| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
INSULIN-GLUCAGON-GI PEPTIDES-DIABETES MELLITUS |
in Adipose Tissue Leads to Reduced Adipose Mass and Local But Not Systemic Insulin Resistance
Harvard School of Public Health, Division of Biological Sciences and Department of Nutrition, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Gökhan S. Hotamisligil, M.D., Ph.D., Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. E-mail: . ghotamis{at}hsph.harvard.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression in adipocytes is a molecular mechanism by which insulin action is modulated in adipose tissue. While this might be a compensatory response to limit adipose expansion, neither the mechanisms underlying this local effect nor its systemic biological consequences have been studied. It is also not clear whether TNF
-induced insulin resistance in adipocyte alone is responsible for systemic insulin resistance in the absence of obesity. In a transgenic mouse model deficient in endogenous TNF
, we demonstrate that specific expression of the transmembrane TNF
(mTNF
) in adipocytes leads to decreased whole body adipose mass, and local, but not systemic insulin resistance. These data demonstrate that exclusive action of TNF
in adipose tissue strongly inhibits insulin action at this site and leads to reduced adiposity in mice. However, this isolated adipocyte insulin resistance in the context of reduced fat mass and/or the absence of obesity is insufficient to alter systemic glucose homeostasis. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been proposed that adipocyte insulin resistance might act as a limiting factor in adipogenesis owing to insulins strong positive effects on lipogenesis and adipocyte differentiation (11, 12, 13). This latter hypothesis is supported by the inverse relation between the severity of insulin resistance and the extent of obesity in humans (14). In addition, the use of insulin-sensitizing agents for treatment of type 2 diabetes is associated with weight gain, irrespective of the mechanism of action of these drugs. According to this model, isolated adipocyte insulin resistance might even be beneficial by limiting excess obesity. However, most of these questions remain unanswered because the molecular mechanism(s) by which insulin action is locally modified in adipocytes are not known. Furthermore, the impact of adipocytes on systemic insulin resistance is not well understood, primarily due to lack of appropriate experimental models.
In the obese state, the adipose expression of TNF
is elevated in many experimental rodent obesity models (15) as well as in obese humans (16, 17). Because TNF
is capable of inducing a catabolic state, the increased production of TNF
in adipocytes has been proposed to be a candidate mechanism used by the organism to induce local insulin resistance and limit further development of the fat mass (11, 12, 13). In line with this, TNF
interferes with adipocyte differentiation (18, 19, 20, 21, 22) and profoundly impacts insulin-responsive cells and tissues (23). Removal of TNF
activity by biopharmaceutical agents (15, 24, 25) or by targeted genetics (26, 27, 28) results in increased responsiveness to insulin. The more challenging aspects of this model are related to the underlying mechanisms to spatially control TNF
action at specific sites such as adipocytes and examine whether such a restricted activity would have local and/or systemic metabolic consequences. In this study, we have attempted to address some of these issues by generating a mouse model where a nonsecretable form of TNF
(mTNF
1-9K11E) is transgenically expressed in an adipocyte-specific manner in animals lacking both copies of the endogenous TNF
gene.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ELISA kits for murine and human TNF
were purchased from Genzyme (Cambridge, MA). The biotinylated polyclonal goat antimurine TNF
antibody was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). The polyclonal rabbit antihuman insulin receptor and insulin receptor substrate-1 antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). The polyclonal rabbit antimouse adiponectin/ACRP30 was a gift from Dr. Philip Scherer (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY).
Generation of the transgenic mice
The 5.4-kb aP2 gene enhancer/promoter was used to drive the target gene (mTNF
19K11E) expression specifically in adipose tissue. The plasmid was constructed as follows: a 1.65-kb XbaI/SfiI fragment containing the SV40 splice and Poly (A) sites was cloned into the SmaI site of pBluescript SKII+ after Klenow fill-in and denoted as pBS-SV40. A 0.76-kb BglII/BamHI fragment containing the coding sequence of mTNF
19K11E was cloned into the BamHI site of pBS-SV40 in sense orientation and named as pBS-TNF-SV40. Finally, the 5.4-kb aP2 gene enhancer/promoter was isolated as a NotI fragment and cloned into NotI site of pBS-TNF-SV40 in correct orientation. For microinjection, the final construct pBS-aP2-TNF-SV40 was digested with KpnI, and the 10-kb fragment containing the aP2 enhancer/promoter, the noncleavable transmembrane TNF
SV40 splice and Poly (A) sites were isolated free of vector sequence. The purified and linearized expression vector was injected into fertilized eggs derived from TNF
-/- C57BL/6 mice. Out of 19 offspring, 7 (36.8%) had integrated the transgene as determined by PCR and southern blot analysis. The primers used to genotyping were as the follows: 5' primer, 5'-GAAGTTCCCAAATGGCCTCC-3'; and 3' primer, 5'-GGATCCAGAGTAAAGGGG TCAGAGTG-3'. These founder mice were bred with nontransgenic TNF
-/- littermates. Heterozygous F1 males were intercrossed with nontransgenic TNF
-/- female littermates. The entire progeny were genotyped by genomic southern blot analysis.
Biochemical assays and insulin and glucose tolerance tests
Tolerance tests were performed on 20-wk-old male mice after 6 h daytime food withdrawal. Insulin and glucose solutions were injected into peritoneal cavity at the dose of 0.5 U/kg and 10 ml/kg (1 M solution), respectively. Blood was collected via tail vein at different time points and glucose levels were measured by the use of a glucometer (Precision, Willow Grove, PA). Plasma insulin, leptin and FFA levels were measured with the rat insulin RIA (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO), mouse leptin RIA (Linco Research, Inc.) and the NEFA-C assay (Wako Chemicals USA Inc., Richmond, VA), respectively. TG, glycerol, and cholesterol levels were measured with the corresponding commercially available assay systems (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
Glucose uptake in isolated adipocytes
Epididymal white fat pads were excised, weighed, and rinsed in isolation buffer (120 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 0.6 mM MgSO4·7H2O and 0.9 mM CaCl2·6H2O, 20 mM HEPES, 200 nM adenosine, and 2.5% BSA). Fat pads were then cut into small pieces in isolation buffer supplemented with 1 mg/ml type I collegenase (Worthington Biochemical Corp., Lakewood, NJ) and digested at 37 C in shaking water bath (Precision) at 100 rpm per minute for 45 min. Then, digested tissues were filtered through 100 µM mesh (TETKO Inc., Briarcliff Manor, NY) to get single cell suspension and cells were rinsed twice with isolation buffer. For glucose uptake, 100 µl cell suspension was used in a 1.5-ml tube together with 350 µl buffer with or without insulin (basal uptake) for a 30-min incubation at 37 C with gentle shaking. Nonspecific uptake was determined by incubating cells with 50 µM cytochalsin B (Sigma), a glucose transporter inhibitor. Then, 50 µl isolation buffer containing 0.5 µCi 14C-deoxy-glucose (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) was added to all tubes and incubated at 37 C for 45 min with gentle shaking. The uptake was terminated by adding 500 µl di-isononyl ester (Fluka, Milwaukee, WI). After gentle mixing, the tubes were spun at 1,000 rpm for 2 min and cells on the top layer were transferred to scintillation vials for counting.
Southern blot analysis
Genomic DNA samples were extracted from mouse tails and digested with BamHI. Samples were loaded on 1% agarose gel along with molecular weight markers and run at 20 V overnight. DNA samples were then depurinated in 0.25 M HCl for 30 min, denatured in 1.5 M NaCl/0.5 M NaOH for 30 min, and neutralized in 1.5 M NaCl/0.5 M Tris·Cl (pH 7.0) for 30 min. After neutralization, DNAs were transferred to a biotran membrane (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA), UV cross-linked and baked at 80 C for 1 h. Hybridization with
32P-deoxy-CTP (NEN Life Science Products) labeled cDNA probes and subsequent washings were done as described previously (22).
Northern blot analysis
RNA samples were extracted as described (15). Following denaturation, RNAs were loaded on a 1% agarose gel containing 3% formaldehyde. After electrophoresis, RNAs were transferred to a biotran membrane (ICN Biomedicals), UV cross-linked and baked at 80 C for 1 h. Hybridization with
32P-deoxy-CTP (NEN Life Science Products) labeled cDNA probes and subsequent washings were done as described previously (22). Pictures of ethidium bromide-stained gels were shown for loading adjustment.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting
To immunoprecipitate membrane-associated TNF
from adipose tissue, two transgenic and two control mice were used for plasma membrane preparations. The monoclonal hamster antimurine TNF
antibody was used for immunoprecipitation (a gift from Dr. Robert D. Schreiber, Washington University, St. Louis, MO). Four micrograms of antibody were used for 1 mg membrane material. The tissue lysates were first cleared with 50 µl protein A (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc., Piscataway, NJ) beads for 1 h at 4 C and then incubated with the immunoprecipitating antibody for 2 h at 4 C. Immunocomplexes were then collected by incubation with 50 µl protein A beads for 1 h at 4 C. Immunoblots were performed by using the biotinylated polyclonal goat antimurine TNF
antibody (R&D Systems Inc.) at a concentration of 0.2 µg/ml. ACRP30/adiponectin immunoblots were done as described (29), using 0.5-µl aliquots of serum and 1:100 dilution of the antibody polyclonal rabbit antimouse ACRP30/adiponectin antibody.
Food intake and feces lipid analysis
Mice were individually caged (10 mice per group) and fed with 50 g of transgenic dough diet. The dough was replaced once every week and weighted daily for 2 wk. The data were presented as an average daily intake from a 2-wk study. The feces were collected weekly for individual mouse. For lipid analysis, equal amount of feces from control and transgenic mice were dissolved in alcoholic KOH (2 parts ethonal:1 part 30% KOH) at 60 C overnight. The above solution was mixed well and 0.5 ml was removed to a microfuge tube, 0.54 ml of 1 M MgCl2 was added. The content was mixed and then let sit on ice for 10 min. Microfuge was spun at top speed and supernatant was saved for glycerol assay.
In vivo insulin-stimulated IR phosphorylation
After an overnight fast, 20-wk-old male mice were anesthetized by ip administration of xylasine (10 mg/kg) and ketamine (100 mg/kg). The abdominal cavity was opened and 500 mIU per kg insulin (Eli Lilly \|[amp ]\| Co., Indianapolis, IN) or an equal volume of PBS solution was administered through the portal vein. Liver and epididymal fat pads were collected 120 sec after the injection and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Protein extracts from the tissue samples were then prepared for detecting IR phosphorylation as described previously (26).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression in adipocytes
exclusively in the adipocyte and test whether it is sufficient to interfere with adipogenesis and adipose tissue insulin action in vivo. To achieve adipose-tissue specific expression of transmembrane TNF
, we constructed a transgenic expression vector driven by the 5.4-kb aP2 gene enhancer/promoter (Fig. 1A
variant, mTNF
1-9K11E (22), the actions of which should be limited to adipose tissue. This TNF
variant carries a 9-amino acid deletion at the site of cleavage recognized by the TNF
converting enzyme and a substitution of lysine at position 9 to glutamic acid. The mutant retains the actions of the wild-type protein as tested previously (22, 31, 32). Under normal circumstances, TNF
is localized to the cell surface as a type 2 transmembrane protein and cleaved at the cell surface to release the soluble cytokine. The mutant used in our work is also inserted to the plasma membrane the same way; however, since the cleavage site is altered it is not recognized by the protease, hence, not cleaved. The biologically active domain is present and it does interact with TNF receptors. This mutant has been characterized extensively in adipocytes (22, 32) and immune cells (31). The transgenic lines were created directly in the TNF
-/- mice to prevent interference from the endogenous TNF
expression at other sites. After microinjection, 19 viable offspring were obtained, and 7 of them had the transgene integrated into their genome. Genomic Southern blotting revealed that they had different copy numbers of the transgene (Fig. 1B
|
19K11E. As shown in Fig. 1C
19K11E protein by immunoblotting. These experiments demonstrated the presence of the protein product of the transgene specifically in transgenic but not control animals (Fig. 1D
, were not detected because mTNF
19K11E lacks the glycosylation site that give rise to these species. We also tested whether there was any unanticipated processing of the transgenic product in adipose tissue and consequent release into circulation in vivo at the baseline conditions and upon administration of lipopolysaccharide. Analysis of blood samples by a TNF
-specific ELISA did not reveal any detectable level of circulating TNF
in transgenic animals even upon 3 mg/kg lipopolysaccharide stimulation for 3 h, where high levels of circulating TNF
was readily detectable in the wild-type animals with intact endogenous TNF
gene (data not shown). These data indicate that the transgene was properly transcribed, translated, translocated, and retained at the desired site and there was no detectable secreted TNF
in these transgenic animals.
