help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lengyel, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tannenbaum, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lengyel, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tannenbaum, G. S.

Endocrinology, Vol 120, 1377-1383, Copyright © 1987 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Mechanisms of calcitonin-induced growth hormone (GH) suppression: roles of somatostatin and GH-releasing factor

AM Lengyel and GS Tannenbaum

Calcitonin (CT) binds to specific receptors in the hypothalamus and has been localized in the pituitary, suggesting a potential neuroendocrine role for this peptide. We and others have previously shown that CT given centrally markedly suppresses pulsatile GH secretion. However, the mechanism mediating this response remains to be elucidated. In the present study, we assessed the involvement of the two hypothalamic GH- regulatory peptides, somatostatin (SRIF) and GH-releasing factor (GRF), using a combination of in vivo and in vitro techniques. Six-hour GH secretory profiles were obtained from eight groups of freely moving rats bearing chronic intracerebroventricular (icv) and intraatrial cannulae. In four groups, salmon (s) CT (250 ng/10 microliters) was administered icv, whereas the remaining four groups received either normal saline (NS) icv or sCT iv. Central injection of sCT caused a severe suppression in amplitude of spontaneous GH pulses compared to NS icv-treated control rats, whereas the same dose of sCT iv had no significant effect. Passive immunization of sCT icv-injected rats with a specific antiserum to SRIF failed to restore the amplitude of GH pulses to normal values. In addition, in vitro basal and 50 mM K+- stimulated SRIF release from incubated hypothalamic fragments was not altered by sCT in doses ranging from 10(-10) to 10(-6) M. The iv administration of a bolus of rat GRF (1-29)NH2 (1 microgram) 1 h after sCT icv injection also failed to augment plasma GH levels compared to sCT iv-treated rats (16.6 +/- 10.0 vs. 326.6 +/- 63.6 ng/ml; P less than 0.001) and NS icv controls (407.2 +/- 145.4 ng/ml; P less than 0.01). Blood calcium levels decreased similarly 1 h after iv and icv sCT administration. These results demonstrate that: sCT inhibits pulsatile GH secretion via a central nervous system site of action, GH suppression induced by sCT is apparently not due solely to increased hypothalamic SRIF release, and centrally administered sCT produces an acute loss of responsiveness of somatotrophs to GRF, which can be dissociated from peripheral blood calcium levels.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. Giustina and J. D. Veldhuis
Pathophysiology of the Neuroregulation of Growth Hormone Secretion in Experimental Animals and the Human
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 1998; 19(6): 717 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1987 by The Endocrine Society