help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, S.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 11 4622-4628
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Maternal Deprivation and Stress Induce Immediate Early Genes in the Infant Rat Brain

Mark A. Smith, Su-Yong Kim, Helga J. J. van Oers and Seymour Levine

Biological Psychiatry Branch (M.A.S., S.-Y.K.), National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; and Department of Psychology (H.J.J.v.O., S.L.), University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Mark A. Smith, M.D., Ph.D., DuPont Merck, Experimental Station, E400/4448, P.O. Box 80400, Wilmington, Delaware 19880. E-mail: smithma{at}a1.lldmpc.umc.dupont.com


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is normally quiescent during the stress-hyporesponsive period (SHRP) from day 4–14 in infant rats. However, maternal deprivation (DEP) can disinhibit the HPA axis, thus enabling neonatal rats to respond to mild stressors. In an effort to understand how DEP may alter HPA axis sensitivity, we used in situ hybridization to measure changes in the expression of stress-responsive genes in the brains of neonatal rats. Despite the minimal HPA axis response in nondeprived rats during the SHRP (postnatal day 12), the mild stress of a saline injection significantly increased messenger RNA levels of two immediate-early genes (IEGs), c-fos and NGFI-B, in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and in the cerebral cortex. Following 24 h of DEP, the induction of IEGs in response to stress was greatly potentiated in the PVN of P12 neonates. In contrast, DEP attenuated the effects of stress on IEG induction in rats that had matured beyond the SHRP (P20). Surprisingly, DEP decreased basal levels of CRH messenger RNA in the PVN at P12 and P20. Thus the SHRP most accurately refers to HPA axis insensitivity to stress because the brain itself readily responds to stress as evidenced by the induction of IEGs.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE EARLIEST descriptions of the ontogeny of the endocrine response to stress led to the conclusion that during postnatal development there was a period of stress nonresponsiveness (1). (See Ref. 2 for review.) Thus, from postnatal day 4–14, the neonatal rat appeared to show little or no adrenocortical response to most stimuli that elicit a response later in development. This developmental phenomenon was originally called the stress-nonresponsive period, which was later modified to the stress-hyporesponsive-period (SHRP) (3). All of the early studies however, examined changes in plasma levels of corticosterone (CORT) using the best available methodologies at the time. With advances in measurement techniques and the ability to analyze other components of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, questions were raised as to the absoluteness of the SHRP. Thus, while the adrenal appeared to be relatively insensitive to stress during the SHRP, when pituitary ACTH was examined, a robust response was observed to a number of different stimuli including immune signals (4), excitatory amino acids (5), histamine, and exposure to cold (6). The neonatal rat is however, unresponsive to milder stressors (i.e. novelty and saline injections) (7). Whether the differences in response to different stimuli are a function of the intensity of the stimulus or represents differential maturation of the neural pathways that regulate the release of ACTH to different stimuli has not as yet been resolved.

Interestingly, the SHRP depends on normal mother-infant interactions. Following 24 h of maternal deprivation (DEP) during the SHRP, the rat pup responds with significant increases in ACTH and CORT when exposed to novelty or saline injections (7). The endocrine response to these stimuli following DEP is different from that observed in the adult in that the neonate has elevated levels of ACTH and CORT, which remain elevated for a prolonged period following exposure to the stressor (8). These data suggest that the dam is exerting an inhibitory influence on the pup’s HPA axis. Thus, the neural mechanisms required to elicit the appropriate endocrine response following stress appear to be present early in development, but various components of the dam’s behavior (feeding and stroking) seem capable of inhibiting or dampening the response (9).

While the attenuated pituitary and adrenal responses to stress during the SHRP have been well described, very little is known about the acute effects of DEP on the neural correlates of the stress response. A few studies have examined CRH messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of infant rats. Generally, changes in CRH mRNA levels are not readily observed during the first postnatal week but may increase in response to adrenalectomy (10) or surgical stress (11) during the second postnatal week. At 6 and 9 days of age, DEP and cold stress did not increase CRH expression despite the fact that the CORT response to cold was significantly greater in DEP pups compared with nondeprived pups (12). Thus, changes in CRH mRNA may not correlate with the endocrine response in neonatal rats during the SHRP.

