| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Department of Biochemistry and Physiology, Department of Laboratory Animal Resources, Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065; and Department of Medicine, St. Lukes/Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University New York, New York 10019
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. V. Ding, Department of Molecular Endocrinology, Merck Research Laboratories (RY80W-243), P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, New Jersey 07065. E-mail: victor-ding{at}merck.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-androstan-3
,17ß-diol
(3
-diol) have been implicated in prostate hyperplasia in man and
dogs, but neither of these steroids bind to androgen receptors (ARs).
Recently, we reported that E2 and 3
-diol stimulated
generation of intracellular cAMP via binding to a complex of sex
hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and its receptor (RSHBG) on
prostate cells. We speculated that this pathway, involving steroids
normally found in the prostate, was involved in the indirect activation
of ARs. Using the dog as a model to test this hypothesis in normal
prostate, we investigated whether E2, 3
-diol, and SHBG
stimulated the production of the androgen-responsive protein, arginine
esterase (AE), the canine equivalent of human prostate-specific
antigen. In cultured dog prostate tissue preincubated with SHBG,
E2 and 3
-diol stimulated AE activity. These effects were
blocked by hydroxyflutamide, an AR antagonist, and by
2-methoxyestradiol, a competitive inhibitor of E2 and
3
-diol binding to SHBG. In the absence of exogenous steroids and
SHBG, AE also was significantly increased by treatment with forskolin
or 8-Bromoadenosine-cAMP. These observations support the hypothesis
that in normal prostate, E2 and 3
-diol can amplify or
substitute for androgens, with regard to activation of the AR via the
RSHBG by a signal transduction pathway involving cAMP.
Because both E2 and 3
-diol are involved in the
pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia in dogs and implicated in
benign prostatic hyperplasia in man, antagonism of the prostatic SHBG
pathway may offer a novel and attractive therapeutic target. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-androstan-3
,17ß-diol (3
-diol), bind to the
SHBG-RSHBG complex and stimulate cAMP production (3, 4, 5).
Because cAMP transduces downstream signals implicated in modulation of
cell growth (6, 7, 8, 9) and regulation of specific gene transcription and
expression (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16), activation of this pathway by E2 and
3
-diol may prove to play a critical role in prostate function.
The androgen receptor (AR) is a tissue-specific transcription factor
that is directly activated by binding to testosterone and
5
-dihydrotestosterone (DHT). However, its indirect activation by
FSH, by polypeptide growth factors, and through a cAMP pathway has been
reported (17, 18, 19, 20, 21). Androgens cause an increase in the production of
specific proteins in the prostate. For example, in humans, synthesis of
prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is stimulated by DHT (22). In dogs, DHT
increases prostate arginine esterase (AE) synthesis (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28).
The steroids, DHT, E2 and 3
-diol, implicated in prostate
growth, all bind to SHBG with high affinity; but only E2
and 3
-diol activate SHBG-RSHBG in prostate tissue,
causing rapid accumulation of intracellular cAMP (3, 4, 29).
Traditionally, 3
-diol has been thought to be a biologically inert
metabolite of DHT; however, this metabolite was recently shown to
exhibit hormonal activity (3, 30). Further, for more than a decade, it
has been known that administration of 3
-diol induces benign
prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in dogs (31, 32, 33, 34, 35). E2 also has
been implicated in contributing to the pathogenesis of BPH. In
castrated dogs, E2 prevents prostate regression; moreover,
BPH can be induced experimentally by estrogens in intact dogs and
monkeys (32, 33, 34, 35, 36). In humans, accumulation of E2 in the
prostate is associated with advancing age (37). E2 also has
been implicated in contributing to the growth and progression of human
prostate cancer (38). In this regard, E2 binding to SHBG
has been shown to stimulate cAMP accumulation in a human prostate
cancer (LNCaP) cell line (5).
Prostate growth is known to be mediated by DHT activation of AR and
consequent increase in the production of PSA (22). To address the
mechanism by which E2 or 3
-diol stimulation, via the
SHBG-RSHBG pathway, might contribute to prostate growth in
the dog, we asked whether the increase in cAMP was linked functionally
to an androgen-responsive pathway in primary cultures of dog prostate.
