA, medial preoptic area; ODN, oligodeoxynucleotide; PN0, postnatal d 0; PVP, paraventricular thalamic nucleus, posterior part; SRC-1, steroid receptor coactivator-1; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; TTBS, TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20; VMH, ventromedial hypothalamus.
Received December 21, 2001.
Accepted for publication April 23, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. McCARTHY Estradiol and the Developing Brain Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 91 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schumacher, R. Guennoun, A. Ghoumari, C. Massaad, F. Robert, M. El-Etr, Y. Akwa, K. Rajkowski, and E.-E. Baulieu Novel Perspectives for Progesterone in Hormone Replacement Therapy, with Special Reference to the Nervous System Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2007; 28(4): 387 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Olesen, H. M. Jessen, C. J. Auger, and A. P. Auger Dopaminergic Activation of Estrogen Receptors in Neonatal Brain Alters Progestin Receptor Expression and Juvenile Social Play Behavior Endocrinology, September 1, 2005; 146(9): 3705 - 3712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.H. Abbott, D.K. Barnett, C.M. Bruns, and D.A. Dumesic Androgen excess fetal programming of female reproduction: a developmental aetiology for polycystic ovary syndrome? Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2005; 11(4): 357 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Davis, M. L. Seney, H. J. Walker, and S. A. Tobet Differential Colocalization of Islet-1 and Estrogen Receptor {alpha} in the Murine Preoptic Area and Hypothalamus during Development Endocrinology, January 1, 2004; 145(1): 360 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Molenda, C. P. Kilts, R. L. Allen, and M. J. Tetel Nuclear Receptor Coactivator Function in Reproductive Physiology and Behavior Biol Reprod, November 1, 2003; 69(5): 1449 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |