help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diano, S.
Right arrow Articles by Horvath, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diano, S.
Right arrow Articles by Horvath, T. L.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 11 4226-4238
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Mitochondrial Uncoupling Protein 2 (UCP2) in the Nonhuman Primate Brain and Pituitary1

Sabrina Diano, Henryk F. Urbanski, Balazs Horvath, Ingo Bechmann, Akifumi Kagiya, Gabor Nemeth, Frederick Naftolin, Craig H. Warden and Tamas L. Horvath2

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (S.D., G.N., F.N., T.L.H.) and Section of Neurobiology (T.L.H.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520; Division of Neuroscience (H.F.U.), Oregon Regional Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon 97006; Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (B.H.), Aladar Petz County Hospital, Gyor 9023, Hungary; Department of Anatomy, Cell and Neurobiology (I.B.), Humboldt-University, Charite, Berlin 10098, Germany; Nursing, School of Allied Medical Sciences (A.K.), Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8564, Japan; and Rowe Program in Human Genetics (C.H.W.), Department of Pediatrics and Section of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, School of Medicine, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Tamas L. Horvath/Sabrina Diano, Department Ob/Gyn, Yale University, School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street FMB 339, New Haven, Connecticut 06520. E-mail: tamas.horvath@yale.edu or sabrina.diano{at}yale.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Energy dissipating mechanisms and their regulatory components represent key elements of metabolism and may offer novel targets in the treatment of metabolic disorders, such as obesity and diabetes. Recent studies have shown that a mitochondrial uncoupling protein (UCP2), which uncouples mitochondrial oxidation from phosphorylation, is expressed in the rodent brain by neurons that are known to regulate autonomic, metabolic, and endocrine processes. To help establish the relevance of these rodent data to primate physiology, we now examined UCP2 messenger RNA and peptide expressions in the brain and pituitary gland of nonhuman primates. In situ hybridization histochemistry showed that UCP2 messenger RNA is expressed in the paraventricular, supraoptic, suprachiasmatic, and arcuate nuclei of the primate hypothalamus and also in the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland. Immunocytochemistry revealed abundant UCP2 expression in cell bodies and axonal processes in the aforementioned nuclei as well as in other hypothalamic and brain stem regions and all parts of the pituitary gland. In the hypothalamus, UCP2 was coexpressed with neuropeptide Y, CRH, oxytocin, and vasopressin. In the pituitary, vasopressin and oxytocin-producing axonal processes in the posterior lobe and POMC cells in the intermediate and anterior lobes expressed UCP2. On the other hand, none of the GH-producing cells of the anterior pituitary was found to produce UCP2. The abundance and distribution pattern of UCP2 in the primate brain and pituitary suggest that this protein is evolutionary conserved and may relate to central autonomic, endocrine and metabolic regulation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ENERGY balance is achieved by the fine synchronization of peripheral anabolic and catabolic processes. When energy expenditure is consistently exceeded by energy intake and energy conservation, the unused energy becomes stored in fat pads and may result in obesity. In an attempt to elucidate ways of enhancing energy expenditure to diminish fat stores, increasing attention has been paid to energy dissipating processes and their regulatory components (1, 2).

In the process of storing energy, the hydrogen proton gradient that exists between the intermembrane space and mitochondrial matrix, serves to transform the positive energy in the high-energy compound ATP. In the mitochondria there are molecules located in the inner membrane that dissipate energy contained in the nutrients through the uncoupling of the respiratory chain from oxidative phosphorylation. When these molecules, called uncoupling proteins (UCPs), are present they may transform the positive energy from the hydrogen proton gradient into heat, thereby, diminishing energy storage.

To date, five putative uncoupling proteins (UCP1, UCP2, UCP3, UCP4, and brain mitochondrial carrier protein 1 [BMCP1]) have been discovered, and all of them can promote partial uncoupling of the mitochondrial proton gradient from ATP production in yeast and/or mammalian cells (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). The five UCPs have different tissue distribution patterns and appear to be regulated differently, suggesting that they may have distinct physiological roles. While UCP1 and UCP3 are expressed only in the peripheral tissues (3, 4, 5, 7, 8), UCP2, UCP4 and BMCP1 are expressed in the central nervous system as well (6, 9, 11, 12). In the rodent brain, UCP2 is expressed predominantly in neuronal populations of subcortical regions that are involved in the central regulation of metabolic, endocrine, and autonomic processes (12), which is in contrast to the more ubiquitously distributed UCP4 and BMCP1 (9, 10). In particular, we (12) and others (11) have shown that the messenger RNA for UCP2 is localized in the supraoptic, paraventricular, suprachiasmatic, and arcuate nuclei of the hypothalamus of rodents. It has also been found that UCP2 protein is associated with the mitochondria and adjacent cytosol of neurons in the aforementioned regions and is coexpressed with several neuropeptides involved in metabolic, endocrine, and autonomic regulation, including neuropeptide Y (NPY), and with receptors for peripheral hormones such as leptin and gonadal steroids (12).

While data gathered on brain UCP2 in rodents suggest an important involvement of UCP2 in homeostatic regulation (12), Fleury et al. (6) failed to detect UCP2 expression in human brain samples. Consequently, it is unclear whether the rodent findings have any relevance to the physiology of humans or other mammals. To help clarify this issue, the present experiment used in situ hybridization histochemistry and immunocytochemisty to study the expression of UCP2 in the brains of nonhuman primates.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
This study was performed using available tissues from three different nonhuman primate species. For the in situ hybridization histochemistry, brain and pituitary tissues from rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta, n = 2) were studied. For the immunocytochemistry, brains from rhesus macaques (M. mulatta, n = 2), cynomolgus macaques (M. fascicularis, n = 3), and African green or vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops, n = 3) were studied. All of the primate tissue was collected under protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committees of Yale University and Oregon Health Sciences University.

Tissue preparation for in situ hybridization histochemistry
Rhesus macaque hypothalami and pituitary glands were obtained from the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center (ORPRC) Tissue Distribution Program. The animals were deeply anesthetized using ketamine/pentobarbital according to procedures established by the Panel on Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Society and perfused with 1 liter of 0.9% saline through the ascending aorta (at room temperature) followed by 6.5 liter of ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Hypothalami and pituitary glands were then immersed in fresh fixative for an additional 3 h (at 4 C) and cryoprotected by immersion in 0.02 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing glycerol (10% vol/vol) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; 2% vol/vol) for 24 h, followed by immersion in a more concentrated glycerol (20% vol/vol) phosphate/DMSO solution for an additional 72 h. The tissues were then rapidly frozen in 2-methyl butane (pre-cooled in an ethanol/dry-ice bath) and stored at -85 C. Subsequently, they were sectioned (25 µm using a freezing sliding microtome and mounted on glass microscope slides (Fisherbrand Superfrost/Plus; Fisher Scientific, Auburn, WA).

cRNA probe synthesis and in situ hybridization histochemistry
Human UCP2 riboprobe was used for the detection of UCP2 in monkey hypothalamus. The amplification of the RNA sequence for UCP2 was performed as previously described (6; 5' CATCTCCTGGGACGTAGC 3' and 5' AGAGAAGGGAAGGAGGGAAG 3'). The resulting complementary DNA (1.1 kb), purified from agarose gel using the QIA quick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Inc.), was digested with EcoRI and inserted in pBluescript vector and then subcloned. Linearized DNAs by HindIII and XbaI were transcribed using T7 polymerase (antisense cRNA riboprobe) and T3 polymerase (sense cRNA probe; restriction enzyme XbaI; Riboprobe Combination System T3/T7, Promega Corp. Corporation, Madison, WI), respectively, and labeled with 35S-UTP(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; 10 mCi/ml). The radiolabeled cRNA probe was then purified by passing the transcription reaction solution over a G50 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) and fractions were collected and counted using a scintillation counter. In situ hybridization (ISH) was performed on the tissue sections after first bringing them to room temperature and postfixing them in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 15 min. The sections were then rinsed in phosphate buffer, and digested with Proteinase K (10 µg/ml) in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0; 100 mM Tris, 50 mM EDTA) for 30 min at 37 C. Next, they were acetylated, dehydrated with ascending concentrations of ethanol, and dried under vacuum for 2 h. They were then hybridized for 18 h at 65 C with 100 µl of 35S-labeled antisense riboprobe, diluted to 1 x 107 cpm/ml of hybridization buffer (50 mM dithiothreitol, 250 µg/ml tRNA, 50% formamide, 0.3 M sodium chloride, 1x Denhardt’s solution, 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, and 10% dextran sulfate). For the hybridization, glass coverslips were affixed to the slides using DPX mounting medium (BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, UK). They were subsequently removed after two 30-min soakings in 4x saline-sodium citrate buffer (SSC; the 20x stock solution comprised of 175.3 g sodium chloride and 88.2 g sodium citrate per liter (pH 7.0)) containing 20 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). The sections were then incubated in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0; 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 M sodium chloride) containing RNase A (10 µg/ml) for 30 min at 37 C, followed by two 30-min washes at room temperature with 2x SSC containing 1 mM DTT. After a final 30-min wash at 70 C with 0.1x SSC containing 1 mM DTT, they were dehydrated through ascending concentrations of ethanol, containing 0.3 M ammonium acetate, and air-dried for 30 min. To visualize the hybridization pattern, the sections were apposed to Hyperfilm ß-max (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 6 days.

As a control experiment, sections were incubated as described above with hybridization solution containing the sense-strand probe synthesized with T3 polymerase to transcribe the coding strand of the DNA insert.

Tissue preparation for immunocytochemistry
The vervet (n = 3) and cynomolgus monkeys (n = 3) were painlessly killed under deep anesthesia, to provide tissue for this and other unrelated studies. Their brains were fixed by transcardial perfusion of 500 ml heparinized saline (0.9%) followed by 2000 ml of fixative consisting of 4% paraformaldehyde 15% saturated picric acid, and 0.08% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB), pH 7.4. The mediobasal hypothalamus was dissected out and postfixed for an additional 1.5 h in glutaraldehyde-free fixative. Tissue blocks were washed and stored in 0.1 M PB at 4 C. Coronal sections (50 µm) were cut using a Vibratome (Lancer, St. Louis, MO). Following several rinses in PB, sections were washed for 20 min in 1% sodium borohydride-PB to eliminate unbound aldehydes.