The relative lack of CRH responsiveness during the SHRP raises the question whether the brain is being activated by stress at this time. One way to answer this question is to measure mRNA levels of immediate-early genes (IEGs), such as c-fos and nerve growth factor inducible gene (NGFI-B), in the brain following stress (13). The purpose of the present study then was to determine if brain areas such as the PVN, which are activated in adult rats in response to stress, are likewise activated in the neonate. A second objective was to measure the induction of IEGs in maternally deprived neonates that do exhibit a significant endocrine response to mild stress.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Maternal deprivation and stress
The hybrid offspring of Sprague-Dawley females and Long-Evans males were used as subjects for the experiments described here. Pregnant females were individually housed, and the day following birth (P1), litters were culled to 8 (4 males and 4 females) and placed in clean cages. Subsequently, the animals were not handled until the time of deprivation or stress. The animals were maintained at 25 C with 12 h light. Rat chow and water were available ad lib. Both deprivation and testing began 4–6 h after light onset.

At P11 or P19 rat pups were maternally deprived for 24 h. The mother and litters were removed from the home cage. The litters were deposited in a separate cage placed on a heating pad at 30–33 C in the deprivation room adjacent to the main colony room, under the same temperature and lighting conditions. Neither food nor water were available during the deprivation period. Nondeprived controls were left undisturbed with their mothers until the time of testing.

The stressor consisted of administering a single injection of saline (0.9%, ip, volume = 0.1 ml/10 g BW) and placing the neonate individually in the testing chamber on a heating pad for 30 or 120 min. Neonates were killed either 30 min or 2 h after the saline injection. Trunk blood was collected for determination of ACTH and corticosterone. ACTH and corticosterone (CORT) were measured by RIA [INCSTAR (Stillwater, MN) and ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Costa Mesa, CA), respectively]. Because of a technical error, CORT values for at 30 min after the stressor were lost from the particular group of animals described here. For comparison sake, we list here CORT values from another experiment run in an identical manner. In that other experiment, the ACTH and CORT values at 0 and 120 min were very similar to those reported here and therefore we believe the CORT values at 30 min after the stressor should be representative.

Brains were removed and frozen in isopentane at -30 C. Brains from rats that were not stressed were processed for measurement of c-fos, NGFI-B, and CRH mRNA levels by in situ hybridization. Brains from rats that were killed 30 min after the saline injection were processed for the immediate early genes, c-fos and NGFI-B. CRH mRNA was analyzed in rats that were killed 2 h after the stressor and compared with the unstressed control group.

Riboprobe in situ hybridization
Frozen brain sections (15 µm) through the level of the hypothalamic PVN (-1.8 mm bregma) were cut on a cryostat and mounted onto gelatin-coated slides. In situ hybridization using riboprobes labeled with 35S-UTP was performed as described (14, 15). Briefly, the sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, and delipidated in chloroform. Antisense cRNA probes were transcribed from appropriate linearized plasmids using T7, Sp6, or T3 polymerases according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Ambion, Austin, TX). The c-fos probe consisted of an 860 by fragment containing the 3' untranslated portion of the complementary DNA (cDNA), which was generously donated by T. Curran (16). The NGFI-B probe was a 1-kb fragment containing the coding region of NGFI-B (17) and was kindly provided by Guoqiang Xing, NIMH. The cRNA probe for rat CRF was transcribed from a 1-kb cDNA insert in pGEM 4 containing the full length coding region of rat CRF [kindly provided by Dr. K. Mayo, Northwestern University, and characterized previously (18)]. For each slide containing two brain sections, a saturating amount of 35S-labeled riboprobe (1–2 x 106 cpm) was added to 50 µl hybridization buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50% formamide, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8), 1 x Denhardt’s, 250 µg/ml yeast transfer RNA, 250 µg/ml total RNA, 10 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA, 10% dextran sulfate, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% SDS, and 0.1% sodium thiosulfate. Hybridization took place overnight at 54 C. The next day the sections were rinsed in 4 x SSC, treated with 20 µg/ml RNAse A, rinsed in decreasing concentrations of SSC at room temperature and finally washed in 0.1 x SSC for 1 h at 65 C. The slides were apposed to Kodak Biomax MR film for approximately 2 (NGFI-B), 5 (CRF), or 10 (c-fos) days. Some sections were dipped in photographic emulsion (Kodak NTB-2) and developed after 4 weeks in Kodak D19 developer.

Data analysis
Autoradiograms were analyzed using image analysis software developed by Wayne Rasband at NIH as described (15). Briefly, the gray scale values were corrected for film nonlinearity using 14C standards and expressed in dpm/mg for the cortical areas. In the case of the PVN, gray scale values were multiplied by the area of the PVN (to take into account increases in the number of cells expressing the mRNA species) and expressed in arbitrary units.

Measurements were taken from two to six sections from each animal. Data are given as the mean ± SEM. Differences between groups were tested statistically by ANOVA followed by least squares analysis with Bonferroni correction for multiple groups using SuperANOVA software. In situ hybridization assays were carried out at different times for the P12 and P20 experiments, so the absolute values cannot be compared between the two ages.

As no differences in the mRNA levels of c-fos, NGFI-B, or CRH between male and female rats were observed, the data from the two sexes were combined for statistical analysis.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ACTH and corticosterone
P12.
In NDEP rats, the endocrine response to a mild stressor (ip saline injection) during the SHRP at postnatal day 12 (P12) was virtually absent with only a slight elevation in plasma ACTH and CORT levels. See Figs. 1Go and 2Go. However, in rats that had been maternally deprived for the preceding 24 h, saline injection caused marked elevations in ACTH and especially corticosterone beyond that induced by maternal deprivation alone. (The increased basal plasma CORT levels in DEP animals may have been due in part to dehydration. Cortisol binding globulin is decreased by DEP (2) and therefore may not explain the increased CORT levels.) There was a trend toward an interaction between stress and deprivation on ACTH (F2,72 = 2.80, P = 0.067). For corticosterone there was a potentiation of the stress effect by DEP (F2,64 = 8.73, P < 0.0001). In the DEP group, despite the brief nature of the stressor, corticosterone levels continued to be elevated 2 h later. This may have been partially due to a decreased clearance rate of CORT in DEP rats (Levine et al., unpublished observations).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects of stress and maternal deprivation on plasma ACTH in postnatal day 12 (P12) and P20 rats. Rats were stressed by saline injection and killed 30 or 120 min later. n = 20/group for P12 age and 10/group for the P20 age. *, Stressed group is significantly different from the corresponding unstressed control group at P < 0.05. #, EP group is significantly different from the corresponding NDEP group at P < 0.05.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of stress and maternal deprivation on plasma corticosterone levels.

 
P20.
In rats that had matured beyond the SHRP, stress caused a robust elevation in ACTH and corticosterone in both NDEP and DEP groups. Deprivation in the absence of stress was again sufficient to increase ACTH and corticosterone levels. Interestingly, ACTH and corticosterone quickly returned to baseline in the DEP group after the saline injection, whereas they were still elevated in the NDEP group 120 min later. Thus, the interaction between stress and DEP was highly significant for ACTH (F2,54 = 6.47, P = 0.003) and CORT (F2,48 = 6.95, P = 0.002).

c-fos and NGFI-B mRNA in the PVN and cortex
P12.
To address whether the hypothalamic PVN and other brain regions were activated by maternal deprivation and stress in infant rats during the SHRP, we measured mRNA levels of two immediate-early genes, c-fos and NGFI-B. Despite the minimal endocrine response in NDEP P12 rats, we observed a significant increase in c-fos mRNA levels in the PVN 30 min after the saline injection. See Figs. 3Go and 4Go. After 24 h of DEP, c-fos levels were slightly but significantly elevated. However, stressing the DEP rats resulted in a large increase in c-fos mRNA levels, the magnitude of which was significantly greater than that seen in the NDEP stressed group (F2,68 = 4.17, P = 0.045 for the interaction between stress and DEP). Similar results were observed for NGFI-B. See Fig. 5Go.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Autoradiographs showing effects of stress and maternal deprivation on c-fos mRNA expression in P12 rat brains. Note increases in c-fos expression in hypothalamic PVN, piriform cortex (pir ctx), and to a lesser extent in the cingulate cortex (cing ctx) 30 min after the stress of a saline injection.

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effects of stress and maternal deprivation on c-fos mRNA levels in the PVN. Rats were killed 30 min after stress (ip saline). n = 20/group at P12 and n = 10/group at P20. *, Stressed group is significantly different from the corresponding unstressed control group at P < 0.001. #, DEP group is significantly different from the corresponding NDEP group at P < 0.001.

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of stress and maternal deprivation on NGFI-B mRNA levels in the PVN. As in Fig. 5Go except that n = 4–10/group. *, Stressed group is significantly different from the corresponding unstressed control group at P < 0.001. #, DEP group is significantly different from the corresponding NDEP group at P < 0.01.

 
Transcription factors such as c-fos and NGFI-B were also increased in the piriform cortex and cingulate cortex in response to mild stress (Table 1Go). However, in contrast to the PVN, maternal deprivation did not significantly facilitate the ability of stress to induce c-fos and NGFI-B in these cortical areas.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effects of maternal deprivation and stress on c-fos and NGFI-B mRNA levels in the cingulate and piriform cortex from rats aged P12 and P20

 
P20.
In distinct contrast to the P12 age, DEP dramatically attenuated the ability of stress to induce c-fos mRNA levels in the PVN of P20 rats (F2,32 = 11.88, P = 0.0016 for the interaction of stress and DEP). In addition, DEP attenuated the stress-induced increases in NGFI-B in the cingulate and piriform cortices (Table 1Go).

CRH mRNA in the PVN
Despite the fact that maternal deprivation facilitated the endocrine response to stress at P12, steady-state CRH mRNA levels in the PVN were reduced. This was also true at P20. See Figs. 6Go and 7Go. We were unable to detect an increase in CRH mRNA levels in the infant rats at 2 h following a saline injection regardless of whether they had been previously deprived.



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Autoradiographs showing effects of stress and maternal deprivation on CRH mRNA expression in the hypothalamic PVN of P12 rats. Note decreases in CRH expression in DEP rats regardless of stress.

 


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effects of stress and maternal deprivation on CRH mRNA levels in the PVN. Rats were killed at 2 h after a saline injection, n = 20/group at P12 and 10/group at P20. #, DEP group is significantly different from the corresponding NDEP group at P < 0.01.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
If stress is narrowly defined to include only ACTH and CORT responses, then stress-hyporesponsive period accurately describes the degree of stress reactivity in infant rats between postnatal days 4–14. However, if the concept is broadened to include the central response to stress, then the term SHRP may be less descriptive because a principle finding of this study is that mild stressors can stimulate immediate-early gene expression in the brain of infant rats during the SHRP despite the meager endocrine response. In fact, if the stress response is viewed as a sequence of events originating in the brain and extending to the periphery, then it is the peripheral, endocrine aspects of the stress response, not the central, that seem to be most inhibited during the SHRP. For example, the adrenal CORT response is virtually nonexistent during the SHRP, and the pituitary ACTH response is very meager (see Ref. 19 and Figs. 1Go and 2Go). However, when we examined the PVN, we found significant increases in c-fos and NGFI-B mRNA levels in response to stress. In the cerebral cortex, the fold increases in c-fos and NGFI-B during the SHRP (P12) were similar to those seen at P20. The fact that stress induces IEGs in the brain of neonatal rats during the SHRP is perhaps not surprising given the well known behavioral observation that infant rats vigorously respond to stress in the form of ultrasonic vocalizations (20).

Therefore, the brain seems capable of being activated by stress during the SHRP, but this activation is not translated into a pituitary-adrenal endocrine response. Why during the SHRP, stress-induced brain activation does not result in significant ACTH and CORT secretion is still unclear. Perhaps the dissociation between c-fos/NGFI-B induction and release of ACTH is due to a defect in transduction of PVN stimulation into neurosecretion of CRH in immature rats. However, CRH can be released from the median eminence of 5-day-old pups in response to endotoxin (4). Alternatively, CRH may have been released but cannot stimulate ACTH secretion during the SHRP. This also seems unlikely, as injection of ovine CRH into 10-day-old pups causes a robust secretion of ACTH (although, interestingly, the CORT response is minimal) (19).

It may be that the small increases in c-fos and NGFI-B we observed in NDEP rats are simply not reflective of CRH neurosecretion from the median eminence. Indeed, we did not observe any increase in CRH mRNA levels in response to stress, but this may be because the stressor was too mild to induce CRH mRNA or because we examined the brains too early after the application of the stressor (12). Alternatively, CRH may have been induced, but only in a small subpopulation of vasopressin-containing PVN neurons (21). Future studies examining CRH protein levels and/or using probes for CRH heteronuclear RNA may clarify this issue.

The fact that 24 h of maternal deprivation enables the neonate to respond to mild stressors during the SHRP demonstrates that the mother normally exerts a strong inhibitory effect on the central response to stress during this period of time (9). In the absence of normal mother-infant interactions, this inhibition is compromised, thus enabling the neonate to respond to mild stressors such as a saline injection and enhancing the response to robust stressors such as interleukin-1 (22). The locus of this inhibitory effect of the mother is not known. However, our results suggest that one level of inhibition may occur in the hypothalamic PVN. This is based on our observation that stress induced c-fos and NGFI-B mRNA levels in the PVN to a much larger degree in the DEP animals at P12 compared with the NDEP group. This effect of maternal deprivation appeared to be specific for the PVN as DEP did not have a synergistic effect on stress-induced IEGs in cortical areas. The relatively large increase in c-fos and NGFI-B in the DEP rats that were stressed at P12 may reflect a level of stimulation sufficient to release CRH and thus result in the observed increases in ACTH and CORT during the SHRP. This is not to say that extrahypothalamic areas might not also be involved in the release from inhibition. For example, Vasquez et al. (23) have reported that following DEP there was a down regulation of mineralocorticoid receptors in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. These authors suggested that the relative ratio of mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors in the CA1 region of the hippocampus influences PVN sensitivity and results in an enhanced and sustained ACTH and CORT response to a mild stress stimulus in DEP pups.

It was surprising to find that maternal deprivation decreased CRH mRNA levels in the PVN while potentiating the stress response, at least at P12. One other group also found a decrease in CRH mRNA in response to chronic stress and disturbed mother-infant interactions (24), but why DEP should decrease CRH levels remains a mystery. DEP is apparently decreasing CRH mRNA transcription or increasing CRH mRNA degradation. It is possible that other factors such as vasopressin may play a role in potentiating the stress response following DEP.

The effects of maternal deprivation were markedly different between the SHRP (P12) neonates and rats that were more mature (P20). The most striking difference was that DEP potentiated the ability of stress to induce IEGs in the PVN at age P12 but attenuated the effects of acute stress at P20. It may be that, at P20, the brain has matured to the point where it can respond to the increased corticosterone levels present during the 24 h of DEP and thus have a smaller response to a subsequent stressor. It is also noteworthy that, at P20, ACTH and CORT returned to unstressed baseline levels at 2 h after the saline injection only in the DEP rats. This is unusual because glucocorticoid levels typically remain elevated in response to stress in neonatal rats (25). The NDEP P20 neonates, as well as both NDEP and DEP P12 rats, continued to have elevated ACTH and CORT levels at 2 h, which is more typical. Perhaps DEP at P20 results in higher and more prolonged glucocorticoid feedback that subsequently curtails the HPA axis response to stress. Alternatively, 24 h of food deprivation, which is an unavoidable component of the DEP (9), may attenuate the subsequent response to mild stress at P20 just as it does in the adult (26). However, while fasting may be at least partially responsible for the decreased endocrine and IEG responses to stress in DEP P20 rats, the role fasting plays in the potentiation of the stress response in DEP P12 rats is less clear. Perhaps at P12, fasting leads to more dramatic physiological changes that cause a facilitation of the stress response.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that several brain areas, including the PVN, are activated in response to stress in NDEP neonatal rats during the SHRP despite a negligible endocrine response. However, DEP at P12 facilitates the ability of stress to induce c-fos and NGFI-B in the PVN. Thus, part of the inhibitory effect of the mother-infant interaction during the SHRP may occur at the level of the hypothalamic PVN. Prolonged separation from the mother during the SHRP may result in elevated (27) or reduced (28) CRH mRNA levels in the PVN of adult rats depending on the age when they were separated from their mother. These early environmental experiences may lead to permanently altered stress responsivity and be a significant risk factor for adult psychopathology.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors wish to thank Dr. Robert Post for his enthusiasm and support.

Received May 27, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Schapiro S, Geller E, Eiduson S 1962 Neonatal adrenal cortical response to stress and vasopressin. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 109:937–945
  2. Rosenfeld P, Suchecki S, Levine S 1992 Multifactorial regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis during development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 16:553–568[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Schoenfeld NM, Leathem JH, Rabji J 1980 Maturation of adrenal stress responsiveness in the rat. Neuroendocrinology 31:101–105[Medline]
  4. Shanks N, Meaney MJ 1994 Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activation following endotoxin administration in the developing rat: a CRH-mediated effect. J Neuroendocrinol 6:375–383[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Kent S, Kernahan SD, Levine S 1996 Effects of excitatory amino acids on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis of the neonatal rat. Dev Brain Res 94:1–13[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Walker CD, Scribner KA, Cascio CS, Dallman MF 1991 The pituitary-adrenocortical system of neonatal rats is responsive to stress throughout development in a time-dependent and stressor-specific fashion. Endocrinology 128:1385–1395[Abstract]
  7. Levine S, Huchton DM, Wiener SG, Rosenfeld P 1992 Time course of the effect of maternal deprivation on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the infant rat. Dev Psychobiol 24:547–558
  8. Goldman L, Winget C, Hollingshead GH, Levine S 1973 Post-weaning development of negative feedback in the pituitary-adrenal system of the rat. Neuroendocrinology 12:199–211[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Suchecki D, Rosenfeld P, Levine S 1993 Maternal regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the infant rat: the roles of feeding and stroking. Dev Brain Res 75:185–192[Medline]
  10. Grino M, Young WS, Burgunder JM 1989 Ontogeny of expression of the corticotropin-releasing factor gene in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and of the proopiomelanocortin gene in rat pituitary. Endocrinology 124:60–68[Abstract]
  11. Yi SJ, Masters JN, Baram TZ 1993 Effects of a specific glucocorticoid receptor antagonist on corticotropin releasing hormone gene expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the neonatal rat. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 73:253–259[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Avishai-Eliner S, Yi S-J, Newth CJL, Baram TZ 1995 Effects of maternal deprivation and sibling deprivation on basal and stress induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal components in the infant rat. Neurosci Lett 192:49–52[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Chan RKW, Brown ER, Ericsson A, Kovacs KJ, Sawchenko PE 1993 A comparison of two immediate-early genes, c-fos and NGFI-B, as markers for functional activation in stress-related neuroendocrine circuitry. J Neurosci 13:5126–5138[Abstract]
  14. Whitfield Jr HJ, Brady LS, Smith MA, Mamalaki E, Fox RJ, Herkenham M 1990 Optimization of cRNA in situ hybridization methodology for localization of glucocorticoid receptor mRNA in rat brain: a detailed protocol. Cell Mol Neurobiol 10:145–157[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Makino S, Smith MA, Gold PW 1995 Increased expression of corticotropin-releasing hormone and vasopressin messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus during repeated stress: association with reduction in glucocorticoid receptor mRNA levels. Endocrinology 136:3299–3309[Abstract]
  16. Curran T, Gordon MB, Rubino KL, Sambucetti LC 1987 Isolation and characterization of c-fos (rat) cDNA and analysis of post-translational modification in vitro. Oncogene 2:79–84[Medline]
  17. Milbrandt J 1988 Nerve growth factor induces a gene homologous to the glucocorticoid receptor gene. Neuron 1:183–188[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Imaki T, Nahan J-L, Rivier C, Sawchenko PE, Vale W 1991 Differential regulation of corticotropin-releasing factor mRNA in rat brain regions by glucocorticoids and stress. J Neurosci 11:585–599[Abstract]
  19. Walker CD, Perrin M, Vale W, Rivier C 1986 Ontogeny of the stress response in the rat: role of the pituitary and the hypothalamus. Endocrinology 118:1445–1451[Abstract]
  20. Hofer MA, Shair H 1978 Ultrasonic vocalization during social interaction and isolation in 2-week-old rats. Dev Psychobiol 11:495–504[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Paulmyer-Lacroix O, Anglade G, Grino M 1994 Stress regulates differently the arginine vasopressin (AVP)-containing and the AVP-deficient corticotropin-releasing factor-synthesizing cell bodies in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus of the developing rat. Endocrine 2:1037–1043
  22. Kent S, Tom C, Levine S Effect of interleukin-1ß on pituitary-adrenal responses and body weight in neonatal rats: interaction with maternal deprivation. Stress, in press
  23. Vazquez DM, van Oers H, Levine S, Akil H 1996 Regulation of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor mRNAs in the hippocampus of the maternally deprived infant rat. Brain Res 731:79–90[Medline]
  24. Gilles EE, Guirguis C, Schultz L, Snodgrass SR, Baram TZ 1996 Differential regulation of hypothalamic CRH mRNA by chronic and acute intermittent stress in infant rats. Soc Neurosci 22:A201.7
  25. Vazquez DM, Akil H 1993 Pituitary-adrenal response to ether vapor in the weanling rat: characterization of the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on adrenocorticotropin secretion. Pediatr Res 34:646–653[Medline]
  26. Akana SF, Strack AM, Hanson ES, Dallman MF 1994 Regulation of activity in the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis is integral to a larger hypothalamic system that determines caloric flow. Endocrinology 135:1125–1134[Abstract]
  27. Plotsky PM, Meaney MJ 1993 Early, postnatal experience alters hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) mRNA, median eminence CRF content and stress-induced release in adult rats. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 18:195–200[Medline]
  28. Rots NY, de Jong J, Workel JO, Levine S, Cools AR, De Kloet ER 1996 Neonatal maternally deprived rats have as adults elevated basal pituitary-adrenal activity and enhanced susceptibility to apomorphine. J Neuroendocrinol 8:501–506[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. D. Bruder, J. K. Taylor, K. J. Kamer, and H. Raff
Development of the ACTH and corticosterone response to acute hypoxia in the neonatal rat
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): R1195 - R1203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Schmidt, S. Levine, M. S. Oitzl, M. van der Mark, M. B. Muller, F. Holsboer, and E. R. de Kloet
Glucocorticoid Receptor Blockade Disinhibits Pituitary-Adrenal Activity during the Stress Hyporesponsive Period of the Mouse
Endocrinology, March 1, 2005; 146(3): 1458 - 1464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
M. W. Groer, J. Hill, J. E. Wilkinson, and A. Stuart
Effects of Separation and Separation with Supplemental Stroking in BALB/c Infant Mice
Biol Res Nurs, January 1, 2002; 3(3): 119 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. W. Dent, M. A. Smith, and S. Levine
Rapid Induction of Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Gene Transcription in the Paraventricular Nucleus of the Developing Rat
Endocrinology, May 1, 2000; 141(5): 1593 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. J.J. van Oers, E. R. de Kloet, T. Whelan, and S. Levine
Maternal Deprivation Effect on the Infant's Neural Stress Markers Is Reversed by Tactile Stimulation and Feeding But Not by Suppressing Corticosterone
J. Neurosci., December 1, 1998; 18(23): 10171 - 10179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
E. R. de Kloet, E. Vreugdenhil, M. S. Oitzl, and M. Joëls
Brain Corticosteroid Receptor Balance in Health and Disease
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 1998; 19(3): 269 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals