Endocrinology, Vol 126, 2359-2368, Copyright © 1990 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Antipeptide antibodies to two distinct regions of the androgen receptor localize the receptor protein to the nuclei of target cells in the rat and human prostate

DA Husmann, CM Wilson, MJ McPhaul, WD Tilley and JD Wilson
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235.

We have developed polyclonal antibodies to two synthetic peptides corresponding to the amino-(N-)terminal or carboxyl-(C-)terminal segments of the human androgen receptor (hAR) protein, as deduced from the nucleic acid sequence of the androgen receptor cDNA. Immunoreactive antisera were identified by solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and purified by peptide affinity chromatography. Specific immunoreactivity with the hAR was confirmed by immunoblotting, using both a fusion protein produced in E. coli that contains the C-terminal 880-amino acid sequence of hAR and the full-length receptor protein produced in COS cells after transfection with a plasmid containing the entire hAR-coding region. Immunohistological evaluation of rat and human prostatic tissue using anti-C-terminal or anti-N-terminal antibodies demonstrated similar patterns of specific staining of the nuclei of epithelial and stromal cells. Castration resulted in a decrease in the amount of nuclear AR detected in the rat prostate after a short time of exposure to anti-C-terminal antibodies (less than 4 h), but did not alter the level of specific staining obtained with anti-N- terminal antibodies. This decrease in nuclear staining using anti-C- terminal antibodies could be reversed by treating castrated animals with dihydrotestosterone. When longer times of exposure to the primary antibodies were used, high levels of nuclear staining were obtained with both types of antibodies in prostate specimens from castrate as well as as intact rats. This immunohistochemical staining pattern contrasts with receptor measurements in rat prostate homogenates that indicate the partition of AR binding into the low salt (cytosolic) fraction in the castrate animal and into the high salt (nuclear) fraction in the intact animal. Our results suggest that the AR is predominantly a nuclear protein even in the absence of ligand and that dihydrotestosterone serves to tighten its association with the nucleus. These data also suggest that the immunoreactivity of anti-C-terminal antibodies is influenced by the presence of dihydrotestosterone, presumably via an alteration in the physical state of the receptor protein.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L.G. Wang, X.M. Liu, and J.W. Chiao Repression of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells by phenethyl isothiocyanate Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2006; 27(10): 2124 - 2132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Buchanan, S. N. Birrell, A. A. Peters, T. Bianco-Miotto, K. Ramsay, E. J. Cops, M. Yang, J. M. Harris, H. A. Simila, N. L. Moore, et al. Decreased Androgen Receptor Levels and Receptor Function in Breast Cancer Contribute to the Failure of Response to Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 65(18): 8487 - 8496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. V. Seale, S. A. Wood, H. C. Atkinson, S. L. Lightman, and M. S. Harbuz Organizational Role for Testosterone and Estrogen on Adult Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Activity in the Male Rat Endocrinology, April 1, 2005; 146(4): 1973 - 1982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Buchanan, M. Yang, A. Cheong, J. M. Harris, R. A. Irvine, P. F. Lambert, N. L. Moore, M. Raynor, P. J. Neufing, G. A. Coetzee, et al. Structural and functional consequences of glutamine tract variation in the androgen receptor Hum. Mol. Genet., August 15, 2004; 13(16): 1677 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Ochiai, K.-i. Matsuda, M. Nishi, H. Ozawa, and M. Kawata Imaging Analysis of Subcellular Correlation of Androgen Receptor and Estrogen Receptor {alpha} in Single Living Cells Using Green Fluorescent Protein Color Variants Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2004; 18(1): 26 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.M. Avila, D.R. Allman, J.-M. Gallo, and M.J. McPhaul Androgen Receptors Containing Expanded Polyglutamine Tracts Exhibit Progressive Toxicity when Stably Expressed in the Neuroblastoma Cell Line, SH-SY 5Y Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2003; 228(8): 982 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. P. Banerjee, S. Banerjee, and T. R. Brown Increased Androgen Receptor Expression Correlates with Development of Age-Dependent, Lobe-Specific Spontaneous Hyperplasia of the Brown Norway Rat Prostate Endocrinology, September 1, 2001; 142(9): 4066 - 4075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Maiti, M. L. Meistrich, G. Wilson, G. Shetty, M. Marcelli, M. J. McPhaul, P. L. Morris, and M. F. Wilkinson Irradiation Selectively Inhibits Expression from the Androgen-Dependent Pem Homeobox Gene Promoter in Sertoli Cells Endocrinology, April 1, 2001; 142(4): 1567 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Y. Wan, K. K. Coxe, V. G. Thackray, P. R. Housley, and S. K. Nordeen Separable Features of the Ligand-Binding Domain Determine the Differential Subcellular Localization and Ligand-Binding Specificity of Glucocorticoid Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2001; 15(1): 17 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. Buchanan, M. Yang, J. M. Harris, H. S. Nahm, G. Han, N. Moore, J. M. Bentel, R. J. Matusik, D. J. Horsfall, V. R. Marshall, et al. Mutations at the Boundary of the Hinge and Ligand Binding Domain of the Androgen Receptor Confer Increased Transactivation Function Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2001; 15(1): 46 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. M. Butler,, J. L. Harry,, J. E. Deakin,, D. W. Cooper,, and M. B. Renfree Developmental Expression of the Androgen Receptor during Virilization of the Urogenital System of a Marsupial Biol Reprod, October 1, 1998; 59(4): 725 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. J. Gerdes, T. D. Dang, M. Larsen, and D. R. Rowley Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Induces Nuclear to Cytoplasmic Distribution of Androgen Receptor and Inhibits Androgen Response in Prostate Smooth Muscle Cells Endocrinology, August 1, 1998; 139(8): 3569 - 3577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B. Pratt and D. O. Toft Steroid Receptor Interactions with Heat Shock Protein and Immunophilin Chaperones Endocr. Rev., June 1, 1997; 18(3): 306 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text]