Immunocytochemistry for bright field microscopy
The brain sections were incubated with the primary antisera (rabbit anti-UCP2, 1:500; 12, 13) for 24 h at room temperature. After several washes with PB, sections were incubated in the secondary antibody (biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG; 1:250 in PB; Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) for 2 h at room temperature, then rinsed in PB three times 10 min each time, and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with avidin-biotin-peroxidase (ABC, 1:250 in PB; ABC Elite Kit, Vector Laboratories, Inc.). The immunoreaction was visualized with a modified version of the nickel-diaminobenzidine (Ni-DAB) reaction (15 mg DAB, 0.12 mg glucose oxidase, 12 mg ammonium chloride, 600 µl 0.05 M nickel ammonium sulfate, and 600 µl 10% ß-D-glucose in 30 ml PB) for 10–30 min at room temperature resulting in a dark blue reaction product. In control studies in which the primary antisera was omitted or preabsorbed with its target peptide, no immunostaining could be seen. Additional testing of this affinity-purified antiserum has been performed in previous studies (12, 13).

Immunocytochemistry for epifluorescence microscopy
To test for the phenotypes of UCP2-containing brain and pituitary cells, we used the multiple labeling epifluorescence technique to visualize two tissue antigens in the same axons or perikarya. This procedure is similar to the one described in Horvath et al. (12) and targeted the visualization of UCP2 and neuropeptides of the hypothalamus that were found to be coproduced with UCP2 in the rat (12) and also candidate hormone-producing cells of the anterior and intermediate lobes of the pituitary, including those producing GH or POMC. In short, vibratome sections of either the hypothalamus or pituitary were double immunostained for UCP2 and either neuropeptide Y (NPY), CRF, oxytocin (OT), vasopressin (VP), GH, or POMC. Antisera were purchased from commercial vendors [sheep anti-NPY(Auspep Pty Ltd., Perkwille, Australia), mouse anti-CRF (Biogenesis, Pool, UK), mouse antivasopressin (ICN Biochemicals, Costa Mesa, CA), mouse anti-OT (DiaSorin, Inc., Stillwater, MN), mouse anti-GH (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and mouse anti-ß-endorphin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany). Double-labeled sections were analyzed using an Olympus Corp. upright microscope furnished with accessories enabling epifluorescence microscopy and filters selective for the emission of rhodamine and fluorescein. Control experiments included omission of either of the primary antisera or the use of primary antisera preabsorbed with the peptide against which it was generated. In these control experiments, only single labeling could be detected.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In situ hybridization histochemistry for UCP2 messenger RNA (mRNA)
In the rhesus monkey, UCP2 mRNA was detected in the same hypothalamic nuclei as previously shown in the rat (12). As shown in Fig. 1Go, the hybridization product was found most extensively over cells in the paraventricular, supraoptic, and suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus (Fig. 1Go, A–D). In addition, there was a small population of cells within the arcuate nucleus that also expressed UCP2 mRNA (Fig. 1DGo). A more robust expression of UCP2 message was detected in the pituitary gland, especially in the anterior lobe (Fig. 1EGo). No specific labeling of UCP2 mRNA was detected in the posterior lobe, while the adjacent pia mater, on the edge of the posterior pituitary, showed UCP2 mRNA labeling (Fig. 1EGo). In the anterior lobe, the hybridization product was distributed in a heterogeneous manner creating a "W"-like appearance (Fig. 1EGo).



View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Autoradiographic images of hypothalamic sections of representative rhesus monkeys after in situ hybridization for UCP2 mRNA. A–D, Signals were detected in the supraoptic- (SON), paraventricular- (PVN), suprachiasmatic-(SCN) and infundibular (Inf) hypothalamic nuclei. Hybridization signals were also abundant in the anterior lobe of the pituitary (AP), while the posterior lobe (PP) lacked specific labeling (E). oc, Optic chiasma. Bar scales in panels A (for A–D) and E represent 100 µm and 200 µm, respectively.

 
UCP2 protein expression
The antibody for UCP2 used in the present study, as well as in our previous study (12), is an affinity-purified antiserum against human UCP2 that has been shown to react with UCP2 in skeletal muscle (13) and with recombinant expressed human UCP2. The antibody does not cross-react with yeast expressing human UCP1, although it has a slight cross-reactivity with UCP3, which is not present in the brain. The overall distribution of UCP2 immunopositive cell bodies agreed with the in situ hybridization results and did not differ between the different monkey species. Because of this, we provide a detailed description on the UCP2 immunolabeling of the vervet monkey.