Phenotypic characterization of mTNF
19K11E transgenic mice
At birth, the mTNF
19K11E transgenic mice appeared normal and could not be distinguished from controls (TNF
-deficient littermates) by their appearance. The body weight was monitored from 4 wk of age, at which time no significant differences were apparent between the genotypes. At 8 wk, the body weights of the transgenic mice were lower compared with their littermates. This difference became more significant in the subsequent measurements and by 20 wk, there was a 15% reduction in the body weight of all three transgenic mice lines compared with controls (Fig. 2A
). A general decrease in adipose mass was readily observable upon gross dissection of the mTNF
19K11E transgenic mice (Fig. 2
, CF) and both white (epididymal) and brown fat pads (interscapular) were reduced in mass compared with those from control animals (Fig. 2B
). No difference was evident in the weights of liver, spleen, and heart between the transgenic and control mice indicating that the reduction was specific to fat depots. Histological analysis of fixed adipose tissue showed that transgenic animals had smaller fat cells compared with control mice (Fig. 3
, A and B). The average adipocyte size in the transgenic animals was reduced by 20% compared with the wild-type controls. Although reduction in adiposity is commonly associated with excess lipid accumulation in the liver, sections prepared from the mTNF
19K11 transgenic mice did not reveal any lipid accumulation (Fig. 3
, C and D).
|
|
The leptin level in circulation is strongly related to total fat mass. In further support of reduced adiposity, adipose tissue leptin mRNA (Fig. 4A
) and circulating leptin protein (Fig. 4B
) levels were significantly reduced in the transgenic animals. Interestingly, despite reduced overall adiposity and altered adipocyte size, the expression of mTNF
19K11 under the control of aP2 promoter did not result in alterations of several other adipogenic markers including adipsin, aP2 and ACRP30/AdipoQ (Fig. 4A
). These data indicated that adipocyte de-differentiation did not occur under the experimental conditions used in this study despite reduced overall adiposity. Instead, mTNF
19K11E affected gene expression in a highly selective manner without a general suppression of adipocyte differentiation.
|
has any effect on insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue, glucose uptake experiments were performed with isolated primary adipocytes from epididymal fat pad of transgenic mice as well as controls. Upon insulin stimulation, glucose uptake levels were increased 2.0- to 3.9-fold over baseline in transgenic and control animals, respectively (Fig. 5A
19K11E-expressing primary adipocytes was significantly reduced compared with that in control cells. This reduction was apparent at both saturating and submaximal doses of insulin. Hence, local TNF
action in fat cells was associated with local insulin resistance.
