help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, R. L.

Endocrinology, Vol 112, 707-714, Copyright © 1983 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

The interaction of estrogen- and antiestrogen-receptor complexes with polynucleotides

LC Murphy and RL Sutherland

As the polynucleotide domain of the estrogen receptor (Re) is a possible site for the modulation of Re activity, the interaction of antiestrogen (4-hydroxytamoxifen and tamoxifen)-receptor complexes (4- OH-Tam-Re and Tam-Re) with polynucleotides (oligodeoxynucleotide- cellulose, DNA-cellulose, and polyribonucleotide-agarose) was investigated and compared with that of the 17 beta-estradiol-receptor complex (E2-Re). E2-Re- and anti-Re-E2-complexes were optimally bound to oligo(dT)-cellulose and poly(U)-agarose at 0.15 M KCl and pH 7.6. Temperature activation of the Re was not required for these selective interactions to occur, but they were inhibited by 10 mM sodium molybdate. OH-Tam-Re and E2-Re demonstrated similar selectivity for different deoxynucleotide bases [oligo(dG) greater than oligo(dT) greater than or equal than oligo(dC) greater than oligo(dA) greater than or equal to oligo(dI)] and different ribonucleotide bases [poly(G) = poly(I) greater than poly(U) greater than poly(A) greater than or equal to poly(C)]. Quantitatively, Tam-Re bound significantly less to oligo(dT)-cellulose than did OH-Tam-Re, which did not differ significantly from E2-Re, a result probably related to the dissociation of the lower affinity ligand from the Re/oligo(dT)-cellulose during the assay procedure. Unoccupied Re also bound selectively to these synthetic polynucleotides. It is concluded that: 1) selective binding of Re to synthetic polynucleotides is inhibited by 10 mM sodium molybdate; 2) estradiol is not essential for selective binding to synthetic polynucleotides, since unoccupied Re was only slightly less efficiently bound than E2-Re; and 3) selective binding of Re to synthetic polynucleotides was unaffected by the agonist or antagonist properties of the ligand bound at the steroid-binding site. These data suggest that nonsteroidal antiestrogens are unlikely to exert their antagonist activity by modulating the function of the polynucleotide- binding site of Re.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1983 by The Endocrine Society