help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nolin, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Witorsch, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nolin, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Witorsch, R. J.

Endocrinology, Vol 99, 949-958, Copyright © 1976 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Detection of endogenous immunoreactive prolactin in rat mammary epithelial cells during lactation

JM Nolin and RJ Witorsch

The question of whether endogenous prolactin might be detectable in normally lactating rat mammary glands (LMG) was examined by light microscopic immunohistochemistry. In an initial study, sections of LMG were incubated sequentially with I) rabbit anti-rat prolactin (APRL); II) anti-rabbit gamma globulin: peroxidase conjugate (ARgammaG-per), prepared from goat anti-rabbit gamma globulin and horseradish peroxidase, and III) 3,3'-diaminobenzidine mixed with H2O2(DAB). Use of this three-step procedure led to staining of stromal, parenchymal and intraluminal elements. However, control procedures which ommitted step I produced similar staining, caused by direct binding of the ARgammaG- per to endogenous tissue components (possibly rat immunoglobulins). This precluded detection of indirect, APRL-linked, binding of ARgammaG- per. In subsequent experiments, direct binding of ARgammaG-per was prevented by preincubating LMG sections with goat anti-monkey gamma globulin (AMgammaG), following which, the three-step reaction sequence (APRL, ARgammaG-per and DAB) led to APRL-dependent staining, both within the alveolar lumina and in the apices of epithelial cells. This staining, presumably of endogenous prolactin, appeared to be specific, since it did not occur when absorbed APRL (APRL admixed with highly purified rat prolactin) was substituted for APRL in step I of the reaction sequence. In contrast, when an incubation with purified rat prolactin was interposed between the AMgammaG pretreatment and the three-step reaction sequence, staining of epithelial elements was intensified, indicating that these cells had contained unoccupied prolactin-binding sites. The apparent presence of both prolactin- binding sites and endogenous immunoreactive prolactin in LMG alveolar cells strongly suggests that this protein hormone can enter these target cells under physiological conditions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. V. Clevenger, P. A. Furth, S. E. Hankinson, and L. A. Schuler
The Role of Prolactin in Mammary Carcinoma
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2003; 24(1): 1 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. E. Freeman, B. Kanyicska, A. Lerant, and G. Nagy
Prolactin: Structure, Function, and Regulation of Secretion
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2000; 80(4): 1523 - 1631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1976 by The Endocrine Society