|
Experiments were also performed to examine whether mTNF
19K11E expression in adipocytes interfered with insulin signaling at this site in vivo, thereby reducing glucose transport. To do this, insulin was administered via the portal vein and after 2 min epididymal fat pads and livers were collected for the preparation of protein extracts (26). Insulin receptors were immunoprecipitated with a polyclonal antibody and tyrosine phosphorylation levels were examined by immunoblotting with a monoclonal antibody against phosphotyrosine (26). As shown in Fig. 6A
, insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of the insulin receptor ß-chain was readily detectable in controls. The extent of this phosphorylation was reduced by 70% in the adipose tissue of transgenic mice compared with that in controls (Fig. 6
, A and B). In contrast, no obvious difference in IR phosphorylation was detected in liver lysates (data not shown). These data indicate that mTNF
19K11E directly suppresses insulin receptor signaling in adipose tissue in vivo and induces strong local insulin resistance in adipocytes of the transgenic mice.
|
transgene in adipose tissue could be sufficient to alter systemic glucose metabolism. This issue became particularly interesting because the transgenic animals exhibited a reduction in adiposity and an increase in circulating adiponectin/ACRP30 level, both of which would enhance insulin action systemically whereas their adipocytes were highly insulin resistant locally. To investigate the effects of adipose tissue-restricted TNF
action on whole body glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity, steady-state plasma glucose and insulin levels were determined in transgenic animals and controls. At 20 wk of age, both steady-state and fasting plasma insulin levels in the transgenic mice were significantly lower than that in control mice (Fig. 7A
19K11E transgenic mice might not have developed systemic insulin resistance. To further address this and explore systemic insulin action and glucose metabolism, both ip insulin and glucose tolerance tests were performed. In insulin tolerance tests, the hypoglycemic response to insulin was more pronounced in the mTNF
19K11E transgenic mice line 1 throughout the experiments compared with nontransgenic controls (Fig. 7C
transgenic animals did not have a systemic impact. Surprisingly, one of the transgenic lines exhibited even improved systemic insulin sensitivity, presumably as a result of the dominant effects of reduced overall adiposity, which was quite significant. The two additional transgenic lines also exhibited similar trends, although the differences in ITT and GTT did not reach statistical significance (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in adipose tissue that exclusive action of this cytokine in adipocytes led only to local insulin resistance in adipose tissue and reduced adipose mass. These results demonstrate that regulated processing of TNF
could be a potential mechanism to limit adiposity.
Obesity is the only known condition where TNF
is expressed at elevated levels in adipocytes (15, 23). Substantial data have accumulated to demonstrate the role of TNF
in inducing insulin resistance through a cross-talk between TNF and insulin receptor signaling pathways (36, 37, 38, 39, 40). In fact, this action of TNF
in adipose tissue is localized perhaps in an autocrine/paracrine fashion to combat further adiposity. While studies in isolated human adipocytes (41) and disproportionately low circulating levels of TNF
protein in obese animal models and humans (23) have supported such a hypothesis, no mechanism has been identified to account for the spatial control of TNF
action and its biological consequences. Recently, we demonstrated that adipocytes are defective in TNF
processing in vitro and in vivo and hence retain excess amount of this molecule on the cell surface. In line with this observation, significant elevations were evident in transmembrane TNF
levels in adipose tissues obtained from several different experimental mouse obesity models, as well as obese humans where adipose TNF
production is abnormally elevated (42). Here, we transgenically reconstituted TNF
expression in the TNF
-/- mice with a noncleavable form of TNF
expressed under the control of the adipocyte specific aP2 promoter/enhancer. The exclusive presence of transmembrane TNF
in adipose tissue resulted in a lean phenotype in transgenic mice, indicating that localized TNF
action could limit adiposity. However, whether this would also be the case in the presence of caloric imbalance and obesity remains to be seen.
The decrease in adiposity in these transgenic mice was not severe. The total body composition analysis revealed a 10% reduction in adiposity. Unlike the transgenic mouse models of lipodystrophy generated by the expression of SREBP-1c and A-ZIP/F under the control of aP2 promoter/enhancer, there were no pathological changes in other tissues and organs in this model. The morphology of adipose tissue, however, was altered in the transgenic animals and the adipocyte size was significantly reduced. If no other aspect of energy metabolism has been altered in these animals, the 10% decrease in adipose mass could have a strong impact on systemic lipid metabolism and lead to a potential increase in the lipid content of the liver. Interestingly, none of these is evident in the aP2-mTNF
transgenic mice. Under gross examination, livers appeared normal. There were no changes in color, and liver lipid content was indistinguishable from the nontransgenic controls. Similarly, no alterations were observed in the plasma lipid profiles.
