help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ojeda, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by McCann, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ojeda, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by McCann, S. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
*MENOTROPINS
*PROGESTERONE
*TESTOSTERONE

Endocrinology, Vol 100, 440-451, Copyright © 1977 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Developmental changes in pituitary responsiveness to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) in the female rat: ovarian-adrenal influence during the infantile period

SR Ojeda, HE Jameson and SM McCann

Pituitary LH and FSH repsonses to synthetic LHRH as estimated by increases in plasma FSH and LH 15 and 45 min following its iv injection were enhanced during the first 2 weeks of life, reaching a maximum around day 10-15 and declining thereafter. No AM.-PM. variations in pituitary responsiveness were observed at any age studied. The increased pituitary response found in infantile rats did not appear to be caused by a slower rate of disappearance of LHRH in blood of the younger animals. Ovariectomy-adrenalectomy. (Ovx-Adrx) or Ovx at day 10, but not Adrx alone, resulted in elevated LH and FSH levels 5 days later and almost complete obliteration of the FSH response to LHRH. The LH response was not altered. Treatment with 5alha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) but not with estradiol benzoate (EB) or testosterone propionate (TP) suppressed the post-Ovx-Adrx rise in plasma LH and FSH. Progesterone (P) potentiated the effect of DHT. Restoration of basal plasma LH and FSH levels (by DHT and/or P) restored FSH responsiveness to exogenous LHRH. EB and TP were ineffective. The LH response was slightly depressed by EB + DHT. It is concluded that the elevated plasma FSH levels in the infantile female rat may be due at least in part to a high degree of pituitary responsiveness to LHRH and/or FSH-RF brought about by steroidal signal of ovarian origin. DHT and P appear to be the steroids responsible for such a stimulatory action.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1977 by The Endocrine Society