help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stachura, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stachura, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, J. M.

Endocrinology, Vol 120, 1719-1726, Copyright © 1987 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Growth hormone-releasing factor-44 specificity for components of somatotroph and lactotroph immediate release pool substructures

ME Stachura and JM Tyler

Rat somatotroph and lactotroph hormone storage is divisible into at least two functional compartments: an immediate release pool (IRP) and a pool that responds to prolonged stimulation. An IRP substructure has been defined by release in response to potassium ion (K+), prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), and Bu2cAMP. The somatotroph IRP is expandable; the lactotroph IRP is fixed in size. The present experiments examined which IRP components contribute to the rapid release of stored GH in response to GH-releasing factor-44 (GRF). Release of stored PRL was monitored for comparison. In vitro prelabeling defined stored rat (r) GH and rPRL. Release in response to 21 mM K+, 3 microM PGE1, 1 mM Bu2cAMP, and/or 3 nM GRF was monitored with a perifusion-immunoprecipitation system. After 120 min of basal perifusion, tissue was exposed to one of the four secretagogues for 90 min. During a second 90-min period a second secretagogue was added while exposure to the first secretagogue continued. We demonstrated that 21 mM K+ reduces peak rGH release in response to 3 nM GRF by 52%, whereas GRF does not reduce rGH release in response to K+; 3 microM PGE1 reduces rGH release in response to GRF by only 19% although GRF reduces rGH release in response to PGE1 by 88%; 1 mM Bu2cAMP reduces rGH release in response to GRF by 87%, and GRF eliminates rGH release in response to Bu2cAMP (1.2% of control value); combined K+ plus Bu2cAMP reduce rGH release in response to GRF to 2.5% of the control value, whereas after GRF pretreatment rGH release in response to combined K+ plus Bu2cAMP is 93% of the control value; and combined PGE1 and Bu2cAMP reduce the response to GRF to 17% of the control value. Effects on rPRL release are qualitatively similar. We conclude that immediate GRF-stimulated release of stored rGH originates in the somatotroph IRP components defined by responses to PGE1 and Bu2cAMP; it derives only slightly, if at all, from the IRP component defined by the response to K+. The smaller GRF-stimulated release of IRP rPRL is similarly derived.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1987 by The Endocrine Society