Central nervous system. UCP2-containing axons were detected in divergent hypothalamic and limbic sites corresponding to the projection fields of the regions where UCP2 mRNA and peptide were found in neuronal cell bodies (Figs. 2Go, 3Go, and 4Go). These areas included the lateral septum, medial septum-diagonal band of Broca region, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, the stria terminalis through its entire length, the organum vasculosum of the laminae terminalis, anteroventral periventricular area, medial preoptic area, periventricular regions, anterior hypothalamus, suprachiasmatic nucleus, retrochiasmatic area, supraoptic, paraventricular, arcuate, ventromedial, dorsomedial nuclei, lateral hypothalamus, external and internal layers of the median eminence, central and medial nucleus of the amygdala, and mediodorsal and paraventricular nuclei of the thalamus ( Figs. 2–4GoGoGo). UCP2-immunoreactive axon terminals established basket-like structures around the perikarya of postsynaptic neurons in different hypothalamic, limbic and brain stem sites (Fig. 2DGo). In the external layer of the median eminence, portal capillaries were surrounded by numerous boutons immunolabeled for UCP2 (Fig. 2EGo).



View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Corresponding to the UCP2 mRNA distribution pattern, immunocytochemical labeling for UCP2 protein in the rhesus monkey identified immunopositive axons in different hypothalamic regions, including the PVN (A), SON (B), and Inf (C–E). The abundance of labeled axons was the highest in the Inf, where almost all observed perikarya were surrounded by numerous UCP2-expressing axon terminals (D). In the external layer of the median eminence (E), portal capillaries were surrounded by numerous UCP2-containing axon terminals (E). oc, Optic chiasma; III, third ventricle; eME: external layer of the median eminence; v: blood vessel. Bar scales in panels A (for A–C) and D (for D and E) represent 100 µm and 10 µm, respectively.

 


View larger version (175K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Abundant UCP2 immunolabeling in the subcortical, extrahypothalamic sites of the cynomolgus monkey. These areas included the stria terminalis (ST; A) the thalamic paraventricular nucleus (tPVN); B) the locus coeruleus (LC; C), dorsal raphe (DR; D), lateral parabrachial nuclei (LPB; E and F). In this latter site, both labeled perikarya (arrowheads on E) and axonal processes (F) were encountered. Me5: mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve; scp: superior cerebellar peduncle. Bar scale in panel E represents 100 µm (for all panels).

 


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of UCP2 immunoreactivity (red dots) in the brain, based on camera lucida drawings of vibratome sections of the African green monkey. Arrows indicate anterior-posterior sequence of section in the rows (A–D). A–B, Sections through the diencephalon. C, Sections through the mesencephalon. D, Sections through the mesencephalon and metencephalon. E, Sections through the myelencephalon.

 
Immunoreactive profiles were also present in different brain stem nuclei of the monkey (Figs. 3Go and 4Go). These regions included the parabrachial nucleus, area postrema, nucleus of the solitary tract, the spinitrigeminal tract, the raphe nucleus, locus coeruleus and the dorsal motor root ganglion of the vagus. In all of the previously mentioned regions, an abundance of UCP2-containing axonal processes was detected (Figs. 3Go and 4Go). In none of the brain sites did glial elements appear to be expressing UCP2. Only a few neuronal perikarya were found to be labeled for UCP2 in the supraoptic, paraventricular, suprachiasmatic and arcuate nuclei of the hypothalamus, in the lateral hypothalamic nucleus and in the lateral parabrachial nucleus of the brain stem (Fig. 3EGo).

Pituitary. Analysis of UCP2-immunolabeling in the pituitary revealed robust expression of this mitochondrial uncoupler in a large population of cells of the anterior pituitary and in the intermediate lobe (Fig. 5Go). In the latter, the distribution of immunolabeled cells was homogeneous and appeared to be present in most of the cells (Fig. 5Go, D and E). In the anterior pituitary, in agreement with the in situ hybridization studies, the vast majority of labeled cells occupied a W-shaped area (Fig. 5Go, B and C) corresponding to acidophilic areas (14). In the posterior lobe, UCP2 immunolabeling was present in axonal processes only (Fig. 5Go, F and G) and the pituicites, the glial cell type of the posterior pituitary, lacked specific UCP2 labeling.



View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Dark-field photomicrographs of a transected pituitary (A–G) after immunostaining for UCP2. UCP2 immunolabeling was present in many, but not all, cells of the anterior pituitary (AP; B and C); panel C is a high power magnification of an area on panel B. In the intermediate lobe (IL), all cells appeared to be labeled for UCP2 (D and E). In the posterior pituitary (PP), only axonal processes were found to contain UCP2 (panel F). Panel G is a high power magnification of a region on panel F. Bar scales in panels A, B (for B, D, and F) and C (for C, E, and G) represent 200 µm, 100 µm and 10 µm, respectively.

 
UCP2 in chemically identified projections of the hypothalamus and posterior pituitary and cells of the anterior pituitary and intermediate lobe
In the hypothalamus and posterior pituitary, we tested for the coexpression of UCP2 and neuropeptides that were already found in UCP2-producing neuronal circuits of rodents (12). We found that the majority of UCP2-expressing axons and putative axon terminals in the infundibular (or arcuate) nucleus were NPY-containing (Fig. 6Go, A and B). Several axonal processes passing through this region and in the external layer of the median eminence were immunolabeled for CRF (Fig. 6Go, C and D). In the posterior pituitary, a population of UCP2-immunoreactive axons was also labeled for either oxytocin (OT; Fig. 6Go, E and F) or vasopressin (VP; Fig. 6Go, G and H).



