help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krystek, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, T. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krystek, S. R., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, T. T.

Endocrinology, Vol 117, 1125-1131, Copyright © 1985 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Prediction of antigenic sites in follicle-stimulating hormones: difference profiles enhance antigenicity prediction methods

SR Krystek Jr, JA Dias, LE Reichert Jr and TT Andersen

A method of predicting antigenic sites in proteins using only the information provided by primary structure has been reported. The basis of this method is that hydrophilic regions of a polypeptide should contain antigenic sites, since hydrophobic sites should be buried and inaccessible. However, if the antigen is homologous with a naturally occurring polypeptide in the immunized animal, the immune system may not recognize the predicted antigenic site as non-self. Therefore, a modification of the prediction scheme has been developed which can simultaneously examine a protein and its homolog. This method would predict as epitopes those sites that are hydrophilic (accessible) and unrelated to the host homolog (non-self). A computer program has been developed to compare polypeptides and generate difference profiles for antigenic sites. The method has been used to distinguish the antigenic determinants of ovine and human FSH.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M Amstalden, D A Zieba, M R Garcia, R L Stanko, T H Welsh Jr, W H Hansel, and G L Williams
Evidence that lamprey GnRH-III does not release FSH selectively in cattle
Reproduction, January 1, 2004; 127(1): 35 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
G. A. ROHRER, T. H. WISE, D. D. LUNSTRA, and J. J. FORD
Identification of genomic regions controlling plasma FSH concentrations in Meishan-White Composite boars
Physiol Genomics, August 30, 2001; 6(3): 145 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. Zanella, D. Lunstra, T. Wise, J. Kinder, and J. Ford
Testicular Morphology and Function in Boars Differing in Concentrations of Plasma Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
Biol Reprod, January 1, 1999; 60(1): 115 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1985 by The Endocrine Society