We selected the canine equivalent of PSA, AE as a marker of activation
of the AR. As anticipated, AE was stimulated by DHT, but most
importantly, in the presence (but not in the absence) of SHBG, both
E2 and 3
-diol mimicked the effect of DHT. While this
work on normal prostate was in progress, similar observations were made
using human BPH tissue, suggesting that this pathway has physiological
relevance in the growth of both normal and hyperplastic tissue
(39).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostatic tissue explants
Unless otherwise specified, prostate tissue was obtained from
pure-bred male beagle dogs, 23 yr of age (3). Dogs were euthanized 7
days after surgical castration. All procedures for the humane handling,
care, and treatment of research animals were done according to humane
animal use procedures approved by the Merck Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee. The prostatic tissue was removed and brought to the
laboratory under sterile conditions. It was divided into approximately
5-mm3 cubes and placed in 100-mm culture dishes (Corning
Glass Works, Corning, NY) in RPMI-1640 medium with 5% FBS containing 1
mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml
streptomycin sulfate, and 0.25 mg/ml amphotericin B for 2 days at 37 C
in an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. Tissue was then
minced into 12 mm3 portions and transferred to 24-well
plates in serum-free medium (0.5 ml/well) for approximately 18 h
before beginning each experiment.
Tissue processing and AE activity determination
Prostatic minces were incubated in the presence or absence of
steroid hormones for 2 days. To avoid having any SHBG in the culture
medium, serum-free medium was used, as previously reported (3, 4).
Fresh medium and hormones were replaced at 24 h. To saturate the
SHBG receptor, prostatic minces were incubated with 50 nM
purified dog SHBG (3) for 3 h. Subsequently, appropriate
concentrations of steroids were added after washing to remove excess
SHBG. Other treatments with hydroxyflutamide (100 nM),
2-methoxyestradiol (2MeOE2), were added 15 min before
addition of steroids. All the steroids and the antagonists used in this
study were initially dissolved in 100% ethanol. Tissue minces were
harvested and homogenized using a polytron (Tekmar Co., Cincinnati, OH)
for 30 sec in 0.5 ml cold PBS (10 mM, pH 7.2) containing
0.2% Triton X-100. The homogenates were centrifuged at 25,000 x
g for 45 min at 4 C to remove particulate matter, and the
supernatants were stored at -80 C. The protein concentration of the
supernatant was determined using the Bio-Rad Protein microassay
procedure. AE activity was determined as described previously (40, 41, 42, 43),
with modifications. The substrate concentration was 1 mM,
and the reaction was carried out at room temperature (
24 C) in 1 ml
0.01 M Tris/HCl buffer at pH 8.0. Total protein amounts
(520 µg) were used to determine the enzyme activity by following
the increase in optical density at 253 nm upon the hydrolysis of
benzoyl arginine ethyl ester (42). AE activity present in tissue
homogenates was found to be stable after sample storage at -80 C and a
single freeze/thaw cycle did not affect the enzyme activity.
Western blotting analysis
Samples were resolved by electrophoresis through 420%
SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels, followed by electroblotting onto
100% methanol-treated PVDF membrane (0.45 µm, Immobilon P from
Millipore, Bedford, MA). The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat
milk in PBS for 1 h. Immunostaining was performed by incubating
with rabbit anti-AE polyclonal antibodies at 1:2,000 dilution in
washing buffer (0.25% gelatin, 5 mM EDTA, 0.15
M NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH
7.4) for 1 h. The membranes were washed for 30 min, then incubated
with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey antirabbit IgG (Amersham)
at 1:3,000 dilution for 40 min. The Western blots were developed using
enhanced chemiluminescence procedures similar to those described by
Amersham. All steps were carried out at room temperature.
Measurement of cAMP level
Levels of cAMP were measured using commercial enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay kits (Oxford Biomedical Research, Inc., Oxford,
MI), as described previously (3). All samples contained
isobutyl-methylxanthine (100 µM).
Statistical analysis
The significance of differences between treatment and control
groups was assessed using Students t test. Values are
reported as the mean ± SEM (SE of the
mean).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
-diol led to an increase in AE activity similar to that observed
with DHT (Fig. 1B
-diol did not stimulate AE activity. Thus, the stimulation of
AE, caused by E2 and 3
-diol, required the
SHBG-RSHBG complex.