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Color fluorescence images from the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus and posterior pituitary illustrating the colocalization of UCP2 (green fluorescent panels of A, C, E and G) and red fluorescent NPY (B), CRF (D), oxytocin (OT, F), and vasopressin (VP, H). Bar scale represents 10 µm.

 
In the anterior pituitary, UCP2 mRNA and protein was distributed in a W-shaped pattern, corresponding to the well-characterized acidophilic area (14). Because heterologous antisera were available for the main cell types of this region (i.e. those producing GH and those producing POMC) (14), the possible coexpression of these hormones and UCP2 was analyzed. GH-immunopositive cells were detected only in the anterior pituitary with a similar overall distribution pattern as UCP2, although not many GH-immunoreactive cells were detected along the lateral edges. Strikingly, however, there was no evidence for coexpression of GH and UCP2 in any cells of the anterior pituitary, even after analysis of 4,000 GH-immunopositive cells in pituitaries of two monkeys (Fig. 7Go). On the other hand, UCP2-producing perikarya were frequently in direct apposition to GH-immunopositive cells (Fig. 7Go, A–I). During this survey, while detecting 4,000 GH-immunoreactive cells, 1,419 UCP2-immunolabeled cells were documented, which represents an approximate 1:3 ratio of UCP2- to GH-producing anterior pituitary cells.



View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Color fluorescence images of the pituitary immunolabeled for UCP2 (red) and GH (green). Panels placed horizontally (A–C; D–F, G–I) show the same field using a rhodamine-specific filter (UCP2 labeling in panels A, D, and G), fluorescein-specific filter (GH labeling on panels B, E, and H), or a filter that is permeable for both the fluorescence and rhodamine spectra (UCP2 and GH labeling on panels C, F, and I). Panels A–C show that UCP2 is expressed heavily in the intermediate lobe of the pituitary (IL) and in the anterior pituitary (AP), whereas GH-immunoreactivity is limited to the anterior pituitary. In the higher-power magnification images of panels D–I, the direct apposition between UCP2- and GH-labeled cells can be seen in the anterior pituitary but none of the cells are double-labeled. Stars in panels D, F, G, and I indicate UCP2-immunolabeled cells that are not expressing GH-immunolabeling in panels E and H. In panel C, bar scale represents 100 µm for panels A–C, while in panels F and I, bar scales represent 10 µm for panels D–I.

 
POMC-immunolabeled cells were less abundant than the GH-immunopositive cells, but, they were distributed within and beyond the putative acidophilic areas of the anterior pituitary and also in the intermediate lobe (Fig. 8Go). In the anterior pituitary, there were subpopulations of POMC neurons distributed mainly along the lateral edges of the anterior pituitary that also expressed UCP2 immunolabeling (620 of the 700 POMC cells counted; Fig. 8Go, A and B), while a large number of both POMC (974 out of 1400) and UCP2 (775 out of 1300) cells were only single labeled in other parts of the anterior pituitary (Fig. 8Go, C–H). In this study, the ratio of UCP2 to POMC-producing cells in the anterior pituitary was found to be approximately 1:1.



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Color fluorescence images of the pituitary immunolabeled for UCP2 (red) and POMC (green). Panels placed horizontally (A–B; C–D, E–F, G–H, and I–J) show the same field using either a rhodamine-specific filter (UCP2 labeling on panels A, C, E, G, and I) or fluorescein-specific filter (POMC labeling on panels B, D, F, H, and J). In this case, a filter that is permeable for both the fluorescence and rhodamine spectra (see Fig. 7Go), was not used to take photographs because of the relatively low emission of green fluorescence in the case of POMC labeling compared with the sensitivity of the image acquiring system. Nevertheless, it is evident that in the anterior pituitary (AP; panels A–H), several UCP2 cells (indicated by arrows) are also immunolabeled for POMC, particularly along its lateral edges (A and B). In more medial regions of the anterior pituitary, the incidence of such double-labeled cells is lower (C–H), whereas numerous single-labeled UCP2 (indicated by stars) and POMC cells (indicated by arrowheads) can be seen. In panels I and J, all of the UCP2-labeled cells of the intermediate lobe (IL) are also immunopositive for POMC (arrows), whereas there is a POMC-labeled neuron (arrowhead) that appears to lack UCP2 immunoreactivity. Bar scales in panels B, D, F, H, and I represent 10 µm.

 
Almost all POMC-immunolabeled cells in the intermediate lobe (967 out of 1000) were also immunoreactive for UCP2 (Fig. 7Go, I and J). The intense labeling of both of these antigens delineated the entire intermediate lobe.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study demonstrated that UCP2 is present in the nonhuman primate brain with an overall distribution pattern and phenotype similar to that previously observed in rodents (11, 12). UCP2 mRNA and peptide were detected in neuronal populations of forebrain and hypothalamic nuclei, such as the supraoptic, paraventricular, suprachiasmatic, and arcuate nucleus, which are involved in the regulation of metabolic, autonomic and endocrine systems. The discrepancy between our finding of UCP2 in primate brain and a previous study of Fleury et al. (6), in which UCP2 mRNA was not found in human brain, is most likely due to sampling of commercially available tissue blots in that study that might not have contained hypothalamic or brain stem tissues. While not impossible, it is unlikely that an evolutionary gap would exist between humans and nonhuman primates in this regard.

In a recent study, UCP2 was detected in neuronal populations producing different neuropeptides that are critical for the maintenance of homeostasis (12). These neuromodulators and hormones included vasopressin and oxytocin in the magnocellular paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei, CRH-producing cells in the parvicellular paraventricular nucleus and NPY-producing neurons in the arcuate nucleus. These same peptide systems were found to be coproduced in the primate brain UCP2 system as well, further indicating that this mitochondrial mechanism represents an evolutionary conserved mechanism normally restricted to those brain circuits that govern autonomic, endocrine and metabolic processes. On the other hand, it may be of significance to note that, possibly due to the significantly increased size of the primate hypothalamus (and diencephalon in general) compared with that of the rodent, the abundance of UCP2 expression seemed somewhat more modest in the primate when compared with the rodent (compare Fig. 4Go, A and B in the current report with Fig. 1KGo in Ref. 12). Whether this apparent species difference is significant and might have functional relevance regarding UCP2’s function in the brain needs to be determined.

One of the novel observations of the present study, which was not addressed in previous experiments, is the demonstration of a robust UCP2 expression in the pituitary. It is particularly noteworthy because the level of UCP2 mRNA expression in this endocrine gland was more impressive than those found in any other parts of the central nervous system. The immunocytochemical data confirmed the widespread expression of UCP2 in all regions of the gland, including cells of the anterior and intermediate lobes and axons of the posterior pituitary. In the anterior pituitary, UCP2 was expressed predominantly in the lateral wings of the acidophilic areas. Interestingly, the most abundant cell type of this region, the GH-producing cells, lacked labeling for UCP2, while a subset of corticotrophs was found to be UCP2-producing.

In light of available information (14), the likely cell types that express UCP2 in these areas are the gonadotrophs and the lactotrophs, because thyrotrophs are most abundant in the medial zone, also called the basophilic wedge, where little evidence of UCP2 expression was found. It should be possible to resolve this issue when heterologous antisera for UCP2 and gonadotrophs or PRL become available. It should also be emphasized that none of the coexpression analyses described in the present study were truly quantitative. Therefore, future studies using a larger number of animals from different experimental conditions should provide better insight into the phenotype of UCP2-producing anterior pituitary cells, and should help to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms that determine UCP2 expression in the pituitary.

Because UCP2-immunolabeling in the posterior lobe was associated with OT- and VP-releasing axons, it may be that central UCP2 is involved in the regulation of some function of the posterior pituitary, such as water homeostasis and lactation (12). The marked expression of UCP2 in all cells of the intermediate lobe raises the possibility that UCP2 may regulate the production and secretion of the products of the POMC gene, which are intimately involved with a variety of homeostatic functions. Indeed, most of the UCP2-containing cells in this region were confirmed as being immunopositive for POMC.

Functional implications
A putative function of uncoupling proteins was first proposed for UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (3). It was postulated and then proven that this mitochondrial device dissipates energy generated through the Kreb’s cycle, in the form of heat (15, 16, 17, 18). In small rodents, this is a critical mechanism in the maintenance of appropriate core body temperature (19). However, while brown adipose tissue is also present in humans, particularly in early childhood, this tissue mass is very small and does not significantly contribute to the maintenance of core body temperature (19). In any case, because of similarities in genetic sequence, UCP2 was also proposed to be a mitochondrial uncoupler (6). In fact, in transfected yeast and in in vitro systems, UCP2 was shown to be a functional uncoupler (6, 20) and thus, it was proposed that it might act like UCP1 in tissues, such as the muscle, heart, spleen, and brain (6, 20). Supporting that notion, in a recent study, we revealed a significant and positive correlation between regional mitochondrial uncoupling activity and temperature and UCP2 protein expression in the rat brain (12). Temperature differences between various brain areas also exist in primates, including humans as shown by both invasive and noninvasive techniques (21, 22, 23, 24, 25). Although the mechanisms behind that dorso-ventral heat gradient in the brain is not clear, it has been proposed that both heat conductance via the skull and regional differences in blood-perfusion are most probably involved. The detection of UCP2 in the nonhuman primate brain, in the present study, suggests that uncoupled mitochondria in the hypothalamus may also contribute to the generation and maintenance of local hypothalamic temperature.

While uncoupling of the oxidative chain from ATP synthesis predicts that energy may be dissipated in the form of heat, the resulting temperature elevation might not be sufficient to significantly alter biochemical mechanisms even in the vicinity of the produced heat. In fact, the putative functions of uncoupling proteins are not limited to heat production but include the regulation of cellular ATP production, and because uncoupling proteins regulate the efficacy of oxidation, they suppress the generation of reactive oxygen species (26). This mechanism could play a critical role in the protection of cells against degeneration that can occur naturally during aging or during pathological conditions. In this regard, it is interesting to note that the expression of UCP2 in the primate brain was associated with those hypothalamic nuclei that are critically important to the minute by minute regulation of the homeostasis, including the paraventricular-, supraoptic-, suprachiasmatic-, and arcuate nuclei but was notably absent in the GH-producing anterior pituitary cells, which are known to deteriorate during aging.

