help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caraty, A.
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caraty, A.
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, D. C.
Endocrinology Vol. 140, No. 1 165-170
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Progesterone Priming Is Essential for the Full Expression of the Positive Feedback Effect of Estradiol in Inducing the Preovulatory Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Surge in the Ewe

Alain Caraty and Donal C. Skinner1

Station de Physiologie de la Reproduction des Mammifères Domestiques, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 37380 Nouzilly, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. A. Caraty, Station de Physiologie de la Reproduction des Mammifères Domestiques, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 37380 Nouzilly, France.

The luteal phase elevation in circulating progesterone (P) powerfully inhibits GnRH and, consequently, LH release, thereby preventing premature preovulatory LH surges in the ewe. Whether luteal phase P modulates the response of the GnRH system to the positive feedback effect of estradiol is unknown. To investigate this possibility, two experiments were conducted during the anestrous season using an artificial model of the follicular phase in ovariectomized ewes bearing 10-mm sc 17ß-estradiol SILASTIC brand implants (Dow Corning Corp.). In Exp 1, ewes (n = 10) were run through four successive artificial cycles during which a luteal phase level of P was either replaced (cycles 1 and 3) or not replaced (cycles 2 and 4). GnRH and LH secretions were monitored by sampling cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and jugular blood from 10–35 h after four 30-mm 17ß-estradiol SILASTIC implants were inserted sc. CSF could be collected from only four ewes over the four cycles. There was no P-dependent difference in the onset of the GnRH and LH surges, which may have been due to a progressive delay in the surge onsets over the four cycles (by ANOVA, P < 0.05). Due to this delay, it was not possible to obtain an accurate estimate of the duration of the GnRH and LH surges in all ewes, but the size of the GnRH surge was always greater when animals had been treated with P, resulting in a significant increase in the maximum (P < 0.01) and mean (P < 0.05) levels during the surge. In contrast, there was no effect on any parameter of LH secretion. In Exp 2, ewes (n = 10) were run through two artificial estrous cycles during which luteal phase P was either replaced or not replaced, using a cross-over experimental design. CSF was collected from seven ewes over the two cycles. GnRH and LH secretions were monitored from 10–53 h after estradiol administration. As in Exp 1, a clear significant increase in the maximal and mean GnRH levels (P < 0.05 for both) was observed during the surge when ewes had been pretreated with P. Again, no changes were observed in LH release during the surge. P priming did, however, delay the onsets of the GnRH (P < 0.01) and LH surges (P < 0.01). Our data show that the increase in P during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle is essential for the full expression of the positive feedback effect of estradiol in inducing the preovulatory GnRH surge in the ewe.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
F Stormshak, C T Estill, J A Resko, and C E Roselli
Changes in LH secretion in response to an estradiol challenge in male- and female-oriented rams and in ewes
Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 733 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. H. Souza, A. Gumen, E. P. B. Silva, A. P. Cunha, J. N. Guenther, C. M. Peto, D. Z. Caraviello, and M. C. Wiltbank
Supplementation with Estradiol-17{beta} Before the Last Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Injection of the Ovsynch Protocol in Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2007; 90(10): 4623 - 4634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. Ben Said, D. Lomet, D. Chesneau, L. Lardic, S. Canepa, D. Guillaume, C. Briant, C. Fabre-Nys, and A. Caraty
Differential Estradiol Requirement for the Induction of Estrus Behavior and the Luteinizing Hormone Surge in Two Breeds of Sheep
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 673 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. Gumen and M. C Wiltbank
Follicular cysts occur after a normal estradiol-induced GnRH/LH surge if the corpus hemorrhagicum is removed
Reproduction, June 1, 2005; 129(6): 737 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.L. Crawford, J.R. McNeilly, and A.S. McNeilly
No Evidence for Pituitary Priming to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in Relation to Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Secretion Prior to the Preovulatory LH Surge in Ewes
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 224 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. H. Hampton, B. E. Salfen, J. F. Bader, D. H. Keisler, and H. A. Garverick
Ovarian Follicular Responses to High Doses of Pulsatile Luteinizing Hormone in Lactating Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2003; 86(6): 1963 - 1969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Gumen and M. C. Wiltbank
An Alteration in the Hypothalamic Action of Estradiol Due to Lack of Progesterone Exposure Can Cause Follicular Cysts in Cattle
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2002; 66(6): 1689 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. P. Sharma, C. Herkimer, C. West, W. Ye, R. Birch, J. E. Robinson, D. L. Foster, and V. Padmanabhan
Fetal Programming: Prenatal Androgen Disrupts Positive Feedback Actions of Estradiol but Does Not Affect Timing of Puberty in Female Sheep
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 924 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. A. Richter, D. S. Spackman, J. E. Robinson, S. Dye, T. G. Harris, D. C. Skinner, and N. P. Evans
Role of Endogenous Opioid Peptides in Mediating Progesterone-Induced Disruption of the Activation and Transmission Stages of the GnRH Surge Induction Process
Endocrinology, December 1, 2001; 142(12): 5212 - 5219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. C. Skinner, A. Caraty, and R. Allingham
Unmasking the Progesterone Receptor in the Preoptic Area and Hypothalamus of the Ewe: No Colocalization with Gonadotropin-Releasing Neurons
Endocrinology, February 1, 2001; 142(2): 573 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. C. Skinner, T. G. Harris, and N. P. Evans
Duration and Amplitude of the Luteal Phase Progesterone Increment Times the Estradiol-Induced Luteinizing Hormone Surge in Ewes
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2000; 63(4): 1135 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. E. Chappell and J. E. Levine
Stimulation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Surges by Estrogen. I. Role of Hypothalamic Progesterone Receptors
Endocrinology, April 1, 2000; 141(4): 1477 - 1485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society