The effects on AE protein were measured by Western blot using a
specific anti-AE antibody. AE migrated as a 29-KDa molecular mass
species on a 420% polyacrylamide gel under nonreducing conditions.
The AE protein in prostate tissue treated with DHT, or SHBG plus
E2, was increased substantially, relative to the respective
controls (Fig. 2
). In tissue treated with
SHBG or E2 alone, the AE activity increased only slightly,
compared with control.
|
-diol also was
blocked by hydroxyflutamide (Fig. 3
|
-diol (Fig. 4A
-diol (Fig. 4A
-diol
also was blocked by 2MeOE2 (Fig. 4B
-diol and suggests that cAMP is a necessary intermediator
between E2- or 3
-diol-SHBG-RSHBG and AE
stimulation. Indeed, both the cAMP analog, 8-Br-cAMP, and the inducer
of cAMP forskolin stimulated AE activity (Fig. 5
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-diol induced prostate
hyperplasia in dogs (31, 32, 33, 34, 35), together with our demonstration that both
these steroids caused increases in cAMP in dog prostate, led us to
hypothesize that these events might be connected (3). We speculated
that perhaps ARs in the prostate were being activated by a
cAMP-mediated pathway.
To test our hypothesis, we investigated the effects of E2
and 3
-diol on an androgen-responsive protein in the dog prostate. AE
is a dog prostate-specific protein under androgenic control that can be
employed as a prostate marker, analogous to the use of PSA in humans
(23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). We first confirmed that AE in dog prostate tissue was
stimulated by DHT and that this effect could be antagonized by the
specific AR antagonist, hydroxyflutamide. We then demonstrated that
E2 and 3
-diol caused AE increase in prostate in the
presence (but not in absence) of SHBG. The effects were not mediated by
the estrogen receptor because, in the absence of SHBG, E2
alone had no effect, and 3
-diol does not bind to the estrogen
receptor. The possible conversion of 3
-diol to DHT does not explain
the effects of 3
-diol, because increases in AE required
preincubation of prostate tissue with SHBG; 3
-diol alone was
ineffective. 2MeOE2 a competitive inhibitor of
E2 and 3
-diol binding to SHBG, blocked stimulation of
cAMP by E2 and 3
-diol and prevented increases in AE
caused by these steroids, suggesting that cAMP was involved in
increasing AE. That 8-Br-cAMP and an inducer of cAMP (forskolin) also
increased AE is consistent with this explanation. Because the AR
selective antagonist, hydroxyflutamide, blocks E2,
3
-diol, and cAMP induction of AE, it seems that these effects are
mediated through ARs. Furthermore, these results support the notion
that ARs can be activated, even in the absence of androgens, by natural
steroids that activate the cAMP pathway. Blockage of ligand-independent
AR activation by antiandrogen is in agreement with several other recent
reports.
Based on our findings, we propose a novel mechanism whereby
E2 and 3
-diol can increase the production of
androgen-responsive proteins in a physiologically relevant system.
The AR, like other steroid hormone receptors, is a phosphoprotein (44, 45), and its activation state can potentially be modulated by
phosphorylation-dephosphorylation, resulting in augmented or
ligand-independent activation (17, 19, 21, 46, 47, 48, 49). The phosphorylation
state of the AR has been shown to be increased upon hormone binding;
however, changes in cAMP levels and activation of protein kinase A also
have recently been implicated in causing ligand-independent activation
of transfected ARs when expressed in either CV-1 or human prostate
(PC-3) cells (17, 20, 21). Consistent with our results in normal
prostate, it is therefore plausible that activation of the
SHBG-RSHBG pathway can lead to androgen-independent AR
activation via stimulation of protein kinase A. It is also possible
that up-regulation of AR expression might occur via a cAMP response
element present within the regulatory region of the AR gene (10, 13).
This could potentially augment AE expression, causing an increase in AR
concentrations and a corresponding increase in basal transcription.
A number of lines of evidence have implied a role for E2 in
the pathogenesis of BPH or in androgen-independent progression of
prostate cancer (31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38). These studies indicate that E2
synergizes with 3
-diol, but not DHT, in induction of canine BPH.