It is interesting to note that while UCP1 and most of the other UCPs, including UCP3, UCP4, and BMCP1 are predominantly associated with only one or two tissue types, UCP2 is more ubiquitous being expressed in the brain and in several peripheral tissues (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Regardless of the principle mechanism of action of UCP2, it is likely to serve different functions in the brain and pituitary than in the periphery. For example, while UCP2 may contribute significantly to energy dissipation in the muscle and adipose tissue, its ability to reduce body weight through its brain and pituitary activity must be negligible. Instead, it is likely that UCP2’s function in homeostatic circuits relates to the fine regulation of the signaling flow within these neuronal pathways. That, however, will most likely have an impact on behavior and endocrine mechanisms relating to peripheral metabolism. In this regard, it may be of significance to note that a strong and abundant expression of UCP2 was found in the hypothalamic NPY circuitry that has been implicated as one of the key regulators of metabolism (27). In future studies, it will be important to establish the parent cells of origin of these NPY projections, which may be located either in the arcuate nucleus and/or other brain sites, including the brain stem. By regulating ATP sources of peptidergic circuits, UCP2 could ultimately affect the threshold of these peptidergic pathways in responding to different environmental stimuli. Also, because UCP2 can reduce free-radical production (26, 28), its expression in key hypothalamic circuits of homeostasis may help to protect these neuronal populations from degeneration. Additionally, as was proposed recently (12), the potential ability of UCP2 to acutely affect local temperature in axon terminals as well as to regulate the local calcium milieu, suggests that this mechanism may be involved in direct regulation of synaptic transmission and/or in the regulation of neurohormone release (CRF, OT, VP) into fenestrated capillaries and the activity of the NPY circuitry to regulate feeding behavior.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NSF Grant IBN-9728581, NIH Grants NS-36111, MH-59847, RR-00163, HD-29186, and HD-37186. Back

2 Supported by a Research Grant from Wyeth-Ayerst Women’s Health Research Institute. Back

Received April 18, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Boss O, Muzzin P, Giacobino JP 1998 The uncoupling proteins, a review. Eur J Endocrinol 139:1–9[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Gura T 1998 Uncoupling proteins provide new clues to obesity’s causes. Science 280:1369–1370[Free Full Text]
  3. Bouillard F, Ricquier D, Thibault J, Weissenbach J 1985 Molecular approach to thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue: cDNA cloning of the mitochondrial uncoupling protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:445–448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Klaus S, Casteilla L, Bouillard F, Ricquier D 1991 The uncoupling protein UCP: a membranous mitochondrial ion carrier exclusively expressed in brown adipose tissue. Int J Biochem 9:791–801
  5. Boss O, Samec S, Paoloni-Giacobino A, Rossier C, Dulloo A, Seydoux J, Muzzin P, Giacobino JP 1997 Uncoupling protein-3: a new member of the mitochondrial carrier family with tissue-specific expression. FEBS Lett 408:39–42[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Fleury C, Neverova M, Collins S, Raimbault S, Champigny O, Levi-Meyrueis C, Bouillard F, Seldin MF, Surwit RS, Ricquier D, Warden CH 1997 Uncoupling protein-2: a novel gene linked to obesity and hyperinsulinemia. Nat Genet 15:269–272[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Gong DW, He Y, Karas M, Reitman M 1997 Uncoupling protein-3 is a mediator of thermogenesis regulated by thyroid hormone, ß3-adrenergic agonists, and leptin. J Biol Chem 272:24129–24132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Liu Q, Bai C, Chen F, Wang R, MacDonald T, Gu M, Zhang Q, Morsy MA, Caskey CT 1998 Uncoupling protein-3: a muscle-specific gene upregulated by leptin in ob/ob mice. Gene 207:1–7[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Sanchis D, Fleury C, Chomiki N, Goubern M, Huang Q, Neverova M, Gregoire F, Easlick J, Raimbault S, Levi-Meyrueis C, Miroux B, Collins S, Seldin M. Richard D, Warden C, Bouilland F, Ricquier D 1998 BMCP1, a novel mitochondrial carrier with high expression in the central nervous system of humans and rodents, and respiration uncoupling activity in recombinant yeast. J Biol Chem 273:34611–34615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Mao W, Yu XX, Zhong A, Li W, Brush J, Sherwood SW, Adams SH, Pan G 1999 UCP4, a novel brain-specific mitochondrial protein that reduces membrane potential in mammalian cells. FEBS Lett 443:326–330[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Richard D, Rivest R, Huang Q, Bouillaud F, Sanchis D, Champigny O, Ricquier D 1998 Distribution of the uncoupling protein 2 mRNA in the mouse brain. J Comp Neurol 397:549–560[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Horvath TL, Warden CH, Hajos M, Lombardi A, Goglia F, Diano S 1999 Brain UCP2: uncoupler neuronal mitochondria predict thermal synapses in homeostatic centers. J Neurosci 19:10417–10427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Simoneau JA, Kelly DE, Neverova M, Warden CH 1998 Overexpression of muscle uncoupling protein-2 content in human obesity associates with reduced skeletal muscle lipid utilization. FASEB J 12:1739–1745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Baker BL 1974 Cytology of pars distalis and pars intermedia. In: Knobil E, Sawyer WH (eds) The Pituitary Gland and Its Neuroendocrine Control. Handbook of Physiology. American Physiological Society, Washington, DC, pp 45–80
  15. Laloi M, Klein M, Riesmeier JW, Muller-Rober B, Fleury C, Bouillaud F, Ricquier D 1997 A plant cold-induced uncoupling protein. Nature 389:135–136[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Nicholls DG, Locke RM 1984 Thermogenic mechanism in brown fat. Physiol Rev 64:1–64[Free Full Text]
  17. Samec S, Seydoux J, Dulloo AG 1998 Role of UCP homologues in skeletal muscles and brown adipose tissue: mediators of thermogenesis or regulators of lipids as fuel substrate? FASEB J 12:715–724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Simonyan RA, Skulachev VP 1998 Thermoregulatory uncoupling in heart muscle mitochondria: involvement of the ATP/ADP antiporter and uncoupling protein. FEBS Lett 436:81–84[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Lowel BB, Spiegelman BM 2000 Towards a molecular understanding of adaptive thermogenesis. Nature 404:652–660[Medline]
  20. Jaburek M, Varecha M, Gimeno RE, Dembski M, Jezek P, Zhang M, Burn P, Tartaglia LA, Garlid KD 1999 Transport function and regulation of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins 2 and 3. J Biol Chem 274:26003–26007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Mellergard P, Nordstrom C-H 1990 Epidural temperature and possible intracerebral temperature gradients in man. Br J Neurosurg 4:31–38[Medline]
  22. Andersen P, Moser EI 1995 Brain temperature and hippocampal function. Hippocampus 5:491–498[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Moser EI, Mathiensen I 1996 Relationship between neuronal activity and brain temperature in rats. NeuroReport 7:1876–1880[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Corbett R, Laptook A, Weatherall P 1997 Noninvasive measurements of human brain temperature using volume-localized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 17:363–367[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Schwab S, Spranger M, Aschoff A, Steiner T, Hacke W 1997 Brain temperature monitoring and modulation in patients with severe MCA infarction. Neurology 48:762–767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Negre-Salvayre A, Hirtz C, Carrera G, Cazenave R, Troly M, Salvayre R, Penicaud L, Casteilla L 1997 A role for uncoupling protein-2 as a regulator of mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide generation. FASEB J 11:809–815[Abstract]
  27. Kalra SP, Xu B, Dube MG, Pu S, Horvath TL, Kalra PS 1999 Interacting appetite regulating pathways in the hypothalamic regulation of body weight. Endocr Rev 20:67–100
  28. Korshunov SS, Korkina OV, Ruuge EK, Skulachev VP, Starkov AA 1999 Fatty acids as natural uncouplers preventing generation of O2 and H2O2 by mitochondria in the resting state. FEBS Lett 435:215–218



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
M G Gnanalingham, A Mostyn, D S Gardner, T Stephenson, and M E Symonds
Developmental regulation of the lung in preparation for life after birth: hormonal and nutritional manipulation of local glucocorticoid action and uncoupling protein-2.
J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 188(3): 375 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
S. O. Kasper, C. S. Carter, C. M. Ferrario, D. Ganten, L. F. Ferder, W. E. Sonntag, P. E. Gallagher, and D. I. Diz
Growth, metabolism, and blood pressure disturbances during aging in transgenic rats with altered brain renin-angiotensin systems
Physiol Genomics, November 17, 2005; 23(3): 311 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
M G Gnanalingham, A Mostyn, J Wang, R Webb, D H Keisler, N Raver, M C Alves-Guerra, C Pecqueur, B Miroux, T Stephenson, et al.
Tissue-specific effects of leptin administration on the abundance of mitochondrial proteins during neonatal development
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 187(1): 81 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Diano, R. T. Matthews, P. Patrylo, L. Yang, M. F. Beal, C. J. Barnstable, and T. L. Horvath
Uncoupling Protein 2 Prevents Neuronal Death Including that Occurring during Seizures: A Mechanism for Preconditioning
Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 5014 - 5021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. L. Horvath, S. Diano, C. Leranth, L. M. Garcia-Segura, M. A. Cowley, M. Shanabrough, J. D. Elsworth, P. Sotonyi, R. H. Roth, E. H. Dietrich, et al.
Coenzyme Q Induces Nigral Mitochondrial Uncoupling and Prevents Dopamine Cell Loss in a Primate Model of Parkinson's Disease
Endocrinology, July 1, 2003; 144(7): 2757 - 2760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diano, S.
Right arrow Articles by Horvath, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diano, S.
Right arrow Articles by Horvath, T. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals