help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubreuil, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brazeau, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dubreuil, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brazeau, P.

Endocrinology, Vol 125, 1378-1384, Copyright © 1989 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Effects of active immunization against somatostatin on serum growth hormone concentration in growing pigs: influence of fasting and repetitive somatocrinin injections

P Dubreuil, G Pelletier, D Petitclerc, H Lapierre, P Gaudreau and P Brazeau
Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Lennoxville, Quebec.

Three experiments were conducted with growing pigs actively immunized against a protein-conjugated somatostatin (SRIF) in Freund's adjuvant. In the first experiment, blood from 24-week-old pigs (seven immunized and eight control) was sampled at 20-min intervals for 6 h to evaluate basal GH concentrations. The animals were then injected iv with porcine GH-releasing factor (GRF)-(1-29)NH2 (10 micrograms/kg). Before GRF stimulation, immunized animals had higher (P less than 0.05) baseline mean GH levels (2.6 vs. 1.4 ng/ml) and area under the GH curve (AUC; 1632 vs. 779 ng/min.ml); they also had higher AUC after GRF administration (4268 vs. 1972 ng/min.ml). In a second experiment eight immunized and eight control pigs were injected iv four times at 90-min intervals with porcine GRF (10 micrograms/kg). Control pigs responding to the first injection did not respond to the second and third, and those responding to the second did not respond to the first, third, and fourth, indicating a decreased responsiveness that was longer than 3 h post-GRF response in control pigs. SRIF-immunized pigs had a more consistent GH response to the GRF injections. Overall, a reduced response was observed after the second and the fourth injections in immunized pigs, although five and six of eight animals had a GH peak response higher than 10 ng/ml during these periods. In a third experiment, effects of fasting, GRF, and SRIF immunization were studied. Immunization and fasting had their own positive effects on serum GH levels. Immunization increased baseline mean GH levels (5.0 vs. 2.2 ng/ml) and total AUC before (2318 vs. 1073 ng/min.ml) and after (1886 vs. 910 ng/min.ml) iv GRF stimulation (10 micrograms/kg) compared to controls. Fasting increased the mean baseline GH level (4.5 vs. 2.6 ng/ml), and it increased AUC before exogenous GRF stimulation (2009 vs. 1392 ng/min.ml). In conclusion, SRIF in pigs seems to be a potent GH- governing factor, since, when inhibited, baseline mean GH levels increase, and a consistent response to GRF is observed. Fasting could increase GH concentrations by different ways: decreasing SRIF release and increasing GRF release or modifying the sensitivity of the somatotrophs to both factors.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
C. M. Yang, A. G. Chen, Q. H. Hong, J. X. Liu, and J. S. Liu
Effects of cysteamine on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities, and metabolic hormones in broilers.
Poult. Sci., November 1, 2006; 85(11): 1912 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1989 by The Endocrine Society