These observations might have several potentially important implications. First, the target for TNF
in mediating its in vivo effects on lipid metabolism has been a subject of discussion where both adipocytes and liver have been implicated (43, 44, 45, 46). Our data demonstrates that isolated TNF
action on the adipocyte is insufficient to induce systemic dyslipidemia and hence, the role of liver should be dominant with respect to this particular effect (46). Second, it is possible that TNF-induced alterations in adipose tissue have secondary effects on other systems, for example through the regulation of adipocyte communication with other metabolically significant sites to establish metabolic equilibrium. In this regard, we determined fecal lipid content, food intake, and body temperature. There was no evidence for intestinal lipid loss in the transgenic animals. There was a small decrease in the daily food intake and a small increase in body core temperature in mTNF
transgenic mice compared with nontransgenic controls. Although, the mechanisms underlying these effects of mTNF
are not yet clear, reduced food intake and increased energy expenditure are the likely underlying causes contributing to the modest reduction in fat mass. Interestingly, we observed higher serum levels of adiponectin/ACRP30 protein. Because this protein can influence muscle to increase fatty acid oxidation and liver to enhance insulin action (29, 34), it is possible that its elevated levels could be critical in the reduced adiposity and increased insulin sensitivity seen in the transgenic animals.
While the transgenic models of lipodystrophy exhibit systemic insulin resistance (9, 10, 47), those with mild reductions in adiposity display enhanced systemic insulin sensitivity (48, 49). A striking recent example for the latter is the unanticipated increase in systemic insulin action in mice heterozygous for a null allele in the PPAR
gene (49, 50). Interestingly, these mice also had reduced adiposity and decrease in the size of the adipocytes, both of which support enhanced insulin action, similar to what we have observed in the transgenic model presented here. PPAR
is primarily expressed in adipose tissue, and loss of function is expected to result in reduced insulin sensitivity. Unfortunately, insulin action in the adipocytes has not yet been studied in this model. Even more interesting and revealing is the phenotype of mice with an adipocyte-specific deletion of the insulin receptor gene. These mice also have reduced adipose mass and despite complete absence of insulin action in adipocytes, do not become diabetic (51). Similarly, in this study, we did not observe any sign of systemic insulin resistance in the mTNF
transgenic mice. On the contrary, transgenic mice were slightly more sensitive to insulin, suggesting that the lean state of these animals might be the predominant factor for determining systemic insulin sensitivity. Taken together, these data indicate that modestly reduced adipocyte volume and adiposity, whether it is the direct or indirect consequence of adipocyte insulin resistance, appear to dominate systemic insulin action. It is even possible that adipocyte insulin resistance itself is a defense against the expansion of adipose mass. In instances where adipose mass is not reduced, such as the case in the adipose specific Glut4-deficient mice, adipocytes could alter systemic glucose metabolism (52).
The transgenic mouse model used in this study was created in the TNF
-deficient background to investigate mTNF
action exclusively in adipose tissue. Although it has been established that the absence of TNF
ligand or receptors partially improve insulin sensitivity in the context of obesity (26, 27, 28), reconstitution of TNF
action only in adipose tissue in lean mice led to local but not systemic insulin resistance (this study). These data indicate that TNF
-induced insulin resistance in adipocytes specifically or adipocyte insulin resistance in general may not be sufficient to induce systemic insulin resistance. If this is the case, it is likely that TNF
action in other target tissues (such as liver, muscle and pancreas) and/or combination of TNF
action in more than one site is responsible for its impact on insulin action systemically. However, it is also likely that, in the context of obesity, local reconstitution of TNF
action in adipocytes would exacerbate insulin resistance in these transgenic mice. Induction of obesity in the transgenic mice described here as well as transgenic mice in the wild-type genetic background should address these questions and these studies are underway. We do also recognize the possibility that our transgenic reconstitution might not have faithfully represented the dose, timing, and the dynamics of TNF
production necessary for its full action and that the results observed are a function of this shortcoming. These questions notwithstanding, the data presented here provides a model where local actions of this molecule is conferred by the transmembrane form of TNF
and result in decreased adiposity and reduced local, but not systemic, insulin sensitivity.
These findings might have important implications in modeling and targeting TNF
biology in obesity as well as dissecting its actions in adipocytes vs. other sites in vivo. For example, if adipose tissue-restricted TNF
action alone is insufficient in conferring insulin resistance or results in distinct phenotypes, then strategies aimed at complete blocking of TNF
cleavage with metalloproteinase inhibitors might provide important tools for alternative therapeutic purposes. So far, one report has shown that KB-R7785, a novel matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, exerts its antidiabetic effect by inhibiting TNF
processing (53). Additional studies will be necessary to further address these critical questions.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: BAT, Brown adipose tissue; mTNF
, transmembrane form of TNF
; mTNF
1-9K11E, nonsecretable form of TNF
mutant; TG, triglyceride; WAT, white adipose tissue.
Received August 28, 2001.
Accepted for publication December 10, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
processing in adipocytes and increased expression of transmembrane TNF
in obesity. Diabetes, in press
. Cell 73:625627[CrossRef][Medline]
: direct role in obesity-linked insulin resistance. Science 259:8791
in human obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 95:24092915
-mediated inhibition and reversal of adipocyte differentiation is accompanied by suppressed expression of PPAR
without effects on Pref-1 expression. Endocrinology 138:27762783
inhibits adipocyte differentiation by selectively activating TNFR 1. J Biol Chem 274:2628726295
: a key component of the obesity-diabetes link. Diabetes 43:12711278[Abstract]
-induced insulin resistance: evidence for differential regulation of insulin signaling by TNF-
. Endocrinology 139:49284935
mediates apoptosis of brown adipocytes and defective brown adipocyte function in obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:80338038
function. Nature 389:610614[CrossRef][Medline]
-mediated insulin resistance in genetic obesity. Endocrinology 139:48324838
gene: metabolic consequences in obese and nonobese mice. Diabetes 46:15261531[Abstract]
inhibits signaling from the insulin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:48544858
in adipocyte metabolism. Semin Cell Dev Biol 10:1929[CrossRef][Medline]
and TNF receptors in obesity and insulin resistance. J Intern Med 245:621625[CrossRef][Medline]
shows a strong relationship to insulin stimulated glucose transport in human adipose tissue. Diabetes 49:688692[Abstract]
in adipose tissue: a local regulator of fat mass. Proceedings of the Keystone Symposia: Molecular Control of Adipogenesis and Obesity, 2000, p 152 (Abstract 422)
on glucose transport and lipid metabolism of newly-differentiated human fat cells in cell culture. Diabetologia 38:764771[CrossRef][Medline]
ediates high-fat diet-induced adipocyte hypertrophy and insulin resistance. Mol Cell 4:597609[CrossRef][Medline]
deficiency. J Clin Invest 105:287292[Medline]
production. Life Sci 61:795803[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Serino, R. Menghini, L. Fiorentino, R. Amoruso, A. Mauriello, D. Lauro, P. Sbraccia, M. L. Hribal, R. Lauro, and M. Federici Mice Heterozygous for Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Converting Enzyme Are Protected From Obesity-Induced Insulin Resistance and Diabetes Diabetes, October 1, 2007; 56(10): 2541 - 2546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lambin, R. van Bree,, I. Vergote, and J. Verhaeghe Chronic Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Infusion in Gravid C57BL6/J Mice Accelerates Adipose Tissue Development in Female Offspring Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2006; 13(8): 558 - 565. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Shi, B. Cave, K. Inouye, C. Bjorbaek, and J. S. Flier Overexpression of Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 in Adipose Tissue Causes Local but Not Systemic Insulin Resistance Diabetes, March 1, 2006; 55(3): 699 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||