Because E2 and 3
-diol are the only two known steroids
that activate the SHBG-RSHBG pathway in prostate tissue
(3), and we have shown that both are capable of activating pathways
normally considered androgen responsive, antagonism of the pathway by
which SHBG leads to the induction of androgen-responsive genes may be a
valuable therapeutic target for the treatment or prevention of BPH or
prostate cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration in a
physiologically relevant system that androgenic events can be observed
in the complete absence of exogenous androgens.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 21, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-androstan-3
,17ß-diol is a hormone:
stimulation of cAMP accumulation in human and dog prostate. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 80:22592262[Abstract]
-reduced
androgens play a key role in murine parturition. Mol Endocrinol 10:380392[Abstract]
-androstanediol induced growth of the dog prostate.
Endocrinology 102:17481755[Abstract]
-dihydrotestosterone, testosterone, estradiol,
and estrone in epithelium and stroma of normal and hyperplastic human
prostate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:375381[Abstract]
-N-benzoyl-L-arginine ethyl ester and
-N-benzoyl-L-argininamide. J Am Chem Soc 87:27282737[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. A. Heinlein and C. Chang Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 276 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. LeRoy, M. V. P. Nadella, R. E. Toribio, I. Leav, and T. J. Rosol Canine Prostate Carcinomas Express Markers of Urothelial and Prostatic Differentiation Vet. Pathol., March 1, 2004; 41(2): 131 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Mohler, C. W. Gregory, O. H. Ford III, D. Kim, C. M. Weaver, P. Petrusz, E. M. Wilson, and F. S. French The Androgen Axis in Recurrent Prostate Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 10(2): 440 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. LOSEL, E. FALKENSTEIN, M. FEURING, A. SCHULTZ, H.-C. TILLMANN, K. ROSSOL-HASEROTH, and M. WEHLING Nongenomic Steroid Action: Controversies, Questions, and Answers Physiol Rev, July 1, 2003; 83(3): 965 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Wilson, R. J. Auchus, M. W. Leihy, O. L. Guryev, R. W. Estabrook, S. M. Osborn, G. Shaw, and M. B. Renfree 5{alpha}-Androstane-3{alpha},17{beta}-Diol Is Formed in Tammar Wallaby Pouch Young Testes by a Pathway Involving 5{alpha}-Pregnane-3{alpha},17{alpha}-Diol-20-One as a Key Intermediate Endocrinology, February 1, 2003; 144(2): 575 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Heinlein and C. Chang The Roles of Androgen Receptors and Androgen-Binding Proteins in Nongenomic Androgen Actions Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2002; 16(10): 2181 - 2187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Hryb, A. M. Nakhla, S. M. Kahn, J. St. George, N. C. Levy, N. A. Romas, and W. Rosner Sex Hormone-binding Globulin in the Human Prostate Is Locally Synthesized and May Act as an Autocrine/Paracrine Effector J. Biol. Chem., July 12, 2002; 277(29): 26618 - 26622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Monti, F. Di Silverio, R. Iraci, C. Martini, S. Lanzara, P. Falasca, M. Poggi, A. Stigliano, F. Sciarra, and V. Toscano Regional Variations of Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I), IGF-II, and Receptor Type 1 in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Tissue and Their Correlation with Intraprostatic Androgens J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 1700 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Falkenstein, H.-C. Tillmann, M. Christ, M. Feuring, and M. Wehling Multiple Actions of Steroid Hormones---A Focus on Rapid, Nongenomic Effects Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 513 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Selva, O. M. Tirado, N. Toran, C. A. Suarez-Quian, J. Reventos, and F. Munell Meiotic Arrest and Germ Cell Apoptosis in Androgen-Binding Protein Transgenic Mice Endocrinology, March 1, 2000; 141(3): 1168 - 1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. P. M. benten, M. Lieberherr, G. Giese, C. Wrehlke, O. Stamm, C. E. Sekeris, H. Mossmann, and F. Wunderlich Functional testosterone receptors in plasma membranes of T cells FASEB J, January 1, 1999; 13(1): 123 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Shaw, M. B. Renfree, M. W. Leihy, C. H. L. Shackleton, E. Roitman, and J. D. Wilson Prostate formation in a marsupial is mediated by the testicular androgen 5alpha -androstane-3alpha ,17beta -diol PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 12256 - 12259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |